Graphic: Duke accuser's story

[DesertFox]

According to new motions filed by defense lawyers, the accuser in the Duke lacrosse sex assault case now says that one of the players did not sexually assault her at all and has changed the time she alleges the attack took place.

The changes in her story cast doubt on the strength of her case. Three Duke students — Colin Finnerty, Reade Seligmann and David Evans — were indicted in the spring on charges of felony rape, kidnapping and sexual assault for an alleged incident on March 13, during a Duke lacrosse team party.

Here are the accuser's version of the events of March 13, 2006, according to investigators.(Reader caution: Sexually-explicit language

More (http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/story?id=2787914)

[DesertFox]

Sounds like what the ho's do regularly for money on MILF.

[S-T]

I do not know what MILF is. I do not want to know. Please, for the love of God, do not explain what MILF is.

Thanks.

[Wyatt_Junker]

Sounds like what the ho's do regularly for money on MILF.

Actually, it sounds like what regulary goes down when I bust out my Twister gameboard with my friends.

http://www.lakewoodbuzz.com/Teen%20Stuff/Twister_Game_Lakewood_Ohio.jpg

[DeclinetoState]

Comments:<ol><li>The lacrosse students showed poor judgment in going to the party (assuming they knew there was going to be a stripper present). However, they are not the first college students to show poor judgment, nor will they be the last. Also, poor judgment is not necessarily a crime.<li>It seems pretty clear that some awful sexual acts have been performed on the dancer. I don't think she made up the graphic incidents out of whole cloth. However, given her profession (and the inconsistencies in her stories), the acts she describes may have occurred on other occasions.<li>Assuming some of the partiers did have sex with her, was it rape? Let's assume it was. Were the lacrosse players the rapists? It's my understanding their DNA wasn't in her. However, they might be culpable if they held her down or otherwise assisted other partiers in forcing the woman to have sex with them.<li>If the players were accessories to rape, then they should have been prosecuted as such from the get-go. Obviously, the woman's statements seemed to indicate that she believed they had raped her. The D.A.'s (usually, assistant D.A.'s are the ones to prosecute cases--unless Nifong did all of the work himself) should have made very sure of what they were doing before they filed the charges. Not only is this necessary to protect the rights of the accused, but it's also necessary to protect the rights of the accuser. Right now, she looks nearly as bad as Nifong. If there was no case to begin with, or a very shaky one at best, or a case of the athletes being accessories--rather than the sexual culprits--as seems most likely today, the prosecutors should have made all of that clear to her so that she could decide whether she wanted to possibly embarrass herself by pursuing a frivolous case of rape.</ol>

[DesertFox]

That's waaaay too much analysis, DtS. Somebody paid this ho to take these privileged white boys down. She warn't smart enough to make it work. Mike Nifong warn't smart enough to recognize that she warn't smart enough to make it work. The ho will just go back to standing on the corner. I hope Nifong does, too -- the corner of the cell.

Meanwhile, the ho done destroyed her own future and that of all her sister ho's. They money in rich white boys wantin' to dip they wix in black girls, even black ho's. But ain't none a them rich white boys gonna be dippin' any black ho's for awhile now.

[DeclinetoState]

I dunno about the premeditation or planning on her part. If it was all premeditated from the start, why did the stripper change her story?

OTOH, criminals and liars are not always the smartest people around (though one could argue that one of them was POTUS a few years ago--but I digress).

[Riverboat]

The ho will just go back to standing on the corner. I hope Nifong does, too -- the corner of the cell.Or maybe he could just play Twister with the boys in the block. Wyatt could loan his game. Best part of all is the sheet is easy to clean. Just wipe it off with a rag and presto!

[Lubbock]

I don't think it was premeditated on the Ho's part at all.

She got to he party drunk, and didn't perform her strip tease as expected. She was falling down drunk, and the boys [who had all chipped in for the dance] were jeering and derisive about her dance.

Then there was a dispute about the money. The boys didn't want to pay her because of her poor performance "on stage."

This was revenge on the Ho's part. She wanted to get back at the boys.

If you remember, the cops found her passed out drunk in an automobile in front of a convenience store. The cops didn't know what to do with her because of her condition, and waned to arrest her.

