Web Games | Internet Advertising | Jordan Shoes | Credit Counseling | Free Mmorpgs
Tribal ignorance [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Tribal ignorance


DesertFox
10-19-2005, 08:08 AM
Christopher Hitchens
Slate
Monday, 17 Oct 05

Ever wonder how to piss off an Iraqi? It's relatively simple. Just ask one, no sooner than you have been introduced: "So you're an Iraqi? How absolutely fascinating. Do tell: Are you a Kurd or a Sunni or a Shiite?" This will work every time, just as it's always so polite and so useful to ask a brown-skinned American if he or she is Chicano or, you know … Latina.

If you fall into conversation with an Iraqi, you will soon enough find out what you want to know. Kurds are not shy about mentioning their nationhood, and followers of the Shiite confession are not inclined to make a secret of the fact. So don't force the question. But you will have to know a lot of Iraqis before you meet one who cannot introduce you, usually with pride, to his or her Sunni cousin, or Kurdish auntie, or Shiite brother-in-law, as the case may be. And as for ethnicity and religion beyond our customary categories, you had better be prepared to meet Turkish and Assyrian Iraqis, as well as to bear in mind that in 1947 there were more Jews in Baghdad than in Jerusalem (many of the former of whom had been there longer), that many hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are Christian from more than one denomination—Islamic fanatics murdered the head of their Anglican congregation just the other day—and that the spiritual leader of the Shiites, Grand Ayatollah Sistani, is an ethnic Persian. ...

This same tribal habit of mind—tribal on our part, I mean, not on the part of the Iraqis—allows some people to make the lazy assumption that the liberation of Iraq has created these differences, or intensified them, rather than sought to compose and heal them. The Saddam Hussein regime was based on a minority of a minority—a Mafia clique based in and around the city of Tikrit—and it stayed in power not by being "secular" or multiethnic but by being sectarian and by playing the card of divide and rule. It treated all the inhabitants of the country as its personal property, and it made lifelong enemies among all communities and all confessional groups.

More (http://slate.msn.com/id/2128193/)

Bluemoon_Rising
10-30-2005, 08:43 AM
A local affiliate of NBC sent a reporter out to Cleveland's downtown commercial district to do "man-on-the-street" interviews. I was actually approached. Question of the day: do you think it possible that Iraq's three major religious factions will be able to peacefully co-exist under the new constitution?

I told the reporter that like everywhere else in the Islamic world there were but two major religious factions in Iraq.

I asked, “What is this third major religious faction?”

"The Kurds," she replied matter-of-factly, full of wisdom.

"The vast majority of Kurds are Sunnis," I explained. “The rest are mostly Christians. The Zoroastrian religion continues to be practiced among them, but only by a very small fraction of the Kurdish population. The Kurds are a tribal group, a nation within a nation. They are not a religious faction."

She looked at me like I was nuts.

Our encounter didn't make the 6:00 p.m. However, a few of the other encounters did, wherein the reporter and the "man-on-the-street" discussed the three major religious factions’ chances.

Imbecile.