UC Berkeley Statistics Prof's Analysis Shows Bush stole 2004 election!!!

[Webruary]

UC Berkeley prof proves Bush stole election!!!

University of California at Berkeley ^ | 11/18/2004 | Michael Hout

SOURCE : http://ucdata.berkeley.edu/new_web/VOTE2004/index.html

Summary:

- Irregularities associated with electronic voting machines may have awarded 130,000 excess votes or more to President George W. Bush in Florida.

- Compared to counties with paper ballots, counties with electronic voting machines were significantly more likely to show increases in support for President Bush between 2000 and 2004. This effect cannot be explained by differences between counties in income, number of voters, change in voter turnout, or size of Hispanic/Latino population.

- In Broward County alone, President Bush appears to have received approximately 72,000 excess votes.

- We can be 99.9% sure that these effects are not attributable to chance.

================================================== ==
SEE ALSO :

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/11-18-2004/0002464301&EDATE=


Statistical Analysis - the Sole Method for Tracking E-Voting - Shows Irregularities May Have Awarded 130,000 - 260,000 or More Excess Votes to Bush in Florida

Research Team Calls for Investigation

BERKELEY, Calif., Nov. 18 /PRNewswire/ -- Today the University of California's Berkeley Quantitative Methods Research Team released a statistical study - the sole method available to monitor the accuracy of e- voting - reporting irregularities associated with electronic voting machines may have awarded 130,000-260,000 or more excess votes to President George W. Bush in Florida in the 2004 presidential election.
...
The data used in this study came from public sources including CNN.com, the 2000 US Census, and the Verified Voting Foundation. For a copy of the working paper, raw data and other information used in the study can be found at: http://ucdata.berkeley.edu (http://ucdata.berkeley.edu/) .

[Kathy29]

Berkeley, well that explains it.

[Webruary]

This is being published even in Technical magazines

http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,10801,97614,00.html?nas=PM-97614



University researchers challenge Bush win in Florida (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1283370/posts)
<SMALL>COMPUTERWORLD ^ (http://www.freerepublic.com/^http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,10801,97614,00.html?nas=PM-97614)| 11/18/2004 | Dan Verton</SMALL>


Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, said today that they have uncovered statistical irregularities associated with electronic voting machines in three Florida counties that may have given President George W. Bush 130,000 or more excess votes. The researchers are now calling on state and federal authorities to look into the problems.

[Beowulf]

Anything to stir up controversy. Can't this ******* and others just deal with Bush's re-election and move on?

[Hottjohn]

Using those same set of so-called "facts," it could be shown that perhaps Kerry was awarded many more votes than he actually received. What a dumbass! Furthermore, the president doesn't steal, unlike his predecessor and his predecessor's wife, who are known to have stolen furniture from the White House and Air Force One upon their departures.

[Longhorn_Platinum]

Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, said...

:whine:
:unsmile:

[DesertFox]

"Unexplained"?

How about, "People voted for Bush because Kerry was a forking idiot"?

[DoctorDoom]

Using those same set of so-called "facts," it could be shown that perhaps Kerry was awarded many more votes than he actually received.Precisely so, but the jerkoff is a Berserkely prof, meaning he's a hyper-leftist.

The asswipes don't like paper ballots. They don't like electronic voting. What they want is a voting method that assures a RAT victory no matter how the people actually vote.

The liberal arseholes will never let it die. They are philosophically incapable of accepting defeat. One hopes that if the dickhead presses the issue, the courts will tell him to piss off and get on with life.

[Timberwolf]

Pathological narcissism???

[CaliGirl]

=Webruary]UC Berkeley prof proves Bush stole election!!! http://freeconservatives.com/smilies/doggie.gif

Having lived in CA my WHOLE LIFE, I can tell you that UC Berkeley is the BIGGEST LIBERAL college on EARTH! What they say and what they do are two different things! UC Berkeley....:flushlib.

[Large_Al]

Using those same set of so-called "facts," it could be shown that perhaps Kerry was awarded many more votes than he actually received. What a dumbass!
what Hottjohn said

[tacitus]

Well a professor at Berkeley said it so it must be true. No political ax to grind there now is there! :duh:

[Apollo5600]

Oh boy I am fed up with the liberal BS, can't we just toss them out of the country already?

[Riverboat]

There must be a study somewhere that proves the incidence of APP (Acid Per Professor) is higher at Berkeley than anywhere else across this fruity plain.

[Federal Farmer]

This professor should put on an old Moody Blues (http://www.seeklyrics.com/lyrics/MOODY-BLUES/Legend-Of-A-Mind.html)album, pop one, and float away in the astral plane.

[tacitus]

This professor should put on an old Moody Blues (http://www.seeklyrics.com/lyrics/MOODY-BLUES/Legend-Of-A-Mind.html)album, pop one, and float away in the astral plane.
Good one.

[The_Elucidator]

Anything to stir up controversy. Can't this ******* and others just deal with Bush's re-election and move on?
Well if they want to act this way, I won't have any problem rubbing salt in the wound every chance I get!

:laugh:

[Aethariel]

Well a professor at Berkeley said it so it must be false. No political ax to grind here now is there!

~Aethariel

[tacitus]

Well a professor at Berkeley said it so it must be false. No political ax to grind here now is there!

