Documented Cases Of Liberal Violence, Intimidation, and Vandalism

[Pendragon_6]

8 October 2005, Seattle, WA:
Veteran's Home Vandalized
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/jamieson/243...html?source=rss (http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/jamieson/243883_robert08x.html?source=rss)

4 September 2005, Louisiana:
Democrat Senator Threatens Violence Against Bush
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/9/4/101101.shtml

1 September 2005, National:
Leftist Radio Host Encourages Looting
http://www.hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25911

25 April 2005, National:
Leftist Radio Threatens to Assassinate Bush
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadA...le.asp?ID=17878 (http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17878)

17 February 2005, Portland, OR:
Former Pentagon Adviser Assaulted at University
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6991863/

24 January 2005, Milwaukee, WI:
Five Democrats Charged with Election-Day Tire Slashing
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=295825

8 November 2004, San Francisco, CA:
Muslim/Democrat Mob Attacks College Republicans
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadA...le.asp?ID=15855 (http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=15855)

30 October 2004, Durango, CO:
Liberal Professor Assaults Conservative Student
http://www.durangoherald.com/asp-bin/artic...ews041030_1.htm (http://www.durangoherald.com/asp-bin/article_generation.asp?article_type=news&article_path=/news/04/news041030_1.htm)

22 October 2004, Tuscon, AZ:
Conservative Commentator Assaulted at University
http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/artic...ch22-ON-CP.html (http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/articles/1022CoulterSpeech22-ON-CP.html)

5 October 2004, Orlando, FL:
Democrat Mob Storms GOP HQ, Injures Staffers
http://www.local6.com/politics/3785861/detail.html

October 2004, National:
A Pattern of Leftist Hatred
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=40898 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40898)

17 September 2004, Huntington, WV:
3-Year-Old Girl Attacked by Democrat Thugs
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040917-010155-8041r.htm

20 March 2003, Madison, WI:
Republican Heaquarters Vandalized
http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/mar03/127180.asp


11 March 2003, Los Angeles, CA:
Peaceniks Destroy 9-11 Memorial
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=31473 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=31473)

[Lazarus]

This is all classic Communist operational doctrine... It is a clear and blatant policy of Communists that violence against their political opponents is perfectly justified if the Communist agenda is furthered...

The Left is becoming more andf more bold in their aggression against their opponents... We can expect more violence in the next 3 years as we go thru another mid-term Congressional race as well as the next Presidential race... I wont at all be suprised if blood is shed by these animals before this is over...

And they are always accusing the Right of being the violent ones...

They should pay heed to the scriptures where they say, "What you sew, so shall you reap..."

[Native American]

1 April 2005
Violent leftist/Democrat physically assaults conservative Pat Buchanan at Western Michigan University
http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/002026.html

[Warlady]

This thread is destined for the Hall of Fame Archives.

[Lazarus]

Yeah I think you're right, girl... It should be made sticky at the very least... I have a feeling that its going to get a lot of contributions over the next few years...

[Warlady]

Done :)

[Lazarus]

My influence here is truly frightening... Mwahahahahaha...:evilgrin:

[Native American]

13 February 1996
Liberals steal press run of conservative newspaper Carolina Review in an effort to preserve victory for their liberal candidate
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/mikeadams/2004/08/16/12704.html

[Native American]

1 March 2002
Liberals steal entire press run of a monthly conservative publication at the University of California-Berkeley (http://www.berkeley.edu/) and harass and intimidate its staff
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26652

[Warlady]

My influence here is truly frightening... Mwahahahahaha...:evilgrin:

Laz you knock me out. :thud:

[Native American]

30 November 2004
Entire run of the November issue of the Yale Free Press, a conservative student publication, was stolen over the Thanksgiving break
http://www.yaledailynews.com/article.asp?AID=27532

[Lazarus]

I love how Adams includes the email addresses of the principle culprits...

We as a nation had better get off our collective ASS and take back our universities... There has always been a certain amount of liberal thinking in these institutions, but lately the radical Socialists have all but taken total control of the Administrations of OUR colleges...

The Brown Shirts are not just a historical detail of Hitler's rise to power... They are alive and well in the Radical Leftist movement to take over this nation... I am absolutely convinced that we will see an attempted Violent Revolution in this country in the next few years...

[Native American]

October 1999
Liberals at California State University at Sacramento stole 3,000 copies of the student newspaper. They were enraged because the paper, The State Hornet, had published the picture of a Hispanic man being arrested and charged with resisting arrest at a football game.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/hentoff062600.asp

[Native American]

(no definite date)
Liberals set fire to copies of The Cornell Review after it published an illustration by syndicated newspaper cartoonist Chuck Asay, titled "Which One of These Kills More Blacks?" There were three panels -- a Ku Klux Klan murder by fire; followers of Hitler in front of a large swastika; and a doctor about to perform an abortion in a Planned Parenthood clinic.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/hentoff062600.asp

[Native American]

17 February 1995
Liberals destroy copies of newspaper at DePaul University and violently seize the newspaper office
http://collegefreedom.org/95press.htm

[Native American]

1992
Liberals vandalize offices of The Collegian at the University of Massachusetts
http://collegefreedom.org/95press.htm

[Pendragon_6]

I figured this post would grow fast. Thanks to all who added to this thread. Now we can keep a record of this type of left-wing extremism.

[Maggie_T]

I agree, Pen. I suggest we delete this from the Hall of Fame forum so that we can have all the info at hand all the time. I can't wait to rub it on the snotty nose of some people I know. :devil:

On the same subject, stand by for David Horowitz' book in which he exposes all the America-hating communits SOBs that "teach" at colleges. Sean Hannity had David on his show last week and what David told made my hair stand on end.

I don't remember the name of the book, but I will look into it. As David told Sean, the only way to fight the bastards is to expose them. Agreed.

[Maggie_T]

Ok, here's the book:

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0895260034.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg


And not surprisingly:


ACLU Attacks David Horowitz's Book: 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America. (https://members.humaneventsonline.com/blog-detail.php?id=12481)

"A coalition of liberal groups and teachers’ unions -- including the ACLU, People For the American Way and the National Education Association -- is denouncing David Horowitz’s new book, The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=ur2&tag=humaneventson-20&camp=1789&creative=9325&path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fproduct%2F 0895260034%2Fsr%3D8-1%2Fqid%3D1140018186%2Fref%3Dpd_bbs_1%3F%255Fencod ing%3DUTF8)."

Hah! ACLU, People for the American Way, NEA: The axis of America-haters. Color me not surprised.


Snip: "The book is purposefully misleading," said Kathy Sproles, president of the National Education Association's National Council for Higher Education. “Mr. Horowitz claims to be protecting the classroom, but most of his stories talk about activities that happen outside the classroom. The only thing Horowitz proves in this book is the distance he is willing to go to silence his critics.”


Uh-huh. Sure. Whatever you say, b****. :rolleyes:


Needless to say, I've already ordered my copy. ;)

[Maggie_T]

The liberal groups belonging to “Free Exchange on Campus”...

An oximoron, if there ever was one. :rolleyes:

Free exchange of what? Bush-bashing? Slurs against conservatives? Hate-speech against Christians?

This just further proves that liberals have completely lost it, and that they are the worst liars that ever walked the face of the earth.

[Native American]

Maggie, another book you might want to take a look at is Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild, by Michelle Malkin. Haven't read that one myself, but Malkin is quite good, and it's a title I came across while searching for some of the examples of the neo-Nazi behavior of Liberals that I posted, above.

[Maggie_T]

Oh, I read that, NA. I read every conservative book that comes out. ;)

You should read it, if you can. Beware, though. You might have to shower afterwards. Michelle reproduced the insults she gets from the "tolerant left" verbatim.

Talk about pottymouth. Yech!

[Native American]

Oh, I read that, NA. I read every conservative book that comes out. ;)

You should read it, if you can. Beware, though. You might have to shower afterwards. Michelle reproduced the insults she gets from the "tolerant left" verbatim.

Talk about pottymouth. Yech!

