Halloween | Mortgages | Best Credit Cards | Loan | Best Credit Cards
The scandal behind the [Plame] scandal [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : The scandal behind the [Plame] scandal


DesertFox
07-20-2005, 09:04 AM
Mark Goldblatt
The American Spectator
20 July 05

There's a more scandalous question hovering in the background of Valerie Plame affair than whether presidential adviser Karl Rove intentionally or inadvertently blew the cover of a CIA agent -- namely, the question of how Plame's husband Joe Wilson wound up as point man to investigate whether Saddam Hussein had tried to acquire uranium from Africa.

It was Wilson, recall, who claimed in July 2003 op-ed for the New York Times that the agency had dispatched him to Niger -- at the personal request, he insinuated, of Vice President Cheney -- to look into the Iraq-Africa connection. Wilson insisted that he'd found no link and accused President Bush of lying in his 2003 State of the Union when he said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Wilson's conclusion that Iraq had never sought to buy uranium from Niger, we now know, wasn't borne out by his own sketchy, hearsay-filled report; indeed, the British government still stands by the intelligence Bush cited. Wilson, in short, misrepresented his own findings in order to undermine the re-election of the president. In the words of Pat Roberts (R. Kansas), chairman of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee which looked into the matter, "[Wilson] seems to have included information he learned from press accounts and from his beliefs about how the intelligence community would have or should have handled the information he provided...Time and again Joe Wilson told anyone who would listen that the president had lied to the American people...and that he had 'debunked' the claim that Iraq was seeking uranium from Africa....Not only did he NOT 'debunk' the claim, he actually gave some intelligence analysts even more reason to believe [the British report was] true."



More (http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=8465)

hdmundt
07-20-2005, 01:13 PM
I agree with the thrust of this article; that there is something worth investigating, but it probably has nothing to do with Karl Rove let alone the President. As I've noted in other threads, Saddam had well-known nuclear ambitions and, no doubt, he had agents make inquiries of nearly every uranium-producing country on the planet. That one was sent to Niger is of absolutely no surprise to anyone. Why, then, a Joe Wilson trip only to Niger? Obviously, the trip was an attempt to catch the President in a lie. Why would the CIA sponsor an overseas trip predicated on distrust of the President? (I don't think it did so. The Wilson's, not the agency, were the movers behind this whole thing.) And why was travel required? Does the U.S. not have a legation in Niger? Couldn't a simple phone call have been tried first - with Wilson's "connections" held in reserve until they were really required? What, exactly, did Joe declare when he returned to the U.S.?

DesertFox
07-20-2005, 01:59 PM
:question: :question: :question: :question: :question: :question: :question: :question: :question: :question:
:question: "What did :question:
:question: Joe know :question:
:question: and when :question:
:question: did he :question:
:question: know it?" :question: :question: :question: :question: :question: :question: :question::question: :question: :question: :question: