Online Advertising | Ringtones | 实验室仪器 分析仪器 磁力搅拌器 分 | Loans | Mortgages
Historic CO2 levels - the emerging picture, [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Historic CO2 levels - the emerging picture,


sunsettommy
04-02-2007, 07:06 AM
http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/archives/003893.html

This is the link to the NOW published paper.

An Englishmen's Castle,
March 31, 2007

Historic CO2 levels - the emerging picture,

Ernst Beck's full paper has now been published:
180 Years of atmospheric CO 2 Gas Analysis by Chemical Methods - ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT VOLUME 18 No. 2, 2007 (http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mscp/ene)
UPDATE - As requested I have removed the link to the full paper.

ABSTRACT
More than 90,000 accurate chemical analyses of CO2 in air since 1812 are summarised. The historic chemical data reveal that changes in CO2 track changes in temperature, and therefore climate in contrast to the simple, monotonically increasing CO2 trend depicted in the post-1990 literature on climate-change. Since 1812, the CO2 concentration in northern hemispheric air has fluctuated exhibiting three high level maxima around 1825, 1857 and 1942 the latter showing more than 400 ppm. Between 1857 and 1958, the Pettenkofer process was the standard analytical method for determining atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and usually achieved an accuracy better than 3%. These determinations were made by several scientists of Nobel Prize level distinction. Following Callendar (1938), modern climatologists have generally ignored the historic determinations of CO2, despite the techniques being standard text book procedures in several different disciplines. Chemical methods were discredited as unreliable choosing only few which fit the assumption of a climate CO2 connection.

__________________________________________________ __________
Much more in the link including this special link worth looking over.

"..And a full set of other linked resources on the page (http://www.biokurs.de/treibhaus/180CO2_supp.htm). Go and dip in and wonder why the IPCC has dismissed this data. As he says:.."