Loan | Samsung | Credit Card Consolidation | Loans | Mobile Phone
Adios, USA! [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Adios, USA!


DoctorDoom
06-18-2006, 05:16 AM
Were these from conspiracy sites, it would be easy to dismiss them.

Quietly but systematically, the Bush Administration is advancing the plan to build a huge NAFTA Super Highway, four football-fields-wide, through the heart of the U.S. along Interstate 35, from the Mexican border at Laredo, Tex., to the Canadian border north of Duluth, Minn.

Once complete, the new road will allow containers from the Far East to enter the United States through the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, bypassing the Longshoreman’s Union in the process. The Mexican trucks, without the involvement of the Teamsters Union, will drive on what will be the nation’s most modern highway straight into the heart of America. The Mexican trucks will cross border in FAST lanes, checked only electronically by the new “SENTRI” system. The first customs stop will be a Mexican customs office in Kansas City, their new Smart Port complex, a facility being built for Mexico at a cost of $3 million to the U.S. taxpayers in Kansas City.

As incredible as this plan may seem to some readers, the first Trans-Texas Corridor segment of the NAFTA Super Highway is ready to begin construction next year. Various U.S. government agencies, dozens of state agencies, and scores of private NGOs (non-governmental organizations) have been working behind the scenes to create the NAFTA Super Highway, despite the lack of comment on the plan by President Bush. The American public is largely asleep to this key piece of the coming “North American Union” that government planners in the new trilateral region of United States, Canada and Mexico are about to drive into reality.Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway (http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?print=yes&id=15497)

"Once complete, the new road will allow containers from the Far East to enter the United States through the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, bypassing the Longshoreman’s Union in the process." And bypassing US security in the process. Doesn't that give y'all a warm & fuzzy feeling?

Welcome to NASCO - International Mid-Continent Trade Corridor (http://www.nascocorridor.com/)

But ... but ... what about our borders? HAH!

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.North American Union to Replace USA? (http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?print=yes&id=14965)

Separately, the articles might be brushed aside. Together ...

Patriot Heart
06-18-2006, 08:50 AM
OK, back to emailing my Senators and Congressman again. Thanks for the heads up Doc, depressing though it is.

Wolfcounsel
06-18-2006, 12:14 PM
The government of the United States WILL be maintained, and the Constitution will be restored, and it will come through armed conflict, and I expect it to be of short duration, if the Armed Forces tell their Commander-in-Chief to stuff his pissing, for which they are not fighting, on the nation's sovereignty.

ConspiracyBuff
06-19-2006, 06:19 AM
Were these from conspiracy sites, it would be easy to dismiss them.

Thats the crux of the problem. Conspiracy sites have been telling people this crap is going on for years now, it will be too late every time by the time the controled MSM decides to enlighten people (well even then you have to search for such news, dont expect Fox to report on it). Maybe people ought to look into the proof of a global push since WW1 for a NWO. Nah, that would make you a conspiracy moron, its much better to remain ignorant and poke fun at such conspiracy theories.

Lazarus
06-19-2006, 02:46 PM
NAFTA Superhighway?! Why? To streamline the invasion from the South?

Good God, he's not even trying to be subtle... Why not just fly C-130's down and bring them in at Taxpayer expense?
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

Antigone
06-19-2006, 02:51 PM
Don't give them any ideas Laz..........Geeeeeeeeeeeez! :)

Antigone
06-19-2006, 02:58 PM
Texas sure is mad!! :thumb:

http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/index.htm

Rhino
06-21-2006, 10:17 AM
I don't see a problem. It's a highway. Actually, it's a bunch of them.

Dowple
06-21-2006, 10:22 AM
I don't see a problem.

No surprise, there.

Lazarus
06-21-2006, 01:16 PM
Texas sure is mad!! :thumb:...Texas has alwasy had the reputation of being ready to break away into a separate Republic... Im all for it... I'll sell the Lazarus estate and move out there if we can actuallyu get this idea moving...

uncommon1
06-21-2006, 03:29 PM
Hopefully, Rhino is merely being facetious. All we need is a big highway, 4 football fields wide, to bring in truckloads of illegals to our front porches. If you think the problem with illegals is bad now, just wait until we open up the door for them.

Rhino
06-21-2006, 03:40 PM
No, I was serious, but not about what you seem to think. I have no problem with a highway for trade. I find no official reference to four football fields wide, or even eight as one link said. I also saw no official reference to seizure through eminent domain, etc. All I saw was a highway, and I have no problem with that. I have a problem with illegals, but that wasn't what was being discussed. Technically, the 'NAFTA Super Highway' doesn't even exist, except in the mind of conspiracy theorists. That's why we haven't seen it in the mainstream media. The Texas link is to the Trans-Texas Corridor, which has nothing to do with NAFTA, except possibly as a periphery issue. It is merely a huge upgrade of the transportation system in Texas. Until this enters into the realm of reality, it's just more highway projects, bullet trains, etc. I have no problem with that. In fact, I'd like to see some upgrades around here.

DesertFox
06-21-2006, 07:32 PM
What Rhino said. To date, this whole uproar smacks of more paranoia along 'Vast (Whatever) Wing Conspiracy' lines.

CzechPrince
06-21-2006, 10:02 PM
My parents told me about this and showed me some other interesting sources (I'll try to find them.)

Bush is a traitor, period.

Rhino
06-22-2006, 06:44 AM
I posted a response but I put it in this thread: http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/showthread.php?p=436352#post436352
Yeah. That was mostly about eminent domain. I responded there, but I'll repeat it here.

I detest the concept of using eminent domain for private purposes, but having a private company responsible for the construction of the highway hardly fits that bill. All highways are built by private construction companies, and many highway systems have their operations contracted out to private companies. That doesn't mean they own them. I work a contract where we built and operate government computer systems. We sure as heck don't own them though.I guess I should have clarified my response by saying there was no reference to using ED for private purposes. Using ED for highway projects is nothing new. I really don't care for any ED on principle, but I grudgingly have to admit that it's sometimes necessary.

Dowple
06-22-2006, 02:57 PM
What Rhino said.

No surprise, there, either.