Hillary's socialism out in the open.

[Kathy30]

She wants to end the "on your own society" and replace it with one of shared prosperity.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070529/clinton_economy.html?.v=1

The end of her presidential aspirations.

[Wolfcounsel]

How does that commie crap of yours work again, you remarkable piece of shit? Let me see, the rich, like you assholes, keep amassing fortunes for yourselves, and you keep placing yourselves above all laws, while you by threat of death force the less-rich to give up a huge part of their earnings so that your benevolent bureaucrats can redistribute it among the low-lifes, scavengers, and other assorted cockroaches, eh?

Phoque you!
May your only virtue be a very short life.


Pardon my French, people.

[PaulRevere]

Hillary's fascist/communist brand of socialism would ruin this country as it has most of Europe, which is moving away from it.

[Rhino]

"There is no greater force for economic growth than free markets. But markets work best with rules that promote our values, protect our workers and give all people a chance to succeed," she said. "Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies."If one takes a moment to ponder what that actually means, it's truly scary. It's right out of Lenin.

[noncom]

Just wait until a Republican Presidential contender finally works up the nerve to call Hillary a "Communist".

Liberals will start demanding that he be sent to a reeducation camp -- uh, I mean "rehabilitation clinic" -- like the ones they send people who say "faggot" to.

[Pennville_Bill]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/Pennville_Bill/Other%20Stuff/Hitlery/HillaryFlag4.gif

[ConspiracyBuff]

Hillary's fascist/communist brand of socialism would ruin this country as it has most of Europe, which is moving away from it.

So true. Most European countries which have had recent elections have voted for what would be the 'right wing' candidate here. Still far from being right wing but the equivalent. Czech Republic is one such example, the people that I talked to there, ones who had jobs, voted for Topolanek who ran on lowering their rediculous taxes and curbing govt funding of people who quite simply chose not to work because they could make just as much sitting home. He won the elections and the guy he beat (incumbent) refused to step down leading to rallies and protests. Topolanek is now the Prime Minister. Now hes trying to cut taxes and reduce welfare spending.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/country_profiles/1108489.stm

[PaulRevere]

Clinton said she would reduce special breaks for corporations, eliminate tax incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas and open up CEO pay to greater public scrutiny.

Hey, Medusa, are you also going after trial lawyer's jackpot justice winnings?
Are you going after the absurd amounts Hollywood elitists are paid for part-time jobs making movies?
Are you going after the family fortunes that the Kennedy's, Kerry's, and other limousine liberals hide in offshore accounts where the IRS never sees it?
Are you going to stop paying limousine liberals and Hollyweirdo's government subsidies hundreds of thousands of dollars each to not raise sheep on their ranchlands in trendy areas of Idaho, New Mexico, and Colorado?

No, I didn't think so.

[Kathy30]

Why would private sector CEOs get their salaries open to public scrutiny when Congress and the Senate doesn't have to do that? Perhaps she wants to put salaries up to a popular vote.

[Rhino]

What tax incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas? There aren't any.

[noncom]

Clinton said she would reduce special breaks for corporations, eliminate tax incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas and open up CEO pay to greater public scrutiny.
There's no way I'm going to read an entire paragraph this psycho says, but just look at this brief snippet and break it down.

She's going to "eliminate tax incentives" for companies that have operations outside America. What the Hell is that supposed to mean? Well, it's safe to say she's not going to REDUCE taxes on operations here, right?

In other words: she intends to try to find a way for America to levy taxes on companies that employ people in other countries. Newsflash, moonbats: Taking oil reserves out of the hands of a dictator and putting them on the open market is called "free enterprise"; what Hitlery wants to do is the DEFINITION of the word "empire."

And what the heck is supposed to be the point of "greater public scrutiny" of CEO salaries? This information is already in every publically-traded corporation's prospectus. What will she do, set up bullhorns on every street corner to keep shouting it over and over again so we all really, really know it now?

Well, maybe. But it's silly to think that's her end goal. Even Stalin didn't gin up hatred and class envy just for its own sake. The information is already known to everyone who has an interest; what Socialists want is to give CONTROL of corporate finances to people who are not shareholders, and therefore have absolutely no vested interest whatsoever -- people whose only qualification for making these kinds of financial decisions is caring very deeply about everything. Translation: moonbats.

[Lazarus]

Im still not convinced she will win the nomination, but if she does, I cant wait for Fred Thompson to sink his claws in her - He'll shred her on national TV and its gonna be brutal...

Notice that i have already assumed that Thompson will be our nominee... As soon as he officially announces, the republican primary is a done deal, IMO...:biggrin:

[BuckeyeMike]

IF she agrees to debate him.....and I kinda doubt she ever will!

[hdmundt]

And what the heck is supposed to be the point of "greater public scrutiny" of CEO salaries? This information is already in every publically-traded corporation's prospectus. What will she do, set up bullhorns on every street corner to keep shouting it over and over again so we all really, really know it now?


Though I'm sure she believes her socialist/Stalinist sentiments are close to what passes for her still adolescent heart, I think she's just putting the fear of Gaia into the psyches(?) of the well-to-do (other than her friends and contributors). If she does manage to get elected I think she'll turn up the volume on those bullhorns in a scheme to collect money - and lots of it. She's simply softening-up "corporate America" with scare tactics. I think Bill-n-Hill have a lot in common with the "Oxbridge" spies of decades past in that they are actually "empty political vessels" (though politics is their element) with no real ideological convictions. They are simply elitist snobs striving for more money and more power. That they've reached the apex of political power pitching a mix of 60's "idealism" and "caring" is an accident of history. Were they a bit younger, or older, the focus of the pitch would be different, but the striving would be no less ardent. I doubt that either of them see the falseness in themselves. That's why they display no sense of shame, no embarrassment at the hypocrisies they embrace. And people who are that immersed in self-deception won't hesitate to lie to others. And we don't need another power-crazed, money-grubbing, lying Clinton in the White House.

[BIGIRON]

She going to have 25 million mexicans to hand things out to soon, she needs to start buttering us up for hand outs to pedro and juanita.

[noncom]

Im still not convinced [Hillary Clinton] will win the nomination,...
There will not be a Democrat nomination for 2008; there will be a CORONATION, and its winner was decided 6 years ago. The dog-and-pony show going on right now is nothing but an excuse for the liberal media to cover Hillary every day.

Notice that i have already assumed that Thompson will be our nominee... As soon as he officially announces, the republican primary is a done deal, IMO...
Actually, it would be better if the liberal media kept propping up McCain and Giuliani for as long as possible. If they just give up and decide to declare Thompson the "winner" early on, they'll do nothing but briefly describe his race (and ergo him personally) as "boring" once each evening before they spend another half hour covering Hillary's "thrill-a-minute" cakewalk.

But I'm not super worried about that either. Thompson has already demonstrated a panache for sucking the oxygen out of a race he's not even running!

[noncom]

I think Bill-n-Hill have a lot in common with the "Oxbridge" spies of decades past in that they are actually "empty political vessels" (though politics is their element) with no real ideological convictions. They are simply elitist snobs striving for more money and more power.
I don't think so. I think Bill is like that: he couldn't give less of a rat's ass about politics; he only got into politics for the tail.

Bill is the brains of the operation, but Hillary has always been the driving force. She isn't just committed to Socialism; she is a complete fanatic. You don't have to read any tea leaves to psychoanalyze her - just look at her eyes. Without listening to a thing she says, it's just like looking at another Hitler. All except for the moustache.

Oh wait. I just remembered. Hitler had one of those too didn't he? Spooky! :eek: