Yahoo Personals | Personal Loans | Mortgage Loans | Literatura fantástica | Car Insurance
Ex-Gonzales Aide Defends Firings [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Ex-Gonzales Aide Defends Firings


Rhino
03-29-2007, 11:45 AM
Former Gonzales Aide Defends Justice Department Attorney Firings

Thursday, March 29, 2007

WASHINGTON — Alberto Gonzales' former top aide testified Thursday that the attorney general was mistaken when he said he was not involved in the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, adding that the dismissals are "a benign, rather than sinister, story."

Under questioning by Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, Kyle Sampson said Gonzales was involved in the decision to fire the eight attorneys, attending a meeting on the decision 10 days before it was carried out. He said Gonzales was also wrong when he said other senior Justice Department aides gave Congress inaccurate information because they hadn't been fully briefed about the firings.

"I don't remember if the attorney general ever saw documents. I didn't prepare memos for him on this issue. But we did discuss it as early as — before he became the attorney general, when he was the attorney general designate in January of 2005, I think; and then, from time to time, as the process was, sort of, in a thinking phase through 2005 and 2006. And then I remember discussing it with him as the process sort of came to a conclusion in the fall of 2006," he said.

Sampson said he made recommendations about which attorneys should be fired, but "the decision makers in this case were the attorney general and the president."

The former chief of staff argued that the imbroglio had blown up because of poor explanations, but not poor motivations. He also apologized for the confusion and misunderstanding that accompanied the explanation of the firings to senators. A longtime veteran of the Justice Department, he said he resigned because he let down the attorney general by failing to avoid this messy situation.

"As the attorney general's chief of staff, I could have and should have helped to prevent this. In failing to do so, I let the attorney general and the department down. For that reason, I offered the attorney general my resignation. I was not asked to resign. I simply felt honor-bound to accept my share of blame for this problem and to hold myself accountable," he said.

He added that none of the attorneys were let go because of political manipulations.....http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,262122,00.html

DeclinetoState
03-29-2007, 03:04 PM
Time (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,945941,00.html)


Monday, Feb. 06, 1978


Broken promises and misstatements put Carter on the spot

"If I ever tell a lie, if I ever mislead you, if I ever betray a trust or a confidence, I want you to come and take me out of the White House."

—Candidate Carter in 1976



As Republicans rubbed their hands in glee, the Carter Administration last week found itself trying to explain away a skein of presidential lies. In a letter to Justice Department investigators looking into the firing two weeks ago of Philadelphia's Republican U.S. Attorney, David Marston, Carter last week corrected a misstatement he had made during a nationally televised press conference on Jan. 12. Republican Congressmen saw an opportunity to duplicate last summer's damaging controversy over Bert Lance's financial peccadilloes, and to lay siege again to what was once the President's pride: his credibility.

It was Carter's own fault. During his campaign he rashly declared, "All federal judges and prosecutors should be appointed strictly on the basis of merit without any consideration of political aspects or influence." Such appointments are traditionally made on a frankly political basis, and once Carter was ensconced in the Oval Office, that tradition was fully honored. Of the first 65 U.S. Attorneys named by the new Administration, 64 were Democrats. As House Speaker Tip O'Neill put it, "That's the way the System works." And, he might have added, the way Congressmen and Governors want it to work, no matter who is President.

Carter got himself in trouble by making two serious mistakes. Several times he told less than the truth about his role in expediting the removal of Marston. Then, after admitting he was asked to fire Marston by one of the prosecutor's targets of investigation, Democratic Congressman Joshua Eilberg of Pennsylvania, Carter did it anyway.

DeclinetoState
03-30-2007, 06:33 PM
Shameless bump of this thread, since nobody has commented on Jimmy Carter's firing of David Marston, which was arguably far less ethical than anything Bush has ever done.

DesertFox
03-30-2007, 08:57 PM
Jimmy Carter is the vilest person ever to occupy the White House.

DeclinetoState
03-30-2007, 09:07 PM
I dunno about that. The Clintons gave him a run for his money.

It is interesting that Time magazine raked Jimmy over the coals for the Marston firing.