Wikipedia denies the truth

[Republican_Legion]

Edit: Old thread.

[The_Elucidator]

Everybody knows that the MSM is the only credible source for stories such as these because their journalists are more than fair.

[Republican_Legion]

Everybody knows that the MSM is the only credible source for stories such as these because their journalists are more than fair.

Well I am trying to my best to get this out in the open because I dont want the democrats to take back the house and senate because of the MSM lieing about the pages age.

[RogerFGay]

Obscure Blogger Who Broke Foley Story Refuses to Talk to Media (http://newsbusters.org/node/8108)

[Antigone]

Wikipedia denies the truth? Ha! They wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the butt and caused an infected boil to spring forth. That is the one place liberals can go to spout their ridiculous BS and it's never questioned AND they get the added benefit of people thinking everything posted there is factual and historical as in a REAL encyclopedia. Any controversial subject will lean towards the lib viewpoint and outright lies that have been proven to be lies continue to occupy pages and pages of that site.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

Apparently Wiki's not the only one practicing censorship. Just checked Michelle Malkin's video blog, Hot Air (http://hotair.com/) , and she is saying that YouTube has pulled her vids and the vids of other conservatives. Check it out.

So much for the liberals believing in free speech, eh?

[Antigone]

You forget HSRU, free speech only applies if you agree with them. They will "allow" you the opportunity to speak but will retain their right to drown you out in protest so other's can't hear your words. Twisted little freaks IMHO.

[HomeschoolrsRUs]

Twisted little freaks IMHO.

You been watching Glenn Beck? :smirky:

(In case you're not, he always signs off with some variation on "See you tomorrow, you sick freaks.")

[LightHorseman]

Wikipedia WON'T let you contribute to their article?

[Rhino]

They do that all the time.

[Rhino]

I wasn't speaking of what basis they use to deny contributions, only that they do it. Sometimes it's political. Often it's not.

[Peachdiane]

Wikipedia WON'T let you contribute to their article?

Wookiepedia biased? I'm shocked! Just absolutely shocked!

[Antigone]

You been watching Glenn Beck? :smirky:

(In case you're not, he always signs off with some variation on "See you tomorrow, you sick freaks.")

Actually I haven't. I've never heard him before or seen his show. He has a show?

[Peachdiane]

Glenn Beck (http://www.glennbeck.com/home/index.shtml)

Sure does!

[Lazarus]

Apparently Wiki's not the only one practicing censorship. Just checked Michelle Malkin's video blog, Hot Air (http://hotair.com/) , and she is saying that YouTube has pulled her vids and the vids of other conservatives. Check it out.

So much for the liberals believing in free speech, eh?Liberals have never been for free speech... They just use that mantra when they are out of power in order to claim their right to spew lies and chaos... After their efforts gain them control, free speech disappears everytime... It is a basic component of the Communist doctrine...

Now the Leftists are making a conserted effort to gain control of the internet... And they are targeting websites popular with teens and and very young adults...

It is the same strategy they used with MTV... In the beginning it was just an outlet for airing entertainment in the form of the new medium, the music video... It has since eveolved into a prime tool for socialist endoctrination... YouTube is apparently their next attempt at taking control of young impressional minds... And they will succeed where parents fail to teach conservative norms and standards to their children...

[neglesaks]

Wikipedia denies the truth? Ha! They wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the butt and caused an infected boil to spring forth. That is the one place liberals can go to spout their ridiculous BS and it's never questioned AND they get the added benefit of people thinking everything posted there is factual and historical as in a REAL encyclopedia.

On the contrary. ANYONE can edit WikiPedia. That includes you.

[neglesaks]

Wikipedia WON'T let you contribute to their article?

Utter nonsense. The only reasons you won't be allowed to edit an article if your IP address is associated to repeated vandalism, or if an article has been locked due to excessive vandalism or edit wars.

[neglesaks]

Apparently Wiki's not the only one practicing censorship. Just checked Michelle Malkin's video blog, Hot Air (http://hotair.com/) , and she is saying that YouTube has pulled her vids and the vids of other conservatives. Check it out.

So much for the liberals believing in free speech, eh?

There is no such thing as freedom of speech on private property.

WikiPedia is the private property of the server owners.

You figure out the rest.

[neglesaks]

Minor interjection for the Wikipedia bashers:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Conservative_Wikipedians

There are a number of self-professed Conservative Wikipedians, so the claim of WP being "liberal" or "leftist" is far from true.

[Republican_Legion]

No need to bump an old dead thread.

[Republican_Legion]

Minor interjection for the Wikipedia bashers:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Conservative_Wikipedians

There are a number of self-professed Conservative Wikipedians, so the claim of WP being "liberal" or "leftist" is far from true.

Go kiss their ass at their website if your so in love with them.

[neglesaks]

Go kiss their ass at their website if your so in love with them.

Childishness. Whose ass exactly do you want me to kiss?

[Republican_Legion]

Childishness. Whose ass exactly do you want me to kiss?

Still why did you have to bump an old dead thread ? Childishness.

[neglesaks]

Still why did you have to bump an old dead thread ? Childishness.

Well it's not dead anymore, is it?

Sheesh.

And again, whose ass is you you want me to kiss? The wikipedia consists of thousands of contributers. Or maybe you want to brand then all as part of the vast "lefty" conspiracy to drive conservative opinion off the net?

Aha.

[Teenager]

Well it's not dead anymore, is it?

Sheesh.

And again, whose ass is you you want me to kiss? The wikipedia consists of thousands of contributers. Or maybe you want to brand then all as part of the vast "lefty" conspiracy to drive conservative opinion off the net?

Aha.


Dude, it's common net courtesy that you don't bump old threads.

[Republican_Legion]

Dude, it's common net courtesy that you don't bump old threads.

Especially when the topic on wikipedia and mark foley is done.
Its been done a long time ago after the MSM finally acknowledged one of the pages was over 18 at the time of IMs.

[Republican_Legion]

Well it's not dead anymore, is it?

Sheesh.

And again, whose ass is you you want me to kiss? The wikipedia consists of thousands of contributers. Or maybe you want to brand then all as part of the vast "lefty" conspiracy to drive conservative opinion off the net?

Aha.

OK.

[DesertFox]

Wikipedia is a liberal thing. That means we must expect, as a matter of course, that they don't want people such as us contributing anything, correcting anything, donating anything, nothing.

[Republican_Legion]

Wikipedia is a liberal thing. That means we must expect, as a matter of course, that they don't want people such as us contributing anything, correcting anything, donating anything, nothing.

On a daily basis they revert each others contributes based on political bias or vandalism. I've seen more then enough of political bias playing a role in Wikis editing festivals.