Yes, I can well imagine! The neo-Nazi liberals/Democrats tend to be mindless (and quite crude and rude) pigs.

[Maggie_T]

Absolutely.

[Naturalized-Texan]

Let us not forget the vandalism committed against dozens of Bush for President HQs across the country during the 2004 campaign, including shooting out plate glass windows while campaign workers were present, the theft and/or destruction of computers, and the slashing of tires on get-out-the-vote vans.

[Native American]

Let us not forget the vandalism committed against dozens of Bush for President HQs across the country during the 2004 campaign, including shooting out plate glass windows while campaign workers were present, the theft and/or destruction of computers, and the slashing of tires on get-out-the-vote vans.

Hey, c'mon NT - that's just the fabled Democrat Party compassion, on display! Cut those Dimmie neo-Nazis some slack, willya?

[Warlady]

Thanks for the heads up on the new Malkin book. I'll order it tonight. I also want to thank you for your additions to this thread. Great job.

[ldb83]

Anybody ever read any some liberal literature?

[DoctorDoom]

Anybody ever read any some liberal literature?I farking well wouldn't buy it, but I have donned my HazMat gear, updated all my vaccinations, and surfed into liberal websites. The raw, untempered evil and hatred flow in them like toxic waste. If the despicable bastards ever took over this country, they'd try to sell us out to our enemies in a heartbeat.

What the stupid schittes fail to realize is that if they ever had the sort of government that they want, their heads would be the first on the chopping block. Assholes are always the first to go in a dictatorship.

Fortunately, America is waking up to the dangers posed by the scumbags. Their lust for power will go unsated, they will go even further toward the wild side, and their self-destruiction will accelerate. And they won't be missed.

[Native American]

I farking well wouldn't buy it, but I have donned my HazMat gear, updated all my vaccinations, and surfed into liberal websites. The raw, untempered evil and hatred flow in them like toxic waste. If the despicable bastards ever took over this country, they'd try to sell us out to our enemies in a heartbeat.

What the stupid schittes fail to realize is that if they ever had the sort of government that they want, their heads would be the first on the chopping block. Assholes are always the first to go in a dictatorship.

Fortunately, America is waking up to the dangers posed by the scumbags. Their lust for power will go unsated, they will go even further toward the wild side, and their self-destruiction will accelerate. And they won't be missed.

One of the great strengths of the Internet is that it is restoring free speech in this country. Once again people can say what they really think, without having ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN/New York Times/Washington Post dictate what politically correct "thinking" is on the various issues of the day.

But, make no mistake - the scumbags try their darndest to dictate their will in that media also, and attempt to blackball discussion forums that aren't "PC". That's neo-Nazi behavior on the part of those scumbags, and it must be opposed, for the sake of our country, and also for the sake of one of our most precious freedoms - the freedom of speech.

[Naturalized-Texan]

Anybody ever read any some liberal literature?
We are bombarded by liberal lies from the so-called mainstream media every day year in and year out. We don't need to read the lies contained in liberal "literature" to find out what liberals think.

[ldb83]

But, make no mistake - the scumbags try their darndest to dictate their will in that media also, and attempt to blackball discussion forums that aren't "PC". That's neo-Nazi behavior on the part of those scumbags, and it must be opposed, for the sake of our country, and also for the sake of one of our most precious freedoms - the freedom of speech.

I farking well wouldn't buy it, but I have donned my HazMat gear, updated all my vaccinations, and surfed into liberal websites. The raw, untempered evil and hatred flow in them like toxic waste.

Are either of you capable of noticing how strikingly similar you sound to those exact lefties? What I've seen from extreme liberals is basically the same type of statements as those, save a few keywords. Name-calling, generalizing, and basically saying "We must never tolerate these intolerant bastards".

