EveningStar
04-21-2003, 11:47 AM
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court said Monday it will reconsider the scope of the familiar police warnings that begin, "You have the right to remain silent."
The court will look at whether physical evidence seized without such warnings can be used at trial.
The case is a follow-up to a Supreme Court ruling three years ago that upheld the warnings laid out in 1966 in a case called Miranda vs. Arizona.
Full article (http://www.sacbee.com/24hour/nation/story/862204p-6027542c.html)
The court will look at whether physical evidence seized without such warnings can be used at trial.
The case is a follow-up to a Supreme Court ruling three years ago that upheld the warnings laid out in 1966 in a case called Miranda vs. Arizona.
Full article (http://www.sacbee.com/24hour/nation/story/862204p-6027542c.html)