View Full Version : Public gagged at city's homosexual festival
DoctorDoom
06-29-2007, 10:27 AM
The shameless, disgusting pandering to faggots continues.
St. Petersburg, Fla., officials are sticking with plans to limit free speech at the city's homosexual festival this weekend after fighting off complaints they are creating unconstitutional "free speech zones."
Instead, the city will limit some signs and banners to an area "adjacent to the Permitted Street Closure Area."
The issue is that generally, court opinions have held "free speech zones" do not meet requirements of the First Amendment. Thus, the city is no longer calling the area a "free speech zone," although the same zoning restrictions will apply.Public gagged at city's homosexual festival (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56433)
Watch your six, perverts.
Wolfcounsel
06-29-2007, 11:22 AM
"Watch your six, perverts." --DoctorDoom
They are on the list of trash to clean up in America. Stay in your closets or say hello to the cleaners, fruits!
Sarah
06-29-2007, 01:36 PM
Yet once again liberals do not believe in free speech except for liberals.
Timberwolf
06-29-2007, 02:33 PM
*bang* *bang*
Followed by a letter to the local rag stating, "the queers go back in the closet and return our streets to us and they stop dying."
That might get someone's attention...
MrSanity
06-29-2007, 03:28 PM
Atlanta would be proud of them. Why don't the two of them secede from the Union since they're so close together.
And why is this under US Presidents?
kenyon330
06-29-2007, 10:45 PM
*bang* *bang*
Followed by a letter to the local rag stating, "the queers go back in the closet and return our streets to us and they stop dying."
That might get someone's attention...
That's real reasonable.
DoctorDoom
06-30-2007, 09:16 AM
And why is this under US Presidents?Never post while distracted. It's now where I intended it to be.
DoctorDoom
06-30-2007, 09:18 AM
That's real reasonable.It sounds good to me.
kenyon330
06-30-2007, 10:24 AM
It sounds good to me.
Of course it would.
Timberwolf
06-30-2007, 02:51 PM
Buy a clue, chuckles...what's unreasonable??
DesertFox
06-30-2007, 08:44 PM
Queers are gonna push and push until normal people push back. And the push back is going to be a lot harsher than the push.
They ast for it, they'll get it, Toyota.
Sarah
07-01-2007, 10:42 AM
We should start having straight pride parades in response. No gay people allowed to protest.
HomeschoolrsRUs
07-01-2007, 10:46 AM
I join Doc's query: Just exactly what do homosexuals take "pride" in? What are homosexual "pride" parades about?
Tazeeyore
07-01-2007, 10:57 AM
Home, they are proud of the fact that liberals create special exceptions and special rights for perverse behavior and anything else that goes against the founding principles of America. If this continues unabated America will become a third world garbage dump.
DoctorDoom
07-01-2007, 11:01 AM
We should start having straight pride parades in response.That's been done. The faggots had hissyfits about it.
FERNDALE - A parade where at least 200 people are expected to display pride in their heterosexuality is set to roll along Nine Mile on Sunday.
The City Council on Monday approved a request from talk radio station WKRK-FM 97.1 to conduct the parade, which runs from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. from Paxton to City Hall.
The council unanimously approved the radio station's request although one city official expressed some misgivings.
[snip]
A spokesman for Triangle Foundation, a gay advocacy group, last week decried the straight pride parade.
"It mocks the gay community," said Sean Kosofsky, adding that such a parade is akin to celebrating white pride.'Straight pride' on parade Sunday in Ferndale (http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/700634/posts)
Buy a clue, fudge-pumper: I'm straight, I'm white, and I'm proud of both. If you don't like that, you know where you can shove your vacuous, bigoted opinion (once Brucie's tool is extracted).
Wolfcounsel
07-01-2007, 11:29 AM
"It mocks the gay community," said Sean Kosofsky, adding that such a parade is akin to celebrating white pride. --from DoctorDoom's link
This flaming faggot claims to speak for the topsy-turvy turd and fur chasers and denounces the Caucasoid race for being Caucasoid and proud of it?
Sarah
07-01-2007, 11:30 AM
That's been done. The faggots had hissyfits about it.
'Straight pride' on parade Sunday in Ferndale (http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/700634/posts)
Buy a clue, fudge-pumper: I'm straight, I'm white, and I proud of both. If you don't like that, you know where you can shove your vacuous, bigoted opinion (once Brucie's tool is extracted).
See?? What did I tell ya? Liberals believe in free speech only for liberals.
1pro.usa
07-01-2007, 12:25 PM
I wonder, just what is so wrong with gays?
Pray tell.
Wolfcounsel
07-01-2007, 12:46 PM
"I wonder, just what is so wrong with gays?" --1pro.usa
Here they are called homosexuals, or whatever slang people use. But "gay" is reserved for the meaning of happy, cheerful, joyful, et cetera. Besides being anti-sex (no homosexual act deals with sex, which is the union of a male and a female), some homosexuals like to flaunt their activities in public. How many people do you know who go around exhibiting their "talents" for silliness, raunchiness, and other puke-inducing acts to the general public, and demand that nobody insult them for that? How many of these homos do you know who keep their "preferences" to themselves, and stick to acts one normally does among society? They also for the most part want to pervert the state of marriage, which for thousands of years has been the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others in such a union. There is no such thing as "I now pronounce you husband, wife, and intimate other", or other such nonsense.
1pro.usa
07-01-2007, 12:58 PM
Marriage is both religious and legal binding, why deny them of being legally bound?
How many people do you know who go around exhibiting their "talents" for silliness, raunchiness, and other puke-inducing acts to the general public, and demand that nobody insult them for that?Puke-inducing? Interesting... Difference of sexual orientation induces puking? Rather opinionated... I see countless scantily clad women, that may offend just as much, I see straight couples making out all over the place, just because some people have phobia of same sex intercourse (Or milder) should not make a difference. Why stop a couple from loving each other, it's not like they have a choice.
Besides being anti-sex (no homosexual act deals with sex, which is the union of a male and a female)Find me somewhere where it defines sex as ONLY between a man an woman. What of dolphins that display homosexual tendencies?
There is no such thing as "I now pronounce you husband, wife, and intimate other", or other such nonsense.And?
But "gay" is reserved for the meaning of happy, cheerful, joyful, et cetera.I'm afraid that gay in the 21st century also relates to gays. If you wish, "homo" which you used can mean the Latin for "man" or in the case of homosexual in Greek "same" so in neither case does "homo" specifically relate to a person of homosexual tendencies.
DesertFox
07-01-2007, 01:44 PM
Nope. You don't get to kidnap terms from the realm of common discourse and change them to suit your own selfish purposes. Queer is queer.
You also need to learn something about the meanings of words. "Disgust" is not the same thing as "phobia."
You queers want respect, you have to behave in ways that command respect, rather than in ways that command revulsion.
One more thing: If you're here just to stir the pot and try to get everybody all pissed off, I'll run your ass outta here.
buckeyepete
07-01-2007, 02:04 PM
Burn'em Fox. We can all see what this "juvinile" is up to. All they want to do is disrespect adults, while their snot nosed little punk buddies and their flat chested little girlfriends look over their shoulder, laughing about how "brave" they are. Bet ya they don't let mommy and daddy see what their typing.
DesertFox
07-01-2007, 02:18 PM
I'll give him a chance to show he's here for serious discussion and not just pot stirring and rock throwing.
Sarah
07-01-2007, 02:37 PM
flat chested little girlfriends
Don't make fun of us cleavage challenged ladies. :shame:
:jk:
DoctorDoom
07-01-2007, 02:47 PM
Captain Cliché is amongst us.
May we assume that you're queer?
I wonder, just what is so wrong with gays?Per se, nothing. Being queer, regardless of the cause, is a state of being, a mental condition. Queer behavior, and the queer demands for rights based solely on what they do with their genitalia, is the wall between them and the 98%-plus of us who are straight.
Did you bother to read the article ref'd in the OP? Tell us how you can interpret that to be anything other than offensive.
Puke-inducing? Interesting... Difference of sexual orientation induces puking?No, ignorant child, THIS is puke-inducing.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/QPIX/Genie.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/QPIX/Q1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/QPIX/Q2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/QPIX/Q3.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/QPIX/Q6.jpg
That raw sewage might give your queer willy a tingle, but to us it's repulsive, disgusting and puke-inducing. And they are "proud" of that obscene behavior because?
