Limbaugh Detained at Palm Beach Airport

[RightTurns]

Jun 26, 11:10 PM (ET)

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 width=210 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle><TABLE borderColor=#cbcbcd cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 width=150 border=1><TBODY><TR><TD><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR align=middle><TD>http://ak.imgfarm.com/images/ap/thumbnails//PEOPLE_LIMBAUGH.sff_NY121_20060626213139.jpg (http://apnews.myway.com/image/20060626/PEOPLE_LIMBAUGH.sff_NY121_20060626213139.html?date =20060627&docid=D8IGA3VO0)</TD></TR><TR><TD>(AP) Rush Limbaugh smiles after teeing off on the fourth hole of the Spyglass Hill Golf Course during...
Full Image (http://apnews.myway.com/image/20060626/PEOPLE_LIMBAUGH.sff_NY121_20060626213139.html?date =20060627&docid=D8IGA3VO0)</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><STYLE>p {margin:12px 0px 0px 0px;}</STYLE>WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) - Rush Limbaugh was detained for more than three hours Monday at Palm Beach International Airport after authorities said they found a bottle of Viagra in his possession without a prescription.

[RightTurns]

http://apnews.myway.com//article/20060627/D8IGA3VO0.html

Why does this dumbshit keep challenging the system?
Does he have a death wish?

[DoctorDoom]

What's he going to do, hijack the f**king plane with Viagra? "Send this plane to Cuba or I'll pop a pill and spear you with my dick!"

This is shameless liberal politics, inasmuch that the DBM was told. Would anyone else in the country make news for Viagra?

[The_Elucidator]

Typical; we always knew that the MSM had a hard-on for Rush, this just proves it!

[MSGT]

Here (http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060626/lam109.html?.v=37) is his attorney's responce.

1 question.....Rush why don't you have your own plane????????:question:

[BuckeyeMike]

I thought he did!!!??????


It was a customs inspection....he was returning from an international trip.
He had to pass through customs whether it was a commercial flight or his personal plane. Is there really a story here? Or just bullshit journalism?
Seems I just answered my own question eh?

[DoctorDoom]

It might be necessary to go through that BS, especially on international flights, whether he uses commercial or private planes.

[BuckeyeMike]

Sorry Doc,,,wuz editing and adding whilst you posted more succinctly.

[MSGT]

:doh: tired. must. get.. sleep...

[True Grace]

http://apnews.myway.com//article/20060627/D8IGA3VO0.html

Why does this dumbshit keep challenging the system?
Does he have a death wish?

I'm sorry. You are going to have to speak a little louder. I can't hear you.

[Lubbock]

She's just jumping up and down gleeful a this news. It gives her twissted and tortured mind something to tsk tsk a conservative over.

Jumping up and down, clapping her hands and dancing in circles gleeful.

Stupid twit!

[Rhino]

I'd like to know how this information got out. Customs inspections are private by law.

[TechnoPrincess]

As said before, I just don't see what the story is here. Is it because it was Rush, or viagra? If it has been prescription Prilosec or Alegra would there be all this fuss? WOO HOO, he has Viagra....who the &^%$ cares?!:confused:

Rhino - I've wondered the same thing.

[True Grace]

I think we are supposed to snicker because Rush uses Viagra. Liberals never progress beyond grade-school antics, and that is surely a hoot to them.

Of course, seeing how liberal males are closer to neuters than real men, they probably won't ever have the need for Viagra.

[Lubbock]

It's Plam Beach County. The most liberal county east of the Mississippi, I guess. Isn't Palm Beach the county where Dubya won the 2000 election? Weren't they the Hanging Chad county?

They hate Bush, they hate Republicans, they hate Rush, and he's down there in the hornets nest, rubbing their noses in it 24/7/365.

Anymore rhetorical questions, Rhino?

If the NYT thinks it's perfectly fine to reveal classified information that could make us vulnerable to a terrorist attack, certainly any Customs official or member of the Sheriff's department in Palm Beach County wouldn't blink twice at revealing information about medication in Rush Limbaugh's suitcase.

[Wolfcounsel]

"Of course, seeing how liberal males are closer to neuters than real men, they probably won't ever have the need for Viagra." --True Grace

That's assuming they know what to do with their equipment before the need for Viagra.<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

[Rhino]

Anymore rhetorical questions, Rhino?No one in the Sheriff's Department would have known about this. It would have been a Customs agent, who should be fired for violating privacy, or worse. This was a non-issue elevated to sensationalist status for no reason other than political witch hunting.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

No one in the Sheriff's Department would have known about this. It would have been a Customs agent, who should be fired for violating privacy, or worse. This was a non-issue elevated to sensationalist status for no reason other than political witch hunting.

:yeahthat: :ditto:

[Lubbock]

Okay, I admit it. I'm confused.

" . . . Customs officials found a prescription bottle labeled as Viagra in his luggage that didn't have Limbaugh's name on it, but that of two doctors, said Paul Miller, spokesman for the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. . . . "

Customs didn't have to call the Sheriff's department to take Rush into custody? Customs has it's own lock up? I guess in a place that big, they probably do at the airport, but don't they eventually have to turn detainees over to the sheriff's department?

So why was the Sheriff's department spokesman talking to the media?

I'm confused.

[Rhino]

Me too.

[Borgia]

What does Rush need Viagra for? He is unmarried and a man of values, right?

[Rhino]

I valued sex, even when I was unmarried. You just can't resist the insulting jabs, can you?

[Antigone]

So why was the Sheriff's department spokesman talking to the media?



My theory is because of this:

Miller said the alleged violation could be a second-degree misdemeanor. The sheriff's office was investigating and will soon turn the case over to the state attorney's office, which had no immediate comment Tuesday.
But under the deal reached last month with prosecutors, Limbaugh was not to get arrested for any infraction for 18 months in exchange for authorities deferring a charge of "doctor shopping." Prosecutors had alleged the conservative talk-show host illegally deceived multiple physicians to receive overlapping painkiller prescriptions.

They can use this to say "no deal, you broke the agreement" and continue on their partisan witch hunt to "get Rush". They were pissed they couldn't get their conviction so they are going to continue to drag him down with ANYTHING.

Would the Viagra show up in his drug tests he has to submit to as part of the deal? :question:

[Kathy29]

The whole thing was just to publicly humiliate and embarass Limbaugh. He did not have Viagra without a prescription. It was his, with a prescription. It was in another bottle. You know that little sticker on the bottle that says its illegal to put anything else in the bottle. That's the "law" he violated.

Next Limbaugh sensational arrest will be when he tears the label off his mattress. You know, the label that says do not remove this label.

[Borgia]

I valued sex, even when I was unmarried. You just can't resist the insulting jabs, can you?

Were you insulted?

Anyway, I don't have a problem with him having sex outside of marriage but you conservatives sure seem to think that is wrong. (Perhaps not you personally but many do) On this very board we get to read about how trollops should keep their legs closed from the likes of Doom and Wyatt (and others). I am just a tad confused as to why they think it is wrong for a trollop to have sex outside of marriage but Rush gets a pass.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

The whole thing was just to publicly humiliate and embarass Limbaugh. He did not have Viagra without a prescription. It was his, with a prescription. It was in another bottle. You know that little sticker on the bottle that says its illegal to put anything else in the bottle. That's the "law" he violated.

Next Limbaugh sensational arrest will be when he tears the label off his mattress. You know, the label that says do not remove this label.

http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/images/icons/biglaugh.gif :yeahthat:

[Wolfcounsel]

"What does Rush need Viagra for? He is unmarried and a man of values, right?" --Borgia

Maybe they were leftovers from his third marriage, eh? Why was this made public, do you know, or have any idea?
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

[Borgia]

"What does Rush need Viagra for? He is unmarried and a man of values, right?" --Borgia

Maybe they were leftovers from his third marriage, eh? Why was this made public, do you know, or have any idea?
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

Leftovers? Are you proposing that Rush Limbaugh packs to go to foreign countries and makes sure he takes his viagra medication that he no longer needs due to his divorce for no reason? Yeah, sure. ;)

Why was it made public? To embarrass Rush and make money. If you are asking do I think it should have been made public, then I would answer, "no".

[Borgia]

The whole thing was just to publicly humiliate and embarass Limbaugh. He did not have Viagra without a prescription. It was his, with a prescription. It was in another bottle. You know that little sticker on the bottle that says its illegal to put anything else in the bottle. That's the "law" he violated.

It is just a little more than that, actually. The viagra prescription was made out to the doctor as Rush wanted anonymity. That would be illegal (having a prescripption made out to someone else for your prescription) but it is a misdemeanor at worst. No charges will or should be filed IMO.

[Lubbock]

How much cocaine do you suppose was being overlooked while Customs was focusing on a completely legal product?

And of course, no politics was played in this incident. Right?

Get Rush is now a game being played in Palm Beach County.

Ask me why Liberals disgust me. Ask me why I have nothing but utter disdain and comtempt for Liberals.

Liberalsim if the most hate-filled, evil force on the face of the earth.

[Borgia]

Liberalsim if the most hate-filled, evil force on the face of the earth.

That's right, we are worse than the devil himself. He is really just our errand-boy but someday maybe we'll promote him. :)

[Wolfcounsel]

"Leftovers? Are you proposing that Rush Limbaugh packs to go to foreign countries and makes sure he takes his viagra medication that he no longer needs due to his divorce for no reason? Yeah, sure. ;)" --Borgia

How do you know he divorced for no reason?

[Borgia]

"Leftovers? Are you proposing that Rush Limbaugh packs to go to foreign countries and makes sure he takes his viagra medication, that he no longer needs due to his divorce, for no reason? Yeah, sure. ;)" --Borgia

How do you know he divorced for no reason?

Sorry about that, I added the important punctuation to make my meaning clearer.

[Lubbock]

When I saw this article posted late last night, I knew exactly where the thread was going today. I knew exactly which Site Pest whould show up, all snide and snarky, smirking, and licking his chops.

[Rhino]

They can use this to say "no deal, you broke the agreement" and continue on their partisan witch hunt to "get Rush".He didn't break the agreement. There was no infraction.

It was in another bottle. You know that little sticker on the bottle that says its illegal to put anything else in the bottle. That's the "law" he violated.No, he didn't. It was in the original bottle. They just didn't put his name on it to protect his privacy. By the way, I've never seen a sticker like that.

Were you insulted?I meant to him, not me.

Anyway, I don't have a problem with him having sex outside of marriage but you conservatives sure seem to think that is wrong. (Perhaps not you personally but many do) On this very board we get to read about how trollops should keep their legs closed from the likes of Doom and Wyatt (and others). I am just a tad confused as to why they think it is wrong for a trollop to have sex outside of marriage but Rush gets a pass.They feel that way? So why attack Rush? Has he ever professed this? I personally don't know, but I don't recall ever hearing it. Absent that, your remark just appears to be a cheap shot. That was why I responded as I did.

It is just a little more than that, actually. The viagra prescription was made out to the doctor as Rush wanted anonymity. That would be illegal (having a prescripption made out to someone else for your prescription) but it is a misdemeanor at worst. No charges will or should be filed IMO.Correct. That would be against the law, for the doctor who wrote it that way. I didn't see his detention mentioned in the article.

[Borgia]

When I saw this article posted late last night, I knew exactly where the thread was going today. I knew exactly which Site Pest whould show up, all snide and snarky, smirking, and licking his chops.

Heh, heh. I am evil incarnate, remember?

But as to Rush, I don't think this should have been made public. I don't think any charges should be brought against him. Sounds kind of pro-Rush to me.

My only query is why he had viagra in the first place. I would have thought a man of such high moral character would shrink at the mere thought of having sex outside of marriage.

[Wolfcounsel]

Maybe he is using Viagra for pulmonary hypertension? The point remains, that some morons revealed private information to the media.

[TechnoPrincess]

My only query is why he had viagra in the first place. I would have thought a man of such high moral character would shrink at the mere thought of having sex outside of marriage.

Maybe he was engaged in "self love":question:

[Borgia]

They feel that way? So why attack Rush? Has he ever professed this? I personally don't know, but I don't recall ever hearing it. Absent that, your remark just appears to be a cheap shot. That was why I responded as I did.

Well, why do conservatives have such high regard for Rush if he is flaunting high moral values? Doe she have no moral core that tells him that sex outside of marriage is wrong? Why are there no conservative moral police questioning Rush on this?

I am not taking a shot at Rush cause I have no problem with him having sex outside of marriage. He is not offending my morality.

But I wonder about all those conservatives who DO take a strong stand agaisnt sex outside of marriage. I could name plenty of conseravtive columnists that write about it regularly. Or I could mention many posters on this board like Homes, Maggie, Doom, and Wyatt.

I am just concerned that Rush is letting them down. :(

[Rhino]

My only query is why he had viagra in the first place.It's none of our business, really.

[Borgia]

Maybe he was engaged in "self love":question:

Good point and a possiblity. Timber brought up another one which I assume is another reason why you might take viagra.

I wonder if Rush will address this on his show. Can someone tell me what he has to say about it today? Thanks!

[Rhino]

I am just concerned that Rush is letting them down.
Sure you are.

[Borgia]

It's none of our business, really.

I agree. I merely posit from what we know already.

1. Rush has viagra
2. Rush is divorced

?

[Peachdiane]

TP!!!! :rotflmbo:

If this had been any lib, it'd be swept under the rug and forgotten...

[Rhino]

Timber brought up another one which I assume is another reason why you might take viagra.Not likely. The medication is sildenafil. It was only called Viagra when it was marketed for erectile dysfunction, so it's unlikely the bottle would have been labeled as such for cardiovascular reasons.

[Borgia]

Sure you are.

Well, I know how his fans tend to see Rush as having such high moral fiber. Certainly more than an evil liberal like me. :)

[Borgia]

Not likely. The medication is sildenafil. It was only called Viagra when it was marketed for erectile dysfunction, so it's unlikely the bottle would have been labeled as such for cardiovascular reasons.

All right, scratch that possibility off the list. Back to technoprincess' explanation as the sole possibility here.

[DeclinetoState]

Donkey Union Jackass Forum :sheeple: reaction (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2357568)

The article implies there was stuff other than Viagra.

What do you think might be found if Customs ever went through Ted Kennedy's luggage?

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

But I wonder about all those conservatives who DO take a strong stand agaisnt sex outside of marriage. I could name plenty of conseravtive columnists that write about it regularly. Or I could mention many posters on this board like Homes, Maggie, Doom, and Wyatt.

I am just concerned that Rush is letting them down. :(

Have you ever seen me extolling him as a model of Christian virtue?

[aaron11]

What does Rush need Viagra for? He is unmarried and a man of values, right?

That is a valid point.

Fortunately, Rush is not nor has ever been a symbol of conservative values. He is a celebrity and a political commentator, no different then any other. Personally, i think Rush is a dork and a tad irresponsible, but I still agree with many of his political views. However, it is and always been Rush's ability to cut through the Liberal choke hold on information that makes him invaluable. It's isn't his views that pisses off the left, it the fact that they are heard by so many.

[Antigone]

He didn't break the agreement. There was no infraction.


According to a different article the agreement was that he was not to get arrested for ANY infraction (link below).

But under the deal reached last month with prosecutors, Limbaugh was not to get arrested for any infraction for 18 months in exchange for authorities deferring a charge of "doctor shopping."

Since they are saying they COULD charge him with a second degree misdemeanor and it is has been turned over for investigation by the state attorney's office, I extrapolated that to mean they will be looking for a way to say "no deal" once they charge him. I say "once they charge him" because the history shows they will go to any length to get their conviction for something, anything and now that they can throw their deal out based on an arrest for ANY infraction, they will be looking under every rock to find that infraction.

If the article is wrong about the deal, then my theory doesn't fly but I was basing my response on that article.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FL_LIMBAUGH_VIAGRA_FLOL-?SITE=FLPET&SECTION=STATE&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

[Borgia]

Have you ever seen me extolling him as a model of Christian virtue?

1. Is sex outside of marriage immoral?

2. Is Rush immoral for having sex outside of marriage?

[Rhino]

According to a different article the agreement was that he was not to get arrested for ANY infraction (link below).Correct, but there was no infraction and he wasn't arrested. If the doctor gave the prescription that way, and it's illegal, he would be at fault, not Limbaugh. The issuing pharmacy could also be liable. If it is a perfectly legal, common practice, there again was no infraction. If Rush himself took some action to make the bottle appear without his name, then he would be subject to charge/arrest, but I see absolutely no mention of that possibility. So, he commited no infraction and there was no arrest. I'm sure the Associtaed Press, who wrote the second link, would love Rush to be in violation of the court agreement, but he simply isn't, at least not going by the information we have now.

[Antigone]

Correct, but there was no infraction and he wasn't arrested. If the doctor gave the prescription that way, and it's illegal, he would be at fault, not Limbaugh. The issuing pharmacy could also be liable. If it is a perfectly legal, common practice, there again was no infraction. If Rush himself took some action to make the bottle appear without his name, then he would be subject to charge/arrest, but I see absolutely no mention of that possibility. So, he commited no infraction and there was no arrest. I'm sure the Associtaed Press, who wrote the second link, would love Rush to be in violation of the court agreement, but he simply isn't, at least not going by the information we have now.

I fully understand that Rhino, I was just stating that I think they are using this as a way to try and "find" something they can charge him with in order to say he broke the agreement. If this was anybody except Rush, you would never know about it and they would probably look into it and let everyone off the hook as it wouldn't be worth their time. But if this gives them another shot at Rush, you can bet they will use everything in their arsenal to "find" a way to charge Rush even though he was not the one breaking any laws.

[aaron11]

1. Is sex outside of marriage immoral?

2. Is Rush immoral for having sex outside of marriage?

Yes.

We are all sinners. I would fall into the repentant category.

