9-11: White Collar Terrorist Operation

[Seeker of Truth]

9-11: White Collar Terrorist Operation
by DR. LEONARD HOROWITZ

1) The "terrorist" attacks were completely predictable and, in fact, predicted.

Forewarnings were issued by many patriotic and heroic individuals to government and military officials well in advance of Sept. 11, 2001.

For instance, in August, Drs. Garth Nicolson, Ph.D., and his wife Nancy Nicolson, Ph.D., among the world's most esteemed Mycoplasma researchers and Gulf War Syndrome investigators, reported to Pentagon officials that they had confirmed intelligence that on Sept. 11, 2001 a terrorist strike against the Pentagon would be made.

Their sources included individuals in key intelligence positions, the mob, and one high level African diplomat. Their "information was passed on to the Director of Policy of the Department of Defense, the Inspector General of the US Army Medical Corps and the National Security Council,"

Dr. Nicolson wrote. "Unfortunately, it was ignored." Likewise, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the award-winning author of the prophetically titled book, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare, (http://www.tetrahedron.org;

http://www.prophecyandpreparedness.com) released three months before the attacks on Washington and New York, correctly predicted such a first strike on New York.

For three years, based on government documents and intelligence reports, he had been warning "Metropolis" residents, "It's time to move."

2) On Friday, September 7, Florida Governor, Jeb Bush, brother to the President, issued an Executive Order in which members of the Florida National Guard were activated, "for the purpose of training to support law-enforcement personnel and emergency-management personnel in the event of civil disturbances or natural disaster." Perhaps the president and his brother received Dr. Nicolson's warnings or were the source of the warnings?


3) Numerous reports have surfaced alleging that Bush administration, military, and intelligence officials' close associates had suddenly, and inexplicably, sold all their airline stock just days before the terrorist attacks. The F.B.I. is reportedly investigating these reports and such "inside traders."


4) Osama bin Laden and his band of "Terrorists" could not have pulled off the "sophisticated" operation of four simultaneous air hijackings, and precision directed attacks, without the support of one or more "intelligence organizations."

This was the expert testimony provided by past CIA Afghanistan operations director and bin Laden's American intelligence aficionado, Milt Bearden, interviewed by Dan Rather on September 12, 2001. In fact, when pressed by Dan Rather to endorse the theory of bin Laden's culpability, Mr. Bearden stated, "if they didn't have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one."


5) On October 31, 2001, the French daily Le Figaro reported that Osama bin Laden had met with a high-level CIA official in July 2000.

At that time, bin Laden was already being sought for trial for his involvement in two U.S. embassy bombings and the U.S.S. Cole attack. The meeting was held in bin Laden's private suite in a Dubai hospital. Though he was eligible for extermination, according to President Bill Clinton's intelligence findings, on July 14th he was let go and left Dubai on his private jet.

Much more of this @ conspiracyplanet.com (http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=112&contentid=668)

[Seeker of Truth]

9-11 Commission Testimony Too Hot To Be Under Oath

by Tom Flocco
(posted 7:00 AM. ET)

WASHINGTON, May 27, 2003 (TomFlocco.com) -- Just after former head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Jane Garvey concluded her controversial time-line of events testimony and responses to questions from Chairman Thomas Kean’s blue-ribbon 9/11 panel Thursday afternoon, whispers commenced among the reporters and some of the victim family members in attendance at the Hart Senate office building.

Kean, a popular former governor of New Jersey who was known for integrity, fairness, and good judgment will have some major decisions in coming weeks -- given that many of the witnesses he called to testify could not get their stories straight regarding key events on the 9/11 time-line sequence.

Jane Garvey, former head of the Federal Aviation Administration, had a difficult time during her testimony on Thursday afternoon, particularly with issues surrounding the 9/11 timeline. Moreover, she continually remarked that the FBI was handling many issues thought to be within her own realm.

For those fully conversant with the published event chronologies and incredible story legs linked to the attacks, Garvey’s statement and answers to questions began a series of some of the most compelling declarations since the Watergate hearings. All this, with the next morning’s witness statements before the Commission -- and hallway press interviews -- continuing to surprise more and more as testimony progressed.

Curiously however, none of the testimony offered before the Commission was sworn under oath (either on Thursday or Friday); and the most critical statements concerning the 9/11 military response failures occurred on the morning prior to a long Memorial Day weekend when the public would not be paying attention.

Just prior to the start of Friday’s sparsely attended hearings, we asked Kean’s Deputy for Communications Alvin S. Felzenberg why none of the witnesses were being sworn in.

Felzenberg, a former Heritage Foundation fellow connected to the Bush 2000 presidential transition, who has also written for The Weekly Standard, told us “We will not be swearing in witnesses during any [public or private] 9/11 testimony.”

When we asked whether un-sworn testimony would be a wise decision -- considering both the importance of the hearings and Garvey’s conflicted testimony the previous day, spokesman Felzenberg replied: “Congress has indicted individuals for false statements not made under oath, and we don’t think it’s necessary -- so no one will be sworn in. Would you please sit down.”


