View Full Version : Iranian Pilgrims in Mecca Shout "Death to America
smithy
01-11-2006, 06:11 PM
Iranian Pilgrims in Mecca Shout "Death to America, the Great Satan" in an Anti-American Rally
check this link for video feed
http://www.memritv.org (http://www.memritv.org/)/#
this is when we sould have used the nukes, we got them in one place.
listen to nuke mecca option on this link
http://www.ourmedia.org/node/129759 (http://www.ourmedia.org/node/129759)
Yet too many Muzzie apologists keep making excuses for these people trying to continue the lie that they are adherents of the 'religion of peace' and that if we just try to 'understand' them we wouldnt have these problems with these maniacal muslims hell-bent on slaughtering every non-muslim in the world who wont bow their heads to their bloodthirsty moon god.
dPrasse
01-11-2006, 09:32 PM
Time for Doom to post his "Mushroom +Mecca = Crater" illustrated math formula .
Riverboat
01-11-2006, 10:29 PM
this is when we sould have used the nukes, we got them in one place. The timing couldn't be better - zap 'em when their asses are all sticking up in the air.
routerider
01-12-2006, 10:55 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/01/12/hajj.stampede/index.html
Only a couple hundred dead....that sucks.
DoctorDoom
01-12-2006, 02:57 PM
Time for Doom to post his "Mushroom +Mecca = Crater" illustrated math formula .By request ...
<center><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/M2.jpg" />
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Plus.png" />
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/M1.jpg" />
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Equl.png" />
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/M3.jpg" /></center>
DeclinetoState
01-12-2006, 06:19 PM
Were any of these "Death to America!" Iranians trampled in the stampede?
omegatrump
01-12-2006, 06:41 PM
Can't do that DD, that would stop the war.
That is good strategy.
The phrase in Iranian is "Maag Barg Amrika!"
The_RANDy_Corporation
01-13-2006, 08:35 AM
That's an interesting liturgy from the "religion of peace." I wonder if it's chanted to the tune of "Holy, holy, holy?"
Un Con Troll Able
01-13-2006, 11:36 AM
It's ridiculous that we even attempt to interact with that part of the world (Israel being the only exception).
Simply buy their oil, cull their global Islamic domination aspirations by killing the more aggressive Arab leaders--without warning, take out potential WMD programs (and the surrounding city, if that is what it takes), insulate America from their terrorist threats by banning immigration into the U.S. from the region, and then just walk away.
To hell with giving them freedom or justice. These people aren't mature enough to understand it, appreciate it, or defend it. That's why the pharaohs ruled for seven millenia.
Let them know that if the U.S. is the victim of an Arab-based WMD attack, then all of them will be punished (severely). If they try to use oil as a weapon, invade and seize enough oil fields to eliminate the shortfall.
It's not all that complicated. Arabs aren't deserving of our respect. Trying to elevate them or portray them as civilized peoples is akin to putting Mike Tyson in a $2000 suit and presenting him with a doctorate in front the media. It wouldn't change anything because the man would still be an uncouthe barbarian.
And that's the way it is with the Arabs. A trillion dollars worth of oil revenues wouldn't be able to buy them class, sophistication, or a true civilization.
Just let them wallow in their circa 12th century societal/cultural quagmire until they evolve enough to find the courage to join humanity.
Wolfcounsel
01-13-2006, 11:53 AM
"To hell with giving them freedom or justice. These people aren't mature enough to understand it, appreciate it, or defend it. That's why the pharaohs ruled for seven millenia." --Un Con Troll Able
Not all Arabs belong to Stupids 'R' Us. There are plenty of Christian Arabs, and I don't believe they should be placed in the same gutter as the Moslems.
Un Con Troll Able
01-13-2006, 12:15 PM
They are the enemy. That may seem unfair considering that the most tangible common bond is geography, but it is enough. We are dealing with societies and their associated cultures.
Attempting to divide them into good-guy and bad-guy camps based upon individual leanings and beliefs only makes it impossible for America to conduct an effective foreign policy and to decisively wage wars.
Wolfcounsel
01-13-2006, 12:28 PM
"Attempting to divide them into good-guy and bad-guy camps based upon individual leanings and beliefs only makes it impossible for America to conduct an effective foreign policy and to decisively wage wars." --Un Con Troll Ables
I see, said the blind man, as he picked up his hammer and SAW!
Un Con Troll Able
01-13-2006, 12:48 PM
No, not blind. Just focused.
pinqy
01-13-2006, 01:05 PM
No, not blind. Just focused.
Too focused. First, the OP was about Iranians, who are not Arabs. The majority of Arabs in the US are Christian. 1/3 of US Muslims are Black, 1/3 Asian, and the rest mix of Arab, Iranian, and other. So you're lumping in Christians with Muslims to hate and ignoring non-Arab Muslims altogether. I find that....interesting.
