Boxer Nasty remarks About Condi

[Patriot Heart]

I guess we just need to get used to this crap. It is going to get neck deep in the next two years. Nauseating stench though.

BOXER'S LOW BLOW


January 12, 2007 -- Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, an appalling scold from California, wasted no time yesterday in dragging the debate over Iraq about as low as it can go - attacking Secre tary of State Condoleezza Rice for being a childless woman.
Boxer was wholly in character for her party - New York's own two Democratic senators, Chuck Schumer and Hillary Rodham Clinton, were predictably opportunistic - but the Golden State lawmaker earned special attention for the tasteless jibes she aimed at Rice.
Rice appeared before the Senate in defense of President Bush's tactical change in Iraq, and quickly encountered Boxer.
"Who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price," Boxer said. "My kids are too old, and my grandchild is too young."
Then, to Rice: "You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family."
Breathtaking.
Simply breathtaking.
We scarcely know where to begin. The junior senator from California ap parently believes that an accom plished, seasoned diplomat, a renowned scholar and an adviser to two presidents like Condoleezza Rice is not fully qualified to make policy at the highest levels of the American government because she is a single, childless woman.
MORE
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01122007/postopinion/editorials/boxers_low_blow_editorials_.htm?page=0

[CountryGent]

I would have loved to see Condi walk right up to that Boxer cow and slap her silly a few times.

I don't advocate violence against women mind you but many of these women in power deserve exemption.

[Maggie_T]

And this from a woman who hysterically supports the killing of innocent babies.

Sweet are the uses of motherhood. :rolleyes:

Just when I thought that liberals could not sink any lower, they come and prove me wrong.

[S-T]

A great big "thank you" to the Democratic Party for making Nancy Pelosi the new Speaker of the House. She will bring many votes for Republican candidates.

[bannerman]

I guess we just need to get used to this crap. It is going to get neck deep in the next two years. Nauseating stench though.

BOXER'S LOW BLOW


January 12, 2007 -- Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, an appalling scold from California, wasted no time yesterday in dragging the debate over Iraq about as low as it can go - attacking Secre tary of State Condoleezza Rice for being a childless woman.
Boxer was wholly in character for her party - New York's own two Democratic senators, Chuck Schumer and Hillary Rodham Clinton, were predictably opportunistic - but the Golden State lawmaker earned special attention for the tasteless jibes she aimed at Rice.
Rice appeared before the Senate in defense of President Bush's tactical change in Iraq, and quickly encountered Boxer.
"Who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price," Boxer said. "My kids are too old, and my grandchild is too young."
Then, to Rice: "You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family."
Breathtaking.
Simply breathtaking.
We scarcely know where to begin. The junior senator from California ap parently believes that an accom plished, seasoned diplomat, a renowned scholar and an adviser to two presidents like Condoleezza Rice is not fully qualified to make policy at the highest levels of the American government because she is a single, childless woman.
MORE
http://www.nypost.com/seven/01122007/postopinion/editorials/boxers_low_blow_editorials_.htm?page=0


all of the libs are overplaying their hands and making asses of themselves

I appreciate CONDI'S "patience" with this particular slobering nincompoop.

let us remember that lil barbie classifies weapons by thier APPEARANCE

big gun=assualt weapon

[Taylor]

What Boxer said to Rice was uncalled for. What happened to feminism? I thought part of feminism was that women don't need men. Rice chose to be single and childless which I think is ok.

[Maggie_T]

A great big "thank you" to the Democratic Party for making Nancy Pelosi the new Speaker of the House. She will bring many votes for Republican candidates.


No, they won't.

I don't know why you guys get the happy idea that the same people who "stayed home" instead of going to vote, because they were "pissed off at Republicans", all of a sudden will get their brains into functioning order and vote the right way just because a couple of democrats shot their mouth ... as usual. :sulk:

And the same goes for those who believe that "there will be a revolution" for crying out loud on account of democrats f*** things up ... also as usual.

Nothing will happen. The new generations were programmed into shrugging off everything that is not Britney Spear's next divorce, or Angelina Jolie's new lip gloss. Or even better, her new 3rd world baby.

Whatever happy juice you're drinking, I'd like a gallon of it.

[Maggie_T]

What Boxer said to Rice was uncalled for. What happened to feminism? I thought part of feminism was that women don't need men. Rice chose to be single and childless which I think is ok.


Taylor, Condi Rice is a conservative woman. So it's ok for other women to abuse her. In the case of conservative women, feminazis like Boxer quickly forget about the Ya-Ya Sisterhood that is supposed to bond all women together, and they replace with venom and cattiness.

