View Full Version : Mike Nifong is a rapist
Mike Nifong is a rapist (http://www.conservatibbs.com/2006/12/mike-nifong-is-rapist.html)
Anyone with even the slightest shred of human decency recognizes that rape is an evil act. The rapist takes what should be a beautiful moment, sexual intimacy between a man and a woman, and turns it into a brutal, demeaning show of force. Society rightly holds rapists in contempt.
Similarly, Mike Nifong, a corrupt prosecutor in Durham, North Carolina has taken what should be a good and honorable thing (prosecuting dangerous criminals) and turned it into a brutal, demeaning show of force. Mike Nifong has raped the reputations of dozens of men who have committed no crime. Mike Nifong has raped the taxpayers of North Carolina. Worst of all, Mike Nifong has raped the justice system.
I said three months ago (http://www.conservatibbs.com/2006/09/more-on-duke-lacrosse-case.html) that Mike Nifong should be behind bars, and my conviction is stronger than ever after reading this shocking article (http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/story?id=2729248). Following are some quotes:
<table style="border: 3px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" cellpadding="5"><tbody><tr><td>Meanwhile, the director of a private DNA lab testified that he and the district attorney agreed not to report information helpful to the defense team. He cited several different reasons, and acknowledged under cross-examination that he violated his own lab's standards.
Lab director Brian Meehan found genetic material from several men -- though none of them were Duke lacrosse players -- in samples taken from the body of the accuser the night she said she was allegedly gang-raped.
</td></tr></tbody></table> <table style="border: 3px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" cellpadding="5"><tbody><tr><td>The full report revealed that there was DNA from unidentified men inside the woman's body and on her underwear but none from any of the 46 players originally under suspicion. The information is significant to the case because the alleged victim said her attackers ejaculated but did not use condoms.
</td></tr></tbody></table> <table style="border: 3px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" cellpadding="5"><tbody><tr><td>The guidelines also call for five non-suspect individuals to be included for each suspect shown. Instead the police showed the accuser a PowerPoint presentation of all 46 white members of the lacrosse team.
The April 4 photo line-up in which the defendants were identified followed a March line-up in which the woman could not identify anyone as her attacker.
"This procedure was designed to permit [the accuser] to pick any person she desired and identify him as the attacker," the motion said. "That person would then be charged with rape."
</td></tr></tbody></table> It is an obscene travesty of justice that this case has been allowed to continue. It is clear that no "rape" took place at that party. It is clear that the alleged "victim" fabricated the whole thing. Whatever one may think abut the boorish and immoral behavior of the Duke lacrosse team, no member of the team raped this girl, and Mike Nifong knows it. This case is no different from lynchings of black men by racist mobs.
Lubbock
12-19-2006, 06:17 AM
Bravo!!!
Standing ovation!!!
Riverboat
12-19-2006, 07:41 AM
I can't even think of an appropriate punishment for someone who has brought such disrepute to his office.
But I'm sure WolfCounsel will think of sumpin'.
DesertFox
12-19-2006, 07:44 AM
Durham needs to do something about that rapist. Something serious. Something bad.
DeclinetoState
12-19-2006, 11:28 AM
I'm not sure I'd call Nifong a rapist, but he does need to be removed from office and prosecuted for misconduct if he in fact withheld or ordered the lab to withhold exculpatory evidence from the defense. Not only does this harm the reputations--and deprive the civil rights--of innocent people, but it's also a waste of taxpayers' money. He probably should also be disbarred.
Given that the accusation of "rape" was an obvious fabrication, and that it has been obvious for a long time that the accusation of "rape" was a complete fabrication, Nifong should be behind bars whether he hid the evidence or not.
Even radical feminist Susan Estrich took Nifong's head off this week. The man is completely corrupt, pursuing this lynching in order to enhance his own political career. Nifong is despicable.
Lubbock
12-19-2006, 09:20 PM
Bravo!!!
Standing ovation!!!!
