Now Cheney chimes in: Ain't no superhighways

[The_Elucidator]

Now we can put all this conspiracy BS to sleep, this comes straight from the horses mouth. Lil Cheney.. ra ra ain't no superhighway ra, ra, ra... so go f*&^ youself, ra, ra, ra... (you have to watch Lil Bush to get the joke... :D

PREMEDITATED MERGER
<!-- end standing head --><!-- head -->Now Cheney chimes in: Ain't no superhighways
<!-- end head --><!-- deck -->VP latest to make official denial, some call it 'gaming semantics'
<!-- end deck -->

<HR SIZE=1>Posted: July 29, 2007
5:00 p.m. Eastern

<!-- byline -->By Jerome R. Corsi
<!-- end byline --><!--- copywrite only show on NON commentary pages as per joseph meeting 8/23/06 ------><!-- copyright -->© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


Despite evidence to the contrary, Vice President Dick Cheney (http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/) says there is no "secret plan" to create a continent-crossing superhighway to help facilitate a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada.

"The administration is not engaged in a secret plan to create a 'NAFTA super highway,'" asserts Cheney in a recent letter to a constituent, according to a copy of the message obtained by WND.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56912

So there you have it! :biggrin: We don't need no stinkin' highway cause they are coming across with free access anyway....
<!-- end copyright -->

[EveningStar]

:roar:
Jerome R. Corsi<!-- end copyright -->
:rotflmbo:

[The_Elucidator]

Despite evidence to the contrary

I think every article written about the Bush/Cheney administration should start out with that phrase.... Oops, it already does... A phrase the lib rags never dare use in a story about the Clintons.

[DoctorDoom]

There's nothing secret about it. It's quite public. Sometimes, the best place to hide something is in the open.

[EveningStar]

<b><blink>This article is for moonbats. There are no merger plans.</blink></b>

[The_Elucidator]

What are you yelling for?

[EveningStar]

What are you yelling for?
Who? Me?

[EveningStar]

Better? :biggrin:

[The_Elucidator]

Better? :biggrin:

Thank you :thumb: My eyes were hurting!!!

[Rhino]

:roar:
Jerome R. Corsi
:rotflmbo::yeahthat:

[DoctorDoom]

Bring back Dan Rather. HE was trustworthy.

BTW, look up "Trans-Texas Corridor".

TTC-35

The study area for Trans-Texas Corridor-35 (TTC-35) generally parallels I-35 to the east from Laredo to the Oklahoma border. The environmental study for the project is proceeding in two tiers: a first tier that refines the study area to a 10 mile (16 km) wide corridor and a second tier that selects particular alignments. The TTC-35 Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was published in April, 2006[4]. The final EIS is expected to be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration in the summer of 2007[5].Trans-Texas Corridor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Texas_Corridor)

From "Laredo, Texas Gateway to Mexico" (http://www.visitlaredo.com/) to the Oklahoma border. Hmmmmm ...

The Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) is a proposed multi-use, statewide network of transportation routes in Texas that will incorporate existing and new highways, railways and utility right-of-ways. Specific routes for the TTC have not been determined.

As envisioned, each route will include:<ul><li>separate lanes for passenger vehicles and large trucks</li><li>freight railways</li><li>high-speed commuter railways</li><li>infrastructure for utilities including water lines, oil and gas pipelines, and transmission lines for electricity, broadband and other telecommunications services</li></ul>Plans call for the TTC to be completed in phases over the next 50 years with routes prioritized according to Texas’ transportation needs. TxDOT will oversee planning, construction and ongoing maintenance, although private vendors will be responsible for much of the daily operations.Overview (http://ttc.keeptexasmoving.com/about/)

Out in the open.

[The_Elucidator]

I wonder how many illegals are helping to build the TTC?

[Rhino]

The TTC is a highway project in Texas, nothing more. It is unrelated to NAFTA or to a route to Canada, except possibly by sheer coincidence. Texas can't build a route to Canada anyway. Also, if you research the TTC, you'll find that it encompasses many highways in Texas, many of which do not go to Mexico. Proposals for the TTC also predate the SPP, which most conspiracy theorists cite as the beginning of all of this crap.

If Florida starts such a highway improvement project, are we going to claim a conspiracy to create a Cuban union and superhighway? A little perspective would be nice here. This place is starting to sound like the National Enquirer sometimes.

[The_Elucidator]

Ya'll can bitchslap me all you want over what I'm 'bout to say; but to completely dismiss the NAU or to lose sleep over this alledged conspiracy is silly on both sides! I think the truth is somewhere in the middle!

[DesertFox]

I don't. The whole conspiracy myth is silly.

I spoze, when Eisenhower suggested and later signed the bill that resulted in the Interstate system, that he was accused of opening us up to invasion from Mexico and Canada both. Since one in every five miles of the Interstate system is required to be straight (no curves), I spoze that opens us up to invasion from anywhere.