It's always open season on conservative women.

[Lubbock]

Ah . . .

You don't think this little faux pas by Boxer will spark an Ann Coulter column, do you?

I can't wait.

[RED]

No, they won't.

I don't know why you guys get the happy idea that the same people who "stayed home" instead of going to vote, because they were "pissed off at Republicans", all of a sudden will get their brains into functioning order and vote the right way just because a couple of democrats shot their mouth ... as usual. :sulk:

And the same goes for those who believe that "there will be a revolution" for crying out loud on account of democrats f*** things up ... also as usual.

Nothing will happen. The new generations were programmed into shrugging off everything that is not Britney Spear's next divorce, or Angelina Jolie's new lip gloss. Or even better, her new 3rd world baby.

Whatever happy juice you're drinking, I'd like a gallon of it.

You're exactly right Maggie. The DIMs have been openly betraying their own country by undermining the President and military, at war no less, empowering and encouraging the enemy for almost four years now. Talk radio hosts exposed them, folks like you and me exposed their treachery, and yet, it didn't matter. They were able to rest power from the Republicans. The MSM lies, and the braindead, selfish, boobs, listen and cast votes for the irresponsible traitors.

All we can hope for is that we field a strong candidate for President, whoever that could be, :rolleyes: and those who stayed home and didn't vote in 06, come out en masse to stop Hillary and the rest of the commies from being elected.

[Maggie_T]

Ah . . .

You don't think this little faux pas by Boxer will spark an Ann Coulter column, do you?

I can't wait.


Oh, most certainly. I have no doubt that townhall will be full of articles about this. As it should be. And I fervently hope that Ann Coulter writes one of her witty, scathing pieces on the fraud that is liberal feminaziism, in general, Boxer in particular.

But that's not what I was talking about.

[Longhorn_Platinum]

CountryGent:
I would have loved to see Condi walk right up to that Boxer cow and slap her silly a few times.

:thumb: Wow, I love this guy! Stick around, Gent. You'll fit right in here.

[Maggie_T]

You're exactly right Maggie. The DIMs have been openly betraying their own country by undermining the President and military, at war no less, empowering and encouraging the enemy for almost four years now. Talk radio hosts exposed them, folks like you and me exposed their treachery, and yet, it didn't matter. They were able to rest power from the Republicans. The MSM lies, and the braindead, selfish, boobs, listen and cast votes for the irresponsible traitors.

Yes, but it's not only that, RED. What discourages me is that these days, our rights are practically wrenched out of our hands and the majority of people don't even realize it.

That's why I scoff every time I hear my good friends talk about how there will be revolutions if our guns are taken from us, or because of the dictatorship of the left.

Rubbish. Nothing of that will happen. Oh, sure. N-T will put up a fight. As will you, me, my husband, and all the main characters in this website. Whopee. And then, what? Shall I tell you? Then, we will end like David Koresh and his group, BBQd to a crisp in some compound; or shot through the wall, like the guys at Ruby Ridge.

And all the time, liberals here and all around the world, will nod their heads primly and say "Well, the government had to step in, you see. They had guns/were abusing children/were abusing animals", or whatever other excuse they can come up with.

No, I'm afraid guys like our Founding Fathers, like Tom Payne, and all that, are long gone. Those left are too few to make a real difference.

The left has succeeded in making the new generation so gullible, so weak, so lazy, so ignorant of history, so complacent, so government dependant, so everything that is bad, that they see their rights going down the toilet and they don't even care. They shrug and say "Times are changing. The Constitution is a living thing" and the rest of the idiocies they were programmed to say. It's easier that way, you see. Then they are free to go and stupefy themselves in front of the TV, watching mind-numbing horrors like American Idol, and similar trash.

All we can hope for is that we field a strong candidate for President, whoever that could be, :rolleyes: and those who stayed home and didn't vote in 06, come out en masse to stop Hillary and the rest of the commies from being elected.


Forgive me if I don't partake of your hopeful thinking. I'm afraid that right at the moment, I don't feel a strong, unwavering confidence in the new generation, or the immediate future that will result from their "excercizing their civil duty," if you get my drift.

[DeclinetoState]

The :sheeple: bleat.

Posted by BobcatJH in General Discussion: Politics
Fri Jan 12th 2007, 07:11 PM

Looks like the right wing has once again cranked up its outrage machine in an effort to deflect America's attention from a very stark reality. Today's victim? Sen. Barbara Boxer who, during Thursday's testimony of Condoleeza Rice before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said this to the Secretary of State: "Now, the issue is who pays the price. Who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and my grandchild is too young. You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families."

