OJ Simpson Finally Found The Real Killer

[Naturalized-Texan]

After the jury found OJ Simpson "Not Guilty", he vowed to search for the real killer. He searched for many years for the real killer on golf courses across the country and finally found him. The real killer's name is OJ Simpson.

REGAN: 'I DID NOT PAY OJ' (http://www.drudgereport.com/flash1jr.htm)

I never lost my desire for his conviction. And if Marcia Clark couldn’t do it. I sure wanted to try.

In the past few days, since the announcement of the forthcoming book and televised interview If I Did It, it has been strange watching the media spin the story. They have all but called for my death for publishing his book and for interviewing him. A death, I might add, not called for when Katie Couric interviewed him; not called for when Barbara Walters had an exclusive with the Menendez brothers, who killed their parents in cold blood, nor when she conducted her celebrated interviews with dictator Fidel Castro or Muammar al-Gaddafi; not called for when 60 Minutes interviewed Timothy McVeigh who murdered hundreds in Oklahoma City, not called for when the U.S. government released tapes of Osama bin Laden; not called for when Geraldo Rivera interviewed his dozens of murderers, miscreants, and deviants.

Nor should it be.

“To publish” does not mean “to endorse”; it means “to make public.” If you doubt that, ask the mainstream publishers who keep Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf in print to this day. They are likely to say that there is a historical value in publishing such material, so that the public can read, and judge for themselves, the thoughts and attempted defenses of an indefensible man. There is historical value in such work; there is value for law enforcement, for students of psychology, for anyone who wants to gain insight into the mind of a sociopath.

But that is not why I did it. That is not why I wanted to face the killer. That is not why I wanted to publish his story.

I didn’t know what to expect when I got the call that the killer wanted to confess. I didn’t know what would happen. But I knew one thing. I wanted the confession for my own selfish reasons and for the symbolism of that act.

[DeclinetoState]

I am shocked, absolutely stunned to find out that the real killer of OJ Simpson's ex and her friend was OJ Simpson.

These past few years, I thought it was George W. Bush!

:blush:

[conservatour]

I think it is a bit strange that someone who maintains he is innocent would even write such a book. Things that make you wonder.

[Gonzo67]

Ok, I read the article, and I would like to point something out...

This woman is writing an article about Interviewing O.J. and having him confess. But check this out...



1. Because, I knew that the “killer,” as Kim Goldman so eloquently named him, would be acquitted. I knew it from my own experience.

2. Like Nicole Brown, I believed with all my heart . . . and then got punched in the face.

Literally.

3. said, “He’ll be acquitted.” I said it out loud, and the others in the room looked at me in a way I’d been looked at before: “Oh, God. She’s crazy.”

4. I’d listened to the lies (“She hit herself’), watched him charm the police (“Sir, I don’t know why she’s saying this”), endured the ignorance of one cop who looked at me with disdain and said “You must like it,” and couldn’t understand why they didn’t believe me.

5. “First, do no harm.” He was one of the brightest men I’d ever met. And he could charm anyone. He charmed me. We had a child. And then he knocked me out, with a blow to my head,

6. He manipulated, lied, and broke my heart.

7. And then, after all but leaving me for dead in a hospital, where his daughter died a few days later, he left for good.

8. I’d seen it before: The men in court, dressed in their designer suits, blaming the women they attacked. I’d seen, firsthand, the “criminal injustice system,” as I called it in my twenties—the system that let him go one night after assaulting me so he could come right back and do it again.

9. I had my witnesses, thank God, or no one would have believed me.

10. “Why,” one of my own family members said in one of the many denials I’d heard, “would someone like him do that to you? Why? And if he did, you must have done something to provoke him.” I’d heard it all.

11. My son is now twenty-five years old, my daughter fifteen. I wanted them, and everyone else, to have a chance to see that there are consequences to grievous acts. That the consequences of pain and suffering will ultimately be brought upon its perpetrators.

(Note, her DAUGHTER is now 15. Though earlier in her article she mentions a daughter that died. I'm wondering if she had two, or if it's the same one, and she didn't keep good enough track of her whining lies?)