More @ tomflocco.com (http://www.tomflocco.com/9-11_commission_Testimony_too_hot.htm)

[Seeker of Truth]

The truth about sept 11
The following links are collected by an earth citizen, Gerard Holmgren, who wants the truth to come out on september 11 events. He doesn't have a web site and posts his link on forums, to mailing lists. I saved his message in html and give it here.

List of links to documented evidence of high level US complicity in the attacks of sept 11 2001.
(The Web pages below have been backed up. If any links are dead, the backed up page can be mailed on request.)


THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
Section 1: Airforce stand-down

1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media that fighter jets were scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as the following research shows.
Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, by Illarion Bykov and Jared
Israel, 14 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm

1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov
2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm

1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm

1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11,they just " arrived late "
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm

1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely, 12 Dec 2001
http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm

1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm

1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm

Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a routine proceedure. It happened 67 times in the 10 months between September 2000 and June 2001.

1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 2002
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top

So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets scrambled, and why has a cover up story been concocted?

In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! ) where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race tracks.


More @ perso.wanadoo (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/investigation77.htm)

[Seeker of Truth]

The World Messenger
Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (updated from archives)
Have you forgotten how the world crisis of a possible world war we are facing today, all began?
The truth about the alleged 9/11 hijackers - What Bush will never reveal and needs you to forget...
EIGHT of the alleged September 11th Hijackers are Alive
The FBI STILL lists these men as the terrorists who crashed planes into the World Trade Center in New York,
the Pentagon, and Stony Creek Township, Pennsylvania on September 11th. But eight of them are ALIVE.

The FBI press release of September 27th, 2001 contained names, photographs, aliases and other information.
Places of birth, date of birth and other personal details were presented in news media throughout the world.

Eight men accused were NOT on those planes.
So, WHY was Bush allowed to proceed with war against Afghanistan!!!!!!!!!
The so called evidence IS A LIE. Now Bush wants to attack Iraq too.

Saeed Al-Ghamdi, Mohand Al-Shehri, Abdul Aziz Al-Omari and Salem Al-Hazmi
"are not dead and had nothing to do with the heinous terror attacks in New York and Washington."
The Saudi Arabian embassy told The Orlando Sentinel.

Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal told the Arabic Press after meeting with President George W. Bush
on Sept. 20th "It was proved that five of the names included in the FBI list had nothing to do with what happened."

As none of the 19 hijackers named appear on ANY of the four passenger/crew flight lists,
how do the FBI know who they are?...They are all DEAD!

The so called flying capabilities of the 'hijackers' is also a lie.

Information below has not only been carried by the Saudi Gazette (September 18) and
the Khaleej Times (September 20) but also by Robert Fisk in the Independent UK (September 17).

Robert Mueller, director of the FBI, has twice been forced to admit on CNN that there is
"no legal proof to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers" (CNN, September 20 and 27).

Read on to discover what the FBI told the public and what has come to light...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AMERICAN AIRLINES #77 - BOEING 757 - The Pentagon
- 2 out of 5 FBI named hijackers, are alive
Barbara K. Olson had called her husband, Solicitor General Theodore Olson
at the Justice Department at 9:25, from the plane, to tell him about the hijacking.


More @ worldmessenger (http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html)

[Seeker of Truth]

___________An_Interesting_Day:
President_Bush's_Movements_and_Actions_on_9/11

By Allan Wood and Paul Thompson
May 9, 2003


"It was an interesting day." - President Bush, recalling 9/11 [White House, 1/5/02]

At approximately 8:48 a.m. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first pictures of the burning World Trade Center were broadcast on live television. The news anchors, reporters, and viewers had little idea what had happened in lower Manhattan, but there were some people who did know. By that time, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), the National Military Command Center, the Pentagon, the White House, the Secret Service, and Canada's Strategic Command all knew that three commercial airplanes had been hijacked. They knew that one plane had been flown deliberately into the World Trade Center's North Tower; a second plane was wildly off course and also heading toward Manhattan; and a third plane had abruptly turned around over Ohio and was flying back toward Washington, DC.

So why, at 9:03 a.m. - fifteen minutes after it was clear the United States was under terrorist attack - did President Bush sit down with a classroom of second-graders and begin a 20-minute pre-planned photo op? No one knows the answer to that question. In fact, no one has even asked Bush about it.

Bush's actions on September 11 have been the subject of lively debate, mostly on the internet. Details reported that day and in the week after the attacks - both the media reports and accounts given by Bush himself - have changed radically over the past 18 months. Culling hundreds of reports from newspapers, magazines, and the internet has only made finding the "truth" of what happened and when it happened more confusing. In the changed political climate after 9/11, few have dared raise challenging questions about Bush's actions. A journalist who said Bush was "flying around the country like a scared child, seeking refuge in his mother's bed after having a nightmare" and another who said Bush "skedaddled" were fired. [Washington Post, 9/29/01 (B)] We should have a concise record of where President Bush was throughout the day the US was attacked, but we do not.