Before we get to the phony outrage, let's make sure we're all on the same page about what Boxer said. To me, it's as plain as day. Boxer doesn't have any skin in the game, so to speak, with regards to Iraq and the president's escalation. Neither her children nor her grandchildren are of the age where service is a possibility. Rice doesn't have any skin in the game, either, nor do so many who so breathlessly support this disastrous war. But the hawks sit back, in air conditioned offices, and move our young men and women around the globe, mere pawns on a chessboard. More to the point, they send them - as this president did Wednesday night - to their deaths. All the while, they know nothing of the sacrifices those serving and their families make in carrying out their misguided orders.

This, of course, hasn't occurred to the right wing, whose attacks have come at an unsurprising pace. Rupert Murdoch's New York Post, in an editorial titled "Boxer's low blow", accused Boxer of "dragging the debate over Iraq about as low as it can go - attacking Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for being a childless woman." Referring to Boxer's "tasteless jibes", the paper called on her to apologize. Missing the point, the editors wrote, "The junior senator from California apparently believes that an accomplished, seasoned diplomat, a renowned scholar and an adviser to two presidents like Condoleezza Rice is not fully qualified to make policy at the highest levels of the American government because she is a single, childless woman." But they weren't the only ones to miss the point - or lob insults Boxer's way.
Hughes for America (http://journals.democraticunderground.com/BobcatJH/241)

Just so you know what your liberal friends, fiends and neighbors are probably thinking.

[Lubbock]

Just so you know what your liberals friends, fiends and neighbors are probably thinking.

And just who are you accusing of having Liberal Friends?

[DesertFox]

Lub's right. I have ZERO liberal friends and as few liberal acquaintances as I can possibly make do with.

[DoctorDoom]

What discourages me is that these days, our rights are practically wrenched out of our hands and the majority of people don't even realize it.Until the sheeple cease to rely 100% on the DBM for their news, not much will change. NOTHING that is even mildly critical of the RATs will ever see print or air time unless it is so egregious that it cannot be ignored. In that case, it will be written about with neutral or mildly approving terms, every effort will be made to minimize its significance, and if possible it will be blamed on Bush and the GOP.

The aftermath of Katrina is the textbook example of that. RATs in LA blew it big time, but Bush wound up as the villain thanks to the relentless lying and spinning by the repugnant vermin of the RAT-arse-kissing DBM.

[RED]

Forgive me if I don't partake of your hopeful thinking. I'm afraid that right at the moment, I don't feel a strong, unwavering confidence in the new generation, or the immediate future that will result from their "excercizing their civil duty," if you get my drift.

I don't blame you. I've been quite pessimistic myself since November, and I still am. It was really quite shocking to me that we lost. I thought the people would see. Hell, the left kept exposing themselves as TRAITORS. How could the electorate not see? Proves they don't have a clue. :sad:

[DesertFox]

Leave it to liberals to introduce uterine politics.

[DeclinetoState]

And just who are you accusing of having Liberal Friends?You don't even have liberal neighbors? (I won't ask about fiends . . .)

[Beowulf]

I want to see a kickboxing match between Boxer and Condi! My money is on Condi!

[nene]

I'd like Condi over dinner. We appreciate her.

[d'urville]

Taylor, Condi Rice is a conservative woman. So it's ok for other women to abuse her. In the case of conservative women, feminazis like Boxer quickly forget about the Ya-Ya Sisterhood that is supposed to bond all women together, and they replace with venom and cattiness.

It's always open season on conservative women.

Yeah. I've always wondered whether it'd be worse to the left to be a conservative woman or a conservative black or other minority, doesn't matter here, Condi Rice is both.

Again, Barbara Boxer makes absolutely no sense, this exchange:

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">"I'm not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old, and my grandchild is too young . . . So who pays the price? Not me, not you."

Boxer continued:

"You can't begin to imagine how you celebrate any holiday or birthday. There's an absence. It's not like the person's never there. They always were there and now they're not, and you're looking at an empty hole."
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Then how does she know "how it feels" since she can't "pay the price" either? Boxer just couldn't resist an emotional, personal attack, she should apologize to all, but she is a liberal.

[DoctorDoom]

Liberals NEVER apoligize. Being a liberal means never having to say, "I'm sorry I'm a tasteless, insensitive, inconsiderate, microcephalic asshole."

[CountryGent]

Liberals NEVER apoligize. Being a liberal means never having to say, "I'm sorry I'm a tasteless, insensitive, inconsiderate, microcephalic asshole."