The reasons that arguments in liberal forums are so ridiculous is for the same reason that a lot in conservative forums are. The people who join forums like that, right or left, typically do so because there are few other places where they feel safe letting out what they know is extremely biased frustration. But when a person's liberalism is defined basically by little more than their anti-conservatism, or when their conservatism is basically defined by their anti-liberalism, their arguments tend to be pretty warped. That's why some liberals blame Bush for everything. That's why you all can't stop talking about Cindy Sheehan. Because we all need an outlet for our frustration, don't we? If the liberal equivalent of freeconservatives is where you go to try to determine the thoughts of liberals in general, it makes sense why your thoughts, too, tend to be so bent.

[Native American]

Are either of you capable of noticing how strikingly similar you sound to those exact lefties? What I've seen from extreme liberals is basically the same type of statements as those, save a few keywords. Name-calling, generalizing, and basically saying "We must never tolerate these intolerant bastards".

I'm referring to personal attacks the intolerant leftist bastards make against other posters, personally. Which is something I don't do. So no, I don't act like them, at least not in terms of attacking them personally or namecalling them personally.

If you disagree, feel free to quote a post of mine where I personally attacked some leftist bastard poster.

[Native American]

The reasons that arguments in liberal forums are so ridiculous is for the same reason that a lot in conservative forums are. The people who join forums like that, right or left, typically do so because there are few other places where they feel safe letting out what they know is extremely biased frustration. But when a person's liberalism is defined basically by little more than their anti-conservatism, or when their conservatism is basically defined by their anti-liberalism, their arguments tend to be pretty warped. That's why some liberals blame Bush for everything. That's why you all can't stop talking about Cindy Sheehan.

Actually, unless I am mistaken, you are the very first person in this thread to talk about Cindy Sheehan! So not only have we not "not stopped talking about Cindy Sheehan" in this thread, we haven't even started talking about her! So you sound silly with that claim of yours.

BTW, I'm not aware of even one single conservative poster on this website who blames Cindy Sheehan for everything.

So you were wrong, on both of those silly claims of yours!

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

September 2004, Gainesville, FL
Independent Florida Alligator - NEWS (http://www.alligator.org/edit/news/issues/stories/040920punch.html)
College Instructor Assaults GOP Chairman


A SFCC instructor was arrested Thursday after taking on two rivals: a leader of the county’s Republican Party and a life-size cardboard cutout of President George W. Bush, Gainesville Police say. Gainesville Police charged 55-year-old David Philip McCally with battery and criminal mischief, after he allegedly assaulted Travis Horn, Alachua County Republican Executive Committee chairman.

[DoctorDoom]

The people who join forums like that, right or left, typically do so because there are few other places where they feel safe letting out what they know is extremely biased frustration.I state flatly that I am biased.

• My bias is for the Christian faith.
• My bias is for public expressions of faith without lawsuits.
• My bias is for prayer being brought back into schools.
• My bias is for the Three Rs rather than sex-ed and "gay" propaganda.
• My bias is for school vouchers.
• My bias is for conservative ideals.
• My bias is for limited, constitutionally-authorized government.
• My bias is for term limits to rid the Congress of senile dinosaurs
• My bias is for the SCOTUS interpreting laws based on the Constitution rather than interpreting the Constitution to justify laws.
• My bias is for courts ruling on legal issues rather than enacting de facto legislation.
• My bias is for a strong national defense.
• My bias is for the extermination of terrorists by any means necessary.
• My bias is against multi-generational welfare leeches.
• My bias is against trillions of dollars being spent on useless "social programs".
• My bias is against my taxes being used to support murdering the preborn.
• My bias is against the social acceptance of perversion and immorality.
• My bias is against the campaign to destroy the Boy Scouts for refusing to accept queers and atheists.
• My bias is against obsequious catering to every whining atheist/liberal.
• My bias is for free speech for everyone, not just for liberals.
• My bias is for a press that isn't liplocked to the RAT party.
• My bias is for a press that is accountable for publicizing military and intelligence secrets.
• My bias is for calling treason by its rightful name.
• My bias is for prosecution of Americans who give aid and comfort to America's enemies.
• My bias is for revoking the citizenship of Americans who travel overseas to incite hatred of America.
• My bias is for The United States of America, the greatest nation on Earth and in history.
• My bias is for unashamed patriotism and love of America.
• And my bias is against any son of a bitch who would do her wrong.

