Wyatt_Junker
11-01-2005, 10:05 AM
I have a question.
Does anybody remember last year when Kerry had to take out a second on his wife's house (I think it was something like $6 million) and then threw it at his campaign?
The controversy at the time was that he only had a meager Senate salary of roughly $140,000 per annum to pay it off, which was impossible.
First, the house wasn't his to play politics with, putting the act into an illegal private contribution from Tarrayaza. And I think, prior to the election, they even had a prenup agreement making their assests non-joint even if they were married, which would bolster the argument that that house was not his to use since his name appeared nowhere on the deed and thus a bold rejection of the McCain-Feigngold Act.
And since gloryboy lost, that would put him $6 million in the hole, and Tarrayaza out of a house in an act of ultimate jigoloism. Basically, she got used. At the time I think Kerry even said that it would be possible for him to pay back that loan and, here's the kicker, if anybody else kicked in the cash to do so(like his wife), it would put into effect an illegal event.
Has the FEC looked into this yet? Or, was Kerry able to re-route some of that funny money that he raised from the run-up to last year's election from his demographic of dipshits and blue state morons to pay off the banks?
Also, here's another question. Why would any bank assume that risk? At least any bank that I know? That's quite a risk, especially since Vegas had Kerry & Bush tied at roughly 50:50 odds. Banks don't do that. Why did this bank breach protocol?
This has been bugging me and the MSM won't mention it... guaranteed. To date, has there been anything written about it?
Just curious.
I want to see how far the double standards go for notable kingpin leftwads not only in the MSM but election law.
Does anybody remember last year when Kerry had to take out a second on his wife's house (I think it was something like $6 million) and then threw it at his campaign?
The controversy at the time was that he only had a meager Senate salary of roughly $140,000 per annum to pay it off, which was impossible.
First, the house wasn't his to play politics with, putting the act into an illegal private contribution from Tarrayaza. And I think, prior to the election, they even had a prenup agreement making their assests non-joint even if they were married, which would bolster the argument that that house was not his to use since his name appeared nowhere on the deed and thus a bold rejection of the McCain-Feigngold Act.
And since gloryboy lost, that would put him $6 million in the hole, and Tarrayaza out of a house in an act of ultimate jigoloism. Basically, she got used. At the time I think Kerry even said that it would be possible for him to pay back that loan and, here's the kicker, if anybody else kicked in the cash to do so(like his wife), it would put into effect an illegal event.
Has the FEC looked into this yet? Or, was Kerry able to re-route some of that funny money that he raised from the run-up to last year's election from his demographic of dipshits and blue state morons to pay off the banks?
Also, here's another question. Why would any bank assume that risk? At least any bank that I know? That's quite a risk, especially since Vegas had Kerry & Bush tied at roughly 50:50 odds. Banks don't do that. Why did this bank breach protocol?
This has been bugging me and the MSM won't mention it... guaranteed. To date, has there been anything written about it?
Just curious.
I want to see how far the double standards go for notable kingpin leftwads not only in the MSM but election law.