Compare | Credit Cards | Car Insurance | Pay Day Loans | Loans
Scientists discover over 400 pathogens cause bloodstream infections [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Scientists discover over 400 pathogens cause bloodstream infections


StealthDeath
05-17-2006, 04:48 AM
Copyright Notice:
The following research is the property of StealthDeath. This information has been obtained utilizing standard search engines on documents available to public view on the Internet. However, you may not use this research beyond my postings here as I am claiming copyright to my library of information, which has taken 8 years to assemble. These abstracts, document sections and narration are provided here on FreeConservatives.com for criticism, news reporting, and education as a documentary presentation. Your participation is greatly appreciated and needed to help direct which information will be used to create a DVD presentation exposing fraudulent medical care in America.

Want to see something really scary?

In the Spring of 1998, I was conducting initial research on the cause of autoimmune disorders. I ran across Luther E. Lindner’s research papers on a bacterium, which he suspected was the cause of Multiple Sclerosis. He had begun testing blood samples to determine which antibiotics this bacteria was susceptible. This information was then relayed to the MS patient’s doctors for experimental antibiotic therapy. The therapy greatly helped 20-25% and helped another 25% somewhat. He noted that he was not able to eliminate the bacteria from the blood but was able to drive it down bringing on spontaneous remissions in MS patients. One key point he made is that antibiotics could make this bacteria multiply and worsen the patient’s condition in some cases. He was advising a nutritional approach to driving the blood bacteria count down because of this risk.

Contrary to the medical industry’s claims that bacteria could not thrive in the blood, this Senior Pathologist on the staff of Texas A&M University’s Graduate Program in Molecular Pathology made the following statements in an interview with Dan Osborne on 7/22/96:

"I asked Dr. Lindner why so little attention has been given to this in the MS community. He gave several reasons:

1) The initial work is still in progress, and nothing has been published in any medical journal.

2) Medical dogma says that there are no bacteria in the bloodstream or the cerebrospinal fluid. This bacteria is found in those places.

3) Medical dogma also says that MS is caused by a virus or an autoimmune disorder."



Just 6 months later, pathologists testing a new antibiotic for FDA approval leaked the following bomb.



Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 1997
Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of LB20304, a novel fluoronaphthyridone
MG Cormican and RN Jones
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242, USA.

Compound LB20304 is a fluoronaphthyridone carboxylic acid with a novel pyrrolidine substituent. This drug was compared with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and trovafloxacin against over 800 pathogens, most from blood stream infections, by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference methods. LB20304 was the most active agent against gram-positive species including strains observed to be resistant to other fluoroquinolones and glycopeptides. The potency of LB20304 (MIC50, 0.03 micrograms/ml) against the Enterobacteriaceae was exceeded only by that of ciprofloxacin (0.015 micrograms/ml). It has limited activity against gram-negative anaerobes.


In October 1998 issue of Infectious Diseases in Children and article appears titled Pharmaceutical Industry urged FDA to classify bacteremia as a disease. <CITE>October 1998:</CITE> Defining bacteremia as a primary infection would allow the industry to focus on developing specific antibiotics.

Bacteremia and sepsis are terms used to describe bloodstream infection.



1999, Chronicals of Infectious Disease, John Hopkins reports on Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in United States Hospitals: A Three-Year Analysis by M.B. Edmond, et al. The report is an analysis of over 10,000 bloodstream infection cases amongst a 49-hospital consortium. The report lists only 6 bacteria categories as follows:

Coagulase-negative Staph , this is the normal staph that just about everyone has on their skin, 3908 cases, 21% DEAD.

Staph aureus, causes scalded skin syndrome and is usually fraudulently classified as an allergic reaction called eczema, 1928 cases, 25% DEAD.

Enterococci, intestinal staph and other colonic junk, 1354 cases, 32% DEAD.

Candida species, normal vaginal fungal flora, tell a doctor that this goes anywhere else in the body and most will tell you to get your head examined including Dr. Dean Edell on Conservative talk show radio, 934 cases, 40% DEAD.

E.coli, everybody has it in their intestines, 700 cases, 24% DEAD.

Klebsiella, also considered normal intestinal flora, 662 cases, 27% DEAD.


Who is John Hopkins University Hospital System?
Consumer Magazine
Ranks Hospitals
Johns Hopkins Tops U.S. News & World Report’s List

By Melanie Axelrod
N E W Y O R K, July 7— Johns Hopkins Hospital of Baltimore, Md., topped the 2000 edition of "America’s Best Hospitals," according to a recent survey conducted by U.S. News and World Report.


The question is not how many bloodstream infections these hospitals identified, but how many they missed. Top pathologists generally accept that anywhere from 25% to 33% of all bodies in hospital morgues are there because of sepsis (bloodstream infections). These bacteria not only lived in the blood they multiplied faster than the immune system could handle them. So now one needs to ask the obvious questions.

How many bacteria can get into the blood and set up colonies in organs elsewhere in the body causing disease?

How many diseases have they never investigated because of medical dogma?

How many treatments are fraud?

How many charity organizations are complete frauds because no one ever tried to bomb the patients with antibiotics regarding these incurable diseases?

How much of everything we have been told about medicine is false?

We are only 5 years into this challenge with another 15 years to go before doctors even generally accept it. Given the above known information it only stands to reason that probably 80% or more of all incurable conditions will turn out to be an infectious disease.

If you have any chronic illness you should think infection first above all other things. Just beware though, if you suggest this to your doctor you may be labeled a head case.

sunsettommy
05-17-2006, 05:50 AM
I thought a blood test would find bacterial infections in it?

I have all my adult life stayed home when I get sick and recover often in 2-3 days with ZERO medications.

Nowadays I get sick with basic allergy and recover in 2-3 days.I take a lot of vitamin C in the beginning and drink a lot of water.No medications taken.

I never take a flu shot they put out every fall.

I no longer get any bacterial or viral illnesses.It has been about 6 years since I had one.

I have for a long time been wondering why the medical system is so messed up.The cost keeps spiraling.The difficulty to weed out the bad doctors.The difficulty to get a medical license outside the AMA,and so on.

Surely by now they should have discovered a "cure" for many problems such as Louis Gehrig disease,MSC,skin diseases.They have had BILLIONS of dollars invested and still no cure.

I wonder if they simply research with one eye closed.It is amazing since we can see even small cellular details now.We have the Genome project to draw from.The many decades of past research looking for cures available.

The beat goes on and ever more my suspicion grows over the strange medical research inability to figure out the problems of infections.

Oh well.

StealthDeath
05-17-2006, 09:40 PM
I thought a blood test would find bacterial infections in it?

Many of the cultures fail and mainy infections can not be seen without and electron microscope setup. Most hospitals do not have the equipment. Then there is the "normal flora" report that basically states that because I am an expert and I've never heard of this bug causing a problem then it can't be a problem. Norma Flora in World War II meant it was OK for 50% of the population in Italy to have TB.

sunsettommy
05-19-2006, 05:32 AM
I thought a blood test would find bacterial infections in it?

Many of the cultures fail and mainy infections can not be seen without and electron microscope setup. Most hospitals do not have the equipment. Then there is the "normal flora" report that basically states that because I am an expert and I've never heard of this bug causing a problem then it can't be a problem. Norma Flora in World War II meant it was OK for 50% of the population in Italy to have TB.

The hospital I go to sends the blood samples to an outside laboratory that does the blood work analysis.

Maybe this is unusual?