Pledge of Allegiance ban upheld

[Suzie]

Pledge of Allegiance ban upheld

Appeals court decision may send case to U.S. Supreme Court

BREAKING NEWS
ASSOCIATED PRESS

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 28 — A federal appeals court Friday rejected the Bush administration’s request to reconsider its decision that the Pledge of Allegiance is unconstitutional because of the phrase “under God.” The ruling means the case could go to the Supreme Court.
MORE HERE (http://www.msnbc.com/news/878913.asp) /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon119.gif Freekin' communists.

[Warlady]

The 9th Circuit makes me want to reconsider my position against wishing a terrorist attack on US soil.

[jag]

Another reason we need to get Estrada confirmed.

[The_Elucidator]

[ QUOTE ]
Warlady said:
The 9th Circuit makes me want to reconsider my position against wishing a terrorist attack on US soil.

[/ QUOTE ]

Now WL, I think this is fantastic news! Once again, this will blow-up on the 'Rats and all but grease the skids for the Estrada nomination. Oh, and of course the 'Rats will look like idiots again. Their timing remains incredible.

/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon1.gif

Libs---Timing

[Warlady]

Well I'm pretty sure the SCOTUS will overturn them. They always do.

[The_Elucidator]

SCOTUS "Will" overturn this...and the rest of what I said..

[Warlady]

The Democrat party has just gone to hell in a handbasket.

[**DONOTDELETE**]

[ QUOTE ]
Warlady said:
The 9th Circuit makes me want to reconsider my position against wishing a terrorist attack on US soil.

[/ QUOTE ]

The ones that still hate America after 9/11, will not change their views if another attack happened. Those are the ones you could literally call "die hard liberals."

They are liberal right to the bone.

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Nah, the dimocrats have been in Hell for some time now, WL; they're into Abyssal real estate these days.

Why dont we all just nuke the 9th circuit court and turn it into a fast food resturaunt?

Then we can give its judges positions as trash pickers along the interstates with the rest of the criminals.

[The_Elucidator]

Every family tree has its closet idiot! The 9th Circuit is the Judiciaries.

[Gone_with_the_Wind]

I'm embarrassed and ashamed. I can't even claim I'm surprised. Nothing surprises me about my state.

I'm gonna delete my location from my bio. This is too embarrassing.

[jag]

When the SCOTUS overturns this, does that mean will we have an "illigitmate" pledge?

[Warlady]

Godzilla, I was referring specifically to the 9th as a target.

[rbisrb2]

The 9th IS a terrorist attack on the U.S,

[Rigfire]

Big Deal! The ruling only applies to West Coast states like California, Oregon, and Washington. They aren't even part of America anyway. Californians are better off saying their pledge of alliegance to Mexico, and Oregon and Washington ought to affirm their oaths to where they properly belong, Canada and France.

[Warlady]

[ QUOTE ]
jag said:
When the SCOTUS overturns this, does that mean will we have an "illigitmate" pledge?

[/ QUOTE ]

Jag I don't understand your question.

[Venus]

Rig, it affects 9 states and 2 territories. It covers 20% of the U.S. population and 1/3 of the land of the U.S..

WL, if you target the Ninth, which is located in San Francisco, you can say goodbye to me, Best, CAin, Ray, PeteS and a couple others I haven't thought off right off. We'll be dead, unless we're lucky enough to be away at the time.

You see, SF has been named one of the 4 most likely cities to be targeted for a terrorist attack, along with NYC, DC and Chicago, so you might just get your wish.

[Warlady]

Venus surely you know I was not serious. Besides, Osama has too many fans there. He won't attack his fans. I wuz just talking about one ittie bittie building too. A courthouse. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Wonderful news!

[Venus]

Okey-dokey.

BTW, there's one helluva lotta ragheads livin' out here - mainly down on the lower SF peninsula in San Mateo and Santa Clara counties - especially Santa Clara.

p.s. It's a nice building. I bin in it.

[Warlady]

We don't have any of em here in Weatherford. Dallas maybe but not here. Gee no diversity. Everyone seems happy though.

[DeclinetoState]

Click on the /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/icon8.gif (http://www.democraticunderground.com/duforum/DCForumID60/41783.html) to see the argument that "under God" was not in the Pledge till '54, thus it's certainly not constitutional.

[**DONOTDELETE**]

I for one do not believe in pledging allegience to Washington, DC.

[Warlady]

It's not unconstitutional either DTS.

[Rink]

[ QUOTE ]
Rigfire said:
Big Deal! The ruling only applies to West Coast states like California, Oregon, and Washington. They aren't even part of America anyway. Californians are better off saying their pledge of alliegance to Mexico, and Oregon and Washington ought to affirm their oaths to where they properly belong, Canada and France.

[/ QUOTE ]

Rig the problem is California does it, oregon imitates it then washington state imitates oregon, monkey see monkey do, We owe allegiance to the monkey see, monkey do society of democratic idiots in these parts.

Ya know wont be long the 9th Court will probably declare being partiotic and flying the American Flag to be unconstitutional.

Then being proud to be an American citizen will go next.

Someone needs to clean these court idjits out, and make the judiciary accountable to the people of America, this was a longstanding argument when the Constitution was being hashed out by our Founding Fathers, they feared an unelected, unaccountable judiciary taking over.

Their fears are now being realized today 200+ years later.

What a shame.