What follows is an attempt to give the most complete account of Bush's actions - from Florida to Louisiana to Nebraska to Washington, DC.

Preparations

Bush's appearance at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida, on September 11, 2001 had been in the planning stages since August [Booker web site], but was only publicly announced on the morning of September 7. [White House, 9/7/01] Later that same day, 9/11 hijackers Mohamed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi traveled to Sarasota and enjoyed drinks and dinner at a Holiday Inn only two miles down the sandy beach from where Bush was scheduled to stay during his Sarasota visit. [Longboat Observer, 11/21/01, Washington Post, 1/27/02]

On the night of September 10th, Bush stayed at the Colony Beach Resort - "an upscale and relatively pristine tropical island enclave located directly on the Gulf of Mexico, a spindly coral island ... off Sarasota, Florida." [AP, 07/29/01] Zainlabdeen Omer, a Sudanese native living in Sarasota, told the local police that night that someone he knew who had made violent threats against Bush was in town and Omer was worried about Bush's safety. The man was identified only as "Ghandi." A police report states the Secret Service was informed immediately. [Hopsicker, 7/22/02]


More @ cooperativeresearch.org (http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/essayaninterestingday.html)

[Seeker of Truth]

All 911 Airports Serviced by Same Security Firm
RMN Agents Forum

It's one of those times when an innocuous comment in an unrelated news report triggers a revelation. In the article at http://afrocubaweb.com/news/israelispying.htm there is the
following paragraph.

"To make the situation worse, a private security company called ICTS, owned by an Israeli, Ezra Harel, and registered in the Netherlands, was employed at Charles de Gaulle airport to screen passengers boarding US planes. Most of its personnel are ex-Shin Bet officers. The company covers security at Boston’s Logan airport, where the American Airlines plane came down after flight attendants and passengers overpowered Reid."

The point of thie article was that ICTS knew Reid was dangerous, but allowed him on board a flight from Tel Aviv to Paris. Maybe they did and maybe they didn't. But the idea that an Israeli owned company had inside access to the airport used to launch an abortive terror attack brought to mind the strange message Odigo Systems, another Israeli owned company with offices near the World Trade Towers, received that warned of the impending attacks before the hijacked planes had even left the ground.

So, I went back to another story that had surfaced briefly, reported at www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26626 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26626) about how at least one hijacker had smuggled a GUN aboard one of the hijacked planes. Even prior to 9-11, getting a gun on board a passenger plane represented a serious lapse of security. I wondered why this story of a gun was being concealed behind talk of box cutters and screwdrivers.

More @ thetruthseeker.co.uk (http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=810)

[Seeker of Truth]

Still shrouded in secrecy: 9–11

By Linda S. Heard
Online Journal Contributing Writer

ATHENS, May 23, 2003—Never before has one day had such a personal and political impact, and yet September 11, 2001, remains an enigma. Isn't it time we asked the right questions and demanded answers? Questions such as: Why did top Pentagon officials cancel their travel plans for September 11 the day before? Who sent warning text messages to an Israeli company? Why were Israeli spies caught videotaping the implosion of the Twin Towers allowed to go free? Why is nobody yelling: We want the truth?

For Americans, September 11 signifies the day that their nation was attacked on its own soil. For the rest of us it heralds the birth, if not the gestation, of a disturbing New World Order with the US calling the shots.

In the months since 19 hijackers allegedly commandeered civilian aircraft and flew them into the symbols of American power, the Bush administration has extended its military footprint throughout Asia and invaded two sovereign nations: Afghanistan and Iraq.

The war with Afghanistan was ostensibly waged to get Osama bin Laden and to dismantle his al Qaeda network. Bin Laden has never been found but America's thirst to exact revenge was partially quenched.

'Operation Iraqi Freedom' was facilitated by 9–11 too. The American administration tried its best to link the former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to al Qaeda and failed dismally. This didn't deter a US marine from covering the bronze face of the Iraqi leader in Firdous Square, Baghdad, with the exact same flag, which had flown over the Pentagon on September 11.

The US alleged that one of the hijackers, Mohammed Atta, met with an Iraqi secret service agent in Prague and that the anthrax attacks in the US were perpetrated by Iraq. Both these charges were proved false. The man pictured with the Iraqi in Prague turned out not to be Atta, and the anthrax started life in Fort Detrick, a US Army Weapons laboratory in Maryland, with suspect number one being a former employee Lt. Colonel Philip Zack.

Stymied, there was nothing for it but to charge the Iraqi regime with developing weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein is a danger to the United States, they asserted.

The US has yet to give a reasonable explanation as to why this 'dangerous' man did not use his chemical or biological weapons when his enemy was literally at the door.

More @ onlinejournal.com (http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/052303Heard2/052303heard2.html)