You bet your liberal butt I'm biased!

<table align="center" bgcolor="white" bordercolor="cccccc" border="2" cellpadding="8"><tr><td><div align="center"><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/flag.gif"/><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/flag.gif"/><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/flag.gif"/></div></td></tr></table><br><table align="center" bgcolor="400000" bordercolor="cccccc" border="2" cellpadding="8"><tr><td><div align="center"><font face="Verdana" color="ff6060" size="7"><b>God <font color="white">Bless</font> <font color="6060ff">America!</font><font size="4"><br></font></b> </font></div></td></tr></table>

And if you don't like that ...

<table align="center" bgcolor="white" bordercolor="CCCCCC" border="4" cellpadding="8"><tr><td><div align="center"><font face="Verdana" color="blue" size="6"><b>Plant a wet one on my<br>my 100% <font color="red">red-blooded</font><br><font color="blue">American ass!</font><font size="4"><br></font></b> </font></div></td></tr></table>

[DoctorDoom]

We now return you to your regularly-scheduled thread topic.

[Maggie_T]

I state flatly that I am biased.

• My bias is for the Christian faith.
• My bias is for public expressions of faith without lawsuits.
• My bias is for prayer being brought back into schools.
• My bias is for the Three Rs rather than sex-ed and "gay" propaganda.
• My bias is for school vouchers.
• My bias is for conservative ideals.
• My bias is for limited, constitutionally-authorized government.
• My bias is for term limits to rid the Congress of senile dinosaurs
• My bias is for the SCOTUS interpreting laws based on the Constitution rather than interpreting the Constitution to justify laws.
• My bias is for courts ruling on legal issues rather than enacting de facto legislation.
• My bias is for a strong national defense.
• My bias is for the extermination of terrorists by any means necessary.
• My bias is against multi-generational welfare leeches.
• My bias is against trillions of dollars being spent on useless "social programs".
• My bias is against my taxes being used to support murdering the preborn.
• My bias is against the social acceptance of perversion and immorality.
• My bias is against the campaign to destroy the Boy Scouts for refusing to accept queers and atheists.
• My bias is against obsequious catering to every whining atheist/liberal.
• My bias is for free speech for everyone, not just for liberals.
• My bias is for a press that isn't liplocked to the RAT party.
• My bias is for a press that is accountable for publicizing military and intelligence secrets.
• My bias is for calling treason by its rightful name.
• My bias is for prosecution of Americans who give aid and comfort to America's enemies.
• My bias is for revoking the citizenship of Americans who travel overseas to incite hatred of America.
• My bias is for The United States of America, the greatest nation on Earth and in history.
• My bias is for unashamed patriotism and love of America.
• And my bias is against any son of a bitch who would do her wrong.

You bet your liberal butt I'm biased!

<TABLE borderColor=#cccccc cellPadding=8 align=center bgColor=white border=2><TBODY><TR><TD>http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/flag.gifhttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/flag.gifhttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/flag.gif
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE borderColor=#cccccc cellPadding=8 align=center bgColor=#400000 border=2><TBODY><TR><TD>God Bless America!

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

And if you don't like that ...

<TABLE borderColor=#cccccc cellPadding=8 align=center bgColor=white border=4><TBODY><TR><TD>Plant a wet one on my
my 100% red-blooded
American ass!

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


A-BLOODY-MEN!!!!:claps:

[Native American]

21 February 2006
Rude liberal heckles and attempts to shout down Supreme Court justice
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/21/D8FTQ63O1.html

[BaronKelan]

Well said Doc! Those are valid biases that describe what America used to be. There used to be shame for those who sponged off the system and had babies out of wedlock. The Boy/Girl Scouts used to be a program people were proud to have their children involved with (I made it to Eagle). We used to honor those who were rugged individualists instead of punishing them with high taxes or trying to make them feel inferior because they are not "politically correct." And we were especially proud of those who served this country in the military to protect our freedoms.

I am love your biases and proudly support all those things you mentioned. I especially support free speech and reject the violence of anyone who would deny people to support the candidate of their choice. Violence is not pursuasion in a political debate and those who resort to such should be treated as the criminals they are.

