NYC is Republican!!!!

[PrezLeefun]

I am so happy. The canidate that I voted for is going to be mayor again. 4 more years for Micheal Bloomberg.


http://www.nyc.gov/html/om/gif/admin_officials/bloomberg_lowres.jpg

[Republican_Legion]

he's a BIG TIME RINO !

he publicly opposed John Roberts etc .
the guy is as bad as Hitlery clinton .
he's also a fag supporter .

change the title to "NYC IS RINO" .

RINO Info : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg

[PrezLeefun]

I know but its better than DEMOCREEP

[Jasmine Napoli]

Prezlee, Mike "Napolean complex" Bloomberg is a rent a party idiot. At your polling station did you not see that it said "(Republican) Michael Bloomberg - LIBERAL". I couldn't believe it actually said liberal and republican on the same line, it should be an oxymoron, but unfortunately in NY it isn't.His top advisors are all democraps. I voted all the way down column D the Conservative party. I figured that I wasn't "wasting" my vote as some would claim because Bloomberg or Ferrer are both interchangeable. I also wanted the NY GOP to see the state's conservative party's numbers go up so that perhaps they will pull their heads out of their bum bums and get with the GOP ideals of the rest of the country.

[PrezLeefun]

I would have voted third party - but a third party vote would have counted against Bloomberg giving Ferrer an advantage which was something I was not willing to do. I know it said liberal. Beleive me I was in no rush to vote but am ultimately happy with the choice I made considering the selections.

[Republican_Legion]

His top advisors are all democraps

thats not good sign .

[Jasmine Napoli]

I would have voted third party - but a third party vote would have counted against Bloomberg giving Ferrer an advantage which was something I was not willing to do. I know it said liberal. Beleive me I was in no rush to vote but am ultimately happy with the choice I made considering the selections.

Bloomberg had it locked. Ferrer didn't stand a chance (obviously), but as I have said and I am in no way trying to burst your bubble or make you feel bad, just trying to let you know that Bloomberg and Ferrer have the same ideals and most likely the same advisors. :smirky:

[Republican_Legion]

it was a win or win for the democrats .

[Jasmine Napoli]

As a side note I would take a moderate democrat over a liberal republican any day of the week.

[Jasmine Napoli]

it was a win or win for the democrats .

More like a win for liberals and socialists...wait that's redundant! :hahaha:

[Republican_Legion]

As a side note I would take a moderate democrat over a liberal republican any day of the week.

like good ol' zell miller :grin: .:claps:

[Republican_Legion]

More like a win for liberals and socialists...wait that's redundant! :hahaha:

yeah , its either the liberal socialist or the liberal capitalist either which way the dems smile at 5 pm with a glass of Jesus juice . same thing here when arnold won , although arnold actually did something unexpected (vetoed fag wedding bill) .

[Jasmine Napoli]

yeah , its either the liberal socialist or the liberal capitalist either which way the dems smile at 5 pm with a glass of Jesus juice . same thing here when arnold won , although arnold actually did something unexpected (vetoed fag wedding bill) .

Yeah, I must commend Arnie for at least attempting to fix some of the major social and economic problems and I highly respect that he seems to be about "the will of the people". Unfortunately I am so sorry that the immoral wackaloons spoke louder this election period. What happened? Not enough campaigning on Arnie's part?

[Republican_Legion]

on TV 99.9% of the ads were anti-conservative . so that sums it up .
some of the Liberal ads did make me laugh though :thumb: especially how they made the 3 independent judges look like idiots .

[Jasmine Napoli]

I'll tell you what, I'll trade you one Bloomberg and throw in a Pataki for Arnie? Is it a deal? :eureka:

[Jasmine Napoli]

Hell, I'll even throw in Hitlery! :thumb:

[Republican_Legion]

pataki is running for president isnt he ? from what i have heard he is . maybe he'll get the DNC nomination . the Munsters are on TV right now lol

yep take arnold , maybe bloomberg would get the CA GOP motivated to endorse even a Libertarian or Constitpation party . all arnold can do now since the people and the legislature are against him is to just vetoe all spending bills .

[Jasmine Napoli]

Only if you take Hitlery though, she's part of the deal *lol*. I have said since day 1 that Bloomberg is a DNC plant to punish NYC and to prevent NYers from ever voting Republican again.