DeclinetoState
12-19-2006, 10:25 PM
The man is completely corrupt, pursuing this lynching in order to enhance his own political career. Nifong is despicable.Considering that his malfeasance is also apparently coming to light, I think it's safe to say Nifong is pretty damn stupid, too.
BEST45CAL
12-19-2006, 10:29 PM
Put Nifong in a meat suit...blindfolded. Let him trudge along the Sonoran desert, amongst the wolves and wildcats. I think that is good punishment.
Phil Osophical
12-20-2006, 09:29 AM
Nothing's going to happen to the racist, smug and ultra-liberal Nifong. Don't get your hopes up. Strong rumors are circulating that Nifong is telling his cronies in private that all he has to do is put together a racially stacked jury and he will convict those affluent white boys. And he will.
Nifong's self-aggrandizing behavior has been reported to the U.S. Department of Justice. But the little, liberal, racists U.S. Attorney General (Alberto Gonzalez) is not about to do anything which might offend the black community in Durham.
Yeah, those "privileged white boys" are going to jail and everyone in the Durham community knows it already.
Last week, Nifong dropped the rape charges when the alleged victim decided she wasn't sure she had been raped after all. That is, she wasn't sure she had been vaginally penetrated, a distinction required by state law for a charge of rape.
Last March, after the party, the stripper had a different recollection, telling police that she had been raped every which way. But, well, these things are difficult sometimes to keep straight. Rape being so nuanced and all.
****SNIP****
As it turns out, Nifong's case was something less than a slam dunk, and he must have known it. As was recently revealed, Nifong not only knew that lab tests showed no traces of DNA from any of the lacrosse team players, he knew that they did show DNA traces from several unknown other men.
Yet, Nifong and the head of the private DNA lab, Brian Meehan, agreed to exclude those test results from other results turned over to defense attorneys, according to Meehan's testimony during a recent court session.
****SNIP****
As one student at Durham's historically black North Carolina Central University put it to Newsweek, he wanted the lacrosse players punished "whether it happened or not. It would be justice for things that happened in the past."
More evidence that Mike Nifong is a rapist and should be behind bars. (http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/KathleenParker/2006/12/27/parody_at_duke)
DesertFox
12-28-2006, 02:12 PM
Nifong not only knew that lab tests showed no traces of DNA from any of the lacrosse team players, he knew that they did show DNA traces from several unknown other men.Me'n Wyatt'n Riverboat did NOT have sex with that woman, Miss Whatever-Her-Name-Is.
DeclinetoState
12-28-2006, 03:54 PM
The North Carolina State Bar filed an ethics complaint Thursday against Duke lacrosse prosecutor Mike Nifong, accusing him of breaking four rules of professional conduct when speaking to the reporters about the sensational case.
Breitbart.com (http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/12/28/D8MA49OG0.html)
Lubbock
12-28-2006, 08:15 PM
" . . . The North Carolina State Bar filed an ethics complaint Thursday against Duke lacrosse prosecutor Mike Nifong . . . "
It's my understanding that the complaint was filed on May 30th . . . and we're just now hearing about it.
DesertFox
12-29-2006, 04:29 PM
Mike Nifong, he that Austin prosecutor brother.
Lubbock
12-29-2006, 07:20 PM
Yeah. And Fitzpatrick [or Fitzgerald?]. The one who's prosecuting Scotter Libby.
Pennville_Bill
12-30-2006, 01:06 AM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/Pennville_Bill/Other%20Stuff/Clap.gif
Miss Whatever-Her-Name-Is.
She has been named. (http://johnsville.blogspot.com/2006/04/duke-rape-accuser-crystal-gail-mangum.html)
Longhorn_Platinum
01-08-2007, 07:44 PM
CRYSTAL
GAIL
MANGUM
:unsmile: Good. Now, I can call her by her name.
Lubbock
01-08-2007, 08:06 PM
" . . . Good. Now, I can call her by her name. . . . "
You call her whatever you want, LP. I'm going to continue in the "Skanky Ho" vein.
