Loans | PrePaid Credit Cards | Mortgages | Lionel Trains | Ringtones
Kerry Won't Repeat Gore's Mistakes In 2000: Instead He Will Be A Thug [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Kerry Won't Repeat Gore's Mistakes In 2000: Instead He Will Be A Thug


Wyatt_Junker
10-20-2004, 05:37 PM
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=440 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=headlineblack style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 5px">Kerry Recount Strategy Different From Gore's







</TD></TR><TR><TD class=storytext style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 10px">Wednesday, October 20, 2004


http://www.foxnews.com/images/service_ap_36.gif
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=262 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>




</TD><TD><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=20 align=left border=0><TBODY><TR><TD id=story style="BORDER-LEFT: black 1px solid; COLOR: #ffcc00; BACKGROUND-COLOR: black" onclick="storyTab('story',2);"></TD><TD class=spacer>http://www.foxnews.com/images/clear_dot.gif</TD><TD id=background onclick="storyTab('background',2);"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

























<SCRIPT language=JavaScript>writeScroll(openTab2,'2');</SCRIPT>



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
WASHINGTON — Sen. John Kerry (search (http://search.foxnews.com/info.foxnws/redirs_all.htm?pgtarg=wbsdogpile&qcat=web&qkw=John%20Kerry)) has
a simple strategy if the presidential race is in doubt on Nov. 3, the day after the election: Do not repeat Al Gore's (search (http://search.foxnews.com/info.foxnws/redirs_all.htm?pgtarg=wbsdogpile&qcat=web&qkw=Al%20Gore%27s)) mistakes.

Unlike the former vice president, who lost a recount fight and the 2000 election, Kerry will be quick to declare victory on election night and begin defending it. He also will be prepared to name a national security team before knowing whether he's secured the presidency.



</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,136011,00.html

Kathy29
10-20-2004, 05:53 PM
I've seen this posted before. Would he declare victory before getting 270 electoral votes? Would he have a security team in place to defend his self-declared victory.

If he does this, he might very well start the civil war democrats are so intent on starting.

Hottjohn
10-20-2004, 06:35 PM
I've seen this posted before. Would he declare victory before getting 270 electoral votes? Would he have a security team in place to defend his self-declared victory.

If he does this, he might very well start the civil war democrats are so intent on starting.

70 million of us won't go down without a fight.

Naturalized-Texan
10-20-2004, 06:43 PM
The Dimicrats are still mad that AlGore couldn't steal the 2000 election. If Kerry tries to steal this election, there will be blood in the streets. AlGore's attempted coup d'etat was bloodless, Kerry's won't be.

EDIT:
I have often said that if liberals thought that they could get away with it, they would tear up the Constitution, abolish Congress, and establish a totalitarian dictatorship. It sure looks as if Kerry is going to prove me right.

Longhorn_Platinum
10-20-2004, 06:45 PM
:unsmile: I've said it before, but it bears repeating. The demonicrats have a three-fold plan for 2004:

A. Win the election.
B. Steal the election.
C. Accuse the Republicans of stealing the election.

Maggie_T
10-20-2004, 07:05 PM
This must be made a sticky.

HomeschoolrsRUs
10-20-2004, 08:49 PM
From the article,
1. Unlike the former vice president, who lost a recount fight and the 2000 election, Kerry will be quick to declare victory on election night and begin defending it.

2. "The first thing we will do is make sure everybody has an opportunity to vote and every vote is counted," said Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter (search (http://search.foxnews.com/info.foxnws/redirs_all.htm?pgtarg=wbsdogpile&qcat=web&qkw=Stephanie%20Cutter)).Okay, how does one DECLARE victory on election night whilst assuring everyone has an opportunity to vote and every vote is counted? This is contradcitory. Unless and until Mr. Kerry has the majority of electoral votes, I don't care what he "declares," he will not be considered the President of the United States of America.

This is an attempt to intimidate voters in districts and states where the polls haven't closed yet. It is my personal opinion that there should be NO public media statement or tally until ALL votes are accounted for and a clear electoral winner established. We saw first hand how this affected polls in the state of Florida when the mainslime media called the state for Gore too early and voters didn't go to the polls in the panhandle because they felt their votes didn't count.

The democrats are without honor.

CaliGirl
10-20-2004, 09:05 PM
I've seen this posted before. Would he declare victory before getting 270 electoral votes? Would he have a security team in place to defend his self-declared victory.

If he does this, he might very well start the civil war democrats are so intent on starting.What I have been hearing skerry will declare victory even if he doesn't get the 270 electoral votes, and GWB does.

This election is getting down right dirty every day! I can't believe the DemRATS! :hissyfit: They are one sick group of idiots!

