Paid Surveys | Loans | Debt | Loans | Proxy
This is a bit tacky and unseemly [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : This is a bit tacky and unseemly


Keb
04-04-2007, 01:02 PM
(http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/)Edwards Provides Lesson in E-Campaigning 101 (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/)


When you visit the John Edwards for President (http://johnedwards.com/) Web site, you're invited to send a sympathy note to the Edwardses. And tens of thousands of well wishers have done so since that heart-wrenching news conference (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/22/AR2007032200155.html) two weeks ago at which Elizabeth Edwards courageously discussed her incurable cancer.

What those well wishers get in return -- e-mail messages soliciting contributions to Edwards's campaign.

Visitors to the Edwards site who choose to "send a note to Elizabeth and John" are first taken to a heartfelt letter from the candidate (http://johnedwards.com/news/thank-you-20070322/) that was written the day after he learned that his wife's cancer had returned. Edwards thanks readers for their "prayers and wishes," vows that he and Elizabeth will "keep a positive attitude always look for the silver lining" and declares that "our campaign goes on and it goes on strongly."

Anyone who then chooses to send a note of sympathy to the Edwardses -- and, thus, provide his or her e-mail address -- automatically becomes part of the Edwards campaign's online e-mail database, a list that is crucial to any campaign's ability to raise vast amounts of money over the Internet.


I think this quote from the rest of the article sums it up nicely.
"One Democratic operative, citing comments made by Edwards, charged, "There's a certain inconsistency to, on the one hand, going out of his way to say 'don't vote for us because of this tragedy,' but then using it to solicit funds."

The_Elucidator
04-04-2007, 01:11 PM
Another Democrat, who asked to remain anonymous because of the issue's sensitivity, said while it's understandable that campaigns use e-mail addresses they acquire through their Web sites for fundraising purposes, "there should have been an exception in this case."

Why Hitlery, just upset 'cause they out-slimed you...

d'urville
04-04-2007, 05:49 PM
And all this exploitation is working, at least for now. "Tacky and unseemly" is a phrase that brings to mind trial lawyers, these two are no exception.


Uncomfortable Situation, Uncomfortable Words From Edwards

</MTWEBLOGPOSTIFSHOW>John and Elizabeth Edwards' compelling press conference today to announce the somber news that her cancer has returned was marked by optimism and moments of high levity, and one moment of very uncomfortable laughter - when the Democratic presidential hopeful joked that he beat his wife.

Mrs. Edwards was explaining how she cracked her rib - which prompted her to go see a doctor, only to find out that her cancer had returned - while moving a piece of furniture in the couple's new multi-million-dollar mansion outside Chapel Hill.

She said she hurt her back while trying to lift a heavy chest of drawers. Then "John came home" and gave her a "big hug," which is when she felt her back had really been wrenched. "He immediately heard a pop," she said.

That's when the Democratic presidential candidate - who had so far scored close to a perfect 10 for his humanizing, down-to-earth performance throughout the news conference - interjected: "Actually, I was beating her."

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/

The writer of that then informs us that the remarks should be viewed as sympathetically as possible, just like she'd interpert them coming from a Republican, I'm sure.

thoughtomator
04-04-2007, 06:02 PM
(http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/) "One Democratic operative, citing comments made by Edwards, charged, "There's a certain inconsistency to, on the one hand, going out of his way to say 'don't vote for us because of this tragedy,' but then using it to solicit funds." (http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/)

There's no inconsistency at all, if you start by realizing Edwards is a politician, and all politicians should be assumed to be liars unless proven otherwise.

When I first heard the story about his wife's alleged new health problem, my BS detectors went on red alert.

Cui bono? A false claim like this has no downside for Edwards, he gets sympathy up the wazoo and a support boost as a result, and never has to prove a thing.

So, if you start with my initial assumption that, as a politician, Edwards is lying, then soliciting funds based on the alleged health problem is 100% perfectly consistent with what we should expect from a politician lawyer Democrat.

In fact, if he DIDN'T lie, that is what would be inconsistent.

Next thing you know, he'll be channelling a cancer cell in front of a jackpot jury.

DesertFox
04-04-2007, 08:20 PM
Fortunately for Edwards, he won't miss his wife when she goes. He can channel her at will.

Don't we all wish we were so lucky as to have that gift.

:rolleyes: