Jag Wife
08-07-2005, 11:35 AM
I thought I'd address an area of embryonic stem cell research that nobody seems to mention.
You can be sure that if we do start EMBRYONIC stem cell research as mainstream, it will lead to human cloning somewhere down the road. You can't convince me otherwise.
This cloned human being will exist solely for the purpose of getting his/her parts harvested. Wouldn't that make him/her someone else's property?
And didn't we ban slavery in this country in 1863 (I think)? I don't have my copy of the Constitution in front of me.
www.webster.com (http://www.webster.com) defines the word "slave" as:
1 : a person held in servitude as the chattel of another
2 : one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence
Same website defines the word "chattel" as:
1 : an item of tangible movable or immovable property except real estate, freehold, and things (as buildings) connected with real property
Your thoughts.
You can be sure that if we do start EMBRYONIC stem cell research as mainstream, it will lead to human cloning somewhere down the road. You can't convince me otherwise.
This cloned human being will exist solely for the purpose of getting his/her parts harvested. Wouldn't that make him/her someone else's property?
And didn't we ban slavery in this country in 1863 (I think)? I don't have my copy of the Constitution in front of me.
www.webster.com (http://www.webster.com) defines the word "slave" as:
1 : a person held in servitude as the chattel of another
2 : one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence
Same website defines the word "chattel" as:
1 : an item of tangible movable or immovable property except real estate, freehold, and things (as buildings) connected with real property
Your thoughts.