RayChuang
10-20-2004, 10:38 PM
I think the Democrats are itching to start another Civil War in the USA with the 2004 election results. And it will be bloody, too--expect a couple of million dead by the time the war ends. :(

RayChuang
10-20-2004, 10:43 PM
I have often said that if liberals thought that they could get away with it, they would tear up the Constitution, abolish Congress, and establish a totalitarian dictatorship. It sure looks as if Kerry is going to prove me right. I don't think the Democrats could pull that off--the US military would do a coup d'etat if the Democrats are crazy enough to try that.

Naturalized-Texan
10-21-2004, 08:03 AM
I don't think the Democrats could pull that off--the US military would do a coup d'etat if the Democrats are crazy enough to try that.

Correct! And the Constitution would also prevent them from pulling it off. That's why the liberals have been fighting for more than 40 years to decimate the military and destroy the Constitution. If the liberals can weaken the military sufficiently and marginalize the Constitution, they think that they could pull it off.

nene
10-21-2004, 09:02 AM
Don't worry folks, even if Kerry won the election, he won't have power until he is inaugurated on January 20, 2005.

Warlady
10-21-2004, 09:20 AM
Kerry isn't going to win the election. He knows that. That's why they are putting in place a machine to steal it. Fortunately for us, Bush has 60 million in the bank to fight his machine. Kerry only has about 3 so far. I'm sure that will grow but Bush clearly has the upper hand. Another advantage Bush has over Kerry that he didn't have over Gore is that he's already in the White House. We are at least safe and secure until the Democrat's war on the Constitution is won by us. I hope the Independents are disgusted by this and turned off of Kerry. If I was undecided at this point this would sure sway me away from him.

Kathy29
10-21-2004, 10:04 AM
The way it's boiling out is that Kerry will declare victory almost immediately. If he loses, he will say it's fraud and defend his administration. There won't be a Jan 20th inauguration, he could say that the republicans stealing the election won't permit it.

I think it's pretty safe that the military will defend the president, but how about shooting American Citizens in revolt.

Yes, this is a coup d'etat. The democrats are as able to get voter registration lists as the Guardian newspaper in England. They have the names and addresses of everyone who doesn't agree with them already.

I tell you, I am more afraid of John Kerry than I would be of Freddy Kruger.

CaliGirl
10-21-2004, 10:24 PM
Kerry isn't going to win the election. He knows that. That's why they are putting in place a machine to steal it. Fortunately for us, Bush has 60 million in the bank to fight his machine. Kerry only has about 3 so far. I'm sure that will grow but Bush clearly has the upper hand. Another advantage Bush has over Kerry that he didn't have over Gore is that he's already in the White House. We are at least safe and secure until the Democrat's war on the Constitution is won by us. I hope the Independents are disgusted by this and turned off of Kerry. If I was undecided at this point this would sure sway me away from him.
:claps: Thank you for posting this! :claps:

CaliGirl
10-21-2004, 10:38 PM
The way it's boiling out is that Kerry will declare victory almost immediately. If he loses, he will say it's fraud and defend his administration. There won't be a Jan 20th inauguration, he could say that the republicans stealing the election won't permit it.

I think it's pretty safe that the military will defend the president, but how about shooting American Citizens in revolt.

Yes, this is a coup d'etat. The democrats are as able to get voter registration lists as the Guardian newspaper in England. They have the names and addresses of everyone who doesn't agree with them already.

I tell you, I am more afraid of John Kerry than I would be of Freddy Kruger.
My way of thinking also Kathy. I do KNOW the military will defend GWB!

I am also very afraid of skerry and especially his psycho-babble psychopath wife! She really needs to be LOCKED UP with the key thrown away. She is one mean spirited, devious looking, ugly face that can stop a clock!

Warlady
10-21-2004, 10:42 PM
You're welcome Cali. You're right Kathy. The Democrats came very close to pulling off their Coup in 2000. They learned a lot from it but Bush learned a lot too. He's not going to allow Kerry to steal his reelection. I just received an email from the Bush campaign yesterday asking for another donation to fight Kerry. We all need to add to the coffers. It's going to cost a fortune.

shawnwood
10-22-2004, 11:20 AM
I think the Democrats are itching to start another Civil War in the USA with the 2004 election results. And it will be bloody, too--expect a couple of million dead by the time the war ends. :(

Shoot, it must take what like 5-6 liberals to match 1 conservative? I know that in my neighbothood alone, I can take out the liberals myself. They are that damn week!

