Blood In The Water

[Pennville_Bill]

By Neal Boortz
http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html
Liberals see this whole Imus situation as a way to rid themselves of the problem of talk radio. Now that they've succeeded in getting MSNBC to pull Imus' program (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17999196/), they'll concentrate on CBS .. trying to get the radio show cancelled. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if they succeed. Then they will turn their attention to the rest of us. The tape recorders will be running. There is not one single significant right-of-center radio talk show out there that is not going to come under fire. Liberals know -- they've proven it to themselves -- that they simply cannot succeed in talk radio. So, it's all very simple. If they can't succeed, destroy the genre. Their original plan was to wait until Democrats control the congress and the White House and then murder talk radio with the so-called "Fairness Doctrine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine)." Now that they're on the verge of having a talk radio scalp on their belts as retribution for a bad and mean-spirited joke, they see that they may not have to wait for the electorate to give them the power.
In the meantime... while the race industry is calling for the head of Don Imus, we have Crystal Gail Mangum of North Carolina (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265374,00.html). Who is she? She is the woman who falsely accused three members of the Duke lacrosse team of rape. Her unsubstantiated charges resulted in a media firestorm against Duke University and these lacrosse players.



SNIP


Well .. now there's a new game plan. Use the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons of this world to attack these hosts on the basis of race. That's right .. this whole Imus affair isn't really about race! The TV networks and the liberal mainstream media haven't been hammering this Imus thing day after day after day because they really care about the racial aspects of the story. If they were that concerned about the racial angle they would be playing up the Duke case to a similar extent. Race is the means, not the reason. Right now the mainstream press sees race as the key to destroying talk radio. Focus on the hosts ... wait until they say something that can be racially exploited, and then launch the relentless attack. Go after networks, stations and advertisers. Concentrate on them -- one at a time -- like hyenas looking for a meal. Select prey that looks vulnerable. Isolate that prey and go in for the kill. I don't know how many hosts there are out there who have not made comments about black politicians, celebrities or culture that could be used as the basis for a full force attack. I know I have. Have I gone overboard? You bet! Hell .. 37 years in the business, how can you not have screwed up from time to time? I've apologized in the past -- and probably will one day say something else that merits an apology. Apologies aren't enough, however. The Christian concept of forgiveness and tolerance means nothing to the "reverends" Jackson and Sharpton. They're sharks .. and there's blood in the water.
By the way ... my guess? Now that MSNBC has dumped Imus, CBS is sure to follow. Look at it this way .... NBC has canned him. How in the hell can CBS stand up to the this racially charged onslaught? "Hey, CBS! NBC did the right thing? How about you?"


ROSIE? I'M GOING TO PRAISE ROSIE?

Yup! Looks like it! Rosie O'Donnell, weighing in on the Imus matters, warns us that the thought police are coming (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265295,00.html)! Agreeing with Rosie. This is going to bother me all day. I need a drink.

[DoctorDoom]

Here's the permanent kink to the column: Blood In The Water (http://boortz.com/nuze/200704/04122007.html)

Once in a while I disagree with Neal, but he's generally spot on. This is one such time. Liberals are obsessed with censoring all opposing points of view. They don't want freedom. It scares the scheiss out of them when people are free to speak their minds. They are dictators at heart, and they lust for absolute control over American society, over American liberty, and over American thinking.

Given the level of power that liberals seek, it would be dangerous to be a conservative spokesman or spokeswoman. They have already tried to silence Rush through pressure on and boycotts of his sponsors. A few of them with no balls have withdrawn. What the liberals don't grasp is that that the only thing they achieved is making openings for new sponsors, who are lined up waiting for a shot at ads that reach over 20 million listeners every week.

Rush goes on at the head of the pack while Air America, their latest shot at the big times, fades into oblivion. They are incensed at the success of conservative talk radio, and frustrated at their utter inability to compete in the arena of thought and ideas. Their "answer" to their impotence it to silence everyone with whom they don't agree. "If we can't succeed, we'll see to it that you fail."

America is flirting with tyranny. Liberals are only too glad to offer it. And the pot is boiling over. Liberal blood will flow.

[Dowple]

FWIW, last evening or the one before Paula Zahn's CNN show had a piece on "Imus in Context" with "other racist" talk radio hosts. Boortz was featured prominantly. He is right. The Left intends to close down opposing views in the media. As I said on another thread last night, do not dare to criticize ML King, for one of these days it will cost you your life, liberty, property, or all three.

[bannerman]

SHARPTON VOWS MORE: 'It is our feeling that this is only the beginning. We must have a broad discussion on what is permitted and not permitted in terms of the airwaves'...

BEWARE THE "FAIRNESS DOCTRINE"

[Maggie_T]

I agree with everyone here. Liberals have been salivating about the (Un)Fairness Doctrine since the very beginning of conservative radio talk show.

You know their motto: If you can't convince, coerce.

Bastards.