As for Rush, IDK, i have never heard him claim to be Christian.

[Lubbock]

No amount of snickering and snaking and smirking will mitigate that fact that Palm Beach County is out to get Rush. It's a Liberal THANG!

Why engage with this idiot?

It's smirk.

It's snark.

It's "here, let me rub your face in it". He thinks his attempt to make Rush out to be an immoral buffon makes the rest of us look bad.

We all know why the Site Pest is here.

Why engage?

It's worse than trying to carry on an intelligent conversation with that other Troll, RightTurn [who posted this article].

Smirk. Snark. Snicker.

Childish behavior at best; typicl Liberalism.

[Antigone]

I guess Rush made the comment today on his show about picking them (the pills) up at the Clinton Library Gift Shop.

LOL!

[Borgia]

So it appears only some people are held to a high standard of morality when it comes to sex outside of marriage.

For Rush, Doom and his ilk will be hypocrites and let Rush off becasue he is a conservative.

Nothing wrong with Rush having premarital sex - he's a Republican!
Nothing wrong with Bennet and his gambling - he's a Republican!
Nothing wrong with Rush and his drugs - he's a Republican!
.
.
.
.

I think you get the picture.

[Lubbock]

Anti, your assesment of the why of the search and seizure was on point as to motive. You can believe, if there is any way the authorities in PBC can twist this into a "charge", they will do it. If there is any pin hole in the law, they will drive a semi through it. They would love nothing better than to vacate their agreement with Rush.

I don't discount the possibility that PBC will twist and bend the law to get a charge against Rush.

I take comfort in the fact that Roy Black is representing Rush.

I've got another little theory working: it would not surprise me to learn that money changed hands under the table between PBC and Customs in an effort to "get Rush".

How's that for a conspiracy theory?

Never under estimate a Liberal when he's out to get you!

[Rhino]

I fully understand that Rhino, I was just stating that I think they are using this as a way to try and "find" something they can charge him with in order to say he broke the agreement. If this was anybody except Rush, you would never know about it and they would probably look into it and let everyone off the hook as it wouldn't be worth their time. But if this gives them another shot at Rush, you can bet they will use everything in their arsenal to "find" a way to charge Rush even though he was not the one breaking any laws.
No argument here.

[Kathy29]

1. Is sex outside of marriage immoral?

2. Is Rush immoral for having sex outside of marriage?

Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex outside of marriage?

Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex inside his marriage?

Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex at all?

Lets have some demonstrable evidence. Mere possession of Viagra is not proof. You can't even prove he ingested any Viagra, or how much, or when.

In other words you are just yapping.

[Antigone]

I've got another little theory working: it would not surprise me to learn that money changed hands under the table between PBC and Customs in an effort to "get Rush".

How's that for a conspiracy theory?


That is why I asked if Viagra would show up in the random drug tests he has to do. :biggrin:

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

I'll answer yours, but you going to answer mine?

1. Is sex outside of marriage immoral?

Yes.

2. Is Rush immoral for having sex outside of marriage?

Yes.

But neither have I have held Mr. Limbaugh up as a shining beacon example for the issue of sexual morality. If I had, I could see holding my feet to the fire, but since this is not the case may I point out it IS possible to agree with someone on SOME issues, and not on others.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

For Rush, Doom and his ilk will be hypocrites and let Rush off becasue he is a conservative.


Since I was previously listed in your "list," I can presume you are referring to me as one of the "ilk", so I ask, how have I been a hypocrite?

[Borgia]

Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex outside of marriage?
No.


Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex inside his marriage?
No.


Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex at all?
No.

Lets have some demonstrable evidence. Mere possession of Viagra is not proof. You can't even prove he ingested any Viagra, or how much, or when.

Keep deluding tyourself, Kathy. You know, when someone is caught with a certain amount of drugs they can be charged with intent to sell. Can we prove they intended to sell? No.

So, I am open to other possibilities. Please give ANY reasonable explanation why Rush would have a prescription for Viagra if he;

A. Has never had sex outside his marriage
B. Has never had sex within his marriages
C. Has never had sex at all

It is rather humorous that you think someone who has a prescription of viagra has no intent or has never used it for sexual purposes. You give incredible leeway for Rush yet if it were Moore you would be far more condemnatory than I am.

[Borgia]

I'll answer yours, but you going to answer mine?
I think you and I have talked enough that you know I try and always answer questions directed towards me.


But neither have I have held Mr. Limbaugh up as a shining beacon example for the issue of sexual morality. If I had, I could see holding my feet to the fire, but since this is not the case may I point out it IS possible to agree with someone on SOME issues, and not on others.

I totally respect your position and I hold it myself. I do not ask that a liberal be 100% congruent with my POV on all issues.

I guess what got me thinking about his is how on some other thread, I had read from some posters here how some girl should have kept her legs together (their words not mine). I find it odd that it always seems to be the woman who is blamed more than the man for loose sexual morals. So here we have a man who also is displaying loose sexual morals and no righteous indignation from that crowd of people. Is it because he is a man? Is it because he is Rush? I'd like to know why the woman is excoriated but Rush, engaging in the same behavior, is not.

If I mistakenly grouped you in there with some of the others, I apologize. I hope you can see where my concern is coming from. It takes two to tango and men get off far too easy and Rush exemplifies that here on this thread as many race to excuse him.

[Rhino]

You know, when someone is caught with a certain amount of drugs they can be charged with intent to sell.Emphasis on certain, which obviously does not apply in this case. One bottle of pills does not a dealer make. This is just another slander by diversion. The issue here is not his perceived morality or immorality. Don't try to muddy the waters by trying to pretend this is something that it isn't.

[Borgia]

Emphasis on certain, which obviously does not apply in this case. One bottle of pills does not a dealer make. This is just another slander by diversion. The issue here is not his perceived morality or immorality. Don't try to muddy the waters by trying to pretend this is something that it isn't.

Again, I apologize, my point was poorly phrased. I am not implying that Rush was a dealer. My example was showing how the law DOES predict intent based on what you possess. I think it is very reasonable to assume that Rush intends on using his viagra at some point and I think citing this law shows it to be a reasonable assertion. I was just trying to point this out to Kathy, who seemed to come to what I would consider unreasonable conclusions that Rush did not use his viagra or did not intend on using them.

[Borgia]

By the way, all the fools who are having yuks at Rush's expense (I checked out the link to DU) I consider to be consummate fools. Mother Nature will have her last laugh at them in their old age. :)

[Lubbock]

Speaking of . . . consummate fools . . . at just whose expense are your yucks directed at? Rush? Or the Posters her at FC?

Smirk. Snark. Snicker.

Treat that boy to a Klondike bar!

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

I think you and I have talked enough that you know I try and always answer questions directed towards me.

No slight was intended, but if you'll review the posts, you DID answer my question with two of your own, instead of answering the question directly. :smirky:

I totally respect your position and I hold it myself. I do not ask that a liberal be 100% congruent with my POV on all issues.

IS this a matter of POV? I don't agree.

The issue is drugs -- he made a deal predicated on no further infractions (of any kind) for a period of 18 mos. He had a LEGAL substance, he obtained it legally (through his doctor), and he wasn't caught using, abusing, or selling them illegally. The ONLY one who even remotely could be impugned by this is his doctor, for writing the prescription in his name. Where is YOUR righteous indignation directed at the illegal actions of this doctor??? Why isn't HIS name plastered all over the newspapers?

I guess what got me thinking about his is how on some other thread, I had read from some posters here how some girl should have kept her legs together (their words not mine).

Isn't that a generalization?? Did you not just "lump" me in a group? And before I responded, you then referred to me as a hypocrite?

:shame:

I find it odd that it always seems to be the woman who is blamed more than the man for loose sexual morals. So here we have a man who also is displaying loose sexual morals and no righteous indignation from that crowd of people. Is it because he is a man? Is it because he is Rush? I'd like to know why the woman is excoriated but Rush, engaging in the same behavior, is not.

What did the allegation against Rush consist of? Having sex outside of marriage, or having a prescription drug without his name on the bottle?

While he may have had viagra, I have no proof that he had sex. If you would like me to rail against him for outside-of-marriage sex, then you had better give me more proof than a bottle of some viagra pills, that he actually ENGAGED in the activity. Wishful thinking does not a sex-act make, :smirky: .

If I mistakenly grouped you in there with some of the others, I apologize.

Apology accepted.

I hope you can see where my concern is coming from.

Somewhat. The left is full of such people and such behavior, and hardly a peep can be heard from the libocrats when "their" side does the same.

Do As I Say (Not As I Do) : Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy: Books: Peter Schweizer (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0385513496/ref=ase_othert30-20/104-2980733-1433506?s=books&v=glance&n=283155&tagActionCode=othert30-20)

It takes two to tango and men get off far too easy and Rush exemplifies that here on this thread as many race to excuse him.

Wait, I thought you agreed this case was ridiculous? How can they be racing to excuse him, when he's not guilty of what he's been charged?