Rather opinionated...Clue time, child. FC is a politically-conservative OPINION board, ergo being opinionated is the norm. If you disagree with our opinons, tough shit. We didn't invite you here, and we won't rue your departure.
I see countless scantily clad women ...Marching down Main Street telling us how "proud" they are?
... that may offend just as much ...There are few women that would offend me if scantily clad. Helen Thomas, Hillary Clinton, Rosanne Barr and Rosie O'Donut are among them.
Compare this ...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v349/DocDoom777/Babes/ElishaC.jpg
... to those perverted assholes in the above photos and tell us that there is not a fundamental difference between the pix.
I see straight couples making out all over the place ...Not like the queers do, child. Straights would be arrested for that sort of spectacle.
... just because some people have phobia of same sex intercourse ...The good little liberal had to drag in that threadbare word. Oh, my, we are SO impressed! :rolleyes:
This is from a dictionary. You DO know what that is, I assume.
Main Entry: pho·bia
Pronunciation: 'fO-bE-&
Function: noun
Etymology: -phobia
: an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation
I have yet to meet a conservative who has "an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of" queers. Our reactions range from indifference to disgust, but homos do not invoke fear. A couple of poofters swapping bodily fluids in a men's room are not my concept of terrorists.
(Or milder)Parse the word "homosexual" and come up with a definition that is not sexually related.
... should not make a difference.It does when they insist on forcing their "orientation" down American society's throat.
Why stop a couple from loving each other...Love has nothing to do with homosexuality. It's purely physical, purely carnal. IAC, perhaps you will provide us with examples of where that is going on.
Fact time: we don't give a shit what you do, what you do it with, where you do it, how you do it and with whom you do it, as long as you SFTU about doing it. But when you march naked down Fifth Avenue proclaiming your "pride" in your sexuality and demanding that we accept if not embrace it, you're asking for a reaction, and you won't like it when it comes. Count on that.
... it's not like they have a choice.<table align="center" bgcolor="600060" bordercolor="#CCCCCC" border="4" cellpadding="8"><tr><td><div align="center"><font face="Verdana" color="ffff80" size="7">ö<b> * Y A W N * </b>ö<font size="1" color="800000"><br>-</font></font></div></td></tr></table>
I'm afraid that gay in the 21st century also relates to gays.A typical liberal excuses the shameless, politically-correct perversion of English. Regardless of how you want to destroy the language, we do NOT use "gay" to refer to queers. There is nothing "gay" about a sexual abnormality that provides momentary physical pleasures followed by the endless quest for the next usually anonymous piece of meat, while shortening the person's life by at least two decades.
If you wish, "homo" which you used can mean the Latin for "man" or in the case of homosexual in Greek "same" so in neither case does "homo" specifically relate to a person of homosexual tendencies.Since you like to play word games, child, try "homophobia" an epithet that you fling around with abandon. You do realize, of course, that it is impossible for a straight to be "homophobic" about a queer.
Timberwolf
07-01-2007, 02:52 PM
Sarah...more'n a handful is too much anyway...:thumb:
buckeyepete
07-01-2007, 02:59 PM
"Don't make fun of us cleavage challenged ladies." :shame:-----Sarah
Not making fun, Sarah. In fact, my wife was "cleavage challenged" when we were married in Jan, 66. (That's how I like'em, still do.) But my, what 41yrs can do to the human body.:evilgrin:
buckeyepete
07-01-2007, 03:04 PM
"Sarah...more'n a handful is too much anyway...:thumb:" --Timberwolf
Handful? I thought it was a mmm--------nevermind.
Timberwolf
07-01-2007, 03:05 PM
:thumb: 'zackly!! I wuz just bein' proper'n all.
DoctorDoom
07-01-2007, 03:07 PM
But my, what 41yrs can do to the human body.And most of it ain't aesthetically pleasing. :evilgrin:
Wolfcounsel
07-01-2007, 03:12 PM
"Don't make fun of us cleavage challenged ladies. :shame:" --Sarah
A pair of modified sweat glands on a human female of mature age can be of various sizes, some humongous, some mosquito bites, but regardless of the fatty material, all are capable of producing sufficient quantities of colostrum for the newborn baby, and milk for the older newborn, and that's what matters. After that, for the normal male, they are things to play with and gawk, er, uh, I mean, gaze in awe at.:evilgrin:
Charity
07-01-2007, 03:19 PM
I wonder, just what is so wrong with gays?