[Republican_Legion]

it wouldnt make a difference if hillary replaced Diane Feinstein . both are gun grabbers . it might be a improvement since hitlery is better looking then feinstein :hahaha:

[Jasmine Napoli]

LOL, too true.

[Republican_Legion]

the CA DNC has always had corruption scandals , so i''d imagine some would rub on hillary and ruin her 08 run . i remember when sec state of CA resigned over corruption lol . not to mention Gray davis who profited from the Power Energy crisis . so yes we'll take hillary so that she'll get some of the corruption rubbed on her .

[Jasmine Napoli]

Hitlery...becoming corrupt? NOOOOOO but but but but she she's just sooooooooo christian now and is so aware of the corruption of money and she tossed out her libbie ways and is born again! /end sarcasm

[Lazarus]

Pay no attention to the hardliner naysayers, Prez... Its still good that the mayor wears the Republican label... Every little bit that chips away at the Democrat moral helps...

No one expected this guy to be Ronald Reagan...

You did your civic duty and you got to vote for the first time... Way Hay!!! You done ok, sweety... We'z proud of you... :)

[aaron11]

Bloomberg is the Anti-Conservative, then again NYC is no different then any other Liberal city. Any Republican in office in NY State is a Rhino, their is no difference here between Republicans and Democrats here they are all LIBERAL. I don't even bother to vote in State elections and only vote in national election for the hell of it. NY State is beyond redemption so long as their are 8 million assholes in NYC holding the rest of the State hostage....

[aaron11]

Pay no attention to the hardliner naysayers, Prez... Its still good that the mayor wears the Republican label... Every little bit that chips away at the Democrat moral helps...

No one expected this guy to be Ronald Reagan...

You did your civic duty and you got to vote for the first time... Way Hay!!! You done ok, sweety... We'z proud of you... :)

Problem is that the fight is not between Republicans and Democrats. At least not the fight that concerns me. It's between Conservatives and Liberals and their are no Conservatives in the the Republican party of NY State. Continually voting for Liberal Republicans only exacerbates the problem.

[Federal Farmer]

I would have voted third party - but a third party vote would have counted against Bloomberg giving Ferrer an advantage which was something I was not willing to do. I know it said liberal. Beleive me I was in no rush to vote but am ultimately happy with the choice I made considering the selections.
It appears that NYers had no real choice to make, not unusual in any part of the country. Still Prezlee you voted for the first time and got into the fight; your thought process was valid, but as will often happen the election process let you down in that the GOP did not offer a real conservative candidate to vote for. It's a tough decision to make to vote for a 3rd party you know will not win, but sometimes one is compelled to do so despite the outcome; then you know you're a member of a community of like-minded souls, not a member of a Party.

[PrezLeefun]

Pay no attention to the hardliner naysayers, Prez... Its still good that the mayor wears the Republican label... Every little bit that chips away at the Democrat moral helps...

No one expected this guy to be Ronald Reagan...

You did your civic duty and you got to vote for the first time... Way Hay!!! You done ok, sweety... We'z proud of you... :)

Thanx Laz, I love you.:grin:

[aaron11]

Sorry for my rant Prez, frustration over-load.

Good job, welcome to the fight!

[PrezLeefun]

Oh no prob, no worries, no harm, no foul. ;)

[dPrasse]

it wouldnt make a difference if hillary replaced Diane Feinstein . both are gun grabbers . it might be a improvement since hitlery is better looking then feinstein :hahaha:

yes , she sure looks snappy in her uniform !!

[Lazarus]

I love that Pic, dPrasse... Im makin a copy of it for my collection...

Hitlery for Chancellor!!! It takes a Jackbooted Blitzkrieg to raise a child...:biglaugh:

[Aric2000]

yes , she sure looks snappy in her uniform !!

WOW, NOW that is a nice piece of work!!

Mind if I borrow it? LOL

It will upset some people I know MIGHTILY!! LOL

[Beowulf]

I know but its better than DEMOCREEP

Which is just the thinking that is getting us Conservatives into trouble. We fail to see past the alternative which is a Democreep and vote for those who aren't true Conservatives.

I hate to say it but the only way the GOP will get the message is if they lose an election or two and then maybe they'll get their heads on straight. I will vote Constitutionalist before I support more-of-the-same or a Democreep.