Un Con Troll Able
01-13-2006, 01:12 PM
I am lumping them together culturally. Their ethnicity is irrelevant to me, as is their status and stature within their cultures.
I don't drill down to the individual level. That's a liberal trait used to dillute discipline and fortitude.
shawnwood
01-13-2006, 01:15 PM
Also according to a clip on that site, Iran has cured Aides....
pinqy
01-13-2006, 01:49 PM
I am lumping them together culturally. Their ethnicity is irrelevant to me, as is their status and stature within their cultures. So you're division isn't ethnic, yet you only refer to the ethnic group of Arabs. Iranians have a different culture as well, so you're still not including Iranians. So you're condemning Christian Arabs in a thread about Iranian Muslims. Again....interesting.
I don't drill down to the individual level. That's a liberal trait used to dillute discipline and fortitude. You're not even recognizing distinct groups, let alone individuals.
Wolfcounsel
01-13-2006, 01:51 PM
"I am lumping them together culturally. Their ethnicity is irrelevant to me, as is their status and stature within their cultures." --Un Con Troll Able
Why do I have this picture of Billy Carter's visit with Kadaffy?
pinqy
01-13-2006, 01:57 PM
"I am lumping them together culturally. Their ethnicity is irrelevant to me, as is their status and stature within their cultures." --Un Con Troll Able
Why do I have this picture of Billy Carter's visit with Kadaffy?
I don't know, but now I have it too. ugh.
Un Con Troll Able
01-13-2006, 03:00 PM
So you're division isn't ethnic, yet you only refer to the ethnic group of Arabs. Iranians have a different culture as well, so you're still not including Iranians. So you're condemning Christian Arabs in a thread about Iranian Muslims. Again....interesting.
I see them all as Arabs. That is my identifier for ALL of them. I am not interested in any sort of social/ethnic/religious distinctions among them. That is the price they pay for speaking with a single voice when it comes to their opposition to America (and Israel).
You're not even recognizing distinct groups, let alone individuals.
You're right. I am not. They are the enemy so long as they, as a collective, reek of hypocrisy and intellectual cowardice.
Wolfcounsel
01-13-2006, 03:18 PM
"I see them all as Arabs." --Un Con Troll Able
Tell that to the Moslems in Mindanao, in person please.
pinqy
01-13-2006, 03:40 PM
I see them all as Arabs. That is my identifier for ALL of them. All of WHO? Brown people? Muslims? People from Central Asia? South West Asia? North Africa? People who don't eat pork? You seem to be lumping groups that don't speak as a single voice so you're failing to identify any group at all.
Wolfcounsel
01-13-2006, 03:54 PM
Uh, duh, everybody knows who "THEM" are. BWAH-HA-HA!:bdh:
I really miss the other smiley whacking the other smiley on the head.
The above means beating a horse's ass, or beating a dead horse to death. I can't decide which.
Seriously, Un Con. What do you mean by "them"?
pinqy
01-13-2006, 03:59 PM
I don't think he even knows.
Uh, duh, everybody knows who "THEM" are. BWAH-HA-HA!:bdh:
I really miss the other smiley whacking the other smiley on the head.
The above means beating a horse's ass, or beating a dead horse to death. I can't decide which.
Seriously, Un Con. What do you mean by "them"?
Hey Wolfie hows bout these?
http://www.conservababes.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/twak.gif http://www.conservababes.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/bonk.gif
A couple added extras for ya for the fun of it :D
http://www.conservababes.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/sthu.gif http://www.conservababes.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/stuckonstupid.gif
Wolfcounsel
01-13-2006, 04:08 PM
AHHH! Thanks, Rink!:thumb:
Un Con Troll Able
01-13-2006, 11:27 PM
Seriously, Un Con. What do you mean by "them"?
Anyone who resides in a country where Islam dominates. I don't care how peaceful they, as individuals, claim to be. Even the so-called moderate Islamic states are merely an assassination away from going fundamentalist. And it is their ruling cliques and classes that hold all of the power and dictate the tone of their culture. Today's schoolboy is tomorrow's hijacker...or homicide bomber.
Being Arab isn't about skin tone or geographic location. It's about mindset.
It's a mindset where Koran-thumping 'holy' men redefine the words soldier, hero, and martyr to glorify savages--and one-third of the Muslim population cheers, one-third cowers, and one-third leaves to live in the lands of brave men who fought for freedom and justice.
It's a mindset that opposes anything American or Israeli.
It's a mindset where abuse of women is either accepted as a cultural norm or openly tolerated.
It's a mindset that rails against American 'atrocities' while downplaying or ignoring any failings of Islam.
