PDA

View Full Version : Is it a Moon or a Death Star??


Large_Al
03-07-2005, 10:17 AM
Moon with a View: (http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon3.htm)

(http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon3.htm)

Or, What Did Arthur Know … and When Did He Know it? (http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon3.htm)





Click on link and read this if you dare!!

FBetts
03-07-2005, 11:40 AM
I sence a disturbance in the force...wait...no...its indigestion

whipple
03-07-2005, 12:57 PM
Can somebody summarise what this web site is trying to say. As my head is spinning from the charts and figures.
Are they saying Iapetus is artificial? :question:

whipple
03-07-2005, 01:00 PM
It's like something out of Arthur C Clarkes 2001.

Doh, just got it. It is about Arthur. LOL

Large_Al
03-07-2005, 03:32 PM
I think what they are saying is that one of the moons of saturn (the planet not the car co.) Is a death star.

DoctorDoom
03-07-2005, 05:57 PM
This is from NASA's APOD site.

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0502/iapetus_cassini.jpg

Explanation: What has happened to Saturn's moon Iapetus? A strange ridge crosses the moon near the equator, visible near the bottom of the above image, making Iapetus appear similar to the pit of a peach. Half of Iapetus is so dark that it can nearly disappear when viewed from Earth. Recent observations show that the degree of darkness of the terrain is strangely uniform, like a dark coating was somehow recently applied to an ancient and highly cratered surface. The other half of Iapetus is relatively bright but oddly covered with long and thin streaks of dark. A 400-kilometer wide impact basin is visible near the image center, delineated by deep scarps that drop sharply to the crater floor. The above image was taken by the Saturn-orbiting Cassini spacecraft during a flyby of Iapetus at the end of last year.Saturn's Iapetus: Moon with a Strange Surface (http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050201.html)

Draw your own conclusions.

BTW, 2001 involved Jupiter, not Saturn.

FBetts
03-07-2005, 08:18 PM
Ah, it makes alot more sence if you start from the BIGGINING, wich is http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon1.htm , your link started at page 3.

Its still totaly crazy when you read it from the start, but its more logicaly crazy...errr..never mind

tacitus
03-07-2005, 08:25 PM
Interesting, but the moon looks like a liberals brain, full of holes.

UnkHiram
03-07-2005, 09:18 PM
I thought it was a Cylon Base Star from Battlestar Galactica. I am fairly sure that is where Elvis and JFK are hiding. I know that because I had a tracking device in the Toaster Oven that Elvis took from me.

DesertFox
03-07-2005, 09:35 PM
That's a grease spot on some liberal's ass.

ThomasMore
03-07-2005, 10:20 PM
Richard Hoagland has made a career of spinning detailed nonsense.

whipple
03-08-2005, 02:38 AM
Saturn's Iapetus: Moon with a Strange Surface (http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050201.html)

Draw your own conclusions.

BTW, 2001 involved Jupiter, not Saturn.

Arthur C Clarkes 2001 a Space Oddysey was to Saturn. 2010 was written with Jupiter. I think you may be confusing the movie with the book.
Read the article from page 1 and you'll see what I meant.

DoctorDoom
03-08-2005, 03:41 AM
I didn't read the book. In the film, the monolith was orbiting Jupiter. Why?

In the book, 2001, the mission was supposed to go to Saturn, to the odd moon Iapetus in fact. In the book, The Making of 2001, we find that the people who made the movie chose to go to Jupiter instead, because they couldn't build a convincing model of Saturn. About the same time, the movie Silent Running had a wonderful model of Saturn.A Mistake in 2001, a Space Odyssey? (http://www.jimloy.com/movie/2001.htm)

I am now properly informed. That's one fewer in the small list of things that I don't know. :D

whipple
03-08-2005, 03:55 AM
Having read the full article I've decided that Arthur C Clarke was/is without a doubt the most amazing Sci-fi author ever. I've always loved his work but this is kinda spookily coincidental.
I think it would be great if the first evidence of extra-testical life was where the man credited with inventing communication satellites said it would be.
Life on mars is just sooo Orson Welles. Life around Saturn is where its at.

MSGT
03-08-2005, 07:57 AM
HOLY-SMOLEY they got extra-testical life.:blush: :blush: :blush: :blush:

whipple
03-08-2005, 07:59 AM
HOLY-SMOLEY they got extra-testical life.:blush: :blush: :blush: :blush:

Yea, it's a pity they're not near Uranus.....