The Liberals are real slick about their personal attacks. Give it right back to them tho and wait for the whining to begin.

Condi handled herself with class and dignity and that is a unseen trait amongst the bitchy Liberal women of this age.

[MrSanity]

Babs, I'm surprised you didn't throw your children into the same river where Ted Kennedy committed vehicular manslaughter.

Come to think of it, liberals seem to throw bombs in order to compete for Coulter column tryouts.

[TheIrishman]

Boxer is a card carrying member of the Socialist Party of America, unless she has dropped it in the last year or so for political purposes, so what kind of dialogue could one expect from her. She HAS to get her name-calling in, no matter how she does it.

[DesertFox]

Kennedy: vehicular manslaughter.

Boxer: vernacular manslaughter.

[Maggie_T]

Then how does she know "how it feels" since she can't "pay the price" either? Boxer just couldn't resist an emotional, personal attack, she should apologize to all, but she is a liberal.

Exactly. I am always freshly amazed at how liberals trip over their own tongue - not to mention how they go back on their liberal "beliefs" - in order to make a point, or to get at conservatives.

Then I remember that they'll get a free pass from the press and the sheeple, and my amazement turns into acknowldgement of the inevitable.

Come to think of it, liberals seem to throw bombs in order to compete for Coulter column tryouts.

I know. But Ann is the only one who's demonized for it. Even by conservatives. The latter are forever whining for the return of "good debating manners." That's like whining for the return of the dodo.

Manners in politics are completely extinct. They have been for a long time and there is nothing that will bring them back, short of liberals disappearing from the face of the earth. And we should be so lucky. :rolleyes:

That's why I will forever defend Ann Coulter and her ilk (although I think she is quite unique :evilgrin: ). Showing deference and "good debating manners" to liberals is so much 'pearls before swine' and I hate waste.

No, sling mud on swine. That is the only thing they appreciate. anything else is a bloody waste of time. And pearls. ;)<!-- / message --><!-- sig --><!-- / message --><!-- sig -->

[Lubbock]

I never cease to be amazed at the [seemingly] Conservatives who find fault with Ann Coulter.

It seems to me that after three decades of the Conservatives/Republicans taking broadsides from the Left, we should be in unison in our praise of someone like Ann Coulter who will take on the Libs, on their own turf, call them out, point out their lies, their treason, and their bigotry.

But nooooooooo . . .

For whatever reason, we have our share of Lace Panty Conservatives who believe it's beneath us to support Ann.

In almost every instance, that old saw about laying down with dogs and getting up with fleas is true, but when it comes to taking on the Libs, it does not apply.

The only way to get along with Libs is to go at them hammer and tong, guns blazing.

Respond in kind.

It's all they understand. It gets their attention.

And it makes them squeal like a pig under a gate . . . which gives Ann more opportunity to point out their lies, their treason, and their bigotry.

[DesertFox]

What Lub said x 100.

[DeclinetoState]

For whatever reason, we have our share lf Lace Panty Conservatives who believe it's beneath us to support Ann.I'll support Ann, no matter what kind of panties she's wearing.

{DtoS gets slapped. . . }

[DesertFox]

...if any. :D

[Wyatt_Junker]

:rotflmbo:

[MrSanity]

Babs has the integrity of a trash can.

[DesertFox]

Which is standard for a liberal.

[Lubbock]

I don't understand what Mr. Sanity has against trash cans.

[EdmundDantes]

When your enemy is in the process of hanging themselves allow them as much rope as they need.

[Maggie_T]

What Lub said x 100.


Which is pretty much what I said. So I support her, too. :biggrin:

[DeclinetoState]

Bill Press (http://www.billpress.com/blog.html)
January 15, 2007

I think Barbara Boxer’s getting a bum rap.

Unless you’ve been on the moon, you know Boxer’s under attack from the right-wing hate machine for taking on Condi Rice last week.

Talking about who would pay the price for escalation of the war in Iraq, Boxer first told Rice: “My children are too old, and my grandson is too young. So I’m personally not going to pay the price.”

Then she continued: “You’re not going to pay any particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family.”

And for that Boxer’s being accused of being anti-feminist, anti-single women, anti-professional women.

Give me a freakin’ break. First of all, what Boxer said is true: Neither Boxer nor Rice are going to send a son or daughter to fight in Iraq.

Second, the larger point she was making is also true: Namely, that there is no shared sacrifice among Americans in Iraq. Just a few families have been asked to pay the price for all the rest of us.

And that starts in the White House. If George Bush really wants all Americans to support sending more troops to Iraq – why haven’t Barbara and Jenna put on the uniform?