Babb Fest | Credit Cards | Samsung | Payday Loan | Project cars for sale
Lou Dobbs: Bush & McCain's Nightmare [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Lou Dobbs: Bush & McCain's Nightmare


maxparrish
05-27-2006, 06:24 PM
When I first heard that McCain blamed Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaugh for the growing opposition, I wondered "Why Lou Dobbs"? Who looks at CNN anymore, wasn't he just a stock market guy?

Well, as I found out, what Rush Limbaugh is to his mass base, Lou Dobbs is to the elites - a very smart, well respected, "non-nut" on a certiefied mainstream left of center network. Worse yet, he is watched by all the big business and chamber of commerce types who want lots of cheap labor. In a sense, he is the Walter Cronkite of finacial markets - always trusted and definative.

So I started looking up Dobbs and his anchor transcripts (he's more than Finance). Egadds this man IS a no nonense, cut the BS, facts based commentator who is on a mission to expose immigration reform as a travesty. I've got to start watching him!!!!! Here's just one day's broadcast on the story (edited to fit max length of 25%).

May 26th, CNN:

DOBBS: Good evening, everybody.

In the past few minutes, the Senate has voted for what it is calling a comprehensive immigration reform bill, a bill that would give amnesty to millions of illegal aliens. The vote, 62 in favor, 36 against. It is a major victory for corporate America and special interests, a major defeat for middle class Americans who face a new onslaught of cheap imported labor.

But the political battle over this legislation is far from over. The House of Representatives is determined to block the Senate legislation and to make border security the nation's top priority.

Louise Schiavone reports from Washington...
Casey Wian reports tonight from Los Angeles....
And Bill Tucker, here in New York, reporting on the massive financial cost of the Senate bill for American citizen taxpayers.

We begin with Louise Schiavone in Washington -- Louise.

....they (the Senate) rejected other amendments, including one to prohibit illegals from collecting Social Security on wages earned with false IDs.

That's the sort of thing that angers opponents. ...

SEN. JON KYL (R), ARIZONA: My constituents, many of them, are so angry about the failure of the government to fulfill its responsibilities, and do not see in the underlying legislation an approach to do that.

SEN. RICK SANTORUM (R), PENNSYLVANIA: This legislation I think is well outside of what I consider responsible reform. ...

TONY SNOW, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: I can tell you this, it's pretty clear that members of both houses understand that they pay a heavier political price for failing to act than for acting.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

SCHIAVONE: Of course, Lou, the president's press secretary would say that. ...

DOBBS: And Louise, we should point out that this is an instance in which the president of the United States, a Republican, by most -- most identifications, and the majority of the Senate have -- of his party -- have parted company. In point of fact, the president of the United States has sided with the Democratic Party in the Senate, and a majority of the Republicans in the Senate have been defeated on this legislation. ...

DOBBS: Well, there is no question, none whatsoever, that this legislation is flawed in nearly -- in so many ways, that it is utterly breathtaking. I want to add -- Louise Schiavone, thank you very much for that.

I want to add to our update on this legislation. We have just received word from Senator Jon Kyl's office...

Just moments before the final Senate vote, the United States Senate adopted a provision that requires consultation with the government of Mexico before the United States government can build a security fence on our southern border. If there is any doubt whatsoever about who's in charge of U.S. immigration policy, and now border security, it should be dispelled.

The Senate laying bare its motivation and its values and its disregard for border security by placing immigration reform, as it puts it, at the forefront.

The Senate passed its immigration -- comprehensive immigration reform bill without addressing the legislation's massive impact on our legal system or the agencies responsible for enforcing that legislation, should it become law. Opponents say the Senate bill is simply irresponsible and fatally flawed.

Casey Wian reports.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CASEY WIAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): From hiring more Border Patrol agents to verifying the legal status of all new workers, nearly every significant provision of the Senate immigration reform bill faces huge, possibly insurmountable obstacles.

MICHAEL CUTLER, FMR. INS AGENT: Now we've got the United States Senate hell-bent on creating a system that offers as many loopholes and as many areas of vulnerability as we had before. And I just wonder how many of those senators were the same people who were yelling about connecting the dots right after 9/11. WIAN: Perhaps the most glaring loophole is the provision that illegal aliens who have been in the United States more than five years can pay a fine, stay, and work towards citizenship. Those here two to five years would have to self-deport, fill out an application and re- enter through a legal point of entry. Others would have to leave, period.

DAN STEIN, FED. FOR AMER. IMMIGRATION REFORM: As for the requirement that they leave if they've been here less than two years, well, they're supposed to leave now. Who's going to make them? I mean, the senators aren't even answering the core basic questions about why we can't make the law work.

WIAN: The bill would more than double the size of the Border Patrol by 2011, but the agency can't even find enough recruits to fill the jobs it has open now. It also envisions a special guest worker program for 1.5 million farm workers. A smaller program already exists, and it's been plagued by worker abuse and low pay. And the Senate wants a workplace ID verification system set up within 18 months.

SEN. JOHN ENSIGN (R), NEVADA: Every time the government promises an implementation of something, it always seems to take much more time. And that's why I think many of us are skeptical about some of the timelines that have been put out there.