[dPrasse]

Mind if I borrow it? LOL

It will upset some people I know MIGHTILY!! LOL

It is one I found on the web .... go ahead and upset ! :D

[omegatrump]

Problem is that the fight is not between Republicans and Democrats. At least not the fight that concerns me. It's between Conservatives and Liberals and their are no Conservatives in the the Republican party of NY State. Continually voting for Liberal Republicans only exacerbates the problem.

So true, Aaron, The dilution of the standard has all but destroyed the party. What difference does it make what you call the party Demican / Republicrat, when the end result is the same.

The party system has become a control mechanism, applied to the masses to keep them contained as subjects in a charade. All they have to do is float a couple of controversial issues, get a couple of half wits like Mary Madelaine and James Carville to stage a debate and they have the charade in play. Then they manipulate the system to do what they are told by the money that owns both parties.

[omegatrump]

Which is just the thinking that is getting us Conservatives into trouble. We fail to see past the alternative which is a Democreep and vote for those who aren't true Conservatives.

I hate to say it but the only way the GOP will get the message is if they lose an election or two and then maybe they'll get their heads on straight. I will vote Constitutionalist before I support more-of-the-same or a Democreep.

Constitution party, for me too.

[Republican_Legion]

me too , but sometimes the Libertarians have good candiates .

[omegatrump]

I like most of what the Libertarians stand for....

[Disentius]

it was a win or win for the democrats .
Honestly, must everything be about party lines? I will have you know, as a New Yorker, that is was not win-win at all. Ferrer is another NY democratic party machine hack, and Bloomberg is a capable mayor with social stances which win votes in NYC. Bloomberg's problem is his failure to oversee police activity properly, and his backwards ideas about ice cream trucks and smoking.

Can't we get beyond this liberal-conservative democrat-republican labeling game and just discuss these people ACTIONS?

[Republican_Legion]

no .

a RINO is Liberal .

[Disentius]

a RINO is Liberal .

What does that mean? Seriously, im asking, not trying to talk smack. RINO?

[Republican_Legion]

RINO = Republican In Name Only
its for Republicans who are way too Liberal to be considred a Republican like John mccaine , rudy Guilianni , Olympia Snowe , susan Collins , Lincoln Chafee , Arlen Specter . only 1 RINO defected and Joined the Independent Liberal Party and that is Senator Jeffords

[Disentius]

RINO = Republican In Name Only
its for Republicans who are way too Liberal to be considred a Republican like John mccaine , rudy Guilianni , Olympia Snowe , susan Collins , Lincoln Chafee , Arlen Specter . only 1 RINO defected and Joined the Independent Liberal Party and that is Senator Jeffords

Well, you know if you care about having the elected officials in NY be labeled as republican, they will have to represent the people of their constituancy. NYC will never elect a mayor that does not support abortion rights, gay rights, etc. even Guiliani had to pay lip service to such ideals. Then when he tried to start a city review board to make sure no art in city funded museums is "obscene" he recieved a resounding "NO" from his constituents and had to accept their decision.

I want my elected officials to be loyal to the people who elect them, and to represent the SPECIFIC determinations they make, rather than representing a party line that is incongruent with the wishes of the people.
In short, F*** party loyalty, politicians should represent the people.

It is true however, that Bloomberg is a republican in name only. He wanted to run on the democratic ticket, but he could never have made it past the primary.

[Republican_Legion]

NY Conservatives , should focus on digging up corruption on the establishment Liberals so they can get a more conservative or an A+ Rino like Arnold govenator . it happend here and we got DAVIS ousted , and about 6 months ago or so the Sec of State of CA resigned over Corruption Charges . its probally harder to get a Decent RINO in NY because the state is 60% john kerry vs CAs 54% kerry . but its still possible if you have big scandals and controversies against the Liberals . what seems to be the BIG issues in CA and NY is the Economy and the Masses of People feel Socialism is the way to go because they are either very poor or low-income and usually dont understand politics and think Tax & Spend is the way to go . this is mainly in BIG citys with 1+ million people , the Pro-abortion thing is more of Stupidity because the Majority of Low Income people are Religious and Reject Abortion and Gay Rights . it is more of them trying to win the support of the Liberal Elites who probally only make up 5-15% of the Population in NY and CA . CA and NY will elect Socialists and those Socialists go against the peoples Will and support Gay marriage and Abortion . when those things come under attack they use Unlimited Amount of money Generated by Workers Unions , Hollywood , DNC , NOW , NARAL etc and they already Control the Media and they will RUN non-stop ADs and Twist the Issues around so the Majority Reject Conservative Ideas . It happend recently here and every single Good Prop was defeated . Were Are Screwed it seems . no matter how conservative my District/county is the Liberal Socialists in sacremento will be there FOREVER .

unless an earthquake happens San Franciso , CA is locked in a Socialist path headed NOWhere .this may be the same Situation in NY .