Damn that sellout Eisenhower, anyhow! :rolleyes:

[The_Elucidator]

If there were to be a NAU (and I highly doubt it), it would happen with or without this damn highway. The highway is just what everyone focuses to "solidify" this conspiracy.

[Rhino]

That, and the fictitious Amero.

[DoctorDoom]

The TTC is a highway project in Texas, nothing more. It is unrelated to NAFTA or to a route to Canada, except possibly by sheer coincidence.And by sheer coincidence it's the section that goes from Mexico to Oklahoma—where it then ends?

Texas can't build a route to Canada anyway.Nope, it can't, but it can build the Texas section of it (500 miles or so).

Also, if you research the TTC, you'll find that it encompasses many highways in Texas, many of which do not go to Mexico.I have, and that is known. But the fact that all portions of it don't go the same place does not mean that none of them go there.

Proposals for the TTC also predate the SPP, which most conspiracy theorists cite as the beginning of all of this crap.I see no conspiracy, and I threw out my AFDB years ago. I don't smell the scent of the Bilderbergers, the Illuminati or the Zeta Reticulan grays. What I DO see is an international highway that would be economically advantageous to the US, Canada and Mexico. And I see a 500-mile stretch of it in the works.

Frankly, I don't care either way. I have far more pressing concerns with the subterranean tunnel network being built by the coalition of the CIA and the Galactic Federation in preparation for their takeover once Dec 21, 2012 arrives and the close approach of Planet X causes chaos.

[The_Elucidator]

Frankly, I don't care either way. I have far more pressing concerns with the subterranean tunnel network being built by the coalition of the CIA and the Galactic Federation in preparation for their takeover once Dec 21, 2012 arrives and the close approach of Planet X causes chaos.

I knew it... F'n Bush and his Galactic Economy...!!

[Rhino]

And by sheer coincidence it's the section that goes from Mexico to Oklahoma—where it then ends?No coincidence there. That's the part in Texas, which makes pefect sense for Texas to address. What would be coincidence is if that someday became part of a 'NAFTA Superhighway'. Although I've never ruled out that possibility in the future, normal highway expansion/construction doesn't qualify.

What I DO see is an international highway that would be economically advantageous to the US, Canada and Mexico. And I see a 500-mile stretch of it in the works.Of course it would be advantageous. If Nebraska announced major statewide upgrades to Interstate 80, that would be advantageous to Iowa and Colorado too. But that wouldn't entail a joining of the three states. You seem to be saying that any project to enlarge a highway between Mexico and Oklahoma is a 'NAU' conspiracy, or at least some people are saying it that way. By that logic, any work on any highway in Texas that stretches from Mexico to Oklahoma would then automatically be part of a government conspiracy to surrender our sovereignty. So in order to avoid such a conspiracy, all work on any highways in Texas that stretch from Mexico to Oklahoma must cease immediately. But based on some of the wacko conspiracies I've heard before, I wouldn't put this one past some of those folks.

Frankly, I don't care either way. I have far more pressing concerns with the subterranean tunnel network being built by the coalition of the CIA and the Galactic Federation in preparation for their takeover once Dec 21, 2012 arrives and the close approach of Planet X causes chaos.That must consume a lot of your time. :D

[DoctorDoom]

You seem to be saying that any project to enlarge a highway between Mexico and Oklahoma is a 'NAU' conspiracy, or at least some people are saying it that way.A conspiracy involves sub-rosa machinations. The advocates of the NAU are quite open about wanting it. If it becomes a serious proposal, only the oblivious will be able to say, "Shit! I didn't see THAT coming!"

What I am saying is that a 500-mile stretch of super-ultra-highway from Mexico to Oklahoma would make the task of building an international thoroughfare a hell of a lot easier, even if that is not its intention right now. If that's a conspiracy, so be it.

[garlicguy]

... the close approach of Planet X causes chaos.

You know, some of the their front men were part of that Vaudevillean Troupe I mentioned in another thread. We had some drinks after. They didn't seem such bad chappies...

[Rhino]

A conspiracy involves sub-rosa machinations. The advocates of the NAU are quite open about wanting it. If it becomes a serious proposal, only the oblivious will be able to say, "Shit! I didn't see THAT coming!"

What I am saying is that a 500-mile stretch of super-ultra-highway from Mexico to Oklahoma would make the task of building an international thoroughfare a hell of a lot easier, even if that is not its intention right now. If that's a conspiracy, so be it.Okay. That I can agree with. I just disagree with the folks who claim this is all a conspiracy now. Should this all ever really come to pass, the TTC would indeed fit well into their plans, but only by sheer coincidence. Of course, the NAU folks will be happy to take what they can get.

I'm surprised more folks don't cite the NASCO Corridor as opposed to the TTC. That project fits far more easily into the conspiracy theory, other than the fact that it's being proposed right out in the open.