[The_Elucidator]

Just seems to me that ya'll are missing the point completely. When you are giving it to the Libs in the keister 3 hours a day 5 days a week, even the great El Rushbo needs a little boost!

[Rhino]

Again, I apologize, my point was poorly phrased. I am not implying that Rush was a dealer. My example was showing how the law DOES predict intent based on what you possess. I think it is very reasonable to assume that Rush intends on using his viagra at some point and I think citing this law shows it to be a reasonable assertion. I was just trying to point this out to Kathy, who seemed to come to what I would consider unreasonable conclusions that Rush did not use his viagra or did not intend on using them.I understand, but what he takes, why he takes it, when he takes it or how he takes it is not the issue here. There are people here who disagree with sex outside of marriage, but I have seen none of them attempt to force their morality on others. That isn't the issue either. If you want to engage in a big moral debate on sex outside of marriage, please start another thread. It isn't the topic of this one.

[Rhino]

Just seems to me that ya'll are missing the point completely. When you are giving it to the Libs in the keister 3 hours a day 5 days a week, even the great El Rushbo needs a little boost!Since they changed my wife's hormones, I may need to ask the doctor for a boost too. Who knew hormones could make that much difference? And where the hell were these hormones years ago?!?!? LOL!

[Kathy29]

No.


No.


No.


Keep deluding tyourself, Kathy. You know, when someone is caught with a certain amount of drugs they can be charged with intent to sell. Can we prove they intended to sell? No.

So, I am open to other possibilities. Please give ANY reasonable explanation why Rush would have a prescription for Viagra if he;

A. Has never had sex outside his marriage
B. Has never had sex within his marriages
C. Has never had sex at all

It is rather humorous that you think someone who has a prescription of viagra has no intent or has never used it for sexual purposes. You give incredible leeway for Rush yet if it were Moore you would be far more condemnatory than I am.

So you're just yapping.
I thought so.

There is absolutely NOTHING about Rush Limbaugh or his history or his opinions that removes his right of privacy (which is why the whole government case against him fell apart). See if it was Moore, I just wouldn't care. I don't care what he does - because I have no point to make. You do. The point you want to make is that Rush Limbaugh speaks about morality and may be having sex himself. HORRORS.

The whole little exercise was supposed to hold him up to public embarassement and humiliation. In some small minds, it has obviously worked.

You would do much better if you could get your nose out of Rush Limbaugh's pants and find some serious issue to address. Viagra is not on the list of drugs for which someone could go to jail for intent to sell. He had the prescription legally. There is no complaint other than - see Rush Limbaugh has sex! He must be having sex. He has viagra!

I don't know which is the most amusing. Rush's jokes about it, or the hysteria of the liberals.

[The_Elucidator]

Since they changed my wife's hormones, I may need to ask the doctor for a boost too. Who knew hormones could make that much difference? And where the hell were these hormones years ago?!?!? LOL!


I hear ya my brother... I hear ya!

[Borgia]

The ONLY one who even remotely could be impugned by this is his doctor, for writing the prescription in his name. Where is YOUR righteous indignation directed at the illegal actions of this doctor??? Why isn't HIS name plastered all over the newspapers?
The Doc is not a celebrity, thus no media exposure. I think the doctor was wrong. Now let me ask you, do you think it was HIS idea or Rush's idea? Rush was complicit.

While he may have had viagra, I have no proof that he had sex. If you would like me to rail against him for outside-of-marriage sex, then you had better give me more proof than a bottle of some viagra pills, that he actually ENGAGED in the activity. Wishful thinking does not a sex-act make, :smirky: .
Whatever. Need I remind you that God said that the intent to sin is the same as the sin itself? If you want to think he was just harmlessly carrying around viagra that it your choice. Maybe he was going to play a practical joke on a friend or something? :)


Somewhat. The left is full of such people and such behavior, and hardly a peep can be heard from the libocrats when "their" side does the same.
Hypocrisy is not the sole provenance of just one political leaning.

Wait, I thought you agreed this case was ridiculous? How can they be racing to excuse him, when he's not guilty of what he's been charged?

Oh, I think the CASE is ridiculous. I also don't think sex outsid eof marriage is the end of the world either. But OTHERS around here do seem to think that sex outside of marriage is horribly wrong. Yet they choose to ignore, or pretend that Rush did not have sex outside of marriage or that he intended to. That is rank hypocrisy, wouldn't you say?

[Borgia]

There are people here who disagree with sex outside of marriage, but I have seen none of them attempt to force their morality on others. That isn't the issue either. If you want to engage in a big moral debate on sex outside of marriage, please start another thread. It isn't the topic of this one.

OK, just a quick response. they may not try to force their morality on others (due more to impotence than anything else) but they do not desist in heaping scorn upon the "loose woman".

[Wolfcounsel]

"they may not try to force their morality on others (due more to impotence than anything else) but they do not desist in heaping scorn upon the "loose woman"." --Borgia

What "loose woman"? Maybe if guys kept their peepees inside their pants, there would not be any loose women.

"It is rather humorous that you think someone who has a prescription of viagra has no intent or has never used it for sexual purposes. You give incredible leeway for Rush yet if it were Moore you would be far more condemnatory than I am." --Borgia

Moore probably needs more than Viagra.<!-- / message --><!-- sig --><!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

[Rhino]

Yeah, what "loose woman"?

[Borgia]

Yeah, what "loose woman"?

Are you honestly sayiing that you have not heard certain memebers around here rail about how some woman needed to keep her legs shut and so on? Do I need to go find those references?

[Wolfcounsel]

"Are you honestly sayiing that you have not heard certain memebers around here rail about how some woman needed to keep her legs shut and so on?" --Borgia

That would be me, as far as I can remember, and I was referring mainly to bimbettes having children left and right and having daddy and mommy taxpayer support the children, and of course, there were the women quick to have sex with any man who was willing, and I pointed out that if the men kept their peepees put away, the loose women would have no way to have sex with no loose men around.

Okay, back to the topic of Moore's microscopic peepee, er, uh, I mean Rush's Viagra.

[Rhino]

Are you honestly sayiing that you have not heard certain memebers around here rail about how some woman needed to keep her legs shut and so on? Do I need to go find those references?I was speaking in reference to this thread. You're free to argue that morality if you please. I was just asking you to limit it to threads where such morality was the topic. It isn't here. It's not even a side issue, except in an extremely obscure sense. And you aren't the only person guilty of diverting a thread away from the central issue either. We all fall prey to that sometimes. You just seem intent on keeping it off the central issues. I'm not trying to stifle your opinions. I'd just like to stay on topic here.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

The Doc is not a celebrity, thus no media exposure. I think the doctor was wrong.

So only celebrities should be targeted (fairly or unfairly) for media exposure? You want me to get angry and upset with Rush for POSSIBLY having sex outside of marriage, and you're NOT expected to get angry and upset about a doctor actually breaking the law?

Now let me ask you, do you think it was HIS idea or Rush's idea? Rush was complicit.

Do I THINK it was Rush's idea? Possibly, probably. But he's not a doctor, under no legal obligation, the doctor was/is.


Whatever. Need I remind you that God said that the intent to sin is the same as the sin itself? If you want to think he was just harmlessly carrying around viagra that it your choice. Maybe he was going to play a practical joke on a friend or something? :)

Not the issue. You want me to get upset with Rush over a possibility. I can't do that.


Hypocrisy is not the sole provenance of just one political leaning.

Agreed!

Oh, I think the CASE is ridiculous. I also don't think sex outsid eof marriage is the end of the world either. But OTHERS around here do seem to think that sex outside of marriage is horribly wrong. Yet they choose to ignore, or pretend that Rush did not have sex outside of marriage or that he intended to. That is rank hypocrisy, wouldn't you say?

BUT, the drug case is the issue at hand, not whether Rush had sex outside of marriage or not. You can't seem to separate the two.

Hypocrsiy would be if he had just come from a speaking engagement at some conference concerning marital morality, abstinence, etc., and this happened at the airport. That we choose to focus on the ISSUE at hand --- the allegation of misconduct regarding drugs --- instead of WHY he had the particular medication in his possession, is in no way indicative of hypocrisy, imho. I consider your charges of hypocrisy a sidetrack from the main.

[Borgia]

Well, I did say and still maintain that this latest Rush event is fluff masquerading as news.

I think he deserves a right to privacy (yes, I think that is Constitutional thanks to liberal activist judges) about his medical records. I think a prescription falls under that.

Yes, the doctor was wrong to do what he did but I would bet he did so with Rush complicit. My guess is Rush asked him to write it under the doc's name.

No big deal.

[DesertFox]

IIRC, Rush Limbaugh recently divorced and was doing nothing outside his marriage.

I think we are supposed to snicker because Rush uses Viagra. Liberals never progress beyond grade-school anticsThat nailed it. LOW grade-school antics.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

No big deal.

Then why did you try to make it one, :smirky:

One misconception, one must be PERFECTLY moral to speak about morality -- there has only been One Such Person.

I wouldn't expect Mr. Limbaugh to become the spokesperson for the Association of Marriage and Family Ministries -- that WOULD be hypocrsiy, :smirky: .

