Loans | Mortgages | Team Building in London | Loan | Deals On Products
Court rejects Torricelli's attempt to keep Chang sentencing memo secret [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Court rejects Torricelli's attempt to keep Chang sentencing memo secret


oracle
09-20-2002, 07:26 PM
Court rejects Torricelli's attempt to keep Chang sentencing memo secret

By DAVID B. CARUSO
<font size=1>Associated Press Writer

September 20, 2002, 7:12 PM EDT</font>

PHILADELPHIA -- A government memo outlining the criminal misdeeds of a man who made illegal campaign contributions to U.S. Sen. Robert G. Torricelli is not subject to grand jury secrecy rules and may be released to the public, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the New Jersey Democrat's attempt to have the document sealed, saying whatever damage it might do to his reputation was not significant enough to override the public's right to see it.

The memo, filed with a federal judge in New Jersey in May, outlines the government's dealings with David Chang, who was a key witness in the government's now-dropped investigation of Torricelli and who is now serving an 18-month jail term for making illegal contributions to the senator in 1996.

Torricelli was never charged, but a Senate ethics committee reprimanded him, and the issue has been central in his re-election campaign against Republican Douglas Forrester.

Lawyers for Torricelli and the Justice Department had filed motions asking for either some or all of Chang's sentencing memorandum to be sealed, saying that revelation of material from the memo would violate Torricelli's privacy.

...


Here's a link to the story - ...http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/ny-bc-nj--torricelli-chang0920sep20(0,3572472).story?coll=ny%2Dap%2Dreg ional%2Dwire

UBB won't let me post it as a hyperlink because of the parenthesis in the URL.

**DONOTDELETE**
09-20-2002, 07:48 PM
I've got a couple of questions about this, and I hope you will excuse me for not just going to google at the onset.

How is it that the briber is convicted yet the bribee(sp) is not?

Did Chang plead guilty thereby forgoing a public trial thereby foregoing a vetting of the case facts?

What legal precedent was there for “unsealing” the grand jury findings?

Chris
09-20-2002, 08:49 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>Bruce Rosen, the New Jersey attorney who argued the case for The New York Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Record of Bergen County and WNBC-TV of New York, said he will file a motion Monday seeking to have the memo disclosed immediately. Court rules could otherwise leave the memo sealed for another 45 days, he said.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Which means it gets released the day before the election. Poor baby! images/icons/grin.gif

Hottjohn
09-20-2002, 09:03 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR>How is it that the briber is convicted yet the bribee(sp) is not? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

My guess is that was a rhetorical question. Everyone knows that it is virtually impossible to convict a d-Rat when they might lose control of the Senate. Politics is much more important than right or wrong.