WIAN: Another questionable timeline, the bill urges the Homeland Security Department to perform background checks on the estimated 12 to 20 million illegal aliens now in the country within 90 days.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

WIAN: Just proving the identity of all those illegal aliens is a virtual impossible task, because as amnesty advocates often point out, most of them are undocumented. Of course, that is if you don't count the fraudulent documents -- Lou.

DOBBS: Exactly, or whatever you want to call it. Illegal is the bottom line, which the Senate has just moved to the side as if it is of no interest whatsoever as to who obeys our laws or does not.

This issue, Casey, the fact that they're not looking, in any way providing for budget, manpower for the Citizenship and Immigration Services, or ICE and its internal enforcement agents, I mean, this is -- how do we rationalize? How do we explain this?

WIAN: I don't think you can rationalize or explain it, as evidenced by what you just reported a couple of minutes ago, the fact that the Senate has approved an amendment to allow the government of Mexico to basically sign off on whether we can build a border fence or not. I mean, it seems all rationality has gone out the window -- Lou.

DOBBS: This is breathtaking, it is hard to imagine what this president and the leadership of this Senate have been thinking and what -- and it's just extraordinary. Absolutely disregarding the will of the American people, and abandoning common sense all together, or any apparent concern for border security in passing this legislation. So-called comprehensive immigration legislation.

Casey, thank you.

Casey Wian, from Los Angeles.

The Senate's pro-amnesty legislation also ignores a huge economic and financial cost of enacting such legislation. This legislation would cost taxpayers as much as $54 billion over the next 10 years. That is only an estimate, but that is many times more than the cost of the House immigration bill which focuses primarily on border security.

Bill Tucker reports.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

BILL TUCKER, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): When it comes to costs, there's a stark difference between the House version of immigration legislation...

....TUCKER: It should be remembered that the last time the Senate was in this big a rush to pass legislation was the Medicare prescription drug bill. And Lou, that bill was supposed to cost $400 billion. And since its passage, the cost protections have now more than tripled.

DOBBS: They've only missed it by about 80 percent, and those are now conservative estimates, what they told everyone would be $400 billion, looking at over $700 billion. And it's not even clear how well it's working. Remarkable.

But there is a common theme here. Both pieces of legislation were designed first for the benefit of corporate America. And the Senate has, without question -- the Senate leadership -- it is hard to divide the partisan interests here, but it's a remarkable thing. And I will say it again, this Republican president and the Republican leadership of the Senate have sided with the Democrats in the Senate, and have overrun the Republican members of that Senate, the Republican majority in the Senate.

This is as best I can tell unprecedented. We're checking right now to see historically where this has occurred before. But right now, this looks to be unique in history. And a remarkable situation.

Bill Tucker, thank you very much.

Well, California's governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, has announced that he now supports sending new California National Guard troops to the Mexican border if they stay only temporarily.

...A remarkable turn of events on a day in which the Senate has certainly distinguished itself in so many ways, certainly making transparent the politics and the motives and the values of the U.S. Senate.

....And new evidence that the federal government's failure to stop illegal immigration from being a greater burden and keeping illegal aliens from stealing Americans' identity is threatening our national security. We'll have that report as well.

And the Senate voting to give amnesty to millions of illegal aliens today. A powerful member of the House Judiciary Committee, Congressman Steve King, says our illegal immigration crisis and border security crisis will not end by simply opening our borders and legalizing illegal aliens. He's our guest.

Stay with us.

I am stunned and thankful that a mainline anchor has the power and will to talk plainly and logically to the American people - no frilly language or made up BS - just the scarey facts.

I found our nomination for 2008 LOU DOBBS!

Eagle1
05-27-2006, 06:29 PM
dobbs is an opportunist, just happens to take the correct side on this one issue

usually the right choices he makes are for the wrong reasons

maxparrish
05-27-2006, 06:31 PM
dobbs is an opportunist, just happens to take the correct side on this one issue

usually the right choices he makes are for the wrong reasons Is that your attempt to claim his reasoning is wrong? It's clear he has thought a lot about the issue, and which side he's on.

Which side are you on? Mexico or the U.S.A.?

Un Con Troll Able
05-27-2006, 08:52 PM
I wonder how isolated Bush feels right now -- how alone? What that man has done to the Republican Party, and to conservatism, is unprecedented.

Conservatism has been badly fractured. It will take a long time to heal. And perhaps it never will. Perhaps the divisions within conservatism are here to stay.

Both sides accusing each other being RINOs. How more self-destructive can a political party be?

maxparrish
05-27-2006, 09:27 PM
I wonder how isolated Bush feels right now -- how alone? What that man has done to the Republican Party, and to conservatism, is unprecedented.

Conservatism has been badly fractured. It will take a long time to heal. And perhaps it never will. Perhaps the divisions within conservatism are here to stay.

Both sides accusing each other being RINOs. How more self-destructive can a political party be?

Actually both sides are not calling each other RINOS. The conservative base is disenchantated with the business and poltical elites and see them as RINOS, the elites are frustrated with their 'ignorent, populist' loyal base that ought to keep supporting quislings and know that their betters are doing the right thing.

