sunsettommy
10-30-2005, 05:32 PM
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD bgColor=#eecc99>Science Criticism </TD></TR><TR><TD align=right width=585 bgColor=#eecc99 height=11>http://www.nov55.com/lin2.gif</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#eecc99>Gary Novak, Biologist</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Global Warming
It exists, but not due to greenhouse gases. Oceans are heating due to hot spots rotating in the earth's core.
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD bgColor=#ffe5bb>Everything in the atmosphere is a greenhouse gas including water vapor which is a hundred times more prevalent than carbon dioxide. People don't know this, because promoters of GW do so much lying.
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#ddeffe>The atmosphere is only 0.04% carbon dioxide, of which only 3% stems from human activity. Therefore, human activity cannot create global warming stemming from carbon dioxide, though natural causes of global warming certainly can exist. (Explanation)* (http://www.nov55.com/gbwm.html#z)
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#fdfdbe>The oceans regulate CO<SUB>2</SUB> in the atmosphere to the minutest detail, as indicated by an El Nino in the Pacific Ocean, which causes CO<SUB>2</SUB> measurements in the air to increase, and then they renormalize when the El Nino disappears. Link (http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6613)
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#f5ebf5>The oceans are heating up drastically, and the atmosphere only slightly, as indicated by polar ice caps melting and increased rainfall. This points to a hot spot in the earth's core heating the oceans, not human activity.
Nature Study (http://www.nov55.com/gbwm.html#nature)
Same at Greenland (http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/10/21/greenland.icecap.reut/index.html)
Ice Age Theory. (http://www.nov55.com/cli.html)
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#e0fff5>Twenty thousand scientists signed a petition saying carbon dioxide is not creating global warming (link at bottom of page).
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
http://www.nov55.com/gbwm.html
This is a very long but interesting writing.He says that the OCEANS are regulating CO2 and very little else is doing that.It is a warming ocean that is releasing net CO2 and a cooling ocean that ABSORBS net CO2.
He also stated here about how little CO2 actually does as a greenhouse gas:
Explanations
Water vapor is a a greenhouse gas which is far more significant than carbon dioxide, because there is about a hundred times as much of it in the air, depending upon humidity. Its primary effect is to reflect radiation. It produces a highly varied effect which swamps the significance of carbon dioxide.
Since carbon dioxide absorbs and re-emits radiation, rather than reflects it, the radiation is sent in all directions, and only a small percent would be sent back towards the earth. Also, only a very narrow band of wavelengths is absorbed by CO<SUB>2</SUB>.
Compare the numbers to water vapor. There's less than 1% as many molecules of CO<SUB>2</SUB>; it absorbs less than 1% of the radiation; and it sends less than 10% back to earth. That's 100 x 100 x 10 times less effective than water vapor, which totals one million times less effective. If a cloudy day changes the temperature by 10 degrees, carbon dioxide would be a millionth as effective, which would be 0.00001 degrees. The quantities are absurd.
Concerning carbon dioxide, the amount in the air is unrelated to the amount produced. Ocean temperatures determine how much is in the air. An equilibrium is created at the ocean surface, and it regulates the amount in the air. So if there is more carbon dioxide in the air, it means ocean surfaces are warming.
See how silly it is.Co2 has always been overrated and I knew it for a long time as a layman.Surely a competant climate researcher would know better.
Then too Mankind produces only a small portion of the yearly release Co2 into the atmosphere,the Earth does the rest of it.This is elementary knowledge.Surely again the Science researchers would know better.
This one of the reason why I have been a stubborn skeptic the whole time.Co2 is a TINY contributor as a greenhouse gas.Water Vapor gets largely ignored and the "Hockey stick" is absurd research.It is full of second hand at best level proxies.With selected trees in tiny groves or even a SINGLE tree representing a region!
Enjoy.
Global Warming
It exists, but not due to greenhouse gases. Oceans are heating due to hot spots rotating in the earth's core.
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=5 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD bgColor=#ffe5bb>Everything in the atmosphere is a greenhouse gas including water vapor which is a hundred times more prevalent than carbon dioxide. People don't know this, because promoters of GW do so much lying.
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#ddeffe>The atmosphere is only 0.04% carbon dioxide, of which only 3% stems from human activity. Therefore, human activity cannot create global warming stemming from carbon dioxide, though natural causes of global warming certainly can exist. (Explanation)* (http://www.nov55.com/gbwm.html#z)
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#fdfdbe>The oceans regulate CO<SUB>2</SUB> in the atmosphere to the minutest detail, as indicated by an El Nino in the Pacific Ocean, which causes CO<SUB>2</SUB> measurements in the air to increase, and then they renormalize when the El Nino disappears. Link (http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6613)
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#f5ebf5>The oceans are heating up drastically, and the atmosphere only slightly, as indicated by polar ice caps melting and increased rainfall. This points to a hot spot in the earth's core heating the oceans, not human activity.
Nature Study (http://www.nov55.com/gbwm.html#nature)
Same at Greenland (http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/10/21/greenland.icecap.reut/index.html)
Ice Age Theory. (http://www.nov55.com/cli.html)
</TD></TR><TR><TD bgColor=#e0fff5>Twenty thousand scientists signed a petition saying carbon dioxide is not creating global warming (link at bottom of page).
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
http://www.nov55.com/gbwm.html
This is a very long but interesting writing.He says that the OCEANS are regulating CO2 and very little else is doing that.It is a warming ocean that is releasing net CO2 and a cooling ocean that ABSORBS net CO2.
He also stated here about how little CO2 actually does as a greenhouse gas:
Explanations
Water vapor is a a greenhouse gas which is far more significant than carbon dioxide, because there is about a hundred times as much of it in the air, depending upon humidity. Its primary effect is to reflect radiation. It produces a highly varied effect which swamps the significance of carbon dioxide.
Since carbon dioxide absorbs and re-emits radiation, rather than reflects it, the radiation is sent in all directions, and only a small percent would be sent back towards the earth. Also, only a very narrow band of wavelengths is absorbed by CO<SUB>2</SUB>.
Compare the numbers to water vapor. There's less than 1% as many molecules of CO<SUB>2</SUB>; it absorbs less than 1% of the radiation; and it sends less than 10% back to earth. That's 100 x 100 x 10 times less effective than water vapor, which totals one million times less effective. If a cloudy day changes the temperature by 10 degrees, carbon dioxide would be a millionth as effective, which would be 0.00001 degrees. The quantities are absurd.
Concerning carbon dioxide, the amount in the air is unrelated to the amount produced. Ocean temperatures determine how much is in the air. An equilibrium is created at the ocean surface, and it regulates the amount in the air. So if there is more carbon dioxide in the air, it means ocean surfaces are warming.
See how silly it is.Co2 has always been overrated and I knew it for a long time as a layman.Surely a competant climate researcher would know better.
Then too Mankind produces only a small portion of the yearly release Co2 into the atmosphere,the Earth does the rest of it.This is elementary knowledge.Surely again the Science researchers would know better.
This one of the reason why I have been a stubborn skeptic the whole time.Co2 is a TINY contributor as a greenhouse gas.Water Vapor gets largely ignored and the "Hockey stick" is absurd research.It is full of second hand at best level proxies.With selected trees in tiny groves or even a SINGLE tree representing a region!
Enjoy.