[ldb83]

Actually, unless I am mistaken, you are the very first person in this thread to talk about Cindy Sheehan! So not only have we not "not stopped talking about Cindy Sheehan" in this thread, we haven't even started talking about her! So you sound silly with that claim of yours.

BTW, I'm not aware of even one single conservative poster on this website who blames Cindy Sheehan for everything.

So you were wrong, on both of those silly claims of yours!

Good grief. Would you like to claim that Cindy Sheehan hasn't been brought up a great number of times on this site in the past year? Who cares if I was the first to mention her in this specific thread, I mentioned her to get to a greater point. Maybe you should sit a couple more inches away from the monitor so that you can start to notice that instead of cherry picking little phrases out of whatever I'm trying to say. And where the hell did I say anybody blames Sheehan for anything? Normally that stupid post wouldn't warrant a response from me but damn, that's annoying.

[Native American]

Good grief. Would you like to claim that Cindy Sheehan hasn't been brought up a great number of times on this site in the past year? Who cares if I was the first to mention her in this specific thread, I mentioned her to get to a greater point. Maybe you should sit a couple more inches away from the monitor so that you can start to notice that instead of cherry picking little phrases out of whatever I'm trying to say. And where the hell did I say anybody blames Sheehan for anything? Normally that stupid post wouldn't warrant a response from me but damn, that's annoying.

Thanks for asking.

Idb82, 2/21/2006 11:59 AM:

Are either of you capable of noticing how strikingly similar you sound to those exact lefties? What I've seen from extreme liberals is basically the same type of statements as those, save a few keywords. Name-calling, generalizing, and basically saying "We must never tolerate these intolerant bastards".

The reasons that arguments in liberal forums are so ridiculous is for the same reason that a lot in conservative forums are. The people who join forums like that, right or left, typically do so because there are few other places where they feel safe letting out what they know is extremely biased frustration. But when a person's liberalism is defined basically by little more than their anti-conservatism, or when their conservatism is basically defined by their anti-liberalism, their arguments tend to be pretty warped. That's why some liberals blame Bush for everything. That's why you all can't stop talking about Cindy Sheehan.

[emphasis added]

[queue]

Nov. 10, 2004
Republican monitors attacked in Philadelphia.
http://www.cavalierdaily.com/CVarticle.asp?ID=21349&pid=1216

[Pendragon_6]

• My bias is for the Christian faith.
• My bias is for public expressions of faith without lawsuits.
• My bias is for prayer being brought back into schools.
• My bias is for the Three Rs rather than sex-ed and "gay" propaganda.
• My bias is for school vouchers.
• My bias is for conservative ideals.
• My bias is for limited, constitutionally-authorized government.
• My bias is for term limits to rid the Congress of senile dinosaurs
• My bias is for the SCOTUS interpreting laws based on the Constitution rather than interpreting the Constitution to justify laws.
• My bias is for courts ruling on legal issues rather than enacting de facto legislation.
• My bias is for a strong national defense.
• My bias is for the extermination of terrorists by any means necessary.
• My bias is against multi-generational welfare leeches.
• My bias is against trillions of dollars being spent on useless "social programs".
• My bias is against my taxes being used to support murdering the preborn.
• My bias is against the social acceptance of perversion and immorality.
• My bias is against the campaign to destroy the Boy Scouts for refusing to accept queers and atheists.
• My bias is against obsequious catering to every whining atheist/liberal.
• My bias is for free speech for everyone, not just for liberals.
• My bias is for a press that isn't liplocked to the RAT party.
• My bias is for a press that is accountable for publicizing military and intelligence secrets.
• My bias is for calling treason by its rightful name.
• My bias is for prosecution of Americans who give aid and comfort to America's enemies.
• My bias is for revoking the citizenship of Americans who travel overseas to incite hatred of America.
• My bias is for The United States of America, the greatest nation on Earth and in history.
• My bias is for unashamed patriotism and love of America.
• And my bias is against any son of a bitch who would do her wrong.

