Pendragon_6
02-02-2006, 09:54 AM
February 1, 2006
RUSH: Folks, it's now evident that not one Democrat can do this. They need sort of like a round robin, a number of people to do a response to a President Bush speech of any kind. Here's who I would suggest. The next time there is an opportunity or demand that the Democrats respond to a speech by the president, that they line up first, get the al-Jazeera reaction, then go get the president of Iran's reaction. He sounds a lot like the Democrats.
Then go get Hugo Chavez, put him on the roundtable. Give Michael Moore a minute or so, and then you wrap it up with Nancy Pelosi and Dingy Harry and Al Gore and Kerry, and they can all flip coins to see who gets to go last, because that's the power position in one of these things.
But, I mean, you start with al-Jazeera and the president of Iran. Put Saddam in there, too, because Saddam is good at Democrat talking points, because it's clear that Kaine can't do it. David Gergen doesn't know a good one when he hears it, or a bad one when he hears it -- and it's just obvious that there isn't one Democrat anymore qualified to deal with all this.
EIB (http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020106/content/rush_on_a_roll.guest.html)
RUSH: Folks, it's now evident that not one Democrat can do this. They need sort of like a round robin, a number of people to do a response to a President Bush speech of any kind. Here's who I would suggest. The next time there is an opportunity or demand that the Democrats respond to a speech by the president, that they line up first, get the al-Jazeera reaction, then go get the president of Iran's reaction. He sounds a lot like the Democrats.
Then go get Hugo Chavez, put him on the roundtable. Give Michael Moore a minute or so, and then you wrap it up with Nancy Pelosi and Dingy Harry and Al Gore and Kerry, and they can all flip coins to see who gets to go last, because that's the power position in one of these things.
But, I mean, you start with al-Jazeera and the president of Iran. Put Saddam in there, too, because Saddam is good at Democrat talking points, because it's clear that Kaine can't do it. David Gergen doesn't know a good one when he hears it, or a bad one when he hears it -- and it's just obvious that there isn't one Democrat anymore qualified to deal with all this.
EIB (http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020106/content/rush_on_a_roll.guest.html)