After much thinking and listening, I have finally figured out what is driving the RINO's. For Brownback, in part, it is a soft 'Catholic' humantiarianism (which accounts for his pecular conservatism on social issues); for McCain it is ego and arrogance; for Hegel, as well as Brownback, it is the ag industry and slaughter houses that are the biggest employers in the States (Kansas and Nebraska) and employe 10,000s of illegals. Some are loons (Graham), others are true liberals (Spectors, Snowe, etc.).

The largest influence, however, is big business lobbies and their "need" for cheap labor. The Wall Street Journal, Chamber of Commerce, and the ideological - libertarian allies (CATO, REASON) truely believe that immigrants are essential to economic vitality - and are harmless. From Blue Bloods to AG interests there is contempt for populist and grassroots conservatives...they are SO middle class and WORKING Class...I mean, they drink BEER (gasp) and go to NASCAR races. Some go to church because they really believe. And others fly flags, and think in stark terms of right and wrong. They listen to Limbaugh and Hannity.

As for Bush, well, he is not so lonely as he is tired. One can hear it in his voice, his regrets over "Bring it on" and Abu Grahib. He has weathered a lot of vile, much of it unwarranted or dispicably unfair. In many ways he is a good man - but he is also a fool that has brought it on himself. And as a fool he shit on his supporters so many times that he has no friends left, just office syncophants or manipulative and disloyal "allies" (e.g. McCain).

He knows it. He can send Rove to the Hill as much as he wants, they laugh and toss him out. He can do his special pleadings, drawing only snears. Kennedy and Reid mock him behind closed doors, friends look away or spit at his back. He is pathetic and sad. A part of me feels sad for him, another part knows he is the enemy of liberty and must be destroyed - if necessary, handed to the liberals so they may impeach him.

Yes, I see nothing wrong with delivering him to his enemies, his time is over.

BTW, it won't take nearly as long to heal as you think. All it takes is one election - as it took when Jimmy Carter was elected. Ford was an idiot, but he took the nomination from Reagan in 1976. He lost to Carter looking like a fool. Four years later moderates were dead, Reagan initiated an era of conservatism that drove the moderates underground for 30 years. In 2006 or 2008 that may happen again, and four years later "moderates" will be back in their cages.

Moderates are losers, it just takes an occasional election with them in control to drive the lesson home.

BuckeyeMike
05-27-2006, 11:32 PM
....And new evidence that the federal government's failure (FAILURE? FAILURE? HOW ABOUT REFUSAL....OR AIDING AND ABETTING!!!!)to stop illegal immigration from being a greater burden and keeping illegal aliens from stealing Americans' identity is threatening our national security. We'll have that report as well.

X

Un Con Troll Able
05-28-2006, 12:07 AM
Moderates are losers, it just takes an occasional election with them in control to drive the lesson home.

First of all, my compliments on an excellent post. I agree with much of what you said, but I believe that the problem with conservatism is that it has come to rely on too much "We'll get them next time!" thinking. The problems this country is facing -- or will be facing in the next 30 years -- are potentially catastrophic. We can ill afford to continue waiting for the next political train.

This "crisis in faith" (of sorts) is so demoralizing.

maxparrish
05-28-2006, 11:48 AM
Nice post Max, but stop with even the half hearted apologies for this Bastard. You and I both know what Bush's primary motivation is -- he has proven it a hundred times over. He isn't misguided or confused, he is a traitor doing everything in his power to wreck this country as rapidly as he can. While I despise the man, in my less angry moments I know that he is as much a fool as a knowing agent of evil. That he sincerely belives in his view of immigration from Mexico, makes him no less accountable on a moral basis - I would still have to line him up with other leaders before a firing squad (all this after the fanciful revolution of course).

maxparrish
05-28-2006, 12:02 PM
First of all, my compliments on an excellent post. I agree with much of what you said, but I believe that the problem with conservatism is that it has come to rely on too much "We'll get them next time!" thinking. The problems this country is facing -- or will be facing in the next 30 years -- are potentially catastrophic. We can ill afford to continue waiting for the next political train.

This "crisis in faith" (of sorts) is so demoralizing. I'm not so sure its a crisis of faith as it is a crisis of elite-base divisions. When it got down to it - business interests used their money and social influence to line up behind peers like Brownback. We conservatives just didn't realize the power of special interests, having so long defended them against attacks from the left.

Unfortunately we lack a galvanizing personality to lead conservatism. Some, like Buchanan, has permanently stained himself with isolationism and anti-Israel (Jewish) comments; others (like Newt) just don't cut it. Right now, we need a change - a Rick Sanatorium or Fred Thompson...but so far it looks like the pubs are offering (2008) McVain, Hegel, Brownback...etc. ONLY George Allen (and perhaps Newt) will be alternatives - unless Tancedo runs.

Conservative leaders need to get their act together and find someone - these think tank presidents and 527 guys need a conference to find someone. ANYONE -

Un Con Troll Able
05-30-2006, 07:23 AM
Sun circling the Earth? I'm assuming that is a joke.