Does that mean he is no longer a valid voice for OTHER areas of immorality, is that what you are implying?

[Borgia]

I guess what got me thinking about his is how on some other thread, I had read from some posters here how some girl should have kept her legs together (their words not mine). I find it odd that it always seems to be the woman who is blamed more than the man for loose sexual morals. So here we have a man who also is displaying loose sexual morals and no righteous indignation from that crowd of people. Is it because he is a man? Is it because he is Rush? I'd like to know why the woman is excoriated but Rush, engaging in the same behavior, is not.

This is but one minor example of what I refer to:

I don't suppose it ever occured to the slut that Bush didn't force her to spread her legs for the turgid member.
<!-- / message -->

[Rink]

I guess in order to satisfy the uber-moral Liberals Rush Limbaugh has to become a Cloistered monk taking the vows of Poverty, Chastity and Obedience???

he's not a monk, he's a human being, and adult who should have a right of choice in his private life whether or not he wishes to enjoy some things that life brings or not.

Irregardless of the viagra, it is his P-R-I-V-A-T-E life, why should it be the concern of ANYONE's let alone the liberals UNLESS..... the Liberals have an agenda to permanently silence Rush for good?

And in order to silence Rush they have to demonize him and de-legitimize him as much as they can?

This is proving that Rush is extremely effective in the hammering of the liberals and the exposing of their lies, and shenannigans.

[Borgia]

Then why did you try to make it one, :smirky:
I never made it an issue that he wa caught with viagra. I said early on it was unimportant. But it does reveal he is having sex outside of marriage which I thought was a big no-no for conservatives. Guess I was wrong.


Does that mean he[Rush] is no longer a valid voice for OTHER areas of immorality, is that what you are implying?
I am keeping my comments solely to his sexual proclivities. I did not imply anything more than that.

[Borgia]

I guess in order to satisfy the uber-moral Liberals Rush Limbaugh has to become a Cloistered monk taking the vows of Poverty, Chastity and Obedience???

he's not a monk, he's a human being, and adult who should have a right of choice in his private life whether or not he wishes to enjoy some things that life brings or not.

Irregardless of the viagra, it is his P-R-I-V-A-T-E life, why should it be the concern of ANYONE's let alone the liberals UNLESS..... the Liberals have an agenda to permanently silence Rush for good?

And in order to silence Rush they have to demonize him and de-legitimize him as much as they can?

This is proving that Rush is extremely effective in the hammering of the liberals and the exposing of their lies, and shenannigans.

You misunderstand, Rink. I do not care whether he has sex outside of marriage, but my position is not that it is a heinous thing to do. But it is a conservative position that sex outside of marriage is wrong.

If I am incorrect, please advise. I really could have sworn that conservatives (for hte most part) were against sex outside of marriage.

Rhino, feel free to branch this thread and move the posts to a more appropriate locale.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

I never made it an issue that he wa caught with viagra. I said early on it was unimportant. But it does reveal he is having sex outside of marriage which I thought was a big no-no for conservatives. Guess I was wrong.

But that's not true -- the issue you made was EXACTLY that he was caught with viagra! You expcted more outrage over the implication (the viagra) he was having outside-of-marriage sex, than the fact this was a bogus attempt to further tarnish Mr. Limbaugh's reputation. When we did not oblige, which you expected, you accuse us of hypcrisy.

I am keeping my comments solely to his sexual proclivities. I did not imply anything more than that.

Then I must admit, I'm a bit confused by your position. I thought you were pointing out that his (supposed) immoral behavior (sex-outside-of-marriage) disqualified him to speak on issues of morality. Did I misunderstand?

[Peachdiane]

But it does reveal he is having sex outside of marriage which I thought was a big no-no for conservatives. Guess I was wrong.

Now I'm confused. In 2004 he said he was getting a divorce and I thought he was. So why all the harping over sex outside of marriage? :question:

[Rhino]

Now I'm confused. In 2004 he said he was getting a divorce and I thought he was. So why all the harping over sex outside of marriage? :question:Because it's an easy avenue for attack from those who care not about relevance.

[Antigone]

Rhino,

Found this blurb while looking around:

It is generally not illegal under Florida law for a physician to prescribe medication in a third party's name if all parties are aware and the doctor documents it correctly, said Mike Edmondson, a spokesman for the state attorney in Palm Beach County. He would not discuss specifics in the Limbaugh case Tuesday.


The sheriff's office was continuing its investigation and would soon turn the case over to prosecutors, Edmondson said. The alleged violation could be a second-degree misdemeanor if Limbaugh's doctor doesn't confirm the prescription.


Under last month's deal with prosecutors, authorities will dismiss a "doctor shopping" charge if Limbaugh doesn't get arrested for 18 months, among other terms. Prosecutors had said he illegally deceived multiple doctors to get overlapping painkiller prescriptions. Limbaugh denied the charges but admitted he was addicted to painkillers.


This latest case may simply be dismissed if prosecutors can confirm with Limbaugh's doctor that the prescription was indeed for Limbaugh, said Kendall Coffey, a former U.S. attorney in Florida.


"It's perhaps a little embarrassing but not highly incriminating," Coffey said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060627/ap_on_en_ot/limbaugh_viagra;_ylt=AukkAxqLmabs1gwSK4VXeh.s0NUE; _ylu=X3oDMTA3ODdxdHBhBHNlYwM5NjQ-

So as we all suspected, he did nothing wrong, but it isn't stopping the liberals from jumping up and down with glee. I also don't trust the prosecutors to let it be once it all shakes out to be a nothing story. They are as rabid in PBC to "get Rush" as the liberal establishment is to "get Bush".

[Rhino]

I figured.

[Maggie_T]

I'd like to know how this information got out. Customs inspections are private by law.

So? One's medical records are supposed to be protected by HIPAA. Somehow, that did not apply to Rush, whose medical records were all over the place when the "scandal" of his pills broke out.

It's the same old same old, Rhino. If you're a liberal, you're protected by everything and everyone. If you're a conservative, it's open season on you year round.

Not surprised, are you, ducky?

[Rhino]

Nope.

[HooverWasRight]

That nailed it. LOW grade-school antics.


...leave me outta this...ya dick

[Rhino]

LOL! Another drive-by posting!

[HooverWasRight]

LOL! Another drive-by posting!


So if Rush uses viagra..etc...etc... does that mean I can't call him a dick?

[Rhino]

Seems to me it would be the other way around. He'd be more likely to be one, wouldn't ya think? Or at least have one.

[DesertFox]

But Cialis is much better stuff than Viagra.

[Rhino]

Tell Rush.

[DesertFox]

Okay.

Hey, Rush, Cialis is better shit.

[Longhorn_Platinum]

Borgia:
Oh, I think the CASE is ridiculous. I also don't think sex outsid eof marriage is the end of the world either. But OTHERS around here do seem to think that sex outside of marriage is horribly wrong. Yet they choose to ignore, or pretend that Rush did not have sex outside of marriage or that he intended to. That is rank hypocrisy, wouldn't you say?

:sulk: You are so full of sh!t. Yes, there are quite a few people here who oppose extramarital sex, & homosexuality, too, but the general consensus among FreeCers is that what people do in the privacy of their own homes is ultimately up to them, as long as they don't try to ram it down the throats of others. But Rush didn't make an issue of his Viagra or his sex life, his privacy was invaded. Now, stick it, already.

[Jester21]

Was Limbaugh travelling with anyone? I've been unable to determine through the news.

[Timberwolf]

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by TechnoPrincess
Maybe he was engaged in "self love":question:
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Good point and a possiblity. Timber brought up another one which I assume is another reason why you might take viagra.
I did? This is the first post regarding this subject...unless you mean a joke I posted a few months ago...if so, LOL...good one. But, I doubt it. :rotflmbo:
For those of you who have NO idea to what I'm referring...it has something to do with no peeing on one's shoes...and we'll just leave it at that.

I wonder if Rush will address this on his show. Can someone tell me what he has to say about it today? Thanks!
I think he's on vacation until next Wednesday...but, I could be mistaken about that.

[Timberwolf]

Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Borgia
But I wonder about all those conservatives who DO take a strong stand agaisnt sex outside of marriage. I could name plenty of conseravtive columnists that write about it regularly. Or I could mention many posters on this board like Homes, Maggie, Doom, and Wyatt.

I am just concerned that Rush is letting them down. :(
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Have you ever seen me extolling him as a model of Christian virtue?
Or Doc, or Wyatt, or me, or anyone else??

[Timberwolf]

So it appears only some people are held to a high standard of morality when it comes to sex outside of marriage.
Please show me an example or let it be known you've been invited to stuff a hand grenade in your pie hole.

For Rush, Doom and his ilk will be hypocrites and let Rush off becasue he is a conservative.
Not bloody likely, but if you wanna do it...knock yourself out.

Nothing wrong with Rush having premarital sex - he's a Republican!
I don't enjoy the fact that he's been committing adultery since his first divorce. There's everything wrong with fornication, but don't let that prevent you from putting words in other people's mouths.