12. I wanted the acknowledgment, not for me but for my son, so I could turn to him and say, “I’m sorry that he was not a father to you. I’m sorry that he could not teach you what it means to be a man. And, finally, he’s sorry too.”

13. I made the decision to publish this book, and to sit face to face with the killer, because I wanted him, and the men who broke my heart and your hearts, to tell the truth, to confess their sins, to do penance and to amend their lives.

14. The men who lied and cheated and beat me—they were all there in the room. And the people who denied it, they were there too.

15. I thought of the man who had beaten me so many years ago, who left me in a hospital, the man who broke my child’s heart. And I listened carefully.

16. I thought back to Christmas Eve, a few years ago. The man who broke my heart was now standing on my doorstep, shaking. He talked about my son, now in his twenties, and told me I’d done a great job raising him alone.

17. During the years that I was running from work to homework, from my office to every school play, assembly, swim meet or parent conference, he never showed up for a single thing. While I was raising my son, he had lived a high life and then lost everything. He ended up in prison, lost his medical license, lost many of his worldly possessions, lost his looks and now, most of the women who once cared had gone, too.

18. He looked at me. The girl he’d left in the gutter had raised two children alone, had built a successful company, and was now a happy woman.

(note, yeah, she SOUNDS happy... like a happy bitter shrew)

19. I was sad for my son, sad for the women he’d left behind, sad for the mother and siblings he’d disappointed and I was sad for him that he’d missed the opportunity to live a beautiful life.

20. For the girl who was left in the gutter, I wanted to make it right.


Ok, this was supposed to be an article about "O.J. Confessing" yet not one mention of anything OJ said. nearly 80% of the article is a woman bitching about some piece of shit that beat her.

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not heartless.

To any woman reading this, if your old man uses you as a punching bag, you have my sympathy, and I pray that you get out, and get help, both for you and for him.

But if you're in a relationship with a man who has laid you out cold 2, 3, 4, 5 or more times... I DON'T FEEL AN OUNCE OF SYMPATHY!

If you STAY in an abusive relationship, YOU ARE AS MUCH TO BLAME AS THE PIECE OF SHIT THAT BEATS YOU.

I have never struck a woman I have dated. I have never beat one of my girl friends on a daily basis. Believe it or not, there are men like us out there that WON'T beat your ass at the drop of a hat. If you have some kind of strange attraction to the ones that do, that's a problem with YOU.

That article she wrote, aside from mentioning OJ a few times, didn't have shit to do with OJ. It was nothing but a "He hit me, please feel sorry for me" piece.

[Kathy30]

Judith Regan must have been drunk or in a psychotic episode when she wrote that. She did peg OJ right, he's a maligant narcissist. A psychiatrist said so shortly after the trial. Like all malignant narcissists he would be compelled to confess at some point. Like all the others he did it by setting up a hypothetical situation. Not quite so hypothetical since his book is "IF I did it, How It Happened" Not how it might have happened, but how it did happen. He should be under arrest right now. Like everyone else whose trial results in a verdict not in accordance with the popular belief of the way it should have gone, OJ has never been tried in federal court for violating the civil rights of his victims.

[Riverboat]

13. I made the decision to publish this book, and to sit face to face with the killer, because I wanted him, and the men who broke my heart and your hearts, to tell the truth, to confess their sins, to do penance and to amend their lives. Thanks for pointing this out, Gonzo. I had to go back and reread this comment two or three times because I was pretty sure I didn't read it right. Nobody could be that stupid, right?

Only as stupid as a fawning, gullible public that will snap up this remorseless drivel.

[The_Sonarman]

Almost unbelievable.

OJ did it. He got away with it with an ignorant jury. OK.... sometimes that happens.

Now, he gets to make money with a book deal.... and this mess gets dredged up all over again.

OJ reset the bar in defining "low class".

[Naturalized-Texan]

IMHO, all of the above complaints about Judith Regan are misdirected. The real villain in all this is OJ Simpson, not Judith Regan. Those complaints should have been directed to him, not her.

[Gonzo67]

IMHO, all of the above complaints about Judith Regan are misdirected. The real villain in all this is OJ Simpson, not Judith Regan. Those complaints should have been directed to him, not her.