[DesertFox]

New York's in a union lockbox. Not much ever gonna change there. The only reason Giuliani was so effective was that he knew how to talk Noo Yawkuh language. People there understand tough talk when the one talking knows what he's doing. But Rudy's good work was at the margins and based on his personality; he did nothing to change Gotham's corrupt institutions, which would have ensured permanent change.

[aaron11]

New York's in a union lockbox..

Yep, New York actually leans to the conservative side socially, however, so long as the Unions control NYC were screwed, despite the rest of the state being both fiscally and socially conservative. On the county to county map Ney York is actually a red state. Problem is that there are more people in the few blue dots then there is in the whole rest of the state. :shake:

[Bob_Arctor]

NY is one of the most liberal states there are. You can't go by geography, you have to go by the people.

Yep, New York actually leans to the conservative side socially, however, so long as the Unions control NYC were screwed, despite the rest of the state being both fiscally and socially conservative. On the county to county map Ney York is actually a red state. Problem is that there are more people in the few blue dots then there is in the whole rest of the state. :shake:

[aaron11]

NY is one of the most liberal states there are. You can't go by geography, you have to go by the people.

-No, actually NYC is one of the most liberal cities in the world, the State sad to say is being held hostage by those 8-million+ liberal azzholes. Everything West of the coast (Buffalo, Syracuse) being the exceptions are strongly Conservative rural areas. The vast majority of NY State is rural countryside, in fact my immediate region is 20 years behind the rest of the country in a lot of ways.

-If you look at a County to County election map, you will see that the vast majority of counties vote Republican. Which, is why many NYer's are proposing to split the electoral votes more fairly. Having the electoral votes split between the vastly different regions according to population, rather then having NYC (a vastly different region, with vastly different needs) run ruff-shod over the rest of the State. Truth is, the entire State is at the mercy of one tiny OVERPOPULATED Island.

-Of course the Democrats will appose that as if it were life and death. Because in truth, if the entire countries electoral votes were split up according to population per capita', Republican (Conservatives) would dominate in elections. For one thing, more rural country bumpkins would actually GO VOTE knowing that their vote may actually count for something. That has been the number one reason for low voter turn out here in NY State for decades...

[Bob_Arctor]

-No, actually NYC is one of the most liberal cities in the world, the State sad to say is being held hostage by those 8-million+ liberal azzholes.
Well, people matter, not geographic area.

You could point out that Wyoming, the Dakotas and so on are all conservative and take up a ton of space, but it doesn't really matter, as there are so few people.
Of course the Democrats will appose that as if it were life and death. Because in truth, if the entire countries electoral votes were split up according to population per capita', Republican (Conservatives) would dominate in elections. For one thing, more rural country bumpkins would actually GO VOTE knowing that their vote may actually count for something. That has been the number one reason for low voter turn out here in NY State
for decades...
But the counties making up NYC would still dominate the rest of the state even if there were an electoral college system. Also, couldn't you argue the reverse of your last two lines - many people in NYC who are liberal don't vote because they know their side is going to win?

[aaron11]

Well, people matter, not geographic area.

You could point out that Wyoming, the Dakotas and so on are all conservative and take up a ton of space, but it doesn't really matter, as there are so few people.

But the counties making up NYC would still dominate the rest of the state even if there were an electoral college system. Also, couldn't you argue the reverse of your last two lines - many people in NYC who are liberal don't vote because they know their side is going to win?

Well yes, however, if you start out with 31 electoral votes and split them per capita, even if the pubs only get 10 of them, thats still ten more then they would have had otherwise. If you extrapolate that across the country, in States like California, Missouri, Oregon and Washington all States that have significant Conservative populations that are being overshadowed by the "Big City" Liberals, you would certainly change the dynamics. Isn't it about time the millions of people living in rural areas [within "Big City" States] were given even representation, considering their vastly different needs?

As for voter turn out, not necessarily, higher voter turn out tends to favor Republicans, Liberals tend to be more politically active then Conservatives by nature. A trend that is changing, much to the chagrin of the left...