Nothing wrong with Bennet and his gambling - he's a Republican!
I never knew gambling was immoral. I gamble. So what? You spend your entertainment dollars where you want and I'll do likewise.

Nothing wrong with Rush and his drugs - he's a Republican!
Illicit drug abuse and getting addicted to a pain medication that was PRESCRIBED for you is akin to comparing apples to elephants or oranges to meerkats.

I think you get the picture.
No, not really...you used to be mildly amusing...now, you're just a joke.

[DoctorDoom]

Heh, heh. I am evil incarnate, remember?Nah, you're stupidity incarnate, which we all determined almost 1600 posts ago.

On this very board we get to read about how trollops should keep their legs closed from the likes of Doom and Wyatt (and others).Or I could mention many posters on this board like Homes, Maggie, Doom, and Wyatt.For Rush, Doom and his ilk will be hypocritesI hate to be the one to burst your bubble, faggot, but I'm straight. Thus your obsession with me is for nought. However, maybe you can have a dalliance with Mr. Sulu to swap bodily fluids and lessen the pains of disappointment.

[Longhorn_Platinum]

Timberwolf:
I did? This is the first post regarding this subject...unless you mean a joke I posted a few months ago.

:moo: I think he was confusing you with Wolfcounsel, who suggested that Rush might need Viagra for some form of hypertension.

[DoctorDoom]

This is but one minor example of what I refer to:I don't suppose it ever occured to the slut that Bush didn't force her to spread her legs for the turgid member.The topic of that thread (http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/showthread.php?t=37171) was abortion, imbecile. If Rush blames Bush for his abortion, then I'll call him a slut. Until then, troll, your vacuous "point" is impressing only you.

[DoctorDoom]

What's illuminating is the monomaniacal fixation of liberals with attempting to destroy Rush, Ann, Dr. Laura et al by any means fair or foul. Why do they do it? A: they are dynamic, effective voices for conservatism, and the libs cannot compete with them in the arena of ideas. Thus the great liberal champions of free speech try to silence or censor them in order to regain their death grip on the news and information media.

My response to shameless, pathetic losers like Borgtroll:

4Q, A'HOLES!

[Apollo5600]

If I am incorrect, please advise. I really could have sworn that conservatives (for hte most part) were against sex outside of marriage.

Last I checked, Rush did not make it with Monica in the oval office while he was married. He has never been involved in any groping incidents, attempted rapes, that sort of thing. He does not betray the country like liberals do, he does not sell us out to the Chinese, or the Russkies, he does not denigrate our military, or work against the War on Terror. He does not repeat the lies of the leftist traitors, but is infact a patriot.

So, if Rush was having sex outside of Marriage (and as far as I know, he is not a Christian, though I could be wrong... I usually listen to Savage) then that is his problem. But, if I were to say who was scummier, him or liberals? I'd have to go with the scumbag libs.

[Peachdiane]

Let's hope it's not a stiff sentence....

I've never heard Rush profess to be Christian. At least he's honest about it and unlike four abusive people (outside this bb) I know who hide behind Christianity and the Bible.

But, if I were to say who was scummier, him or liberals? I'd have to go with the scumbag libs.
Reading the DU's reaction, no question about it. Leave it to them to link him with DR prostitutes. Mr. Limbaugh, like all of us here, has the rights to his privacy. It should be protected and shouldn't be released by anyone, particularly government officials. I hope he sues. If Rush does not stand up to them, they will continue the harassment....

[Longhorn_Platinum]

Peachdiane:
At least he's honest about it and unlike four abusive people (outside this bb) I know who hide behind Christianity and the Bible.

:question: You know the Phelpses?

[Peachdiane]

The ex's family and his wife. They believe it's perfectly ok to be hate filled and spout hate because gosh, they go to church and follow the Bible. :D

[TechnoPrincess]

The ex's family and his wife. They believe it's perfectly ok to be hate filled and spout hate because gosh, they go to church and follow the Bible. :D

You know...I swear our exes are related!

:D

[Trevelyan]

But Cialis is much better stuff than Viagra.

What about Lavitra?

[TechnoPrincess]

The topic of that thread (http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/showthread.php?t=37171) was abortion, imbecile. If Rush blames Bush for his abortion, then I'll call him a slut. Until then, troll, your vacuous "point" is impressing only you.

Thank you for putting that quote in context :)

[RightTurns]

What's illuminating is the monomaniacal fixation of liberals with attempting to destroy Rush, Ann, Dr. Laura et al by any means fair or foul. Why do they do it? A: they are dynamic, effective voices for conservatism, and the libs cannot compete with them in the arena of ideas. Thus the great liberal champions of free speech try to silence or censor them in order to regain their death grip on the news and information media. It's the same media attention and papparazzi that tries to expose everything about every celebrity. Doesn't matter if it's Rush or Britney Spears. To blame this exposure on liberals is a stretch. Because "liberals" are often the target also.

I don't care that Rush takes Viagra. It doesn't mean diddly (no pun) to me. I don't care what he does in his private life either. But - hey - can I ask MY doctor to prescribe a med for me in someone else's name? And there is no secret that meds transported over borders are checked and should always be contained in the original container.

Rush, just like Britney and Barbra and Madonna are all celebrities. And with that comes a price to pay. To let one of those celebrities "off the hook" just because they're on your side of the political spectrum is hypocritical.

I wrote off Rush a long time ago. Sorry, but I'll stick with the likes of Michael Medved, Dennis Prager and Hugh Hewitt.

[Rhino]

But - hey - can I ask MY doctor to prescribe a med for me in someone else's name?Yep.

And there is no secret that meds transported over borders are checked and should always be contained in the original container.It was in the original container.

Rush, just like Britney and Barbra and Madonna are all celebrities. And with that comes a price to pay. To let one of those celebrities "off the hook" just because they're on your side of the political spectrum is hypocritical.There is no 'hook' to let him off of. He did nothing wrong. I think the problem with this is not so much that it was known, but with the manner in which it was blown out of proportion. I seriously doubt that would have been done with Britney, Barbra or Madonna, but you never know. The problem I have with it was the insinuation that there was wrongdoing involved, before all the facts were known. Yes, that happens with celebreties, but it's most often in publications like the National Enquirer rather than the MSM. My original problem was with the apparent release of information by Customs, but now it appears that was done by the Sheriff's department. They too should have verified the facts before allowing the issue to be sensationalized that way. And yes, I'd say the same thing if it was a liberal.

[RightTurns]

In the original container with your OWN name on it.
I've traveled overseas quite a bit (with prescriptions) and while they haven't always been checked, there have been times when customs have compared them to my passport ID.

I don't see why Rush should get a pass on that.
I didn't.

As far as Britney is concerned, the media is relentless.
And the rest of the Hollyweird crowd have the media hanging from trees and digging through their garbage. So this incident with Rush is no different and shouldn't be treated as so.

[Rhino]

He didn't get a pass. They took the medicine. That's all they ever do in such cases.

[RightTurns]

That's all they ever do in such cases, unless a celebrity is involved.
There is nothing unusual about that.

[Nutrider99]

Gentlemen, let's consider certain elements of this sensationalized invasion of privacy.

1. From what I've seen, by Florida law and precedent, it is not a crime for a physician to fill a prescription in his own name and pass that prescription on to a patient. There was no crime committed.

2. This story was leaked to the press in violation of confidentiality. All persons are innocent until proven guilty. Since Limabugh was not charged with a crime nor was he arrested, the public does NOT have a right to know.

3. All snickering aside, if a person has a medical condition that can be improved by medication, and if a physician prescribes that medication, then it's nobody's business. It's a shame that in this climate a celebrity cannot count on so-called professionals to respect their given professions enough to keep such information silent, and they have to resort to having the physician keep prescriptions in their name to avoid the very publicity that this has provided.

4. If Limbaugh goes out of the country for sexual indulgence, whose business it it, anyway? Christians do not hold him to be their moral leader. Christians seek to be like Christ, and we fail to hit that mark each and every day because of our sinful natures. We don't want to be like Farwell or the Pope, either. We look to our Savior as our inspiration.

5. Rush is a talk show host. He gets paid to be controversial. He gets paid to irritate the libs and to promote his own conservative beliefs. He is also a man, and as such is no less sexually driven than any of us. Frankly, if I needed it, I'd take Viagra also. Fortunately I don't. One reason is that I have good circulation. Another is that I am absolutely in love with my wife, and her body is still for me the ultimate turn on.

6. Where was the righteous indignation of the libs when their commander-in-theif was defiling the Oval Office and endangering the security of the presidency with an intern who had no security clearance? This is nothing more than an opportunity to do what libs do best... attack, smear, slander and lie. The true moral outrage is that those with no morality whatever are pretending to take the moral high ground on this issue.

[RightTurns]

Gentlemen, let's consider certain elements of this sensationalized invasion of privacy. Tell that to every celebrity who has had their privacy invaded.