Pray tell.
1. God lists “homosexual offenders” among “the wicked” (1 Corinthians 6:9).
2. God lists “homosexual offenders” among those who He determines will “not inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Corinthians 6:9).
3. Historically, homosexuality has incurred God’s destructive wrath upon an entire city (Gen. 19:4-5, 11-13).
4. God’s word defines the men of Sodom as “sinning greatly” because of their men having sex with men (Genesis 13:13; 19:5).
5. God calls Sodom’s sin “sexual perversion” (Jude 1:7). Societies that remain in perversion (Sodom, Rome...) are on the road to destruction.
6. God’s word identifies husband-wife relations as “natural relations” and homosexual relations as “unnatural ones” (Romans 1:26-27) and “perversion” (vs. 27).
7. God’s word also rebukes those who “approve of those who practice” homosexuality (Romans 1:32).
8. Jesus settled the marriage issue once for all, declaring that God had made them “male and female ... a man ... [and] his wife” (Matthew 19:4-5).
Wolfcounsel
07-01-2007, 03:19 PM
"Find me somewhere where it defines sex as ONLY between a man an woman. What of dolphins that display homosexual tendencies?" --1pro.usa
Yeah? What of those dolphins that display homsosexual tendencies? You're not trying to say they are trying to create a baby dolphin, are you? The purpose of sexual intercourse is to continue the human species. The pleasure in it is to make people want to continue keeping the human race alive. Can you imagine how many people there would be on earth if sex was something similar to watching Ted kennedy do a strip complete with a towel-drying-between-the-legs routine?
Charity
07-01-2007, 03:23 PM
What of dolphins that display homosexual tendencies?" --1pro.usa
Dolphins are animals first of all. People are not animals. We should know the difference between right and wrong (albeit many do not practice it). When was the last time you saw two male dolphins make a baby?
Charity
07-01-2007, 03:28 PM
Homosexuality is a Sin!
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Sodomy/homosexuality_is_a_sin.htm
Charity
07-01-2007, 03:30 PM
from above link:
According to the Associated Press, as reported in Christian News newspaper (July 23, 2001 p. 3), the seven worst serial killers in the U.S.A. were all homosexual deviates:
<CENTER><TABLE height=119 width=450 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD height=115>
Donald Harvey - 37 murders
John Wayne Gacy - 33 murders
Patrick Kearney - 32 murders
Bruce Davis - 28 murders
Dean Corll, Elmer Wayne Henley, and David Owen Brooks - 27 murders</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>
Sarah
07-01-2007, 03:42 PM
What of dolphins that display homosexual tendencies?
What about it? My neighbor's dog likes to go at it on my leg or a shoe. It's all the same to an animal mindlessly going at it.
Trevelyan
07-01-2007, 04:32 PM
I join Doc's query: Just exactly what do homosexuals take "pride" in? What are homosexual "pride" parades about?
Pride parades are teh queer.
According to the Associated Press, as reported in Christian News newspaper (July 23, 2001 p. 3), the seven worst serial killers in the U.S.A. were all homosexual deviates:
Donald Harvey - 37 murders
John Wayne Gacy - 33 murders
Patrick Kearney - 32 murders
Bruce Davis - 28 murders
Dean Corll, Elmer Wayne Henley, and David Owen Brooks - 27 murders
</CENTER>
Um, ok......
DoctorDoom
07-01-2007, 09:26 PM
Can you imagine how many people there would be on earth if sex was something similar to watching Ted kennedy do a strip complete with a towel-drying-between-the-legs routine?AAUUGGHH!! My mind's eye is blind!
DoctorDoom
07-01-2007, 09:28 PM
Pride parades are teh queer.And that explains what they are proud of in what way?
Trevelyan
07-02-2007, 09:02 AM
And that explains what they are proud of in what way?
No, that is just me saying that pride parades are stupid, and I don’t know why they exist.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.