Hitlerish Liberal suggests mass murder on all handicapped people

[Republican_Legion]

http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=44435&page=1&pp=20
This is from a thread from another forum.
This guy 'Atheist Peace' rants on with his hitlerish views.
I've never seen such disgusting crap on the internet before.


You're missing the point. Intelligent people are fundamentally better and worth much, much more than unintelligent (esp. retards, who should ALL be aborted before birth) people, and educated people are better than uneducated, ignorant people. http://www.twcenter.net/forums/images/smilies/emoticons/wink.gif


The problem is finding a solution. Perhaps some kind of mass-murder and "cleansing" of the masses. The problem comes with who gets to decide who lives...



As far as I'm concerned, those who are more intelligent are better functioning humans, and those who are intelligent and educated, or at least strive for education, are going to better humanity, or at least be better people IMO. Plus, I just have a disdain for stupid, ignorant people. <!-- / message --><!-- sig -->


The DNC needs someone like 'Atheist Peace' to be their campaign spokes person....hmmm the GOP would get probally around 95% of the vote with that scumbag leading the DNC

[Teenager]

His name is an irony of itself. Apparantly he is suggesting that he is a "peaceful atheist," who supports the killing of innocents.

It's people like him who have never experianced unconditional love... and need it.

[Melz]

Did anyone agree with him? Did they tell him that he should not be among the living with comments like that???

[Republican_Legion]

Did anyone agree with him? Did they tell him that he should not be among the living with comments like that???

1 person agreed with him and all the other liberals distanced themselfs from him and some liberals openly disagreed with him. If we ever need a antidote to cure Liberals into Mild Liberals 'Atheist Peace' can sure make even some staunch Liberals question their beliefs.

[DeclinetoState]

Atheist_Peace sounds like a Margaret Sanger eugenicist.

[JNSmith]

I didn't read it all, because I need a shower after that, but if he hsan't been called on it yet, you may want to note that he said something about a "mass murder" in one post, then recants in a nother about only wanting to abort, and is against killing the "living".

[papaimp]

Abortion is killing the living!
He's only fooling hisself......and his Comrades.

[absinthe]

The romans did it---leaving distorted babies by the roadside.

Perhaps I'm jaded. I shared an apartment, way back in the day, with someone who was a 'care-giver' for a pair of downsyndrome guys. They were in their early 20's.

I eventually told him that he wasnt allowed to bring them around anymore. Something about throwing pickles/mustard from their hamburgers on my walls just didnt sit well with me. And the memory of that super stong guy flipping out on my TV because it didnt have Melrose Place on any channels at the time (not making this up).

I quit asking him why he cared for those types of people. He just said i was a callous person at heart but never once could he come up with anyway those 2 guys would ever be anything more than a serious drain on someones resources.

Did their parents love them?..I guess so. But I still fail to see why I should help foot the bill. No one ever helped foot the bill for any of my pets, some of which were by far more intelligent--and that is the truth, not sarcasm.

I've got no problem with the whole live-and-let-live idea. Just dont live near me. Seems conservative enough.

[Rink]

Those Down syndrome boys were not raised right, it takes a LOT of patience to raise kids of that sort and they CAN learn.

At the age of 20 its a little too late, they should have been repetitively corrected till they got the idea that sort of behavior is not wanted.

If a person can teach a dog manners, if a person can teach a horse manners after being allowed to break all the manners rules, if a person can teach a wild cat tameness then human beings, even down syndrome sufferers can also learn.

Just takes a LOT of time and a lot of patience.

One question if these do-gooders who feel the intelligent should be promoted and the unintelligent be eliminated from human society then my question would be WHO determines who is, and who isnt intelligent?

AND who is to say those who do the determination of a persons intelligence might target those advocating the mass extermination of the unintelligent from the 'gene' pool?

Someone needs to confront them with that.

Been handicapped from birth, hearing impaired and I have had Public School Experts declare that I was a 'Retard' and consequently shoved me into the 'Special education classes' with the rest of the severely handicaped.

Later on when tested by DVR (Division of Vocational Rehabilitation) to see how I was in the IQ department and my handicap and how it affected my comprehension and learning skills they found my internal intelligence up in the genius range, and reg IQ in the Avove average rance, the reason why it was lower on the IQ scale than that of the internal intelligence quotient is because my hearing impairment impacted my speech and language skills which impacted my comprehension and learning ability (to a certain extent)

I was not and never was a 'retard'

So who determines who is and isnt intelligent enough to live and what happens if these 'experts' make a huge mistake like they did with me???