1. From what I've seen, by Florida law and precedent, it is not a crime for a physician to fill a prescription in his own name and pass that prescription on to a patient. There was no crime committed. Nor was there any crime commited when Britney Spears put her child in a forward facing carseat. Not according to California law. But did that stop the media?

2. This story was leaked to the press in violation of confidentiality. All persons are innocent until proven guilty. Since Limabugh was not charged with a crime nor was he arrested, the public does NOT have a right to know. Nor does the public have the right to know about Rosie O'Donells private life. Care to expand on that?

4. If Limbaugh goes out of the country for sexual indulgence, whose business it it, anyway? Christians do not hold him to be their moral leader. Christians seek to be like Christ, and we fail to hit that mark each and every day because of our sinful natures. We don't want to be like Farwell or the Pope, either. We look to our Savior as our inspiration. If Paris Hilton makes a sex video for sexual indulgence, who are WE to condemn her?

5. Rush is a talk show host. He gets paid to be controversial. He gets paid to irritate the libs and to promote his own conservative beliefs. He is also a man, and as such is no less sexually driven than any of us. Frankly, if I needed it, I'd take Viagra also. Fortunately I don't. One reason is that I have good circulation. Another is that I am absolutely in love with my wife, and her body is still for me the ultimate turn on.Too much information.

6. Where was the righteous indignation of the libs when their commander-in-theif was defiling the Oval Office and endangering the security of the presidency with an intern who had no security clearance? This is nothing more than an opportunity to do what libs do best... attack, smear, slander and lie. The true moral outrage is that those with no morality whatever are pretending to take the moral high ground on this issue. It all comes back to Clinton. I don't forgive him and I don't forgive Rush either. Rush should know better.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

That was the whole mess in a nutshell!

Thanks Nutrider! :thumb:

[Rhino]

Nor was there any crime commited when Britney Spears put her child in a forward facing carseat. Not according to California law. But did that stop the media?The child was in her lap, which is against California law.

[Rhino]

Sorry. Wrong incident.

[RightTurns]

The child was in her lap, which is against California law. Yes, THAT time. But they also crucified her for having the baby in a forward facing carseat (in the back seat) which apparently in not against California law.

The media is out to get every well-known celebrity, not just conservatives.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

I don't forgive him and I don't forgive Rush either. Rush should know better.

Forgive him for what? Should know better about what?

[RightTurns]

Forgive him for what? Should know better about what? Uhh, should know better that any kind of drug violation will haunt him. Why is that so difficult to understand?

It's no different from the Bill Bennett gambling fiasco.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

Uhh, should know better that any kind of drug violation will haunt him. Why is that so difficult to understand?

Uuh, there was NO drug violation. Why is that so difficult for YOU to understand. What happened was a railroad job.

Limbaugh likely to wait several days - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060627/ap_on_en_ot/limbaugh_viagra;_ylt=AukkAxqLmabs1gwSK4VXeh.s0NUE; _ylu=X3oDMTA3ODdxdHBhBHNlYwM5NjQ-)
"It is generally not illegal under Florida law for a physician to prescribe medication in a third party's name if all parties are aware and the doctor documents it correctly, said Mike Edmondson, a spokesman for the state attorney in Palm Beach County."

BTW, aren't Christians supposed to forgive others, as Christ forgave them? :smirky:

[RightTurns]

BTW, aren't Christians supposed to forgive others, as Christ forgave them? :smirky: That's what I thought. But go visit the Susan Sarandon thread and other threads regarding Hollyweird celebrities. And then tell me that y'all forgive them. Then tell me that there isn't a double standard here.

As far as being railroaded, well I guess a few Hollyweird celebrities could claim the same.

[Rhino]

Homes is right. There was no drug violation to forgive. Everything was perfectly legal.

[Borgia]

The topic of that thread (http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/showthread.php?t=37171) was abortion, imbecile. If Rush blames Bush for his abortion, then I'll call him a slut. Until then, troll, your vacuous "point" is impressing only you.

Hmm, you blamed the girl for getting pregnant and called her a slut.

You'll have to excuse me that I interpreted that in the English language. I don't speak your spin very well.

[True Grace]

One reason is that I have good circulation. Another is that I am absolutely in love with my wife, and her body is still for me the ultimate turn on.

Too much information.

Yes, how dare he speak of his wife that way. We know how liberals can't abide happily married (heterosexual) couples and their families. And a man who is in love with his wife and only wants to make love to her is an abomination. (It IS perfectly acceptable for a man to be in love with another man, however, and want to only have sex with him).

Nutrider, please, next time keep your love for your wife to yourself. You are obviously giving some liberals here the willies by being faithful and monogamous and happy. :rolleyes:

[Rhino]

He has good circulation, but he doesn't circulate. :D

[RightTurns]

Yes, how dare he speak of his wife that way. We know how liberals can't abide happily married (heterosexual) couples and their families. And a man who is in love with his wife and only wants to make love to her is an abomination. (It IS perfectly acceptable for a man to be in love with another man, however, and want to only have sex with him).

Nutrider, please, next time keep your love for your wife to yourself. You are obviously giving some liberals here the willies by being faithful and monogamous and happy. :rolleyes: You are demented in that you choose to bring homosexual love into this debate. Would you like to know how many times I give my husband a blowjob during our acceptable heterosexual love for each other? Oh yeah, my husband is whipped (from another thread). What if I told you that he's only whipped when he's a naughty, naughty boy and deserves to be whipped?

Geez. Give me a break here.

[Rhino]

Hmm, you blamed the girl for getting pregnant and called her a slut.

You'll have to excuse me that I interpreted that in the English language. I don't speak your spin very well.Oh, stop antagonizing. You know very well what the context was. I think you enjoy these arguments too much. You're becoming addicted.

[Rhino]

You are demented in that you choose to bring homosexual love into this debate. Would you like to know how many times I give my husband a blowjob during our acceptable heterosexual love for each other? Oh yeah, my husband is whipped (from another thread). What if I told you that he's only whipped when he's a naughty, naughty boy and deserves to be whipped?

Geez. Give me a break here.And that's not too much information? LOL!!!

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

That's what I thought. But go visit the Susan Sarandon thread and other threads regarding Hollyweird celebrities. And then tell me that y'all forgive them. Then tell me that there isn't a double standard here.

What does that have to do with you not forgiving Mr. Limbaugh? Is your forgiveness predicated on the forgiveness of others for celebrities?

As far as being railroaded, well I guess a few Hollyweird celebrities could claim the same.

So? What does that have to do with the fact you said Mr. Limbaugh should know better? He didn't do anything wrong, so what should he know better?

I'm not especially fond of Mr. Limbaugh anymore either (at least personally), but at least I can admit this was a case of him being targeted for no other reason than public political humiliation, derision, and degradation.

[Nutrider99]

Tell that to every celebrity who has had their privacy invaded.
I have no respect whatever for low life slimeballs who scale fences and use telephoto lenses to spy on others in the privacy of their own homes, nor do I care much for a gossip.

Nor was there any crime commited when Britney Spears put her child in a forward facing carseat. Not according to California law. But did that stop the media?
If Britney Spears doesn't break the law or abuse her child, I really don't care what she does. I think that it's sad she let her public know that she was sleeping around after holding herself up as an icon and promising not to have sex outside of marriage, but even at the time I didn't care what she said or did. I don't have a daughter, but if I did, I would expect her mother to be her role model, not some ditsy headed singer.

Nor does the public have the right to know about Rosie O'Donells private life. Care to expand on that?
Rosie chose to make her "private" life public. I don't go out in public talking about how I have sex with women, why should she? Bedroom doors close for a reason.

If Paris Hilton makes a sex video for sexual indulgence, who are WE to condemn her?
Society has always looked down their noses at sluts and whores, but at the same time, been very thankful for the behavior it criticizes. Again, I don't care who Paris Hilton sleeps with. I'm not buying her video, anyway.


It all comes back to Clinton.
Only the hypocrisy.

I don't forgive him and I don't forgive Rush either. Rush should know better.
Bill Clinton doesn't want your forgiveness. Rush has done nothing to you to require it.

[True Grace]

And that's not too much information? LOL!!!

I think my eyeballs are now scorched.

[Rhino]

I may be jealous. I haven't decided. LOL!

[Nutrider99]

Would you like to know how many times I give my husband a ***job during our acceptable heterosexual love for each other?
I would hope that you two give pleasure to each other as often as possible, and would respect each other enough to keep the details of your sexuality behind closed doors. I do not believe there is any such thing as sexual deviance between two people married to each other so long as it does not demean or injure the other. Whatever makes you happy, I support. As I said, bedroom doors close for a reason. Nobody has a right to know what goes within.

[RightTurns]

But then I force him to bake cookies for me afterwards.

[Rhino]

She was just sarcastically responding to the insinuation that she was against happily married heterosexual couples. It was a bit of a stretch to assume she was against them, so she satirically went to a bit of stretch to disprove the notion. I don't think she wanted to.

[True Grace]

But then I force him to bake cookies for me afterwards.

Eeew! That's even worse than what you wrote before!

My eyes! My eyes! Oh the pain!

[Rhino]

But then I force him to bake cookies for me afterwards.Well, that clinches it. I'm not jealous. I do make the cinammon rolls though.

[Nutrider99]

But then I force him to bake cookies for me afterwards.
Now that's what I call a good trade. He gets the nookie, you get the cookie.

[True Grace]

She was just sarcastically responding to the insinuation that she was against happily married heterosexual couples. It was a bit of a stretch to assume she was against them, so she satirically went to a bit of stretch to disprove the notion. I don't think she wanted to.

Rhino, I was being sarcastic too.

[Rhino]

Yeah, but I don't think she caught that, hence the rather explicit reply.

[Borgia]

Oh, stop antagonizing. You know very well what the context was. I think you enjoy these arguments too much. You're becoming addicted.

I am sorry. Sometimes the language that is used around here gets to me. It actually gets rather offensive but I certainly acknowledge that is only me and my opinion. I guess I didn't expect such coarse language from God-fearing and moral conservatives. (I joke!)

[Borgia]

Now that's what I call a good trade. He gets the nookie, you get the cookie.

Come on! This is Post of the Month material here! :)

[Incident_command]

But then I force him to bake cookies for me afterwards.

Yep, whatever it takes:biggrin:

[Rhino]

Come on! This is Post of the Month material here! :)
So vote for him.

http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/showthread.php?t=37304

[Rhino]

But DeclinetoState has some good ones too.

"I have no problem with a person either burning the flag or wrapping himself in it to protest. Just so long as he (or she) does both things at the same time--and there's only one flag involved."

Unfortunately, I had already voted for this month.

[DoctorDoom]

Using my unmatched investigative skills, I have tracked down the actual home location of RT.

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Idiotasylum.jpg" />

Post # 122:

It's the same media attention and papparazzi that tries to expose everything about every celebrity. Doesn't matter if it's Rush or Britney Spears. To blame this exposure on liberals is a stretch. Because "liberals" are often the target also.There's a really f'ing big difference between paparazzi annoying vacuous Unholywood cretins and blatant liberal witchhunts against powerful conservative voices.

Rush, just like Britney and Barbra and Madonna are all celebrities.Would you care to enlighten us, O Clueless One, on how the DBM and politically-motivated prosecutors are trying to silence if not destroy "Britney and Barbra and Madonna". Your moral relativism is showing ... again.

And with that comes a price to pay.[quote]The "price" payed by Britney having her artificially-enhanced mammaries appearing in scandal sheets is far different than Rush being targeted for destruction by liberal asswarts who cannot compete with him.

[quote]To let one of those celebrities "off the hook" just because they're on your side of the political spectrum is hypocritical.Use this ... QUICKLY. You need it desperately.

<table align="center" bgcolor="400000" bordercolor="CCCCCC" border="4" cellpadding="8"><tr><td><div align="center"><font face="Verdana" color="yellow" size="7"><b>* CLUEPON *<br><font size="5">This cluepon entitles the bearer to<br>one free clue at any local retailer.<br><font size="3">Valid worldwide. No expiration date.</font><br></font></b> </font></div></td></tr></table>

I wrote off Rush a long time ago.I'm sure that he will not be able to sleep knowing that a liberal idiot "wrote (him) off".

Sorry, but I'll stick with the likes of Michael Medved, Dennis Prager and Hugh Hewitt.And?


Post # 124:

As far as Britney is concerned, the media is relentless.And she loves every minute of it.

And the rest of the Hollyweird crowd have the media hanging from trees and digging through their garbage. So this incident with Rush is no different and shouldn't be treated as so.Use the cluepon, troll.


Post # 128:

Nor does the public have the right to know about Rosie O'Donells private life. Care to expand on that?If the dyke would keep her private life private, she might have a legitimate gripe. However, when she flaunts her perverted sexuality to the media, I couldn't care less what happens as a result.


Post # 136:

That's what I thought. But go visit the Susan Sarandon thread and other threads regarding Hollyweird celebrities.Is that your phrase du jour?

And then tell me that y'all forgive them.The premise of forgiving someone is that the person to be forgiven has caused an injury or injustice to the person who will do the forgiving. The mouthy bitch Sarandon has caused me no injury or injustice, ergo I have nothing to forgive. The fact that she's one of a thousand ignorant leftist numbwits who infest Unholywood is not a matter for forgiveness.

Then tell me that there isn't a double standard here.No, there is not. In fact, we at FC are extremely tolerant, as evinced by the fact that a liberal twit like you can rack up almost 500 posts.

As far as being railroaded, well I guess a few Hollyweird celebrities could claim the same.Such as?


And another liberaloser joined the droolfest.

Post # 138:

Hmm, you blamed the girl for getting pregnant and called her a slut.Girls getting pregnant is hardly unusual, thanks to amoral liberals erasing every trace of honor, decency, responsibility and self-control from our culture. Girls getting pregant and then using it as a political ploy to bash President Bush are liberal sluts.

You'll have to excuse me that I interpreted that in the English language. I don't speak your spin very well.You can't grasp any concept more complex than Dick and Jane seeing Spot run.


Back to the troll.

Post # 141:

You are demented in that you choose to bring homosexual love into this debate.Hit a nerve, did she? In the first place, "homosexual love" is an oxymoron. It's 100% pure lust. And in the second place, fag "marriage" is the only "relationship" that liberal homophiles respect.

Would you like to know how many times I give my husband a blowjob during our acceptable heterosexual love for each other? Oh yeah, my husband is whipped (from another thread). What if I told you that he's only whipped when he's a naughty, naughty boy and deserves to be whipped?We didn't ask about your kinky sex life. IAC, we appreciate your not apprising us about how you remove the bands from his cigars.

Geez. Give me a break here.You've been given far more breaks than you deserve.

[DesertFox]

For the life of me I can't remember when the drive by cops went after Brittney Spears.

[Foquet]

I do wish Rush would have just gone postal and told the paid DNC Customs Officer to drop his pants, while Rush had him in a headlock.

[Rhino]

Sort of a reverse body cavity search? That isn't in the manual, is it? Houston, we don't have a procedure for that!

[Maggie_T]

Oh, stop antagonizing. You know very well what the context was. I think you enjoy these arguments too much. You're becoming addicted.

And repetitive. And tedious. And tiresome.

[DesertFox]

Well, if they did NOT search Rush Limbaugh´s rectum for heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine, I WANNA KNOW WHY!

:rolleyes:

[Maggie_T]

Yeah, let's demand a full-fledged investigation ... as well as a recount of the pills. :rolleyes:

[Rhino]

Well, if they did NOT search Rush Limbaugh´s rectum for heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine, I WANNA KNOW WHY!WMD. He also had Ex-Lax in his bag.

[DesertFox]

That explains it.

What a relief.





*snicker*

[HooverWasRight]

Okay.

Hey, Rush, Cialis is better shit.


Yah, Rush ask dickless...he knows.

[Lazarus]

I think we are supposed to snicker because Rush uses Viagra. Liberals never progress beyond grade-school antics, and that is surely a hoot to them.

Of course, seeing how liberal males are closer to neuters than real men, they probably won't ever have the need for Viagra.Beautifully put...!

[HooverWasRight]

Using my unmatched investigative skills, I have tracked down the actual home location of RT.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Idiotasylum.jpg

.


Wouldn't a pic of a NASCAR track only making left turns been more appropriate?

[HooverWasRight]

Would you like to know how many times I give my husband a blowjob during our acceptable heterosexual love for each other?

pics please.

[Lubbock]

Idiot Leftist and Idiot Idiot conversing.

[HooverWasRight]

Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex outside of marriage?

Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex inside his marriage?

Can you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rush had sex at all?

Lets have some demonstrable evidence. Mere possession of Viagra is not proof. You can't even prove he ingested any Viagra, or how much, or when.

In other words you are just yapping.

Oh come on Kathy, don't be so naive.
Pillbaugh the thrice divorced drug addict went to the DR to have a sex romp with an underage girl...I wonder if she was a femiNazi.

[TechnoPrincess]

Yah, Rush ask dickless...he knows.

http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_19_2.gif (http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb001_ZSYYYYYYYYUS) WTF?!











http://www.smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb068&pp=ZSYYYYYYYYUS (http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb068_ZSYYYYYYYYUS)

[Rhino]

WTF?!
That's just Crow teasing Fox.

[TechnoPrincess]

Idiot Leftist and Idiot Idiot conversing.

http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/4/4_1_213.gif (http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb001_ZSYYYYYYYYUS)





http://www.smileycentral.com/sig.jsp?pc=ZSzeb068&pp=ZSYYYYYYYYUS (http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb068_ZSYYYYYYYYUS)

[Rhino]

Crow (HooverWasRight) doesn't post much here anymore, but he's far from an idiot. He just has an 'off the wall' sense of humor. If you weren't here when he used to post, it's hard to understand that. We 'old timers' know him well, so we have you at a disadvantage.