On a side note, I have not been preparing for a civil war, but a war on terror that may have to be fought in the streets of my hometown. :shoot:

PaulRevere
10-22-2004, 01:07 PM
Kerry can set up a provisional governement in MA with VT, RI, CT, and even NY recognizing his presidency and putting themselves under the protection of the U.N. Fine, they can have it to themselves and happily tax the shit out of each other and surrender themselves to the U.N. for all I care. Within a few years you'd see a flood of immigrants into the red states until Moscow-on-the-Charles built a wall to keep people in.

PS: and he can take coastal CA and S. FL with him, too!

Faithful_Servant
10-22-2004, 01:26 PM
Kerry can set up a provisional governement in MA with VT, RI, CT, and even NY recognizing his presidency and putting themselves under the protection of the U.N. Fine, they can have it to themselves and happily tax the shit out of each other and surrender themselves to the U.N. for all I care. Within a few years you'd see a flood of immigrants into the red states until Moscow-on-the-Charles built a wall to keep people in.

PS: and he can take coastal CA and S. FL with him, too!Don't forget about Eugene, Portland and Seattle. Detached enclaves of the
Liberal
Occupied
Socialist
Economic
Republic
States

Samcat
10-23-2004, 09:39 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,136011,00.html
And this surprises you?

Rink
10-23-2004, 09:53 PM
It would seem most here think the military would stop such a coup, so i guess thats why the dems have been wanting to re-institute the draft so they can get as many brain-dead socialist-taught liberals in the military with a reinstituted draft as they possibly can.

makes sense doesnt it?

Maggie_T
10-24-2004, 11:15 AM
Not sure, love. Liberals are by nature cowards. The idea of anyone recruiting a bunch of yellow-bellies to fight for them does not make much sense.

Then again, nothing liberals do makes any sense. :question:

Rink
10-24-2004, 05:09 PM
For cowards they sure are raising a lotta ruckus with their violent tactics.

DoctorDoom
10-24-2004, 09:36 PM
Never alone, however. Like rats, they run in packs.

brakitdwn
10-25-2004, 12:35 AM
I have never owned a gun, and have never allowed them in my house.

But

If Kerry declares victory - I buy a rifle and two hand guns, the rifle for me and the 2 handguns for my eldest son and my wife.

Rink
10-25-2004, 03:16 AM
make sure you act as a responsible gun owner if you do such a thing, make certain you understand how to use the gun and rifles properly and know the safe handling of said armaments and also make sure your eldest son and wife also knows the basics of proper gun handling and safety as well.

Thats a must if you even Contemplate getting a gun for yourself or for members of your family.

Incident_command
10-25-2004, 08:53 PM
PS: and he can take coastal CA and S. FL with him, too!

Aw hell no! Leave South Florida out.

brakitdwn
10-27-2004, 01:57 AM
make sure you act as a responsible gun owner if you do such a thing, make certain you understand how to use the gun and rifles properly and know the safe handling of said armaments and also make sure your eldest son and wife also knows the basics of proper gun handling and safety as well.

Thats a must if you even Contemplate getting a gun for yourself or for members of your family.thanks Rink - I was planning on that too....living in Washington - the liberal west - there are few places to shoot guns that are legal, but I will look up a good gun shop that can show us the ropes and take a refresher gun safety course - cause I took a course when I was in highschool - but that was - well, er...um - ya know - lets just call it a LONG time ago :-)

Rink
10-27-2004, 02:55 AM
When I got my CCW permit, I made it a point to know how to safely and propery use the pistol I had bought.

I took the time and money to take a handgun course before I bought a pistol, that way my handgun instructor helped me pick out what was best for me at the time of instruction.

He gave me some very good ideas and tips as to what kind of gun would be best for me, in fact my handgun instructor was the one that noticed I sighted with my left eye but was right handed. I never knew that till then.

For you, like me, your best bet is to find a gun instructor that can help you and your loved ones learn how to safely and properly handle a gun, and to find the best and right guns for your family.

In my area, even though its a small country town, I lucked out and found a good handgun instructor.

Yes it'll cost some, but then again its worth the time and money to do so.

Thats my advice for you.

(PS: I too live in Liberal Washington, and only 45 miles east of more liberal Portland Oregon & Vancouver Washington LOL)

Kathy29
10-27-2004, 10:44 AM
I have never owned a gun, and have never allowed them in my house.

But

If Kerry declares victory - I buy a rifle and two hand guns, the rifle for me and the 2 handguns for my eldest son and my wife.
I had never owned a gun either. Never allowed them in my house and never even touched one.

Two years ago I was carjacked at gunpoint. Someone and I don't know who, felt that it was necessary to provide the jacker with my personal address and phone information.

Now I have a mini arsenal. The way it's going, I'm glad I do.