Don't get me wrong, I'm not letting OJ "of the hook". He's as guilty now as he was the first day of the trial when everyone in America KNEW he was guilty.

But if you read that article closely, that's not the point of her article.

She uses America's outrage with OJ, to push off a whiny self pity piece. She doesn't have the nerve to title the article properly. The title of it should not even have MENTIONED OJ.

It should have been called, "My Stupid Decisions, And Why I want America To Feel Sorry For Me.".

That article was not about OJ, SHE is the subject in over 80% of that story. It's all about HER. So why did she even bother bringing that piece of shit OJ into it?

Because if she simply wrote an article about herself, no one would be interested. No one would bother reading it. So she sprinkles OJ through it here and there, and viola! Now she can throw out her self pity piece to people who will read it and think it's about OJ.

If she wants to tell me something I already know, that OJ is guilty, then SAY IT. She claims he confessed. But the only "confession" she provides is the title of his book. She doesn't tell us a damn thing he says to her in the "interview". Was there even really an interview? I don't know, because she doesn't tell us what questions, if any she asked, nor what answers, if any, he gave. Sounds like a pretty wasteful interview to me.

That article was about her, and frankly, I'm happy that she got out of her bad marriage. But you know what? Somehow, knowing that she did, has not affected my life in the least. Sorry. Her article is a waste of paper.

[BuckeyeMike]

Almost unbelievable.

OJ did it. He got away with it with an ignorant jury. OK.... sometimes that happens.

I would peg the jury as being more racist than ignorant....as fueld by the scumbag Johnny Cochran. He's the one that pulled the race card....nobody else....and the jury, being prodominately black, bought into it. No hard sell here by the way.

Now, he gets to make money with a book deal.... and this mess gets dredged up all over again.

OJ reset the bar in defining "low class"..

[Naturalized-Texan]

Gonzo67: I guess you didn't hear about the context that provoked Judith Regan's press release. She came under severe criticism from the DBM for publishing the book that exposed OJ's guilt after the DBM had insisted for years that OJ was innocent. In her statement, Judith Regan was merely explaining her reasons for publishing OJ's confession. Since I knew about the bashing from the DBM, I was and still am willing to accept her explanation.

EDIT: The following quote from Regan's statement is vital to our understanding:

What I do know is I didn’t pay him. I contracted through a third party who owns the rights, and I was told the money would go to his children. That much I could live with.

What I wanted was closure, not money.

[Gonzo67]

guess you didn't hear about the context that provoked Judith Regan's press release. She came under severe criticism from the DBM for publishing the book that exposed OJ's guilt after the DBM had insisted for years that OJ was innocent. In her statement, Judith Regan was merely explaining her reasons for publishing OJ's confession.


Yes, I heard about her being slammed. And I agree it was unjustified.

But as you quoted that portion of her article "I didn't pay him", that SHOULD have been the point of the article.

But she lost that point, in her two hour bitch session about how SHE was abused. I don't give a shit. If she wants to make her case that she didn't pay OJ, then make it. Telling me how her husband was a piece of shit doesn't explain why "I didn't pay OJ" is the truth. It doesn't present evidence that she didn't pay him. All it does is scream "Look at me! Feel sorry for me!".

You want to convince me you didn't pay someone, then show me your canceled checks. Show me where your money went, show me reason to believe you didn't pay someone.

Telling me you had a shitty childhood and your wife screwed the mail man doesn't say shit about the topic of discussion.

[Peachdiane]

If you STAY in an abusive relationship, YOU ARE AS MUCH TO BLAME AS THE PIECE OF SHIT THAT BEATS YOU.

It is easier for someone not in that situation to tell a woman what to do. It's not so easy for the woman especially when kids are involved and the majority of time is spent on caring for kids and being behind the man 100% to go to work and make the money and climb up the ladder. For the victim one of the most difficult things to do is admit that the abuse is real. Lucky for me, I gave up hope and got out.

[omegatrump]

What this really show's is what Regan is all about. Everybody knew without the book that OJ did it. Now Regan and company will help him cash in on it. If OJ is low class, then where does that put the Fox crew who help him cash in?

[Naturalized-Texan]

But as you quoted that portion of her article "I didn't pay him", that SHOULD have been the point of the article.
"I didn't pay him" was part of the Drudge headline for the statement I linked to. I still think that her explanation was right and proper.