Are there any decent Arabs? I suppose so. And I'm certain there were decent Japanese and Germans during WWII. These savages killed more people on 9/11 than died at Pearl Harbor--and we vaporized two Japanese cities and firebombed their capital, to the tune of probably somewhere around 300,000 dead civilians (for the latter act). Nowadays, we worry about collateral damage. We worry about their feelings. We want to be friendly towards the smiling ones. Let them move here...after all, with today's politically correct diversity value system that's all takes to be regarded as an 'American.' Legions of the talk-is-cheap social club membership whose religion has generated nothing but misery...domination, murder, torture...bedding down here and extolling the virtues of Islam while ignoring the millenia-long unvarying societal/cultural failure it truly represents everywhere it is practiced. Considering what their faith represents, historically and contemporarily, I don't see how anyone could practice it and keep a straight face--or resent being regarded as a threat because of that faith.
The next attack against the U.S. will be of the WMD-variety. It is inevitable that it will occur. It is not a question of if, but when.
And I can promise you that when it does occur, you are going to see some very radical changes to our foreign relations and immigration policies...and those changes will be deeply rooted in much of what I have been speaking.
A couple million dead Americans is the hell of a price we'll have to pay just so people don't have to worry about defining "Arab" as a matter of life and death right now.
Un Con Troll Able
01-13-2006, 11:44 PM
Tell that to the Moslems in Mindanao, in person please.
Ah yes, Mindanao...the great land that the American ambassador to the Philippines called "the new Mecca for terrorism."
But, hey, as long as there are some peace-loving ones living there...
pinqy
01-14-2006, 07:00 AM
Ah, so you just took a word that has a specific meaning, and then redefined it for yourself in a way that nobody else accepts or understands. Perhaps you don't understand the point of words.
Un Con Troll Able
01-14-2006, 07:36 AM
Ah, so you just took a word that has a specific meaning, and then redefined it for yourself in a way that nobody else accepts or understands. Perhaps you don't understand the point of words.
Nobody else accepts or understands...
How utterly sage-like for you to speak on behalf of the rest of the planet.
Wolfcounsel
01-14-2006, 08:17 AM
"Being Arab isn't about skin tone or geographic location. It's about mindset.
It's a mindset where Koran-thumping 'holy' men redefine the words soldier, hero, and martyr to glorify savages..." --Un Con Troll Able
You are not listening, are you? Not all Arabs are Moslems. Also you just allowed the reference to Mindanao to bypass the word 'Arab' for some reason. I can't make heads or tails out of the enemy you envision. Is it something like "Kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out"?
aaron11
01-14-2006, 01:55 PM
Was this before or after they trampled one another to death like a stampede of mindless cattle?...
*snickers
Wolfcounsel
01-14-2006, 02:52 PM
"Was this before or after they trampled one another to death like a stampede of mindless cattle?..." --aaron11
That's what I was trying to figure out what Un Con Troll Able was talking about--mindless cattle or just any Arab. I don't know of anything but Moslems (mindless cattle) going to take a chance on getting their asses trampled during a hajj.
pinqy
01-14-2006, 06:29 PM
Nobody else accepts or understands...
How utterly sage-like for you to speak on behalf of the rest of the planet.
Find me one other person who, without you having to explain, would say that a Black Christian in the Sudan, killed for his beliefs, is an Arab and an enemy. By your definition "Anyone who resides in a country where Islam dominates." is an Arab. Find me any source besides yourself using this concept. "Arab" has a specific accepted meaning.
Find me one other person who, without you having to explain, would say that a Black Christian in the Sudan, killed for his beliefs, is an Arab and an enemy. By your definition "Anyone who resides in a country where Islam dominates." is an Arab. Find me any source besides yourself using this concept. "Arab" has a specific accepted meaning.
The definitions of what an 'Arab' is can be found on the net if you do a little research, I found one definition on Wikipedia...
Definition of What an Arab is on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab#Who_is_an_Arab.3F)
Origin and Identity of the Arabs (http://www.imninalu.net/myths-Arabs.htm)
pinqy
01-15-2006, 07:44 AM
The definitions of what an 'Arab' is can be found on the net if you do a little research, I found one definition on Wikipedia...
I am well aware of the definition of Arab. Un con trollable is not. Read the thread. By HIS definition a Black Christian in the Sudan would be an Arab.
Un Con Troll Able
01-15-2006, 11:27 AM
I am well aware of the definition of Arab. Un con trollable is not. Read the thread. By HIS definition a Black Christian in the Sudan would be an Arab.
And?
Wolfcounsel
01-15-2006, 11:56 AM
"I am well aware of the definition of Arab. Un con trollable is not. Read the thread. By HIS definition a Black Christian in the Sudan would be an Arab." --pinqy
"And?" --Un Con Troll Able
By that standard of definition, you would probably define a skunk as an animal with mammary glands, and then proceed to lump all mammals into the skunk category.
:whip:
I'd say that merits four hours of peepee-whacking for you.
Un Con Troll Able
01-15-2006, 12:36 PM
How eloquent.
Wolfcounsel
01-15-2006, 12:41 PM
Hey, no problem. I try more hard than usualer.
aaron11
01-15-2006, 03:40 PM
LMAO, Wolfy...
That's funnier then usualer...
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.