Credit Card Consolidation | Buy PSP | Loans | High shear mixers Colloid mills Kneaders | Car Insurance
Requiring Photo I.D. for Voters Should Be Senate's Highest Priority Before It Ajourns [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Requiring Photo I.D. for Voters Should Be Senate's Highest Priority Before It Ajourns


DeclinetoState
11-10-2006, 09:43 PM
Gina Cobb (http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/)

Attention has begun to turn to the possible priorities of the current Congress before it adjourns for the year. Lest we forget, at this moment both the House and Senate still have Republican majorities. That will change 100% when Congress returns in January.

An Associated Press story Thursday listed several possible priorities for Congress, but ignored the urgent need for passage of a bill requiring that voters show photo identification before they cast ballots in federal elections.

One of the absolute highest priorities for the Senate before it adjourns must be passage of the Federal Election Integrity Act of 2006, which was already passed by the House.

The status of the Federal Election Integrity Act of 2006 is here (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-4844). The full text (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h109-4844) of the Act is here.

First, consider the fact that in many states, it is illegal for election officials to ask a voter to provide photo identification.

Second, consider the fact that America has a huge and ever-increasing population of illegal immigrants. States like California, Arizona, and Colorado, to name a few, are straining under the weight of their illegal immigrant populations. The problem is massive, nationwide. Unlike naturalized citizens who have jumped all the hurdles required for citizenship, these illegal immigrants or non-citizen residents do not necessarily share an understanding and appreciation of our system of government; they did not study civics and American history in high school (if they reached high school at all). Not all are literate, even in their native languages. Many do not speak or write English fluently, or at all.

Third, consider this fact: In many states and cities with high immigrant populations such as California, Colorado and Arizona, up to half the ballots were cast as absentee ballots this year. Click on the link above for the blog and all its links.

dajoga
11-10-2006, 10:51 PM
Is this a state's issue? I've had to show photo ID every time I vote! What's the big deal? How else can you ID a voter?

Antigone
11-10-2006, 10:55 PM
I've never had to show ID. We go in, state our name, they find it in the book and we sign next to it. Of course, when you know just about everybody in town that makes it easy. :) For a large city where most people don't even know their neighbor I can't imagine what a mess and possible fraud magnet this process would be.

I find it rather unnerving that ID is NOT required.

d'urville
11-11-2006, 01:59 AM
They're trying to encourage mail-in voting here, so I had to go into the city to vote in person. I'd never seen anybody there before in my life, but the election officials just asked for name and address.

It was crowded, and there were all these people there with badges that said "Democrat Party election 2006 observer" on it. That was it, except for a couple of armed police officers there.

Photo Voter ID is over, if anything, restrictions will be lessened. Forget:

Status: Passed House (98% of Republicans supporting, 98% of Democrats opposing.)
This bill has been passed in the House. The bill now goes on to be voted on in the Senate.

The Congress is a lame duck, too, they'd have less than three weeks to ram it through the Senate, the Democrats will just send it to die in a committee.

Maggie_T
11-11-2006, 09:42 AM
The democrat majority senate's highest priority?

HAH!! Pull the other one, will you. :rolleyes:

BarkleUSA
11-11-2006, 10:58 AM
I never have to show an ID here in Michigan. There are 2 steps:

1. I must fill out and sign a card with name, address and date of birth.
2. They find me in their registered voter ledger and hand me a ballot.

If Howard Dean knew the above info - and knew I was out of town or was not going to vote, he could have voted for me and no one would ever know, including me.

They do not check the signature (against a valid signature on file) and they do not ask for any ID.

I would feel better if they would mail me a confirmation that I voted - to alert people disenfranchised by people voting in their place.

It would be interesting to go down the list of people that voted in my precint and just call them and ask "Did you vote on November 7?"

Of course the Democrats would never allow that...