*Crickets Chirping*

:D

DesertFox
03-08-2005, 09:38 PM
If the theory of evolution means anything in our universe, we'll find life on Mars before we find it anywhere else -- unless it finds us first.

DoctorDoom
03-09-2005, 01:44 AM
If we find life ANYWHERE other than here, abiogenesis is dead. It was impossible once. More than once is impossible to the power of infinity. Personally, I believe that the universe is teeming with life. It's a big place, and my God wouldn't limit Himself to life here. And considering some of the bizarre life forms that exist on this little blue marble, the possibilities are almost limitless.

"Sometimes I think we're alone in the universe, and sometimes I think we're not. In either case the idea is quite staggering."
-- Arthur C. Clarke

DoctorDoom
03-09-2005, 01:54 AM
HOLY-SMOLEY they got extra-testical life.Well, it takes a lot of balls to become space-farers. Unfortunately, America lost its balls when the Columbia was lost. I doubt that we'll see a major recommitment to space exploration in our lifetimes.

whipple
03-09-2005, 02:54 AM
If we find life ANYWHERE other than here, abiogenesis is dead. It was impossible once. More than once is impossible to the power of infinity. Personally, I believe that the universe is teeming with life. It's a big place, and my God wouldn't limit Himself to life here. And considering some of the bizarre life forms that exist on this little blue marble, the possibilities are almost limitless.

"Sometimes I think we're alone in the universe, and sometimes I think we're not. In either case the idea is quite staggering."
-- Arthur C. Clarke

I've got a better quote for you...

"Sometimes I think that the surest sign of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." - Calvin 'The Authoritive Calvin & Hobbes'

I love calvin & hobbes :thumb:

whipple
03-09-2005, 02:56 AM
Well, it takes a lot of balls to become space-farers. Unfortunately, America lost its balls when the Columbia was lost. I doubt that we'll see a major recommitment to space exploration in our lifetimes.

China, Russia and Japan seem to be growing rather large cajones if you ask me.

DoctorDoom
03-09-2005, 04:47 AM
Probably "cojones", the Spanish word in general use.

It will take another boot in the ass to revitalize the US space program. We'd have done nothing if Sputnik's beeps from orbit didn't jar us from our lethargy. And when Yuri Gagarin orbited in April of 1961, the impetus was provided. The Apollo program resulted and the first footprints on the moon were from the American, Neil Armstrong.

Two shuttle failures later, America's resolve has been paralyzed. It's going to take a really big jolt to restart it.

whipple
03-09-2005, 05:02 AM
If they discovered a chinese missile base on the moon or mars would that do it? Not that it's a likely scenario.
What do you suppose needs to be done to jump start it? I personally think that space travel is essential to our continued survival as a species. If we stay on Earth we will eventually become extinct.

The_Sonarman
03-13-2005, 06:40 PM
"We" have gotten stuck in a deep rut flying near earth orbit shuttle missions. That is "safe" and appeals to NASA bureaucrats. At least, Russia has the dream to go to Mars which is the logical next step.

"Man" will go to the planets, and perhaps beyond. Unless we kick NASA out of it's lethargy, or out of the way, it probably won't be Americans.

DoctorDoom
03-13-2005, 09:17 PM
It's partly NASA and partly liberals who think that NASA's paltry budget is still too much when there are votes that can be bought with handouts.

The awesome success of Spirit and Opportunity (http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/) demonstrates that America CAN do wondrous things. However, two shuttles accidents sprayed icewater on America's passion for manned exploration. It's an idiotic response, obviously. Envision ending air travel after two plane crashes, or sea voyages after two sinkings.

Ultimately, man WILL leave this little blue world and walk on the Moon again, and on Mars, and perhaps one day on planets light years away. First, however, it's necessary to rekindle the fire of curiosity and adventure, and as long as sucking up to dependency class leeches is more important than exploring the Final Frontier, that won't happen.

iFocusNews.com
03-19-2005, 05:56 AM
That link looks scary, I think I'ma just stay put right here...

g21lto
06-02-2005, 08:12 PM
So just how many of those pesky things did Palpatine have around?

Need a spare Death Star or two for whenever the Alliance gets cocky, I guess.