Mortgage | Free Mmorpgs | Online Advertising | Myspace Graphics | Loans
Global Warming Skeptics [Archive] - FreeConservatives

PDA

View Full Version : Global Warming Skeptics


sunsettommy
04-15-2007, 08:55 AM
<CENTER>Welcome to Global Warming Skeptics</CENTER>

Earth’s environment has become a hot button issue; so much so, that it has stumbled into the political arena. Yet, when the layers are peeled away on this issue, critical thinkers ask if the sky is really falling or is the media hyping the matter. Something is going on with Mother Earth’s climate; there is no doubt about that. Precisely what is going on is anyone’s guess and due to the planet’s dynamics, the reason can’t be pinned down to one primary cause. After all, it's been changing for 4.5 billion years.

What is Global Warming: The Short Version

When we hear the topic of global warming brought up, usually the first thing that goes through many people’s minds is the modern human industrial population. Typically many of the people who discuss it know little to nothing of the history behind it; no shock there.

Global warming was first introduced in 1824 by a man named Joseph Fourier (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect). Anyone familiar with US history will soon realize that we were not even close to our industrial might like we are today; yet, this concept of global warming was first observed early in the 19th Century. However, it wasn’t until 1896 (yes, that’s still the 19th Century) that a scientist, by the name of Svante Arrhenius (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius), began looking into the human aspect of global warming and the contribution of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions into the atmosphere and increasing the planet’s temperature. He concluded that man was the cause.

In the 1930's, G.S. Callander gathered temperature readings from more than 200 weather stations located around the world. After he gathered these numbers and got back to his lab, he concluded that the increase in the earth’s temperature was due to the contribution of greenhouse gasses from the human industry. Later in the 1950’s, Gilbert Plass, while conducting research on infrared radiation absorption and atmospheric CO2, also concluded that humans were the cause of temperatures rising around the globe. During this time the “Keeling Curve” was introduced. This honorific was so called because Charles David Keeling documented atmospheric carbon dioxide levels being emitted by Mauna Loa volcano in Hawaii.At any rate, these studies were going on and on and it seemed that the consensus from the scientific community was that, indeed, we humans are the cause of rising global temperatures. However, it wasn’t until 1988 that the issue would actually go global (pun intended).

In 1988 The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), which was formed by the United Nation’s Environmental Program and the World Meteorological Organization, conducted a World Climate Conference in 1990 to review the First Scientific Assessment Report. Well over 700 scientists gathered at this conference in order to create the 1992 UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). When this conference was concluded, the “Scientific Declaration” was issued:

“A clear scientific consensus has emerged on estimates of the range of global warming that can be expected during the 21st century.... Countries are urged to take immediate actions to control the risks of climate change.”

We here at Global Warming Skeptics do not buy into this "consensus" science.

A Challenge

If Al Gore and his sycophants are so sure that the earth will be destroyed in the time remaining of his prediction, then we challenge any of them to come here and answer some hard questions. Al Gore has ducked, weaved, and dodged everyone that wants to interview him on the subject, so we challenge any of his doomsdayers to come here and debate the issue. After all, he is a nominee of the Nobel Peace Prize.

http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/

What do you guys think of this?

DoctorDoom
04-15-2007, 09:34 AM
What do I think of skepticism about global warming? Two hours ago ...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Nature/TaxDay2007.jpg

And there's a schitteload more to come.

DesertFox
04-15-2007, 09:52 AM
One word sums up GW enthusiasts:

LIARS!

noncom
04-15-2007, 10:36 AM
In the 1930's, G.S. Callander gathered temperature readings from more than 200 weather stations located around the world. After he gathered these numbers and got back to his lab, he concluded that the increase in the earth’s temperature was due to the contribution of greenhouse gasses from the human industry. Later in the 1950’s, Gilbert Plass, while conducting research on infrared radiation absorption and atmospheric CO2, also concluded that humans were the cause of temperatures rising around the globe. During this time the “Keeling Curve” was introduced. This honorific was so called because Charles David Keeling documented atmospheric carbon dioxide levels being emitted by Mauna Loa volcano in Hawaii.At any rate, these studies were going on and on and it seemed that the consensus from the scientific community was that, indeed, we humans are the cause of rising global temperatures. However, it wasn’t until 1988 that the issue would actually go global (pun intended).
This timeline would look even more ridiculous if you inserted the "Global Cooling" scare of the 1960's and 70's - based on a downward "trend" in world temperatures that began around 1945.

People equate Global Warming alarmists with Chicken Little, but that's unfair. Chicken little was at least CONSISTENT in his idiocy; if he first screamed "The sky is falling! And then yelled "The sky is rising!" everytime a cloud passed by, even the other chickens wouldn't have believed him.

