Water Filters | Loans | Personal Loans | Homeowner Loan | Mortgages
Liberals' lament just proves GOP's strength [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Liberals' lament just proves GOP's strength


Pendragon_6
09-17-2006, 07:33 AM
September 17, 2006
BY GEORGE WILL

In this autumn of their discontent, Republicans tremble as November nears. But now comes yet another book by a gloomy liberal anticipating permanent Republican dominance. Thomas B. Edsall of the New Republic, in Building Red America: The New Conservative Coalition and the Drive for Permanent Power, argues that inexorable social forces, augmented by the conservatives' superior reservoirs of anger, ruthlessness and cynicism, favor Republicans, ''the party of the socially and economically dominant.''

The parties are almost at numerical parity, but Edsall, who until recently was a Washington Post political reporter, says Republicans rep- resent people ''more broadly skilled in economic combat'' and ''more accustomed to the rigors of the market.'' Hence Republicans can maintain ''a thin but durable margin of victory.''

''The GOP,'' Edsall laments, ''has achieved a gradual erosion of the popular consensus behind the major progressive and social-egalitarian movements of the 20th century.'' But what actually ''achieved'' that? Edsall says the principal Republican objective has been to break ''the trust . . . between the government and millions of its less advantaged citizens.'' But he acknowledges that Republicans have been helped ''inestimably'' by ''the daily inefficiencies of government'': ''The monopoly nature of government guarantees that the public services will often lag in quality behind those delivered in the competitive private sector.'' Hence ''the declining credibility of non-market solutions to economic problems'' and the demoralization of ''backers of a redistributive agenda.''


In Full
Chicago Sun-Times (http://www.suntimes.com/output/will/cst-edt-geo17.html)

DoctorDoom
09-17-2006, 07:37 AM
... the conservatives' superior reservoirs of anger, ruthlessness and cynicism ...Pot, meet kettle.

Lubbock
09-17-2006, 08:58 AM
George Will writes way over my head.

DeclinetoState
09-17-2006, 10:02 AM
Actually, Will's most difficult language appears when he's quoting Edsall, the liberal. My guess is the GOP will lose a few seats in November, but not as many as originally believed, and a few still considered up for grabs or even a virtual Democrat lock right now will stay Republican.

Edsall sounds intelligent, but if he's a liberal, he's probably not as smart as he sounds.

2nd_Amendment
09-17-2006, 10:26 AM
The GOP is looking at long term dominance only because the Dem Party moved so far left they could only function well somewhere in Europe. The Repub Party simply moved into the Moderate Left vacuum where the Dems used to be. Take the people who will vote for a Leftist Repub as well as a Dem so long as their Big Government freebies keep coming, add in the conservatives who are more worried about their Party label than anything else and add a dash of neo-cons who wanted just this since the early 70's and BY GOLLY! you've got a whing recipe...for Constitutional disaster.

The question is, will anything come along and fill in the vacuum where a conservative party once was?

DoctorDoom
09-17-2006, 12:17 PM
My take is somewhat different. The libeRATs are obsessed with keeping an obvious gap between themselves and the Pubs. Therefore, if the GOP moves to narrow the gap, the RATs' only option is to move even further left to maintain it, thus distancing themselves from the majority of Americans and marginalizing themselves into irrelevance.

The Soros/Moore/MoveOn loonies who control the RAT party now are killing it, and they're too stupid to understand why. They have a delusion that they are failing to resonate with the people (exemplified, they fantasize, by the Berkeley buffoons and their ilk) because they aren't sufficiently extremist. And when they move leftward, they isolate themselves from their major voter base and alienate all but the lunatic fringes of society.

I see some very slick behind-the-scenes Rovian politicking going on here by the GOP

2nd_Amendment
09-17-2006, 12:21 PM
But the result is still that the Dems become Socialist and the Repubs become...Moderate at best. What's that supposed to leave for conservatives and Constitutionalists? Pat Buchanan? :roar: :rotflmbo:

Republican_Legion
09-17-2006, 12:24 PM
Pat Buchanan is not a conservative. He's an ex-conservative.

2nd_Amendment
09-17-2006, 12:35 PM
He's closer to conservative than is most of the current leadership of the Republican Party... OTOH you might want to note those smileys after my post, indicating I wasn't being too terribly serious.

DoctorDoom
09-17-2006, 12:37 PM
Once the RATs commit suicide, then the GOP is free to purse conservative policies without having to wade through RAT shit every step of the way.

2nd_Amendment
09-17-2006, 12:45 PM
They'll only do that if we lean on them heavy. You know as well as I do there are enough people out there voting Party label, regardless of Party stance, that they may not do it at all. Hell, that sort is the only thing keeping the Dem party afloat now...

"Well my GrandPappy voted fer the second Roo-see-velt and if it weres gud enuf fer him...by gumption..."

Seems that's the kind of voter mentality we've entered into these last few years.

Naturalized-Texan
09-17-2006, 12:48 PM
Pat Buchanan is not a conservative. He's an ex-conservative.
He used to be a Reagan conservative, but he deserted the conservative ranks about 12 years ago. He has aligned himself with the left even to the piont of naming a known Communist - Lenora Fulani - as his 2000 campaign manager.

BarkleUSA
09-18-2006, 04:48 PM
RE:

''The GOP,'' Edsall laments, ''has achieved a gradual erosion of the popular consensus behind the major progressive and social-egalitarian movements of the 20th century.''

Umm, that’s because we tried it for 100 years – and people figured out that socialism doesn’t work.