[Naturalized-Texan]

It is easier for someone not in that situation to tell a woman what to do. It's not so easy for the woman especially when kids are involved and the majority of time is spent on caring for kids and being behind the man 100% to go to work and make the money and climb up the ladder. For the victim one of the most difficult things to do is admit that the abuse is real. Lucky for me, I gave up hope and got out.
You are spot on. That's what my wife has always said about spousal abuse. Most women can't afford to leave an abusive relationship.

[Gonzo67]

It is easier for someone not in that situation to tell a woman what to do. It's not so easy for the woman especially when kids are involved and the majority of time is spent on caring for kids and being behind the man 100% to go to work and make the money and climb up the ladder. For the victim one of the most difficult things to do is admit that the abuse is real. Lucky for me, I gave up hope and got out.



You are spot on. That's what my wife has always said about spousal abuse. Most women can't afford to leave an abusive relationship.


I was in that "situation" once. I dated a woman, she left me and started seeing some asshole that smacked her around quite regularly.

She came to me one day, asked for help, I got her out of there, we started dating again shortly after that. A couple months later, she split. She went back to the asshole that beat her.

Now, if it's so easy to leave someone that helps you, and it's so easy to walk out on someone that treats you like gold, how is it so DIFFICULT to walk out on someone that beats the shit out of you?

Sorry. When she went back to him the second time, you might think me just as heartless as she said I was. But I flat out told her, one night, he's going to start swinging at you, and he's not going to stop until you're in the hospital or dead. And you will have deserved every hit.

She had asked me for help getting out a few months after going back to him. I hung up on her.

Sorry. I don't see it, and I don't buy it. If it's so easy to walk away from someone that treats you right, it should be that much easier to let go and walk away from an abusive asshole.

Every time I hear one of these crack pots say "But I love him, and I know he's sorry..." I have to exert myself to stifle a laugh. It takes all I have to NOT tell her "Yeah, and you probably believe that too you ignorant bitch."

Sorry, I guess I'm just a heartless, uncaring asshole. So be it. I still don't buy it.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig --><!-- / message -->

[Timberwolf]

Gonz...my ex was the same way, to a degree. I was good to her, accepted her kids as my own. She walked out on me because, after 3 years of almost constant arguing, I stopped. Drove her nuts.

I guess some people just can't handle a healthy relationship...she certainly fit into that category.

[DeclinetoState]

Those are the women who end up calling Dr. Laura then arguing with her when she tells them to stop shacking up with a guy who probably either is or should be wanted in five states for grand theft auto and a lot of other stuff that's a lot worse.

[Bluemoon_Rising]

Thinks that make you go, "I don't care."

[HooverWasRight]

My cousin and I are the same age and he played 3 years in the NFL, and he was also a running back in Buffalo in "73. He said every time they were in the huddle OJ wanted the ball. "Give me that ball I'll get the first down."

[Peachdiane]

I was in that "situation" once.

No offense Gonz but until you have been married ten years to an asshole who hides his abuse behind Christianity and the church, you have not been in my situation. And, I don't think you'll marry an "Christian" asshole like him anytime soon. :lol:

I got her out of there, we started dating again shortly after that. A couple months later, she split. She went back to the asshole that beat her.

Yeah, I've seen women with such low self esteem they keep returning to trash. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Now, if it's so easy to leave someone that helps you, and it's so easy to walk out on someone that treats you like gold, how is it so DIFFICULT to walk out on someone that beats the shit out of you?

I hope you know not all women are the same. I'm sorry that happened to you. It would be very difficult for me to leave someone who treats me well. So, I have NO INTENTION of doing so because I am treated well.

FYI, my ex and his family kept chanting that mantra, "Well he provides the bread, so he treats her well...." BS. Until someone was there with me, during those ten years, inside my home, they have no f**king clue and that includes all the "well meaning" church people and pastor who think it's God's will to enable an abuser and point fingers at the wife. "Yeah he has an anger problem but what did SHE do to set him off?" "He's just stressed from work. She musta handed him the baby when he got home...."

She had asked me for help getting out a few months after going back to him. I hung up on her.Understandable. You gave her fair warning.

