Republicans Rip Democrats' 'Real Security' Plan

[Pendragon_6]

By Susan Jones
CNSNews.com Senior Editor
March 30, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - Democrats say Americans deserve "Real Security," and if Americans vote for Democrats, that's what they'll get.

But Republicans say the Democrats have missed numerous opportunities to demonstrate their commitment to national security. Their votes belie their promises, some say.

At a press conference in Washington Wednesday, Democrat leaders outlined a plan intended to demonstrate that "Democrats are the party of real national security."

"The highest responsibility of government is to protect the security of every American," said Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. "After five years of Republican incompetence, Americans have had enough. They expect and demand policies that are tough and smart," he said.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said Democrats have put forward an agenda that "offers a new direction - on that is strong and smart, one that understands the challenges America faces in a post 9/11 world."



In Full
CNS News (http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=\Politics\archive\200603\POL 20060330c.html)

[PatrioticAmerican]

There are only two things full of shit in this world: colons and Democrats.

[DeclinetoState]

There are only two things full of shit in this world: colons and Democrats.

Would you like my gut reaction to that statement?

[Native American]

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said Democrats have put forward an agenda that "offers a new direction - on that is strong and smart, one that understands the challenges America faces in a post 9/11 world."

So what are Nancy and the Democrats' specific plans? Also, why did the Democrats wait over 4 years before deciding they would "offer a new direction"?

I also notice Nancy and the Democrats, unlike President Bush, never have any actual specifics to offer.

[DoctorDoom]

The RATs are obsessed with banning the monitoring of terrorist communications. They're on a crusade to undermine the administration and the military in Iraq and the WoT. XXX-42 ignored three offers to deliver bin Laden, did nothing when al Qaeda repeatedly attacked the US, sold military secrets to the Chicoms for campaign funds, and gutted the intelligence agencies. And they support "Real Security"?

If it weren't so pathetic, it would be laughable.

[Naturalized-Texan]

Since when is treason real security?