Beowulf
03-04-2007, 04:24 PM
So claim the Democrats, who want to make us all pay more. So much for being for "Working people!":flame:
That translated into a "surtax" of about $2,680 per household in 2001, the national taxpayer advocate said at a recent hearing of the House Budget Committee. "That is an extraordinary burden to ask our nation's compliant taxpayers to bear every year," Nina E. Olson said.
<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = AT /><AT:CLASS></AT:CLASS>"It's not just a budgetary problem," the committee chairman, Rep. John Spratt, D-S.C., said at the hearing. "It raises fundamental issues of moral fairness."
<AT:CLASS></AT:CLASS>The new Democratic majority sees these uncollected billions as a major source of revenue that could be used to pay for education, health and other priorities without busting the budget.
http://kevxml2adsl.verizon.net/_1_2LJMTO103Y2B5WN__vzn.dsl/apnws/story.htm?kcfg=apart&sin=D8NLJ5QO1&qcat=usnews&ran=8643&passqi=&feed=ap&top=1
And now watch the Lib trolls start applauding and say that we should be paying more. Fricking Doorknobs!!
That translated into a "surtax" of about $2,680 per household in 2001, the national taxpayer advocate said at a recent hearing of the House Budget Committee. "That is an extraordinary burden to ask our nation's compliant taxpayers to bear every year," Nina E. Olson said.
<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = AT /><AT:CLASS></AT:CLASS>"It's not just a budgetary problem," the committee chairman, Rep. John Spratt, D-S.C., said at the hearing. "It raises fundamental issues of moral fairness."
<AT:CLASS></AT:CLASS>The new Democratic majority sees these uncollected billions as a major source of revenue that could be used to pay for education, health and other priorities without busting the budget.
http://kevxml2adsl.verizon.net/_1_2LJMTO103Y2B5WN__vzn.dsl/apnws/story.htm?kcfg=apart&sin=D8NLJ5QO1&qcat=usnews&ran=8643&passqi=&feed=ap&top=1
And now watch the Lib trolls start applauding and say that we should be paying more. Fricking Doorknobs!!