Sorry. I don't see it, and I don't buy it. If it's so easy to walk away from someone that treats you right, it should be that much easier to let go and walk away from an abusive asshole.

Sorry to see you feel this way. Only because in MY situation it wasn't so easy to take that first leap. There's the lack of finances, children with special needs, the outside pressure to stay married because "Divorce is a SIN..." "You need to STAY married for the children...." "No one loves children like the biological father..." "No one wants to marry a "used" 30 year old mom" and all the other 10,465 excuses to wade through.

There's a vicious cycle of abuse, apologies, and honeymoon period then it starts again. After 2 years of waiting for him to get counseling, I finally looked at my sons and realized they needed to SEE and hear with their own eyes that it's NOT okay to treat women like this. I didn't want them becoming like their father so I finally broke the cycle and got out. Unfortunately the stalking, intimidation, and threats still occur from him and his new wife... that never stops. But, my sons and I are happier and I feel human instead of sub-human and that's what matters.

I already spelled out the abuse in another thread HERE (http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/showthread.php?t=6598) and it's old but Wyatt gave a great analogy:

And even if one breaks the cycle midway before the final act, its not to say that there won't be repurcussions as in brain damage or soul damage. Back to Gonzo:

Every time I hear one of these crack pots say "But I love him, and I know he's sorry..." I have to exert myself to stifle a laugh. It takes all I have to NOT tell her "Yeah, and you probably believe that too you ignorant bitch."

Well, I wasn't a crack pot but yeah our self esteem's been pummeled so low we actually believe our husbands when he says he's sorry. After all, we married the man trusting he would treat us well especially when he stands behind the Bible, not knowing just how horrible behavior escalates through the years.

Sorry, I guess I'm just a heartless, uncaring asshole. So be it. I still don't buy it.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig --><!-- / message -->

That's ok, you have your feelings and I have mine. :) Fortunately there are women like me who recognize gold when they see it. I hope you find such a lady. :)

[Naturalized-Texan]

Headline on Drudge:

FOX CANCELS OJ BOOK, TV SPECIAL

[Lubbock]

You are spot on. That's what my wife has always said about spousal abuse. Most women can't afford to leave an abusive relationship.

I've finally found something that I don't see eye-to-eye with NT on.

I'll mark this day on my calendar.

Weighing the cost of staying in an abusive relationship as opposed to [what some people see as] the "benefit" [financial] of staying, a woman can't "afford" to stay.

Right here in Lubbock, there are no less than ten organizations --the police department included, that are geared to getting a woman out of an abusive relationship: from restraining the abuser --physically and legally, to getting a woman on the path to being self sufficient: shelter, counseling, child care, help in job training, help in finding a job, permanent housing, financial help until the woman can take care of herself.

When children are involved, and more often than not there are children, the cost of staying rises exponentially.

Abuse is generational. Children who are raised in it are more apt than not to become abusers at worst, and at worst, find themselves as adults in abusive relationships.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the girl Gonzo is talking about grew up seeing her mother abused.

Having seen so much of it, and having listened to every excuse known to man from women who proclaim they "can't get out," I just can't gather up much sympathy for women who stay.

[RayChuang]

Headline on Drudge:

FOX CANCELS OJ BOOK, TV SPECIAL

About time, too. Everybody hated the idea and I'm not surprised that Fox dropped the it like a hot potato.

[Naturalized-Texan]

Lub: I suspect that most abused women have no idea that such help is available.

[Riverboat]

I think it is a bit strange that someone who maintains he is innocent would even write such a book.I was just about to say the same thing after thinking about this all day. Good thing I went back and reread the posts.

But to elaborate on your post, I can't imagine why anyone would write such a book about how he would kill his WIFE!!! A normal person would recoil at such a notion, let alone write about it. And any publisher with a brain the size of a walnut would have pitched the book, the agent and the writer out of a 23'rd story window. Imagine if Michael Jackson came in with a book called If I Had Molested That Those Boys/A Hypothetical Look Inside the Dressing Room at The Gap.

Sumpin' ain't right 'bout they boy.

[Beowulf]

OJ sees the real killer everyday....when he looks in the mirror.