This is just so wrong, so terribly, terribly wrong

[DeclinetoState]

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Censored.jpg" /> (http://news.search.yahoo.com/search/news?p=mexico+farmers+nude&fr=&c=news_photos)

Why do ugly people insist on appearing in public in the buff?


Edited by DD to eliminate the pic, which is here. (http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/ap/20060421/capt.mogb10404211805.mexico_naked_protesters_mogb1 04.jpg?x=209&y=345&sig=T2v7xFqeJe1msHGvtQ0f9w--) Click the graphic for the source.

[Warlady]

What's wrong is you posting nudes on this site where children can view them.

[DoctorDoom]

According to part of the Yahoo image URL, these are "mexico_naked_protesters". The Mexicriminals must be showing us that they have nothing to hide. And the idiots want us to take them seriously.

[Charity]

What's wrong is you posting nudes on this site where children can view them.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

You read my mind Warlady.

[DeclinetoState]

What's wrong is you posting nudes on this site where children can view them.

It was from Yahoo, not exactly known as a porn site.

[Trevelyan]

It was from Yahoo, not exactly known as a porn site.

Hah, I was expecting something more than I saw when I clicked the link to the photo, considering the fact it was censored.

[DoctorDoom]

The picture is still accessible and linked to, but many Freecers have kids around mommy or daddy when the puter is on. Good judgment dictates not having such photos in the posts.

[sunsettommy]

I find no reason for this thread to exist.

What was the point Decline to State?

[DeclinetoState]

"What was the point Decline to State?<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->"

Read my question in the OP.

"Good judgment dictates not having such photos in the posts.<!-- / message -->"

And what would "good judgment" say about this (http://freeconservatives.com/pics/clinton/clintonstash.jpg)?

[Charity]

Just throwing in my opinion here but there is a big difference between naked people and a dog pooping on a magazine. We see dogs do that every day, including kids seeing it, but naked people we do not see nor want to. My son reads this forum from time to time and I don't want him seeing naked people when he visits.

[DeclinetoState]

Then there are probably a lot of other things that other people, including moderators, post here that you don't want kids to see, either.

[Charity]

Most of the time I know what he sees here is not too outrageous until ya start posting nekkid people.

[sunsettommy]

"What was the point Decline to State?<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->"

Read my question in the OP.

"Good judgment dictates not having such photos in the posts.<!-- / message -->"

And what would "good judgment" say about this (http://freeconservatives.com/pics/clinton/clintonstash.jpg)?

I read the question.

I still fail to see why it is such a big deal to make a thread over?

You still failed to make a point.

Then we have an ADMINISTRATOR who apparently thought YOU failed to use good judgement in this forum by changing YOUR post.

"Edited by DD to eliminate the pic, which is here. (http://us.news3.yimg.com/us.i2.yimg.com/p/ap/20060421/capt.mogb10404211805.mexico_naked_protesters_mogb1 04.jpg?x=209&y=345&sig=T2v7xFqeJe1msHGvtQ0f9w--) Click the graphic for the source."

Then we have Warlady stating "What's wrong is you posting nudes on this site where children can view them."

I made my point that you failed to use good judgement starting this thread.

[sunsettommy]

Then there are probably a lot of other things that other people, including moderators, post here that you don't want kids to see, either.

So you are going to start rationalizing after you were corrected by TWO Administrators?

To me good judgement is NOT posting naked pictures on a forum.

It is a no brainer.

[DesertFox]

It was from Yahoo, not exactly known as a porn site.What has the source to do with it? Nobody's said you posted from a porn site, or even that you posted porn. Everyone has plainly said that you posted N-U-D-E-S and that they are inappropriate here.

[ConservativeYouthMovement]

Also the link being called censored leaves you to believe there are black boxes or blurrs.

[Wolfcounsel]

Kids don't see too many people (liberals) walking around with their heads up their butts, as I've seen posted here. It took me a while to explain to my 6-year-old granddaughter, who happened to sneak a peek at the monitor. I explained about photoshopping, and then I showed her some warping techniques with her picture, big nose, big ears, huge eyes. No harm done. She asked me if I could do like the cranio-rectal picture. It took me by surprise, but she asked how do I make the head disappear.:evilgrin:

[Rhino]

........but she asked how do I make the head disappear.Register as a democrat.

[Native American]

It was from Yahoo, not exactly known as a porn site.

What has the source to do with it? Nobody's said you posted from a porn site, or even that you posted porn. Everyone has plainly said that you posted N-U-D-E-S and that they are inappropriate here.

DesertFox, I think what DtoS is telling us is that he depends on Yahoo to make his moral judgements for him, and that he isn't able to make reasonable moral judgements about things on his own.