NRA May Back a Democrat Instead of Ohio's DeWine

[Warlady]

Thursday, Aug. 18, 2005 5:12 p.m. EDT


NRA Might Back Democrat Instead of DeWine The National Rifle Association is so miffed over Republican Sen. Mike DeWine’s vote on gun liability that the organization may even back a Democrat in next year’s election.

DeWine angered the NRA in July when the Ohio lawmaker was one of only two Republicans to oppose a bill shielding gun makers from liability for damages resulting from the use of their firearms, according to the publication The Hill.


The Rest (http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/8/18/171326.shtml?et=y)

[Republican_Legion]

Dewine , another Rino pops out of a Elephant costume .

[Beowulf]

It's a shame when the NRA has to select between a RINO and a Lib. It's a no-win situation.

[Republican_Legion]

It's a shame when the NRA has to select between a RINO and a Lib. It's a no-win situation.

what about when its a RINO like DeWhiny vs a DINO like Zell Miller ?

wasnt zell miller pro-2nd amendment ?

[Beowulf]

what about when its a RINO like DeWhiny vs a DINO like Zell Miller ?

wasnt zell miller pro-2nd amendment ?

Don't know. But, I have said in the past, I would vote for a Zell Miller if he ran for POTUS.

[BEST45CAL]

i'll take a pro-gun dem over an anti-gun pub any day.

[Republican_Legion]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zell_Miller

[The_RANDy_Corporation]

Good. The NRA has never been an extension of the Republican party. And Dewine must go. See my signature line below.

[Bluemoon_Rising]

DeWine is my congressman, and he's a real piece of work: a jackass. Still, unless the Democratic alternative is more conservative than he, I'll stick with him. It wouldn’t make much sense to throw DeWine overboard -- though his support for gun owner’s rights be lukewarm -- in favor of a Democrat who is rabidly anti-gun.