Cell Phone Auction | Mortgage Calculator | Payday Advance | Online Loans | Loans
20 years after Chernobyl [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : 20 years after Chernobyl


DesertFox
04-14-2006, 04:57 PM
Steven Milloy
Foxnews.com
13 Apr 06


April 26 marks the 20th anniversary of the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Anti-nuclear activists are still trying to turn Chernobyl into a bigger disaster than it really was.

Although the Number Four nuclear reactor at Chernobyl exploded just before dawn on April 26, 1986, Soviet secrecy prevented the world from learning about the accident for days. Once details began to emerge, however, the anti-nuclear scare machine swung into action.

Three days after the accident Greenpeace “scientists” predicted the accident would cause 10,000 people to get cancer over a 20-year period within a 625-mile radius of the plant. Greenpeace also estimated that 2,000 to 4,000 people in Sweden would develop cancer over a 30-year period from the radioactive fallout.

At the same time, Helen Caldicott, president emeritus of the anti-nuclear Physicians for Social Responsibility, predicted the accident would cause almost 300,000 cancers in 5 to 50 years and cause almost 1 million people either to be rendered sterile or mentally retarded, or to develop radiation sickness, menstrual problems and other health problems.

University of California-Berkeley medical physicist and nuclear power critic Dr. John Gofman made the most dire forecast. He predicted at an American Chemical Society meeting that the Chernobyl accident would cause 1 million cancers worldwide, half of them fatal. ...

As of mid-2005, fewer than 50 deaths were attributed to radiation from the accident – that’s according to a report, entitled “Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts,” produced by an international team of 100 scientists working under the auspices of the United Nations. Almost all of those 50 deaths were rescue workers who were highly exposed to radiation and died within months of the accident.

So far, there have been about 4,000 cases of thyroid cancer, mainly in children. But except for nine deaths, all of those with thyroid cancer have recovered, according to the report. ...

More (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191721,00.html)

DoctorDoom
04-14-2006, 05:30 PM
Liberals are as predictable as beer farts. They're unfathomably clueless, they lie through their teeth, and their "statistics" are invariably one digit followed by zeroes because at-a-glance numbers draw more attention. Compare:

2,000 to 4,000. 10,000. 300,000. 500,000. 1,000,000.

2,074 to 3,852. 11,841. 301,694. 518,227. 1,092,616.

Liberals almost always cite a "statistic" that follows that pattern. Look up their numbers on iraq. The fewer non-zero digits there are, the better they like them. The sheeple can read them without having to think.

I've been dealing with those farking morons since the 70s, and their only saving grace is that they are consistent: from the days of chaining themselves to fences at Diablo Canyon and Seabrook till this very day, they have remained pristinely ignorant of even the most basic scientific facts about nuclear technology. And they are invariably leftist looneytoons.

For the next several decades at least, only nuclear power can replace fossil-fuel-fired generation. And as the article notes, the very same dipshits who are screeching about greenhouse gases are rabidly opposed to nukes. Their rationale is simple: a shortage of energy will give them power to dictate how others will live. They don't want clean, safe, abundant energy. They want chronic shortages, with them in control of how it is dispensed.

"It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy because of what we might do with it. We ought to be looking for energy sources that don't give us the excesses of concentrated energy with which we could do mischief to each other."
-- Amory Lovins, Mother Earth News, 11-12/77

"In fact, giving society cheap abundant energy at this point would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun."
-- Paul Erlich, Not Man Apart (Friends of The Earth), Vol 5, No. 18, Sept 1975

They are elitists, absolutely convinced that they are superior beings and that they have a divine right to be in charge. If everyone else suffers, they don't care, because they will be exempt.

Can you say "limousine liberals", boys and girls?

DesertFox
04-14-2006, 05:59 PM
Can you say "limousine liberals", boys and girls?Yes, sir. But I don't want to. Do I hafta? Do I really gots to? Huh? huh? huh?