You bet your liberal butt I'm biased!
:claps:
Doc:

This deserves a gold plaque.

[Maggie_T]

Speaking of vandals, I just got Horowitz's book The Professors - The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America. Oh, dear. It's much thicker than I thought. :(

Before I read it, I'm going to make sure I have plenty of Pepto Bismol at hand.

[Maggie_T]

Guys, you MUST read the above-mentioned book. Especially if you have kids.

WARNING: Expect your blood pressure to rise.

However, it is a MUST read.

[Maggie_T]

Nov. 10, 2004
Republican monitors attacked in Philadelphia.
http://www.cavalierdaily.com/CVarticle.asp?ID=21349&pid=1216

Sickening.

[hdmundt]

ACLU Attacks David Horowitz's Book: 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America. (https://members.humaneventsonline.com/blog-detail.php?id=12481)

"A coalition of liberal groups and teachers’ unions -- including the ACLU, People For the American Way and the National Education Association -- is denouncing David Horowitz’s new book, The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=ur2&tag=humaneventson-20&camp=1789&creative=9325&path=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fgp%2Fproduct%2F 0895260034%2Fsr%3D8-1%2Fqid%3D1140018186%2Fref%3Dpd_bbs_1%3F%255Fencod ing%3DUTF8)."

Hah! ACLU, People for the American Way, NEA: The axis of America-haters. Color me not surprised.


I saw Horowitz on CSPAN, yesterday, addressing a crowd of students/faculty at Duke Unversity. He gave examples from his book of faculty incompetence and intimidation of administrators. The guy has guts. He even took a couple of Duke faculty members to task. He was, of course, heckled by the more childish of the audience members. It was an interesting hour. (The dreadfully serious queries from the students during the Q&A session were priceless). I read his frontpagemag.com on occassion and his book is on my to-get list.

[Maggie_T]

Horowitz is one of my heroes. I heard him on Hannity talk show when he went there to talk about his book.

Of course, the only "argument" the left could come up with was "He just bad-mouths those who disagree with him." Yeah, that from the "enlightened" geniuses in academia, who look down on the rest of us lesser mortals. :rolleyes:

[Truth_Hunter]

This is all classic Communist operational doctrine... It is a clear and blatant policy of Communists that violence against their political opponents is perfectly justified if the Communist agenda is furthered...

The Left is becoming more andf more bold in their aggression against their opponents... We can expect more violence in the next 3 years as we go thru another mid-term Congressional race as well as the next Presidential race... I wont at all be suprised if blood is shed by these animals before this is over...

And they are always accusing the Right of being the violent ones...

They should pay heed to the scriptures where they say, "What you sew, so shall you reap..."


Please read Matthew 6, about how the Hypocrite Pharisees always trumped their goodness in Public, even as they did evil in private ("outside ye are as white sepulchres, but inside full of dead mens bones").

The Pharisees were TRAITORS to Judea. The Sadducees were blatant Roman-installed puppets. But the Pharisees were, with but a few staunch exceptions like Gamaliel and Nicodemus, sell outs. Their lucrative trade businesses all ran through Roman held territory, especially the Mediterranean itself.

So, in order to make their money, they did as Rome wished.

But to MAKE UP FOR THE TREASONOUS ACTIVITIES DONE IN PRIVATE...

they TRUMPETED JUST HOW GOOD THEY WERE IN PUBLIC. "Preemption", if you will, hard to accuse somebody of doing something bad if they are looking so good.

I know allot of Leftists.

I guarantee you all but the most gullible and deluded know what they are doing.

They pre-emptively trumpet their COMPASSION FOR WHALES and TREES...

FOR A REASON

[Native American]

March 30, 2006 - Washington, DC

Liberal and Democrat congressman Cynthia McKinney viciously slugged a Capital Police officer who spotted McKinney attempting to avoid a scanner.

Members of Congress are allowed to bypass the metal detectors and security checkpoint. However, they are required to wear a lapel pin that identifies them as lawmakers, and McKinney has already admitted she wasn't wearing one when she was stopped for dodging the scanner.