DeclinetoState
11-08-2006, 06:13 PM
Proposition 83
Sex Offenders. Sexually Violent Predators. Punishment, Residence Restrictions and Monitoring
State of California
Initiative Statute - Majority Approval Required
Pass: 4,418,111 / 70.5% Yes votes ...... 1,848,159 / 29.5% No votes
Source (http://www.smartvoter.org/2006/11/07/ca/state/prop/83/)
OK, so Californians, the citizens of Nancy's home state, support restrictions on sexually violent predators. It looks like even a lot of libs understand this one.
But wait! Look at the results for San Francisco, Nancy's home base:
San Francisco County Results
Propositions Yes Votes % No Votes %
Sex Offender
Reform 74,706 46.8% 84,603 53.2%
CA Secretary of State (http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Returns/prop/38.htm)
Over half of Nancy's constituents opposed the measure, even though it was supported in every other county of California, including nearby (and liberal) Marin and San Mateo counties.
Sex Offenders. Sexually Violent Predators. Punishment, Residence Restrictions and Monitoring
State of California
Initiative Statute - Majority Approval Required
Pass: 4,418,111 / 70.5% Yes votes ...... 1,848,159 / 29.5% No votes
Source (http://www.smartvoter.org/2006/11/07/ca/state/prop/83/)
OK, so Californians, the citizens of Nancy's home state, support restrictions on sexually violent predators. It looks like even a lot of libs understand this one.
But wait! Look at the results for San Francisco, Nancy's home base:
San Francisco County Results
Propositions Yes Votes % No Votes %
Sex Offender
Reform 74,706 46.8% 84,603 53.2%
CA Secretary of State (http://vote.ss.ca.gov/Returns/prop/38.htm)
Over half of Nancy's constituents opposed the measure, even though it was supported in every other county of California, including nearby (and liberal) Marin and San Mateo counties.