The_RANDy_Corporation
08-06-2001, 03:55 PM
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><HR> After this remarkably long walk on a short legal pier, having received no useful guidance whatever from either party, the Court has endeavored, primarily based upon its affection for both counsel, but also out of its own sense of morbid curiosity, to resolve what it perceived to be the legal issue presented. Despite the waste of perfectly good crayon seen in both parties' briefing (and the inexplicable odor of wet dog emanating from such) the Court believes it has satisfactorily resolved this matter. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That is a sample of the District Court's decision in Bradshaw v. Unity Marine, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8962 (S.D. Tex. 2001), authored by Judge Samuel B. Kent. Give yourself a treat and look it up. It is the funniest legal opinion I've read since 12 So. 2d 305.
That is a sample of the District Court's decision in Bradshaw v. Unity Marine, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8962 (S.D. Tex. 2001), authored by Judge Samuel B. Kent. Give yourself a treat and look it up. It is the funniest legal opinion I've read since 12 So. 2d 305.