Longhorn_Platinum
01-08-2007, 10:00 PM
:unsmile: I'd be offended by that, if I were a skanky ho.
Lubbock
01-08-2007, 10:09 PM
Nah. You wouldn't. You'd wear it like a badge of honor.
cerberus
01-08-2007, 11:06 PM
I wouldn't be too worried about Nifong. Looks like the State Bar is after him. He'll be lucky if he isn't disbarred (but it would be good for the rest of us!)
Mike Nifong is a Rapist, Part II (http://www.conservatibbs.com/2007/01/mike-nifong-is-rapist-part-ii.html)
The events surrounding the clearly fabricated charges of "rape" against several Duke University students just gets more and more strange. Duke University President Richard Brodhead said last week (http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1124935/) that two of the three men accused of gang-raping a stripper would be allowed to return to classes.
Wow, what a show of grace by Brodhead the Blockhead. After banning them from the university based on absolutely nothing, does he now expect people to see him as magnanimous? Please. "President" Brodhead caved in to political pressure from radical feminists and race-baiters, helping to convict innocent men in the media without the benefit of a trial by jury. "President" Brodhead urinated and defecated on the principle of "innocent until proven guilty". He should be ashamed of himself.
As I have said before, Mike Nifong is a rapist (http://www.conservatibbs.com/2006/12/mike-nifong-is-rapist.html) and should be behind bars. Even far-Left feminists Susan Estrich (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,237084,00.html) have taken Nifong's head off. But Nifong had accomplices to his crimes, and one of his accomplices was Richard Brodhead. Allowing the falsely accused students to come back is not nearly enough; a public apology followed by Brodhead's resignation would be appropriate. If Brodhead the Blockhead is not enough of a man to resign, he should be fired.
Meanwhile, Mike Nifong's case continues to crumble around him, as the North Carolina bar filed ethics charges against the corrupt prosecutor (http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/12/29/duke.lawyer.ap/index.html). A excerpt from the article:
<table style="border: 3px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" cellpadding="5"><tbody><tr><td>Nifong also is charged with breaking a rule against "dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation." The bar said that when DNA testing failed to find any evidence a lacrosse player raped the accuser, Nifong told a reporter the players might have used condoms.
According to the bar, Nifong knew that assertion was misleading, because he had received a report from an emergency room nurse in which the accuser said her attackers did not use condoms.</td></tr></tbody></table> Unbelievable. Nifong also said. "One would wonder why one needs an attorney if one was not charged and had not done anything wrong." Oh, gee, Mike, I wonder why that could be? Could it be because they saw the lynch mob forming? Could it be because they knew a jury in Durham might convict them no matter how weak the evidence is? Could it be because an overzealous, corrupt "prosecutor" was determined to use them as a stepping stone to greater political power?
In her New Year's Day (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,240559,00.html) column, Estrich argues that the woman who falsely accused these men of rape is also a victim of Nifong's overzealous and politically-motivated "prosecution". While Estrich has a point, shed no tears for this woman, who for no good reason still has not been named in the mainstream media. (This blog (http://johnsville.blogspot.com/2006/04/duke-rape-accuser-crystal-gail-mangum.html) and Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_Gail_Mangum) have outed her, though.) Whatever her motivations were, she knew exactly what she was doing and deserves all the scorn heaped upon her.
None of this is to say that the Duke lacrosse players were shining beacons of morality. It is clear that these men, while not guilty of rape, have engaged in unsavory behavior. Ann Coulter said it best (http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=109) several months ago when she wrote: "You can severely reduce your chances of having a false accusation of rape leveled against you if you don't hire strange women to come to your house and take their clothes off for money."
For an enlightening take on this travesty of justice, see Thomas Sowell's columns from January 2nd (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2007/01/02/the_real_issue_at_duke) and January 3rd (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2007/01/03/the_real_issue_at_duke_part_ii).
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.