So anybody who refers to Global Warming fanatics as "bird brains" has some apologizing to do - to all the birds of the world.

DeclinetoState
04-15-2007, 10:46 AM
What do I think of skepticism about global warming? Two hours ago ...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Nature/TaxDay2007.jpg

And there's a schitteload more to come.
One of the effects of global warming is colder winters. This is because global warming affects climate, not weather.

:D

NLB
04-15-2007, 11:09 AM
One of the effects of global warming is colder winters. This is because global warming affects climate, not weather.

:D

:confused: That make little or no sense! That's like saying one of the effects of turning on the oven is frozen food. That is because ovens affect space and not time. :biggrin:

noncom
04-15-2007, 11:28 AM
:confused: That make little or no sense! That's like saying one of the effects of turning on the oven is frozen food. That is because ovens affect space and not time. :biggrin:
This is probably the most succinct explanation of the theory of Global Warming I've ever heard.

sunsettommy
04-15-2007, 12:45 PM
LOL,

I posted this because I am a Moderator there and was looking for some constructive criticism.

Oh well.

DoctorDoom
04-15-2007, 04:35 PM
The site is excellent. AlBore's Church of Global Warming is ... well ... er ...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/BB%20Pix/BS1.jpg

DeclinetoState
04-15-2007, 05:02 PM
Originally Posted by DeclinetoState http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/images/white/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://www.freeconservatives.com/vb/showthread.php?p=541618#post541618)
One of the effects of global warming is colder winters. This is because global warming affects climate, not weather.

:D
:confused: That make little or no sense! That's like saying one of the effects of turning on the oven is frozen food. That is because ovens affect space and not time. :biggrin:
Yet we used to have a poster here who basically made that argument. Remember MaximumSam?

Naturalized-Texan
04-15-2007, 05:17 PM
LOL,

I posted this because I am a Moderator there and was looking for some constructive criticism.

Oh well.
Read my sig line for my constructive criticism.

DoctorDoom
04-15-2007, 05:20 PM
Remember MaximumSam?Yep. He was a twit. Last I heard he was getting married. Maybe his ball & chain told him to choose between the Net and her.

DesertFox
04-15-2007, 05:40 PM
I've determined that global warming affects time, not space. The reason it gets colder during global warming is that, as time gets warmer, space gets colder. It's an inverse relationship. We live in space, so we feel the cold.

Now. If you wanted it warmer, you would pray to Gaia for global cooling. You really bright boys and girls have already figured out why -- because global cooling affects time, not space!

:rolleyes:

NLB
04-15-2007, 09:01 PM
I think it affects Buckaroo Bonzai from the 5th dimension. The 5th dimension is a dark and scary place located in Rosie O'Donnell's navel.

maxparrish
05-02-2007, 05:10 PM
LOL,

I posted this because I am a Moderator there and was looking for some constructive criticism.

Oh well.

ST,

I am a regular lurker at climateaudit. I'd love to find a site that is technical, but has informed participants that can do a bit of coaching for those of us whose stat background never got much beyond step-wise regression in old computer stat packs.

Heck if there are just a few of us, that is fine - but I'd also like to improve my skills along with knowledge. The politics is okay, BUT I am also interested in knowing the science.

At the moment I am jabbing in the Science forum at Internet Infidels with a couple of M&M critics - fun but a lot of work to educate the unwilling.

DoctorDoom
05-02-2007, 06:29 PM
You can't educate the morons at Intellectually Inert DingBats. They're "freethinkers", ergo free of thinking. But, we have a long-standing practice of ignoring them lest they start another thread calling for trolling here.

sunsettommy
05-26-2007, 03:19 PM
Maxparrish:


At the moment I am jabbing in the Science forum at Internet Infidels with a couple of M&M critics - fun but a lot of work to educate the unwilling.


A week ago I started a new thread there at I I and all I got was swill.

I patiently tried to get them to make a rebuttal against the article I posted.They say there is nothing to rebute.

The circus went on and on and I kept trying to get them to address the article and not me.They kept picking on me.

They are not worth my time and will ask the administrators to end my account there.

They are so full of it.

Go ahead and have fun with these loggerheads.

sunsettommy
05-26-2007, 03:24 PM
Maxparrish:


I am a regular lurker at climateaudit. I'd love to find a site that is technical, but has informed participants that can do a bit of coaching for those of us whose stat background never got much beyond step-wise regression in old computer stat packs.



It is a fine fine forum there.

Go look at the latest news about weather reporting stations.It has been a great last couple of weeks about it.The surface temperature data more and more are being shown to be skewered.

DR. Jones and Dr. Hansen look real bad.

Despite having doctorates.They sure make shallow incomplete science papers.

I go lurk there too.