Broadband | Credit Cards | Mortgages | Car Finance | Modded Xbox
Geneva Conventions Rights For Detainees [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Geneva Conventions Rights For Detainees


Rhino
07-11-2006, 08:32 AM
Pentagon Memo Says Detainees Protected by Geneva Conventions

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration said Tuesday that all detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and in all other U.S. military custody around the world are entitled to protections under the Geneva Conventions.

White House spokesman Tony Snow said the policy, outlined in a new Defense Department memo, reflects the recent 5-3 Supreme Court decision blocking military tribunals set up by President Bush.

The policy, described in a memo by Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England, appears to reverse the administration's earlier insistence that the detainees are not prisoners of war and thus subject to the Geneva protections.

Word of the Bush administration's new stance came as the Senate Judiciary Committee opened hearings Tuesday on the Guantanamo issue -- which is testing unity among Republicans on Capitol Hill, with lawmakers trying to decide in an election season how military detainees should be tried and what their rights should be.

Snow insisted that all U.S. detainees have been treated humanely. Still, he said, "We want to get it right."

"It's not really a reversal of policy," Snow asserted, calling the Supreme Court decision "complex.".........http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,202922,00.html

Rink
07-11-2006, 12:17 PM
Are they THAT stupid?

to Ascribe the Geneva Convention to TERRORISTS???

These are NOT people who fit the normal standard bill that the Geneva Convention falls under, they do not fight for any particular nation, they do not wear an identifying uniform, they do not belong to any national military.

These people are Terrorists to whom the Geneva Conventions DO NOT APPLY.

WTF is wrong with the Bush Administration here?

Rhino
07-11-2006, 12:36 PM
WTF is wrong with the Bush Administration here?Wrong scapegoats. It was the Supreme Court decision that prompted this.

Rhino
07-11-2006, 01:10 PM
Upon further examination, it appears the media hasn't gotten this exactly right (color me surprised). The memo supposedly only states that Article 3 is to be adhered to. All that says is stuff like persons taking no active part in the hostilities won't suffer violence to life and person, outrages upon personal dignity, the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples and the wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.

There is a paragraph that says "The Parties to the conflict should further endeavour to bring into force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other provisions of the present Convention." But since there is no nation to enter into special agreements with, that seems inapplicable.

There is also a paragraph that reads, "The application of the preceding provisions shall not affect the legal status of the Parties to the conflict."

Rink
07-11-2006, 01:14 PM
Personally I have a better solution to this problem with these 'terrorists' and would-be terrorists...... terminate their sorry excuse for lives the moment they find them, then you wont Have any problems, wranglings or hand-wringings bein done by the terrorist sympathizers and their sycophants.

I am starting to sound more like WolfCounsel every day.... hope thats a good thing?

Rhino
07-11-2006, 01:16 PM
Rink: The Terminator!

http://www.edge-online.co.uk/archives/terminator-thumb.jpg

Rink
07-11-2006, 01:35 PM
Heehe Yea, gotta love that pearly white toothy grin yea? :D