Repair Bad Credit | Mortgage Loans | Cheap Loan | Auto Loans | Online Advertising
For Two White House Aides in the Plame Leak Case, a second Issue Rises [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : For Two White House Aides in the Plame Leak Case, a second Issue Rises


Webruary
07-21-2005, 10:20 PM
For Two Aides in Leak Case, 2nd Issue Rises (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1448092/posts)

The New York Times ^ (http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/22/politics/22leak.html?hp&ex=1122004800&en=da4770e9392bb1c6&ei=5094&partner=homepage) | July 22, 2005 | DAVID JOHNSTON


WASHINGTON, July 21 - At the same time in July 2003 that a C.I.A. operative's identity was exposed, two key White House officials who talked to journalists about the officer were also working closely together on a related underlying issue: whether President Bush was correct in suggesting earlier that year that Iraq had been trying to acquire nuclear materials from Africa.

The two issues had become inextricably linked because Joseph C. Wilson IV, the husband of the unmasked C.I.A. officer, had questioned Mr. Bush's assertion, prompting a damage-control effort by the White House that included challenging Mr. Wilson's standing and his credentials. A federal grand jury investigation is under way by a special counsel to determine whether someone illegally leaked the officer's identity and possibly into whether perjury or obstruction of justice occurred during the inquiry.

...... The work done by Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby on the Tenet statement, during this intense period, had not been previously disclosed. People who have been briefed on the case discussed the critical time period and the events surrounding it to demonstrate that Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby were not involved in an orchestrated scheme to discredit Mr. Wilson or disclose his the undercover status of his wife, Valerie Wilson, but were intent on clarifying the use of intelligence in the president's address. Those people who have been briefed requested anonymity because prosecutors have asked them not to discuss matters under investigation.


(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/22/politics/22leak.html?hp&ex=1122004800&en=da4770e9392bb1c6&ei=5094&partner=homepage) ...

DesertFox
07-21-2005, 11:45 PM
From what I've read on this thing, it's a far stretch to style Valerie Plame "a CIA officer."

Venus de Smilo
07-22-2005, 12:06 AM
I'm surprised that the NYT willingly published this, even slanted as the article is. It does the left's trumped-up grievances against Rove no good to have it known that there was real purpose rather than malice behind the effort to clarify where Wilson was coming from with his story about Saddam and Niger, especially since he was later proven to have lied.

And this is certainly relevant to the subject of source disclosure on another thread. If journalists had to disclose sources at the drop of a federal prosecutor's hat, we wouldn't have gotten this:

"Those people who have been briefed requested anonymity because prosecutors have asked them not to discuss matters under investigation."

Warlady
07-22-2005, 12:46 AM
Interestink. Veddy veddy interestink.