Is This The Democracy We Are Fighting For? (Barbra Streisand barf alert!)

[EveningStar]

Why are we really fighting this war? First it was the search for WMDs. None were found. Then it was hunting for the terrorists and "smoking them out." Weve only created a breeding ground for more terrorists. Finally, President Bush insisted the mission in Iraq was worth it in order to bring democracy to the country and unseat Saddam Hussein, a very bad guy, but one who was contained economically, politically and militarily. Remember, he was our ally in the fight against Iran. And there are many countries that need democracy, but the United States has not gone in militarily and usurped control. But Iraq has oil and Bush has a lot of big oil friends...

Go here for more wisdom (http://www.barbrastreisand.com/statements.html)

[Warlady]

I just have one question for this crazy bitch. Where was she when Clinton was fighting wars all over the place, Kosovo, Haiti, Mogadishu, Waco and Baghdad (just to name a few)? Not one peep out of the crazy bitch for 8 years of a [p]resident who deployed our military more than ANY President in our history. You know? It would almost be worth electing a Democrap just to shut her up...I said almost. I ain't that crazy.

[EveningStar]

Hey, Babs...

http://www.rc4systems.net/albums/album04/stfu.gif

[Wolfcounsel]

RRRRRRRAAAAAAAALPH!! :barfy:

[EveningStar]

Or to put in another way... (http://www.portalbecker.de/yoda.jpg)

[sunsettommy]

I just have one question for this crazy bitch. Where was she when Clinton was fighting wars all over the place, Kosovo, Haiti, Mogadishu, Waco and Baghdad (just to name a few)? Not one peep out of the crazy bitch for 8 years of a [p]resident who deployed our military more than ANY President in our history. You know? It would almost be worth electing a Democrap just to shut her up...I said almost. I ain't that crazy.

Could it be..........,

That she was one of the women sexually haressed by Clinton and did not complain.

That must be it.

[Warlady]

tommy, I suspect she was the one doing the sexual harrassing. It's a well known fact that Hillary hates her because....

Also, wasn't Babsie with Mz Post jumping up and down on the bed in the Lincoln bedroom?

[sunsettommy]

tommy, I suspect she was the one doing the sexual harrassing. It's a well known fact that Hillary hates her because....

Also, wasn't Babsie with Mz Post jumping up and down on the bed in the Lincoln bedroom?

Hey I was just being nasty about big nose striesand.

I really do not know how many men she pays to "play her".

Oops getting nasty again.Oh well with a woman like that it is easy.

She is simply dishonest in what she says and I could easily tear her stupid rants apart.I have done that in another forum and koolaid drinkers backed off when they saw how bad she is.It is really easy to show what a dishonest liar she is.

Her first lie I saw was this:"Why are we really fighting this war? First it was the search for WMDs. None were found"

Can you spot the lie?

How about this ignorance?: "Then it was hunting for the terrorists and "smoking them out." Weve only created a breeding ground for more terrorists."

Never mind that they are mostly NON Iraqi's doing the terrorizing.It is impossible to create what is already existing.They are coming from the surrounding muslim nations and now mostly blowing up Iraqi civilians.

Or this crap: "President Bush insisted the mission in Iraq was worth it in order to bring democracy to the country and unseat Saddam Hussein, a very bad guy, but one who was contained economically, politically and militarily."

He was unseated because he was a menace to the region and continually violating the many U.N. resolutions.He harbored terrorists.He promoted terrorism on Isreal with $25,000 payments to familys of a suicide bomber.He shot at the American/British jets patrolling the northern and southern skies.The training terror camp at Salmon la pac.The stated intent to destroy America.Tried to murder President Bush #1.

Saddam in signing the ceasefire way back in 1991 admitted he has WMD to destroy.He had 12 years to destroy and document that destruction.To comply with the condition of the ceasefire concerning WMD.He failed to do what he agreed to do and after a long run of run arounds with the U.N. and the inspectors.President Bush RESUMED the war to remove the stupid thug.If Saddam just comply with the Ceasefire,he would still be in power right now.

Then since he was going around an U.N. restriction with the oil for medicine program he abused to build palaces his military and amass a fortune,over the backs of the Iraqi's.Violating the true intent of the program.

It is torture to continue reading such idiotic and abyssmally ignorant tripe.Just about everything she prattles about has been long debunked.

The war for Oil.Debunked
The colonization plans.Debunked
The war is another vietnam.Debunked
No WMD found.Debunked
Hussein was contained.Debunked
Can not bring Democratic government set up into Iraq.Debunked

She is ignorance stupidity personified.

A piece of @*&#$!

[sunsettommy]

Here is what the stupid woman fails to see:PART 1 Red bolding are mine.

"I share the [Bush] administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction."

Congressman Dick Gephardt (D-Iowa)
September 19, 2002
CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/09/19/bush.congress.iraq/)

"As we survey the landscape of threats to our security in the years ahead, the greatest are terrorists like Al Qaeda and rogue regimes like Saddam Hussein's. Saddam hates America and Americans and is working furiously to accumulate deadly weapons of mass destruction, and the missiles, planes, and unmanned aerial vehicles to use in attacking distant targets .... The essential facts are known. We know of the weapons in Saddam's possession: chemical, biological, and nuclear in time. We know of his unequaled willingness to use them. We know his history. His invasions of his neighbors. His dreams of achieving hegemonic control over the Arab world. His record of anti-American rage. His willingness to terrorize, to slaughter, to suppress his own people and others. We need not stretch to imagine nightmare scenarios in which Saddam makes common cause with the terrorists who want to kill us Americans and destroy our way of life."

Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-Connecticut)
September 13, 2002
The United States Mission To The European Union (http://www.useu.be/Categories/GlobalAffairs/Sept1302LiebermanBushIraq.html)

"While the distance between the United States and Iraq is great, Saddam Hussein's ability to use his chemical and biological weapons against us is not constrained by geography - it can be accomplished in a number of different ways - which is what makes this threat so real and persuasive."

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California)
October 10, 2002
Senate.gov (http://www.senate.gov/~feinstein/Releases02/r-iraq10.htm)

"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration's policy towards Iraq, I don't think there can be any question about Saddam's conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts."

<!--QuoteEnd-->Congressman Henry A. Waxman (D-California)
October 10, 2002
Waxman.house.gov (http://www.waxman.house.gov/news_files/news_statements_res_iraq_10_10_02.htm)

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security. Now this much is undisputed."

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-New York)
October 10, 2002
Senate.gov (http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html)

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."

<!--QuoteEnd-->Senator Carl Levin (D-Michigan)
September 19, 2002
Senate.gov (http://www.senate.gov/~levin/newsroom/release.cfm?id=217516)

__________________________________________________ ___________

That many Democrats believed that Hussein is a danger and a liar.They liberals who are saying this.

<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEnd-->

[sunsettommy]

PART 2 Red bolding mine.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."

Senator John Edwards (D-North Carolina)
October 10, 2002
Senate.gov (http://edwards.senate.gov/statements/20021010_iraq.html)

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has and has had for a number of years a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. At what point we do what President Kennedy did in 1962, which is to make that information available to the American people and to the international community as a predicate for whatever use of force will follow, is going to be an important strategic decision for this administration."

<!--QuoteEnd-->Senator Bob Graham (D-Florida)
Quoted from "Meet the Press"
December 8, 2002
NPR.org (http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/transcripts/2002/dec/021208.ohara.html)

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

<!--QuoteEnd-->Senator John D. Rockefeller IV (D-West Virginia)
October 10, 2002
Senate.gov (http://www.senate.gov/~rockefeller/news/2002/flrstmt0102002.html)

"Make no mistake: Saddam Hussein is a ruthless tyrant, and he must give up his weapons of mass destruction. We support the President in the course he has followed so far -- working with Congress, working with the United Nations, insisting on strong and unfettered inspections. We need allies today in 2003, just as much as we needed them in Desert Storm and just as we needed them on D-Day in 1944, when American soldiers -- including my father -- fought to vanquish the Nazi threat. We must convince the world that Saddam Hussein is not America's problem alone -- he's the world's problem. And we urge President Bush to stay this course for we are far stronger when we stand with other nations than when we stand alone."

Governor Gary Locke (D-Washington)
Democratic Response to President Bush's
"State of the Union" address
January 28, 2003
USembassy-Australia.state.gov (http://usembassy-australia.state.gov/hyper/2003/0129/epf303.htm)

"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. He miscalculated an eight-year war with Iran. He miscalculated the invasion of Kuwait. He miscalculated America's response to that act of naked aggression. He miscalculated the result of setting oil rigs on fire. He miscalculated the impact of sending scuds into Israel and trying to assassinate an American President. He miscalculated his own military strength. He miscalculated the Arab world's response to his misconduct. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."

Senator John Kerry (D-Massachussetts)
January 23, 2003
GWU.edu (http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/issues/kerr012303spfp.html)
<!--QuoteEnd-->
<!--QuoteEnd-->

[sunsettommy]

From BBC NEWS,
Saturday, February 7, 1998 Published at 00:08 GMT<!--******** END COMPONENT ******** -->


Special Report
<!--CONTENT INCLUDES GO HERE-->http://news.bbc.co.uk/furniture/nothing.gif
<!--Main Headline here -->Iraq on the net - comprehensive links

Excerpt:<!--End Main Headline -->

The latest crisis - prompted by Iraq's failure to comply with the UN weapons inspections programme - has been exhaustively covered by Net news services over the last few months.

Information from UN organisations monitoring the situation and the policies of the US and the wider international community towards Iraq have been published on the Internet since use of online services exploded two years ago.
There is a wealth of discussion and analysis of issues such as the growth of Iraq's chemical and biological armoury, the Arab position on the crisis, and significant support for the Iraqi people is also evident online.
Disarming Iraq - the UN mandate The terms of the ceasefire which ended the Gulf War were made in United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 on April 3 1991. Iraq was required to accept unconditionally the removal or rendering harmless of specified weapons and missiles of mass destruction.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/special_report/iraq/54261.stm
__________________________________________________ _________
A lot of links to use for DEBUNKING morons like Barbara Striesand.

[Riverboat]

Silly me. I had thought we went to Iraq to hunt down pup seals so we could bash in their heads and collect the fur to make Barbra a nice coat.

[sunsettommy]

Silly me. I had thought we went to Iraq to hunt down pup seals so we could bash in their heads and collect the fur to make Barbra a nice coat.

Why damage fine fur on this human waste?

She is better off wearing a gorilla suit.

[BuckeyeMike]

That would be considered a "full body cosmetic improvement"!

[DoctorDoom]

<center><font size="7" color="000080"><b>Barfra says ...</b></font>

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/BarfraS.jpg"></center>