**DONOTDELETE**
07-20-2001, 02:13 PM
It's not bad enough that the dems are lying rats the repubs are silent on this issue. Bunch of spinless wimps!!!
The article mentions the Constitution, but as we all know, the demonrats would rather burn it than look at it. Remember it's a living document changing with the times. So every time these people get the whim, zap the Constitution is changed.
Their idea of balanced is like 'bi-partisanship', as long as they get their way, it's OK.
---------------------------------------------
What Will They Think Of Next?
By
Thomas L. Jipping
You need to know the underhanded and dishonest tactics being used to block President Bush´s judicial nominees. The Bush administration and Senate Republicans should be the ones telling you but, despite their continuing silence, you still need to know.
Among the many excuses of Senate Democrats and their leftist allies to block judicial confirmations is the supposed need for "balance" on the federal courts. The Constitution calls for no such thing in giving the president the power to appoint judges and Democrats, of course, only discovered the need for balance upon President Bush´s election. And this argument doesn´t even fly on the numbers, since Bill Clinton just finished appointing 374 federal judges.
Looking specifically at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers nine western states, reveals just what is going on here. The Ninth Circuit is legendary or, should I say, notorious. This is the court that said landlords must rent to shacking-up couples despite their religious objections, that the Constitution contains rights to assisted suicide and to conduct government business in foreign languages, and that cities can discriminate against religious groups in opening their parks to community events. The U.S. Supreme Court reverses the Ninth Circuit three to four times as often as any other.
Read the rest here. (http://toogoodreports.com/column/general/jipping/071901.htm)
The article mentions the Constitution, but as we all know, the demonrats would rather burn it than look at it. Remember it's a living document changing with the times. So every time these people get the whim, zap the Constitution is changed.
Their idea of balanced is like 'bi-partisanship', as long as they get their way, it's OK.
---------------------------------------------
What Will They Think Of Next?
By
Thomas L. Jipping
You need to know the underhanded and dishonest tactics being used to block President Bush´s judicial nominees. The Bush administration and Senate Republicans should be the ones telling you but, despite their continuing silence, you still need to know.
Among the many excuses of Senate Democrats and their leftist allies to block judicial confirmations is the supposed need for "balance" on the federal courts. The Constitution calls for no such thing in giving the president the power to appoint judges and Democrats, of course, only discovered the need for balance upon President Bush´s election. And this argument doesn´t even fly on the numbers, since Bill Clinton just finished appointing 374 federal judges.
Looking specifically at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers nine western states, reveals just what is going on here. The Ninth Circuit is legendary or, should I say, notorious. This is the court that said landlords must rent to shacking-up couples despite their religious objections, that the Constitution contains rights to assisted suicide and to conduct government business in foreign languages, and that cities can discriminate against religious groups in opening their parks to community events. The U.S. Supreme Court reverses the Ninth Circuit three to four times as often as any other.
Read the rest here. (http://toogoodreports.com/column/general/jipping/071901.htm)