"Oopps we made a mistake thus-and-such shoulndt have been killed he was mislabeled, sorry!!"

Thats what these dumbshits are gonna get if they get into this crap.

[absinthe]

So who determines who is and isnt intelligent enough to live and what happens if these 'experts' make a huge mistake like they did with me???


I'm with ya on that---that would be the whole problem. Granted, his comment about the wholesale slughtering might apply if we were talking about an easily definable uselessness such as..say..the country of Niger....I'm right with you on seeing it as hard to support.

Who makes the decision? Who defines the criteria? On this one, I only have an opinion. Call me a fencesitter if you will, but more accurately, I'm one of those that has to watch what I say in public as I generally have zero regards for the life of my fellow man. but thats just me.

There are times when I see handicap people and think--"daymn! that would truly suck to be like that!" But it still does not inspire in me any form of sympathy.

I'm all for some hard-core stem-cell chop-em-up genetic research to eliminate handicaps. And intelligence. I've been around enough inbreeding over here and also when I lived in Alaska so that no one can tell me that genetics dont play a role in intelligence.

Yea, intelligence would surely be a stickler to define. Its all relative to the next guy. I can't offer any solutions other than if some people could be identified with genetic traits that their offspring would be sorely 'disadvantaged', ...possibly limit procreation? I know--thats enough to have me flamed for a week but sometimes, really. The 'family' in Ohio, (I think that was it?), 2 non-indipendant adults hooking up through their mutual care center and having kids that were more deformed than they and having the intellect of a pack of tic-tacs. I think someone would be hard pressed to justify that as being a 'right' to bear children.

The vast majority of locals around me are all on the same wavelength--gutteral, yelling, dangerously animated during speech :smile: , bickering about minutae--all in all...like an arabic jerry springer after party Flea Market.

And for them---thats perfectly normal---even at may advanced levels of the new government.

But in western Europe or the Canadian/US arenas? no...they would not even be tolerable. Seen as a wholly un-imaginative lot that uses group-think mentality where indipendant thought is considered bad. They would be the ones eliminated if someone were to make that decision. But I'm about to get off topic with that example.......

hmmm....guess i posted a little more than a quick reply

[Scared]

"Okay, well, I was half joking, I guess. I really do think that, ideally, all severely retarded babies would be better off being aborted, but I definitely said extreme things I didn't really mean. If you knew me personally, you'd understand. I sometimes tend to take very extreme points of view like this, which I know will **** a lot of people off, and then "advocate" them. That probably isn't the best explanation, but that's basically what that was."

[Republican_Legion]

Those Down syndrome boys were not raised right, it takes a LOT of patience to raise kids of that sort and they CAN learn.

At the age of 20 its a little too late, they should have been repetitively corrected till they got the idea that sort of behavior is not wanted.

If a person can teach a dog manners, if a person can teach a horse manners after being allowed to break all the manners rules, if a person can teach a wild cat tameness then human beings, even down syndrome sufferers can also learn.

Just takes a LOT of time and a lot of patience.

One question if these do-gooders who feel the intelligent should be promoted and the unintelligent be eliminated from human society then my question would be WHO determines who is, and who isnt intelligent?

AND who is to say those who do the determination of a persons intelligence might target those advocating the mass extermination of the unintelligent from the 'gene' pool?

Someone needs to confront them with that.

Been handicapped from birth, hearing impaired and I have had Public School Experts declare that I was a 'Retard' and consequently shoved me into the 'Special education classes' with the rest of the severely handicaped.

Later on when tested by DVR (Division of Vocational Rehabilitation) to see how I was in the IQ department and my handicap and how it affected my comprehension and learning skills they found my internal intelligence up in the genius range, and reg IQ in the Avove average rance, the reason why it was lower on the IQ scale than that of the internal intelligence quotient is because my hearing impairment impacted my speech and language skills which impacted my comprehension and learning ability (to a certain extent)

I was not and never was a 'retard'

So who determines who is and isnt intelligent enough to live and what happens if these 'experts' make a huge mistake like they did with me???

"Oopps we made a mistake thus-and-such shoulndt have been killed he was mislabeled, sorry!!"

Thats what these dumbshits are gonna get if they get into this crap.

Rink, I went thru special ed also, I have Asperger Syndrome(high functioning autism).

[DesertFox]

That guy is so far off-the-wall that I suspect he's simply a troll.