Loans | Loans | Credit | Loans | Literatura fantastica
City considers ‘red-tagging’ problem houses [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : City considers ‘red-tagging’ problem houses


Rink
01-13-2006, 05:47 PM
City considers ‘red-tagging’ problem houses

BY DEENA WINTER / Lincoln Journal Star

It’s not a scarlet letter. But it is a bunch of letters on a red tag stuck to someone’s house — if the occupants have gotten into trouble with the law for such things as parties, noise or litter.

City leaders are floating the idea of slapping so-called “red tags” on disorderly houses to serve notice to inhabitants, neighbors and landlords that they’re in trouble with the law.

And they’d better not get into trouble again any time soon.

The idea was suggested by Ed Caudill, a 21-year North Bottoms resident and neighborhood activist who hopes to reduce the parties, litter and noise in his neighborhood, where the many small, old rental houses are popular with University of Nebraska-Lincoln students.

Caudill got the idea from Tucson, Ariz., where police have the authority to stick red tags on what are considered disorderly houses — or properties where five or more people are gathered or where there’s excessive noise, traffic, obstruction of streets, littering, public drinking, fighting, disturbing the peace or minors drinking alcohol.

The warnings must stay posted for 120 days. If a tag is taken down, the tenants are fined. If there are any subsequent violations within the next 120 days, police can cite and fine everyone from property owners to tenants and party guests.

Lincoln City Councilwoman Patte Newman, who has been working to help local neighborhood associations deal with problem properties and party houses, is helping to examine the idea of red-tagging.

“That’s an obvious reminder,” she said of the bright red warning. “It’s basically giving the police another tool in their armory to have.”

Carol Brown said the Neighborhood Alliance, a group of neighborhood associations, plans to push for a red-tag ordinance.

More on this Story (http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2006/01/13/top_story/doc43c710ab048cc072966049.txt)

==============================================

Personally the authorities should have a right to paint the ENTIRE house Bright blazing red FWIW, and the people whining and complaining it would hurt their property value needs to take a clue, hiding the fact that you have nuisance morons that make life hell for you and your neighbors dont make YOU look any good, clean up your neighborhood THEN you will have much better property values.

To hide such a thing is disgraceful, if not downright unethical to do.

BEST45CAL
01-13-2006, 08:20 PM
That's rather kind of them. Out here, they just slap a lien on the property.

Teenager
01-13-2006, 08:28 PM
Personally the authorities should have a right to paint the ENTIRE house Bright blazing red FWIW, and the people whining and complaining it would hurt their property value needs to take a clue, hiding the fact that you have nuisance morons that make life hell for you and your neighbors dont make YOU look any good, clean up your neighborhood THEN you will have much better property values.

To hide such a thing is disgraceful, if not downright unethical to do.

We don't need more authorities restricting us on how to behave. The neighbors will do that themselves.

Rink
01-13-2006, 08:37 PM
We don't need more authorities restricting us on how to behave. The neighbors will do that themselves.

Um if you live right next door to a neighbor that has and holds 24/7 LOUD parties while You are trying to get your sleep to be able to get up in the morning for work I should think You would want something done about that sort of thing.

And you wonder why I choose to live in the sticks (unfortunately those city shits re trying to come to my town and right next to me and shove their city-like subdivisions right up in font of my face whether or not I want it.)

BEST45CAL
01-14-2006, 12:17 AM
Just one more reason to live in the country.

Rink
01-14-2006, 12:21 AM
Indeed, I Live in the country, the Only prob is we got the city folks comin up here in the country and bringing their city garbage with them (honkin huge sprawlin subdivisions, homeowners associations and ubermanaged housing complexes.)

Wish they'd leave us alone and stop trying to 'Love the Columbia River Gorge' to death like they have every other nice rural area surrounding them.

They'll ruin this place then move on to the next rural place and ruin it too.

DesertFox
01-14-2006, 09:07 AM
This is a good idea, and I'm surprised Rink supports it.

Rink
01-14-2006, 03:53 PM
Actually DF the reason why I support it is because in my life I have lived next to neighbors from hell.

So I know how hard it is to live with neighbors that drive ya nuts. Been thru it.

(Its half the reason why I am Completely against this subdivison being planned here right next to this house where I currently live at, I dont WANT people living c lose to me cuz I know whats gonna happen again and I dont want it to happen. This house sits on a dead-end cul-de-sac, and its relatively quiet here, that wont last once that friggin subdivision that Chinidere wants to put in here.)