MPAA | Best Credit Cards | Salvage Title Cars | Loans | Jorge Bucay
Feminist Intellectual: Oxymoron? [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Feminist Intellectual: Oxymoron?


HomeschoolrsRUs
02-20-2005, 10:33 PM
Feminist Fatale
Where are the great women thinkers? Thinking so much about women has shrunk their minds.
by Charlotte Allen
2/16/2005



When Susan Sontag died recently, she was mourned as America's leading female intellectual. So the question naturally arose: Is there anyone to take her place? If you can't come up with many names, you're in good company. The list is short.

This wasn't always the case. Ironically, during that part of the 20th century when overt discrimination barred many women from advanced educations, lucrative fellowships and prized teaching and editorial positions preparatory for the world of public letters, there were many brilliant, highly articulate female writers who combined a rigorous mind with a willingness to engage broad political, social and literary issues for an audience beyond academia. We still read their books (or at least their epigrams), and we remember their names: Gertrude Stein, Dorothy Parker, Simone de Beauvoir, Simone Weil, Mary McCarthy, Iris Murdoch, Hannah Arendt and Sontag, to name several.

Some of these women possessed glittering scholarly credentials. But most did not, because a public intellectual is more than simply an intellectual. Unlike the academic version who speaks mostly to fellow scholars, public intellectuals pitch their ideas to the general reading public -- and their writings appear in newspapers, magazines and books.

More of this article, found here:

Independent Women's Forum: Feminist Fatale (http://www.iwf.org/articles/article_detail.asp?ArticleID=726)

DesertFox
02-22-2005, 09:22 PM
Of the feminists named in that article, only two qualify as bona fide intellectuals: Simone de Beauvoir and Camille Paglia. Susan Sontag was no intellectual; she was a literary artiste, short on literary and long on artiste.

There is no shortage of female (vice feminist) scholars of first rank today, though. Christine Hoff Sommers comes to mind. Paglia, of course. Gertrude Himmelfarb. Most stay out of the limelight and stick to their scholarly pursuits, which is what makes them scholars.

UnkHiram
02-22-2005, 09:27 PM
I have been married for 19 years, I learned along time ago that on some subjects its best if I keep my mouth shut.

HomeschoolrsRUs
02-22-2005, 09:31 PM
Most stay out of the limelight and stick to their scholarly pursuits, which is what makes them scholars.

Why do you think that is, Fox? (just curious)

Do male intellectuals seek the limelight, or are they sought out, do you suppose? Maybe I just don't understand the definition of an "intellectual." Whenever I hear that word, the first name (and picture of the person) that comes into my head is
Bill Buckley.http://www.townhall.com/graphics1/columnists/buckley.gif

DesertFox
02-23-2005, 05:37 AM
Homes, male scholars also generally shun the limelight.

whipple
02-23-2005, 06:30 AM
Agreed Desertfox. Intellectuallism isn't something that people who possess(gah I can never remember how to spell that) it like to trumpet. Seeking out the limelight tends to tarnish it not to mention dilute it.
Not all scholars can nor should be labelled as intellectual however scholarly pursuits do tend to attract people of an intellectual nature.