[Seabee]

This was revenge on the Ho's part. She wanted to get back at the boys.



Yup she wanted revenge, the only thing I do not think she counted on was the media hysteria the case would cause. She probably figured she could bribe the families with a civil suit or something, forgetting or not knowing, it was election time in Raleigh.

[Lubbock]

Bingo.

[Gonzo67]

What I find most amazing is the "double Standards" in the racially charged country these days.

On one occasion, I was driving through Dayton Ohio. I had a crappy little truck truck that was hardly reliable. I stalled out at a light, and was attempting to start the truck again. Having lived in Detroit, I should have known better, but not being IN Detroit at the time, I didn't see anything wrong with driving through a decent sized city with my doors unlocked. After all, I'm not a "small guy", and I can hold my own.

Well, after about the third crank, still the truck doesn't start, but my door is jerked open, and a black man puts a gun to my head. The only words he spoke were "The money! Now!"

Not wishing to be shot over $17, which is all I had in my wallet, I handed it over to him. Thankfully, he ran without checking it. (To this day, I no longer carry cash on me, if I carry cash at all. Now it's Debit Card or just enough cash for what I need and NEVER in my wallet.)

When I arrived back at my Girlfriends, I called the police. They asked what he looked like, I was unable to give a good description of his face because, as I told the police officer, I was more interested in the gun that was pointed at my head. I described the clothes, and the coat the mugger was wearing, and the cops asked me if I would ride with them, because they just picked someone up in the area and would like to see if I could identify him.

I went, but the man they had wasn't the one that robbed me. Then the cop asked me something that floored me. "Will you agree to come to the police station and take a polygraph test?"

I was amused at this. I asked why the VICTIM of a crime is being treated as a criminal? They claimed that usually, when a WHITE person accuses a BLACK person of a crime, they're lying!

Well, I went with them, I took their polygraph test (and yes, they actually gave me one) and passed their polygraph test. When we were finished, I started asking my OWN questions:

MY Questions to the "Officers":

#1: Why was it automatically assumed that a WHITE man would LIE about being mugged of $17?

Answer: Allot of hemming and hawing...

#2: Was the black man you had in custody actually a criminal you caught, or was it an undercover and you were hoping to determine if I was lying?

Answer: It was in fact a plain clothes cop, and they were seeing if I would "point out" an "innocent black man".

#3: Does this not in fact point out that the Dayton Police are, in fact, HYPOCRITES who will lie, manipulate, and waste taxpayer money just to see if someone is lying to them?

Answer: They had no idea what I meant by that.

#4: Why were they wasting their time, my time, and taxpayer dollars screwing with me, when they SHOULD be out on the street, looking for the NIGGER with a gun? (Personal Note: There were 3 Black cops present, including the "under-cover that they tried to get me to identify who had walked in during my third question - And I DID use the "N" word to express my dis-satisfaction with their whole "Mayberry Operation")

Answer: I was asked by one of the "African American" cops to NOT use that word again.

To which I went on a tirade about the constitution, freedom of speech, and how if he doesn't LIKE that word, I suggest he leave the room because I'm about to use it several more times.

The rest of the encounter can basically be described as me doing my level best to push the buttons of some of Dayton's finest, in an attempt to see just how far I have to go to get my ass thrown in jail. But I was pissed, and I thought I deserved a little fun at the P.D.'s expense.

But the entire point of that little story is this:

I find it fascinating that a White person can accuse a Black person of a minor crime in this country, and the "suspicion" IMMEDIATELY goes to the WHITE person's credibility.

Yet a Black person can accuse White people of HORRENDOUS crimes, and the WHITE people are tried, convicted, and sentenced in the Media in a matter of days, while the BLACK person's credibility is NEVER called into suspicion. Even later, when the Black person shows themselves to be LYING, the media, and those in "authority" will STILL spin it to make the White person appear to STILL be the "guilty party".

Yes kiddies... Jesse Jackhole and Al "Pimp Daddy" Sharpasston are correct. Racism is alive and well in these United States. So all you white people, time to bow, scrape and grovel at the feet of your Black Masters.