~Aethariel
You are so witty. :duh:

[Aethariel]

And you're utterly oblivious to the fact that you're chucking rocks from a house made of glass. We can call it even, eh?

~Aethariel

[Warlady]

Aethariel pssssssssst Bush won. Get over it. Get a life. Don't worry. Be happy and all that rot.

[Faithful_Servant]

Well a professor at Berkeley said it so it must be false. No political ax to grind here now is there!

~AetharielHey Aetheriel!! We never said it was wrong because it came from a Berkley prof., we said it was wrong because it was stupid. We questioned the profs. objectivity due to a huge historical precedence that basically states that Berkley is a VERY liberal college and college profs. have VERY strong tendency to be liberals. When you combine these two facts with a statement that is so obviously flawed and pointedly opposed to the election of PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH, you are able to draw the conclusion that this loser is pursuing a political agenda and not maintaining the scientific objectivity he should be keeping. Now we may be wrong, but if it waddles, quacks and makes ducklings, it's a pretty safe assumption that it's a _ _ _ _ (I'll let you fill in the blanks).

[SunnyBrook]

There must be a study somewhere that proves the incidence of APP (Acid Per Professor) is higher at Berkeley than anywhere else across this fruity plain.
LOL!

Good one, River!

[Beowulf]

And you're utterly oblivious to the fact that you're chucking rocks from a house made of glass. We can call it even, eh?

~Aethariel
You're still in denial that your man lost. Do us a favor and run to Canada like so many of your Lib brethren are doing. I'll even hold the door for you.

[Aethariel]

When you combine these two facts with a statement that is so obviously flawed and pointedly opposed to the election of PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
Uh-huh, despite the fact that the study explicitly states that, even given the maximum possible alleged error, it doesn't call into question the statewide results in favor or Bush, or the general election. Of course, I imagine most of you intellectually-honest folks actually read the abstract and simply drew bizarrely inaccurate conclusions, and didn't simply jump to man your regular stupid positions without even reading the study first.

Aethariel pssssssssst Bush won. Get over it. Get a life. Don't worry. Be happy and all that rot.
You're still in denial that your man lost. Do us a favor and run to Canada like so many of your Lib brethren are doing. I'll even hold the door for you.
Psst, morons, I never said he didn't, and I even conceded quite explicitly in an earlier thread that he won it fair and square, and congratulated the regulars of this board on their man's victory. This might be hard, but try approaching the real world without your rose-tinted lenses for once, hmm? You'd be surprised that everyone doesn't meet your puerile stereotypes and beliefs.

~Aethariel

[Apollo5600]

Ya'll are going to be in a shock when Kerry wins by a sizable margin...

Shock, followed shortly by name-calling, sour grapes, accusations of cheating, and likely many dire predictions of doom. Oh, well. That's what ye get for trusting your "heart" over zee cold, brutal power of scientific calculation. AhhhhHhh...yes...

~AetharielDamn Aethariel, you are eating the **** outa your words!

[Apollo5600]

That is worthy of being added to my sig!

[Wyatt_Junker]

That is worthy of being added to my sig!
No kidding. The veritable nostradums reminds me of the local palm reader who runs the 'real business' out her back door, a working whorehouse.

Keep that sig of hers in there. Builds character.

[I Love My Country!]

Damn Aethariel, you are eating the **** outa your words!
Classic!

:claps:

[UnkHiram]

Tell me again why we cant Nuke Berkley?

[Riverboat]

Tell me again why we cant Nuke Berkley?Because it's part of California, and. . . and. . . oh, never mind.

[CaliGirl]

Because it's part of California, and. . . and. . . oh, never mind.Thanks River for not telling Unk how to nuke Berkeley! :wave: Our two daughters, son-in-law and granddaughter live not far from there! Grant you that is the BLUE part of the state.

PLEASE... those who want CA NUKED, do remember those who are on your side do live in CA! :wave:

[Riverboat]

Thanks River for not telling Unk how to nuke Berkeley! Our two daughters, son-in-law and granddaughter live not far from there! Grant you that is the BLUE part of the state. Oh, c'mon. It's not as if we wouldn't give them fair warning. We conservatives look out for each other, after all. ;)

[DoctorDoom]

You WOULD be the one to take something that comes out of US Berserkely seriously. You might find this useful.

<table align="center" bgcolor="400000" bordercolor="CCCCCC" border="4" cellpadding="8"><tr><td><div align="center"><font face="Verdana" color="yellow" size="7"><b>* CLUEPON *<br><font size="5">This cluepon entitles the bearer to<br>one free clue at any local retailer.<br><font size="3">Valid worldwide. No expiration date.</font><br></font></b> </font></div></td></tr></table>

[DoctorDoom]

<table align="center" bgcolor="black" bordercolor="#CCCCCC" border="4" cellpadding="8"><tr><td><div align="center"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Troll_02.jpg"><br><br><font face="Verdana" color="F3D4B5" size="6"><b>DO NOT FEED<br>THE TROLL!<font size="4"><br></font></b></font></div></td></tr></table>

[Apollo5600]

The troll in that picture looks kinda cute, makes you want to feed it.

[DoctorDoom]

As long as its diet consists of liberals, DUh-ites and Internet Inconsequentials kiddies, it's acceptable.