Vince Foster might save America from Hillary

[oracle]

Vince Foster might save America from Hillary (http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/datelinedc/s_80854.html)

Sunday, July 14, 2002


The emergence of Hillary Clinton as a potential candidate for president is an indication of how desperate Democrats are becoming.

Early in the 1992 election, when President George Herbert Walker Bush looked invulnerable, serious Democrat challengers went fishing, and Bill Clinton won the White House despite the handicap of Al Gore.

We can all agree that, for better or worse, Bill would not have won without the help of Hillary. Now, with another George Bush heading the popularity polls, pollsters are placing the junior senator from New York ahead of a pack that includes Sens. Evan Bayh and John Kerry, Gov. Gray Davis and the inevitable Kennedy collection.

There is even talk of a Bill Clinton scheme to have Hillary as a vice-presidential candidate in 2004, willing to run with either Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri or Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina. Al Gore isn't a likely candidate because not even Democrats like a sure loser on the ballot.

The selective memory of the American voter is evident in Hillary's "strong negatives" — falling from 46 percent during her Senate race down to 30 percent today. And, in a world where the media believes itself to be the surreptitious president-maker, polls show that more than 80 percent of people working in the media voted against George Bush.

HOW SERIOUS IS HILLARY?

Is she a serious contender? A random selection of Hillary cleanup stories might shed some light:

In 1969, a group of Black Panthers was on trial in New Haven, Conn., charged with the torture killing of one of their comrades. The story goes that Hillary Clinton, then a student at Yale and working with the ultra-radical National Lawyers Guild, supported the Panthers and helped shut down the university with protests. Today, Hillary's friends will say, "It is hard to fault her efforts to monitor the trial." They don't want to comment on the fact that the future first lady joined the law office of hard-core communist Robert Truhaft as an intern and worked with him on defense strategies for the New Haven Nine.

Then let's take a peek at the many ultra-leftist causes Hillary Clinton has supported for individual indictments and glance at her inexplicable executive actions in the White House:

...


Click here to read more (http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/datelinedc/s_80854.html)

[Etaoin]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by oracle:
We can all agree that, for better or worse, Bill would not have won without the help of Hillary.
[b]...


Click here to rea more (http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/datelinedc/s_80854.html)<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Oracle, I have to take issue with this post. Certainly Hillary had an extremely minor role, but the real reason that Bush lost a second term was a multiple causation.

1. He stated that the "success" in the Desert Storm was a product of the United Nations.

2. He lied to the American people. "READ MY LIPS!"

3. G.H.W. Bush was unelectable despite his credentials as he was essentially unAmerican in his support for the U.N. He was the quintessential bureaucrat, and despite being a pilot in WW11, was a follower and not a leader. His administration was a negation of the Reagan Revolution. The subsequent administrations were the Bush, Clinton administrations that deliberately tried to demolish the accomplishment of the Reagan administration.

It was H. Ross Perot who sank George Herbert Walker Bush. The irony is that G.H.W. Bush sponsored Perot's admittance into the elite Council on Foreign Relations. Sorry that I cannot relate why (because I don't know) what alienated the two.

[Venus]

Wow. The author dropped a huge bomb there, me thinkst, with plenty of ammo up his sleeve if it's ever needed, or so he implies.

I hope he's got life insurance.

Et, it's possible that the author was referencing Hitliary's help in getting Bubba the nomination rather than in winning the election. The author just isn't clear. GHW Bush's positions and Perot's candidacy wouldn't have had much impact at that phase of the election process. Yet without winning the nomination, Bubba wouldn't have been elected.

[Incident_command]

I would have more faith in this article if the writer would not have given Hillary so much credit for clintons win. GW lost due to Perot and the media inflating a so called bad economy.

[Etaoin]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Venus:
Wow. The author dropped a huge bomb there, me thinkst, with plenty of ammo up his sleeve if it's ever needed, or so he implies.

I hope he's got life insurance.

Et, it's possible that the author was referencing Hitliary's help in getting Bubba the nomination rather than in winning the election. The author just isn't clear. GHW Bush's positions and Perot's candidacy wouldn't have had much impact at that phase of the election process. Yet without winning the nomination, Bubba wouldn't have been elected.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You're right Venus. I haven't been able to access the link for unknown reasons...my computer just keeps searching. As to the Black Panther connection, David Horowitz broke that story in his book. Too bad it wasn't available in '92. What a BIZARRE pair the Clintons are, nez c'est pas?

[PaulRevere]

Hillary should also be hounded for the release of her thesis at either Wellesly or Yale (I forget which). According to Barbara Olson in Hell to Pay, the Clintons had her thesis made unavailable to the public - something she said was very unusual. You can bet it is a blueprint for Hillary's Mein Kampf.